8 research outputs found

    Species Interactions during Diversification and Community Assembly in an Island Radiation of Shrews

    Get PDF
    Closely related, ecologically similar species often have adjacent distributions, suggesting competitive exclusion may contribute to the structure of some natural communities. In systems such as island archipelagos, where speciation is often tightly associated with dispersal over oceanic barriers, competitive exclusion may prevent population establishment following inter-island dispersal and subsequent cladogenesis.) species in the Philippines are the result of competitive exclusion preventing secondary invasion of occupied islands. We first compare ecological niche models between two widespread, allopatric species and find statistical support for their ecological similarity, implying that competition for habitat between these species is possible. We then examine dispersion patterns among sympatric species and find some signal for overdispersion of body size, but not for phylogenetic branch length. Finally, we simulate the process of inter-island colonization under a stochastic model of dispersal lacking ecological forces. Results are dependent on the geographic scope and colonization probability employed. However, some combinations suggest that the number of inter-island dispersal events necessary to populate the archipelago may be much higher than the minimum number of colonization events necessary to explain current estimates of species richness and phylogenetic relationships. If our model is appropriate, these results imply that alternative factors, such as competitive exclusion, may have influenced the process of inter-island colonization and subsequent cladogenesis.We interpret the combined results as providing tenuous evidence that similarity in body size may prevent co-occurrence in Philippine shrews and that competitive exclusion among ecologically similar species, rather than an inability to disperse among islands, may have limited diversification in this group, and, possibly other clades endemic to island archipelagos

    The neutron and its role in cosmology and particle physics

    Full text link
    Experiments with cold and ultracold neutrons have reached a level of precision such that problems far beyond the scale of the present Standard Model of particle physics become accessible to experimental investigation. Due to the close links between particle physics and cosmology, these studies also permit a deep look into the very first instances of our universe. First addressed in this article, both in theory and experiment, is the problem of baryogenesis ... The question how baryogenesis could have happened is open to experimental tests, and it turns out that this problem can be curbed by the very stringent limits on an electric dipole moment of the neutron, a quantity that also has deep implications for particle physics. Then we discuss the recent spectacular observation of neutron quantization in the earth's gravitational field and of resonance transitions between such gravitational energy states. These measurements, together with new evaluations of neutron scattering data, set new constraints on deviations from Newton's gravitational law at the picometer scale. Such deviations are predicted in modern theories with extra-dimensions that propose unification of the Planck scale with the scale of the Standard Model ... Another main topic is the weak-interaction parameters in various fields of physics and astrophysics that must all be derived from measured neutron decay data. Up to now, about 10 different neutron decay observables have been measured, much more than needed in the electroweak Standard Model. This allows various precise tests for new physics beyond the Standard Model, competing with or surpassing similar tests at high-energy. The review ends with a discussion of neutron and nuclear data required in the synthesis of the elements during the "first three minutes" and later on in stellar nucleosynthesis.Comment: 91 pages, 30 figures, accepted by Reviews of Modern Physic

    Multiorgan MRI findings after hospitalisation with COVID-19 in the UK (C-MORE): a prospective, multicentre, observational cohort study

    Get PDF
    Introduction: The multiorgan impact of moderate to severe coronavirus infections in the post-acute phase is still poorly understood. We aimed to evaluate the excess burden of multiorgan abnormalities after hospitalisation with COVID-19, evaluate their determinants, and explore associations with patient-related outcome measures. Methods: In a prospective, UK-wide, multicentre MRI follow-up study (C-MORE), adults (aged ≥18 years) discharged from hospital following COVID-19 who were included in Tier 2 of the Post-hospitalisation COVID-19 study (PHOSP-COVID) and contemporary controls with no evidence of previous COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid antibody negative) underwent multiorgan MRI (lungs, heart, brain, liver, and kidneys) with quantitative and qualitative assessment of images and clinical adjudication when relevant. Individuals with end-stage renal failure or contraindications to MRI were excluded. Participants also underwent detailed recording of symptoms, and physiological and biochemical tests. The primary outcome was the excess burden of multiorgan abnormalities (two or more organs) relative to controls, with further adjustments for potential confounders. The C-MORE study is ongoing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04510025. Findings: Of 2710 participants in Tier 2 of PHOSP-COVID, 531 were recruited across 13 UK-wide C-MORE sites. After exclusions, 259 C-MORE patients (mean age 57 years [SD 12]; 158 [61%] male and 101 [39%] female) who were discharged from hospital with PCR-confirmed or clinically diagnosed COVID-19 between March 1, 2020, and Nov 1, 2021, and 52 non-COVID-19 controls from the community (mean age 49 years [SD 14]; 30 [58%] male and 22 [42%] female) were included in the analysis. Patients were assessed at a median of 5·0 months (IQR 4·2–6·3) after hospital discharge. Compared with non-COVID-19 controls, patients were older, living with more obesity, and had more comorbidities. Multiorgan abnormalities on MRI were more frequent in patients than in controls (157 [61%] of 259 vs 14 [27%] of 52; p<0·0001) and independently associated with COVID-19 status (odds ratio [OR] 2·9 [95% CI 1·5–5·8]; padjusted=0·0023) after adjusting for relevant confounders. Compared with controls, patients were more likely to have MRI evidence of lung abnormalities (p=0·0001; parenchymal abnormalities), brain abnormalities (p<0·0001; more white matter hyperintensities and regional brain volume reduction), and kidney abnormalities (p=0·014; lower medullary T1 and loss of corticomedullary differentiation), whereas cardiac and liver MRI abnormalities were similar between patients and controls. Patients with multiorgan abnormalities were older (difference in mean age 7 years [95% CI 4–10]; mean age of 59·8 years [SD 11·7] with multiorgan abnormalities vs mean age of 52·8 years [11·9] without multiorgan abnormalities; p<0·0001), more likely to have three or more comorbidities (OR 2·47 [1·32–4·82]; padjusted=0·0059), and more likely to have a more severe acute infection (acute CRP >5mg/L, OR 3·55 [1·23–11·88]; padjusted=0·025) than those without multiorgan abnormalities. Presence of lung MRI abnormalities was associated with a two-fold higher risk of chest tightness, and multiorgan MRI abnormalities were associated with severe and very severe persistent physical and mental health impairment (PHOSP-COVID symptom clusters) after hospitalisation. Interpretation: After hospitalisation for COVID-19, people are at risk of multiorgan abnormalities in the medium term. Our findings emphasise the need for proactive multidisciplinary care pathways, with the potential for imaging to guide surveillance frequency and therapeutic stratification

    The planning controversy in the Brazilian economy: rhetoric as an instrument for forming beliefs

    No full text
    O capítulo I pretendeu explicitar em primeiro lugar uma forma de representação do uso da retórica no âmbito do esquema de comunicação entre dois agentes: o receptor e o emissor da mensagem. Pretendeu-se também definir que a necessidade de adaptação da mensagem à audiência é um imperativo derivado da existência de crenças pré-estabelecidas e fora do controle racional dos agentes. No contexto do esquema de comunicação entre dois agentes (cuja origem é a ciência cognitiva) pretendeu-se também esquematizar os graus de sujeição do emissor às crenças do receptor de modo a visualizar de modo mais claro as varias possibilidades abertas com o uso da retórica, uma delas de desvirtuamento do processo de presuasão - quando o papel do emissor degenera de líder para liderado no processo de formação de crenças. A aplicação empírica da análise retórica (realizada no capítulo III tendo como objeto de estudo a Controvérsia do Planejamento, evidenciou primordialmente o efetivo uso de técnicas de argumentação retórica por parte dos participantes do debate. Outro aspecto evidenciado foi a adaptação de ambos os emissores às crenças difundidas da platéia em questão. Esta adaptação foi evidenciada através da semelhança das estratégias retóricas de ambos os oponentes do debate, apesar do flagrante antagonismo das recomendações concretas de política econômica. Ainda sob o aspecto de uma melhor identificação do uso da retórica, o capítulo I pretendeu definir o conceito de \"idéia-núcleo\" (A) - isenta de componentes de retórica - e da idéia adaptada à audiência (Â) - mais próxima das crenças pré-estabelecidas da platéia. A análise da Controvérsia permitiu verificar a possibilidade concreta de decompor um determinado discurso em subconjuntos de proposições que podem ser enquadradas nas especificações da idéia original, pretendida pelo emissor, e da idéia adaptada para as crenças da audiência. ) Acredita-se que esta forma de identificar os subconjuntos de idéias presentes num determinado discurso possa auxiliar na análise retórica em economia. Do ponto de vista do levantamento da conjuntura histórica que propiciou a efetivação da Controvérsia (apresentado no capítulo II) ficou evidenciada a importância de uma massa crítica de interesses envolvidos para dar início à Controvérsia, formando assim, o conjunto de razões que possibilitam a própria existência deste debate econômico fora das fronteiras acadêmicas. Acredita-se também que a análise da Controvérsia e do comportamento dos debatedores exemplifica claramente a exigência de inteligibilidade do economista no momento em que pretende formular diretivas de política econômica e, portanto, cumprir seu papel profissional além dos muros da comunidade acadêmicaChapter I first intended to explain a form of representation of the use of rhetoric in the context of the communication scheme between two agents: the receiver and the sender of the message. It was also intended to define that the need to adapt the message to the audience is an imperative derived from the existence of pre-established beliefs and beyond the agents\' rational control. In the context of the communication scheme between two agents (whose origin is cognitive science) it was also intended to outline the degrees of subjection of the sender to the receiver\'s beliefs in order to visualize more clearly the various possibilities opened up with the use of rhetoric, one of them is the distortion of the process of persuasion - when the sender\'s role degenerates from leader to led in the process of forming beliefs. The empirical application of rhetorical analysis (carried out in chapter III with the Planning Controversy as the object of study, evidenced primarily the effective use of rhetorical argumentation techniques by the participants of the debate. Another aspect evidenced was the adaptation of both issuers to the beliefs This adaptation was evidenced by the similarity of the rhetorical strategies of both opponents of the debate, despite the blatant antagonism of the concrete recommendations of economic policy. Still under the aspect of a better identification of the use of rhetoric, chapter I intended to define the concept of \"core idea\" (A) - exempt from rhetorical components - and from the idea adapted to the audience (Â) - closer to the pre-established beliefs of the audience. The analysis of the Controversy made it possible to verify the concrete possibility of decomposing a given discourse into subsets of propositions that can be framed in the specifications of the original idea, intended by the issuer, and of the idea adapted to the beliefs of the audience. ) It is believed that this way of identifying the subsets of ideas present in a given discourse can help in rhetorical analysis in economics. From the point of view of the survey of the historical conjuncture that led to the realization of the Controversy (presented in chapter II), the importance of a critical mass of interests involved to start the Controversy was evidenced, thus forming the set of reasons that make possible the very existence of this economic debate outside academic boundaries. It is also believed that the analysis of the Controversy and the behavior of the debaters clearly exemplifies the demand for intelligibility of the economist when he intends to formulate economic policy directives and, therefore, fulfill his professional role beyond the walls of the academic communit

    A controvérsia do planejamento na economia brasileira: a retórica como Instrumento de formação de crenças

    Full text link

    Cognitive and psychiatric symptom trajectories 2–3 years after hospital admission for COVID-19: a longitudinal, prospective cohort study in the UK

    No full text
    Background: COVID-19 is known to be associated with increased risks of cognitive and psychiatric outcomes after the acute phase of disease. We aimed to assess whether these symptoms can emerge or persist more than 1 year after hospitalisation for COVID-19, to identify which early aspects of COVID-19 illness predict longer-term symptoms, and to establish how these symptoms relate to occupational functioning. Methods: The Post-hospitalisation COVID-19 study (PHOSP-COVID) is a prospective, longitudinal cohort study of adults (aged ≥18 years) who were hospitalised with a clinical diagnosis of COVID-19 at participating National Health Service hospitals across the UK. In the C-Fog study, a subset of PHOSP-COVID participants who consented to be recontacted for other research were invited to complete a computerised cognitive assessment and clinical scales between 2 years and 3 years after hospital admission. Participants completed eight cognitive tasks, covering eight cognitive domains, from the Cognitron battery, in addition to the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire for depression, the Generalised Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale, the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Scale, and the 20-item Cognitive Change Index (CCI-20) questionnaire to assess subjective cognitive decline. We evaluated how the absolute risks of symptoms evolved between follow-ups at 6 months, 12 months, and 2–3 years, and whether symptoms at 2–3 years were predicted by earlier aspects of COVID-19 illness. Participants completed an occupation change questionnaire to establish whether their occupation or working status had changed and, if so, why. We assessed which symptoms at 2–3 years were associated with occupation change. People with lived experience were involved in the study. Findings: 2469 PHOSP-COVID participants were invited to participate in the C-Fog study, and 475 participants (191 [40·2%] females and 284 [59·8%] males; mean age 58·26 [SD 11·13] years) who were discharged from one of 83 hospitals provided data at the 2–3-year follow-up. Participants had worse cognitive scores than would be expected on the basis of their sociodemographic characteristics across all cognitive domains tested (average score 0·71 SD below the mean [IQR 0·16–1·04]; p<0·0001). Most participants reported at least mild depression (263 [74·5%] of 353), anxiety (189 [53·5%] of 353), fatigue (220 [62·3%] of 353), or subjective cognitive decline (184 [52·1%] of 353), and more than a fifth reported severe depression (79 [22·4%] of 353), fatigue (87 [24·6%] of 353), or subjective cognitive decline (88 [24·9%] of 353). Depression, anxiety, and fatigue were worse at 2–3 years than at 6 months or 12 months, with evidence of both worsening of existing symptoms and emergence of new symptoms. Symptoms at 2–3 years were not predicted by the severity of acute COVID-19 illness, but were strongly predicted by the degree of recovery at 6 months (explaining 35·0–48·8% of the variance in anxiety, depression, fatigue, and subjective cognitive decline); by a biocognitive profile linking acutely raised D-dimer relative to C-reactive protein with subjective cognitive deficits at 6 months (explaining 7·0–17·2% of the variance in anxiety, depression, fatigue, and subjective cognitive decline); and by anxiety, depression, fatigue, and subjective cognitive deficit at 6 months. Objective cognitive deficits at 2–3 years were not predicted by any of the factors tested, except for cognitive deficits at 6 months, explaining 10·6% of their variance. 95 of 353 participants (26·9% [95% CI 22·6–31·8]) reported occupational change, with poor health being the most common reason for this change. Occupation change was strongly and specifically associated with objective cognitive deficits (odds ratio [OR] 1·51 [95% CI 1·04–2·22] for every SD decrease in overall cognitive score) and subjective cognitive decline (OR 1·54 [1·21–1·98] for every point increase in CCI-20). Interpretation: Psychiatric and cognitive symptoms appear to increase over the first 2–3 years post-hospitalisation due to both worsening of symptoms already present at 6 months and emergence of new symptoms. New symptoms occur mostly in people with other symptoms already present at 6 months. Early identification and management of symptoms might therefore be an effective strategy to prevent later onset of a complex syndrome. Occupation change is common and associated mainly with objective and subjective cognitive deficits. Interventions to promote cognitive recovery or to prevent cognitive decline are therefore needed to limit the functional and economic impacts of COVID-19. Funding: National Institute for Health and Care Research Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centre, Wolfson Foundation, MQ Mental Health Research, MRC-UK Research and Innovation, and National Institute for Health and Care Research.</p
    corecore