Free-style technique versus computed tomographic angiography-guided perforator selection in deep inferior epigastric perforator flap harvest: a prospective clinical study

Background: Computed tomographic angiography (CTA) is the preferred diagnostic tool in preoperative deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap assessment, though some surgeons prefer approaching perforator selection with intraoperative findings alone. Methods: This prospective observational study conducted between 2015 and 2020 assessed our intraoperative decision-making "free-style" technique for DIEP flap harvest. Any patient with indication for immediate or delayed breast reconstruction using abdominally based flaps and who received preoperative CTA was enrolled. Only unilateral cases performed by the same surgeon were considered. Allergy to iodine-based contrast media, renal impairment and claustrophobia were other exclusion criteria. Primary endpoint consisted in comparing operative times and complication rates between free-style technique and CTA-guided approach. Secondary endpoints included evaluation of agreement rate between intraoperative findings and CTA, and identification of variables affecting operative time and complication rate. Demographics, surgical information, agreement versus non-agreement and complications were collected. Results: Starting from 206 patients, 100 were enrolled. Fifty were assigned to Group A, receiving DIEP flap with free-style technique. The other 50 were assigned to Group B, receiving DIEP flap with CTA-guided perforators selection. Study groups' demographics were homogenous. Operative time was statistically lower (p = .036) in free-style group (252.4 ± 44.77 min vs. 265.6 ± 31.67 min). Complication rates were higher in CTA-guided group (10% vs. 2%) though this was not significant (p = .092). Overall agreement rate in dominant perforator selection between intraoperatively and CTA-based assessment was 81%. Multiple regression analysis showed no variable increased complication rate, though CTA-guided approach, BMI > 30 and harvesting more than one perforator were respectively associated with B-coefficient of 17.391 (2.430-32.351, 95% CI) [p = .023], 3.50 (0.640-6.379, 95% CI) [p = .017] and 18.887 (6.232-31.542, 95% CI) [p = .004], predicting increased operative time. Conclusions: The free-style technique proved to be a useful tool for guiding DIEP flap harvest with good sensibility in detecting the dominant perforator suggested by CTA without statistically increasing surgery duration and complications

Determining Breast Implant Prevalence. A Population Study of Italian Chest Radiographs

Background Current breast implant prevalence within the general population remains elusive. An accurate prevalence is critical to serve as the denominator for any assessment of breast implant-related complication. The purpose of this manuscript is to assess this prevalence in women aged 20-70 years in Italy.Materials and Methods Eight reviewers, demonstrating a mean sensitivity of 87.0% and specificity of 97.0%, were recruited for retrospective identification of implants on chest radiographs from a tertiary academic hospital in a major urban setting. Three final reviewers were selected, and they assessed all eligible chest radiographs collected between January and December 2019. The hospital-based population was compared to epidemiological data at a local, regional and national level to demonstrate homogeneity of age structures using the phi correlation coefficient.Results We identified 3,448 chest X-rays which yielded 140 implants, with an overall prevalence of 4.1% for women aged 20-70. Implants were bilateral in 76% of cases and unilateral in 24%. They were placed cosmetically in 47.1% cases and used for reconstruction in 52.9% cases. Phi correlation coefficient found no differences across hospital-based, local, regional and national populations.Conclusion A validated method was performed to estimate implant prevalence from an academic hospital in a major urban setting at 4.1% and was used to estimate national prevalence in Italy. The implications of this epidemiologic study may reach across national borders for improved understanding of breast implant epidemiology and in predicting the total number of patients within a given population that may be affected by device complications

Clinical recommendations for diagnosis and treatment according to current updated knowledge on BIA-ALCL

Shared strategies and correct information are essential to guide physicians in the management of such an uncommon disease as Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (BIA-ALCL). A systematic review of the literature was performed to collect the most relevant evidence on BIA-ALCL reported cases. A panel of multidisciplinary experts discussed the scientific evidence on BIA-ALCL, and updated consensus recommendations were developed through the Delphi process. The lastest reported Italian incidence of BIA-ALCL is 3.5 per 100.000 implanted patients (95% CI, 1.36 to 5.78), and the disease counts over 1216 cases worldwide as of June 2022. The most common presentation symptom is a late onset seroma followed by a palpable breast mass. In the event of a suspicious case, ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration should be the first step in evaluation, followed by cytologic and immunohistochemical examination. In patients with confirmed diagnosis of BIA-ALCL confined to the capsule, the en-bloc capsulectomy should be performed, followed by immediate autologous reconstruction, while delayed reconstruction applies for disseminate disease or radically unresectable tumor. Nevertheless, a multidisciplinary team approach is essential for the correct management of this pathology

Long-Term Clinical and Aesthetic Results of a Systematic Fat Transfer Protocol for Total Breast Reconstruction after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy

Background: Autologous fat transfer can be safely offered for total breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy. The aim of this study was to extend a fat transfer protocol to smokers and compare the long-term results among them and irradiated and nonirradiated patients. Methods: One hundred seventeen breasts after nipple-sparing mastectomy were prospectively enrolled and stratified in group A (25 irradiated), group B (21 smokers), or group C (71 controls). A standardized fat transfer protocol was used. Data collected were patient demographics, surgery information, and aesthetic analysis. Continuous and categorical variables were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis test, and the Cohen Kappa test was used to test interrater variability for the aesthetic analysis. Results: Groups were homogeneous for demographics (p > 0.05) but significantly different in number of fat transfer sessions (p < 0.001), mean volume of the first two treatments (p = 0.003), and mean total volume of injected fat (p = 0.002). Volume, shape, position of the breast mound, inframammary fold, and scar location subscales obtained high score evaluations without a significant difference among groups (p > 0.05), whereas skin texture subscale showed a lower score evaluation in group A (p = 0.003). Although a significant difference for total subscales was worse in group A (p = 0.004), the global score had a high rate evaluation in all groups (p = 0.145). Interrater reliability showed substantial agreement among all categories. Conclusion: Although further investigation is required, the authors confirm the efficacy of their fat transfer protocol for both irradiated and nonirradiated nipple-sparing mastectomy patients and propose its indication to smokers with comparable clinical and aesthetic results

Total breast reconstruction with the fat-augmented latissimus dorsi (FALD) flap. High safety in a single-center uncontrolled case series

According to ASPS, 107,238 breast reconstructions (BR) have been performed in the United States this year. The latissimus dorsi (LD) flap is used for breast reconstruction (BR), either with an implant or an extended flap harvest. Implant-enhanced LD is associated with 50% reoperation rates. To avoid implant-related complications, we introduced the Fat-Augmented LD (FALD) flap. Several authors report 92% patient satisfaction and 36% complication rates (CR). The aim of our study is to present a single-center uncontrolled case series with long follow-up assessing CR and esthetic results. Women with small-to-moderate breasts requiring immediate or delayed BR were included, whereas athletic and paraplegic women or patients with contraindication for free flap BR were excluded. Clinical and surgical data were analyzed. Esthetic analysis was performed using a panel of independent observers. Between December 2010 and November 2019, 100 patients underwent 148 FALD-based BR. Average operative time was 193.5 min for unilateral procedure and 290.6 min for bilateral procedure. Mean immediate AFT volume was 105.3 cc (range 60-170) per breast. Major complication (total or partial flap necrosis > 30%) rate was 0%, and minor complication (partial flap necrosis < 30%, fat necrosis hematoma, seroma, donor site dehiscence, and chronic pain) rate was 6.76%. Esthetic analysis garnered satisfactory results for all types of mastectomies. For variables regarding skin texture (p = 0.001), scar location (p = 0.005), and total score (p = 0.001), patients undergoing Modified Radical Mastectomy scored lower than Skin-Sparing Mastectomy and Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy. We were able to confirm that the FALD flap is a safe with a low complication rate and high patient satisfaction. Level of Evidence IV

Oncologic Outcome of 1000 Postmastectomy Breast Reconstructions with Fat Transfer. A Single-Center, Matched Case-Control Study

Background: Autologous fat transfer has an important role in breast reconstructive surgery. Nevertheless, some concerns remain with regard to its oncologic safety. The authors present a single-center, case-matching study analyzing the impact of autologous fat transfer in the cumulative incidence of local recurrences.Methods: From a prospectively maintained database, the authors identified 902 patients who underwent 1025 breast reconstructions from 2005 to 2017. Data regarding demographics, tumor characteristics, surgery details, and follow-up were collected. Exclusion criteria were patients with distant metastases at diagnosis, recurrent tumor, or incomplete data regarding primary tumor; and patients who underwent prophylactic mastectomies and breast-conserving operations. Statistical analysis was conducted to evaluate the impact of the variables on the incidence of local recurrence. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results: After 1:n case-matching, we selected 919 breasts, of which 425 patients (46.2 percent) received at least one autologous fat transfer session versus 494 control cases (53.8 percent). Local recurrences had an overall rate of 6.8 percent, and we found local recurrences in 14 autologous fat transfer cases (3.0 percent) and 54 controls (9.6 percent). Statistical analysis showed that autologous fat transfer did not increase the risk of local recurrences (hazard ratio, 0.337; CI, 0.173 to 0.658; p = 0.00007). Multivariate analysis identified invasive ductal carcinoma subtype and lymph node metastases to have an increased risk of local recurrences (hazard ratio >1). Conversely, positive hormonal receptor status was associated with a reduced risk of events (hazard ratio <1).Conclusions: Autologous fat transfer was not associated with a higher probability of locoregional recurrence in patients undergoing breast reconstruction; therefore, it can be safely used for total breast reconstruction or aesthetic refinements

TFEB and TFE3 control glucose homeostasis by regulating insulin gene expression

: To fulfill their function, pancreatic beta cells require precise nutrient-sensing mechanisms that control insulin production. Transcription factor EB (TFEB) and its homolog TFE3 have emerged as crucial regulators of the adaptive response of cell metabolism to environmental cues. Here, we show that TFEB and TFE3 regulate beta-cell function and insulin gene expression in response to variations in nutrient availability. We found that nutrient deprivation in beta cells promoted TFEB/TFE3 activation, which resulted in suppression of insulin gene expression. TFEB overexpression was sufficient to inhibit insulin transcription, whereas beta cells depleted of both TFEB and TFE3 failed to suppress insulin gene expression in response to amino acid deprivation. Interestingly, ChIP-seq analysis showed binding of TFEB to super-enhancer regions that regulate insulin transcription. Conditional, beta-cell-specific, Tfeb-overexpressing, and Tfeb/Tfe3 double-KO mice showed severe alteration of insulin transcription, secretion, and glucose tolerance, indicating that TFEB and TFE3 are important physiological mediators of pancreatic function. Our findings reveal a nutrient-controlled transcriptional mechanism that regulates insulin production, thus playing a key role in glucose homeostasis at both cellular and organismal levels

Italian cohort of Lafora disease: Clinical features, disease evolution, and genotype-phenotype correlations

Background: Lafora disease (LD) is characterized by progressive myoclonus, refractory epilepsy, and cognitive deterioration. This complex neurodegenerative condition is caused by pathogenic variants in EPM2A/EPM2B genes, encoding two essential glycogen metabolism enzymes known as laforin and malin. Long-term follow-up data are lacking. We describe the clinical features and genetic findings of a cohort of 26 Italian patients with a long clinical follow-up. Methods: Patients with EPM2A/EPM2B pathogenic variants were identified by direct gene sequencing or gene panels with targeted re-sequencing. Disease progression, motor functions, and mental performance were assessed by a simplified disability scale. Spontaneous/action myoclonus severity was scored by the Magaudda Scale. Results: Age range was 12.2\u201346.2 years (mean:25.53 \ub1 9.14). Age at disease onset ranged from 10 to 22 years (mean:14.04 \ub1 2.62). The mean follow-up period was 11.48 \ub1 7.8 years. Twelve out of the 26 (46%) patients preserved walking ability and 13 (50%) maintained speech. A slower disease progression with preserved ambulation and speech after 654 years of follow-up was observed in 1 (11%) out of the 9 (35%) EPM2A patients and in 6 (35%) out of the 17 (65%) EPM2B patients. Follow-up was >10 years in 7 (41.2%) EPM2B individuals, including two harbouring the homozygous p.(D146N) pathogenic variant. Conclusions: This study supports an overall worse disease outcome with severe deterioration of ambulation and speech in patients carrying EPM2A mutations. However, the delayed onset of disabling symptoms observed in the EPM2B subjects harbouring the p.(D146N) pathogenic variant suggests that the underlying causative variant may still influence LD severity