Antimicrobial stewardship programs in seven Latin American countries: facing the challenges

Antecedentes: Diversos estudios han demostrado que más del 50% de los antibióticos utilizados en los hospitales son innecesarios o inadecuados y que la resistencia a los antimicrobianos puede suponer cada año hasta 20.000 millones de dólares de sobrecostes médicos. Por otro lado, los programas de administración de antimicrobianos (PEA) reducen significativamente el uso inadecuado de antimicrobianos, la aparición de resistencias a los antimicrobianos, las infecciones asociadas a la atención sanitaria y los costes en el ámbito hospitalario. Objetivo: Evaluar el desarrollo de ASP y el ahorro de antibióticos en 7 hospitales latinoamericanos utilizando indicadores cuantitativos estandarizados en todas las instituciones de salud participantes. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio de intervención, donde se realizaron evaluaciones pre y post utilizando una herramienta de puntuación estandarizada adaptada de los estándares de acreditación de la Joint Commission International y, del Instituto Colombiano de Normas Técnicas y Certificación. Se evaluó ASP de 7 hospitales latinoamericanos entre 2019 y 2020. Se realizó una evaluación pre-intervención en cada hospital para cuantificar el grado de desarrollo de la ASP (ASP Development score). Con base en estos resultados, se implementó una capacitación in situ adaptada en cada hospital, seguida de una evaluación posterior a la intervención para cuantificar la mejora de los indicadores de desarrollo de ASP. Además, se estimó el ahorro monetario en antimicrobianos derivado de la intervención del PEA. Resultados: En la evaluación previa a la intervención, la puntuación media de desarrollo del PEA en las 7 instituciones fue del 65,8% (40-94,3%). Los puntos con la puntuación más baja fueron los relacionados con el seguimiento y la comunicación de los progresos y el éxito del PEA. Para la evaluación posterior a la intervención, 2 instituciones no pudieron participar debido a la presión impuesta por la pandemia COVID-19. Para los 5/7 hospitales restantes, la puntuación media del desarrollo del PEA fue del 82,3%, con un aumento del 12,0% en comparación con la medición previa a la intervención de las mismas instituciones (puntuación media previa a la intervención 70,3% (48,2%-94,3%) Los puntos con un aumento significativo fueron los indicadores clave de rendimiento, la educación de los AMS y la formación de los prescriptores. Tres de los siete (3/7) hospitales informaron de ahorros monetarios en antibióticos asociados a la intervención ASP. Conclusiones: El uso de la herramienta descrita demostró ser útil para evaluar áreas específicas del desarrollo del PEA que eran deficientes y adaptar las intervenciones para los hospitales participantes, en consecuencia, ayudó a mejorar el desarrollo del PEA en las instituciones que se sometieron al análisis previo y posterior a la intervención. Además, las estrategias mostraron ahorros monetarios en los costes antimicrobianos cuando se midieron. © 2023, Los autores.Background: Studies have shown that more than 50% of the antibiotics used in hospitals are unnecessary or inappropriate and, that antimicrobial resistance may cost up to 20 billion USD in excess medical costs each year. On the other hand, Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASP) significantly reduce inappropriate antimicrobial use, emergence of antimicrobial resistance, healthcare associated infections, and costs in hospital settings. Objective: To evaluate the development of ASP and antibiotic savings in 7 Latin American hospitals using standardized quantitative indicators in all the participating health care institutions. Methods: An interventional study was conducted, where pre- and post- evaluations were performed using a standardized score tool adapted from the Joint Commission International accreditation standards and, the Colombian Institute of Technical Standards and Certification. We evaluated ASP from 7 Latin American hospitals between 2019 and 2020. A pre-intervention evaluation was done in each hospital to quantify the degree of development of the ASP (ASP Development score). Based on these results, tailored on-site training was implemented in each hospital, followed by a post-intervention evaluation to quantify improvement of ASP-development indicators. In addition, monetary savings in antimicrobials derived from the ASP intervention were estimated. Results: In the pre-intervention evaluation, the average ASP development score for the 7 institutions was 65.8% (40-94.3%). The items with the lowest development score were those related to monitoring and communicating the ASP progress and success. For the post-intervention evaluation, 2 institutions couldn’t participate due to the pressure imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic. For the remaining 5/7 hospitals, the average ASP development score was 82.3% with an increase of 12.0% when compared to the pre-intervention measurement of the same institutions (average pre-intervention score 70.3% (48.2%-94.3%) The items with a significant increase were key performance indicators, AMS education and training of the prescribers. Three of the seven (3/7) hospitals reported antibiotic monetary savings associated to the ASP intervention. Conclusions: The use of the tool described shown to be useful to evaluate specific areas of ASP-development that were lacking and tailor interventions for the participating hospitals, consequently, it helped improve ASP-development in the institutions that underwent pre- intervention and post-intervention analysis. In addition, the strategies showed monetary savings on antimicrobial costs when measured. © 2023, The Author(s)

Enfermedades de transmisión sexual y salud sexual del costarricense. Tema II. Sífilis y gonorrea

They are very diverse causes that can generate the appearance of an STD, including bacteria are common and they can be transmitted by sexual contact, including vaginal, anal and oral sex.In this second installment on the sexual health of Costa Ricans the behavior of two major diseases analyzed, and which often are accompanied by other sexually transmitted diseases. Syphilis these diseases are caused by the Treponema pallidum and gonorrhea caused by Neisseria gonorrhoeae is a gram negative diplococcus.The report of this release analyzes the behavior of these diseases at the regional level in Latin America and behavior locally, in Costa Rica. Not be required to make the reader a person skilled in the subject, because it starts from the definition of the disease, ETS symptoms, methods of diagnosis and possible treatments for it.Following, the results obtained by the monitoring unit of the Ministry of Health of Costa Rica, so it is possible to observe and analyze the behavior of the disease in the country between 2002 - 2012.Although the treatments used for the disease are commonly used in care facilities Level II and Level III Public Health System in Costa Rica, it has been difficult to eradicate as common sexually transmitted diseases in the country.Son muy diversas las causas que pueden causar la aparición de una enfermedad de transmisión sexual. Entre las más comunes están las bacterias, que pueden transmitirse por contacto sexual (sea vaginal, anal u oral).En esta segunda entrega sobre la salud sexual de los costarricenses se analiza el comportamiento de dos enfermedades de alta prevalencia y que en muchas ocasiones se acompañan de otras de transmisión sexual. Dichas patologías son sífilis, ocasionada por la espiroqueta Treponema pallidum, y gonorrea causada por Neisseria gonorrhoeae, que es un diplococo gram negativo. En este artículo se analiza el comportamiento de estas patologías a nivel regional en América Latina y su comportamiento a nivel local en Costa Rica. No es necesario que el lector sea experto en el tema, pues se parte de la definición de la patología, sus síntomas, métodos de diagnóstico, así como los posibles tratamientos.Se muestran los resultados obtenidos por la unidad de vigilancia del Ministerio de Salud de Costa Rica, de manera que es posible observar y analizar el comportamiento de estas dos enfermedades en el país entre los años 2002 y 2012.Aunque los tratamientos utilizados para combatirlas son de uso común en los centros de atención de los niveles II y III del sistema de salud pública costarricense, es difícil erradicarlas como enfermedades comunes de transmisión sexual.

In vitro activity of ceftaroline against bacterial isolates causing skin and soft tissue and respiratory tract infections collected in Latin American countries, ATLAS program 2016–2020

ABSTRACT: Objectives: Ceftaroline, a broad-spectrum cephalosporin, has activity against Gram-positive and several Gram-negative bacteria (GNB). This study aimed to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of ceftaroline and comparators against isolates causing skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) and respiratory tract infections (RTIs) collected in Latin America (LATAM) in 2016–2020 as part of the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance program (ATLAS). Methods: Minimum inhibitory concentrations were determined using both Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) criteria. Results: Ceftaroline demonstrated potent activity against methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (CLSI/EUCAST: MIC90 0.25 mg/L; susceptibility 100%), whereas activity against methicillin-resistant S. aureus varied for SSTIs (MIC90 1 mg/L; susceptibility 92.5%) and RTIs isolates (MIC90 2 mg/L; susceptibility 72.9%) isolates. For Streptococcus pneumoniae, particularly penicillin-resistant isolates commonly causing respiratory infections, high ceftaroline activity (MIC90 0.25 mg/L; susceptibility 100%/98.4%) was noted. All isolates of β-hemolytic streptococci were susceptible to ceftaroline (S. agalactiae: MIC90 0.03 mg/L [SSTIs]; MIC90 0.015 mg/L (RTIs); susceptibility 100%; S. pyogenes: MIC90 0.008 mg/L; susceptibility 100%). Ceftaroline was highly active against Haemophilus influenzae, including β-lactamase positive isolates (MIC90 0.06 mg/L; susceptibility 100%/85.7%). Ceftaroline demonstrated high activity against non-ESBL-producing GNB (E. coli: MIC90 0.5 mg/L, susceptibility 91.9%; K. pneumoniae: MIC90 0.25 mg/L, susceptibility 95.1%; K. oxytoca, MIC90 0.5 mg/L; susceptibility 95.7%). Conclusion: Ceftaroline was active against the recent collection of bacterial pathogens commonly causing SSTIs and RTIs in LATAM. Local and regional surveillance of antimicrobial resistance patterns are crucial to understand evolving resistance and guide treatment management

Notes for genera – Ascomycota

Knowledge of the relationships and thus the classification of fungi, has developed rapidly with increasingly widespread use of molecular techniques, over the past 10--15 years, and continues to accelerate. Several genera have been found to be polyphyletic, and their generic concepts have subsequently been emended. New names have thus been introduced for species which are phylogenetically distinct from the type species of particular genera. The ending of the separate naming of morphs of the same species in 2011, has also caused changes in fungal generic names. In order to facilitate access to all important changes, it was desirable to compile these in a single document. The present article provides a list of generic names of Ascomycota (approximately 6500 accepted names published to the end of 2016), including those which are lichen-forming. Notes and summaries of the changes since the last edition of `Ainsworth Bisby's Dictionary of the Fungi' in 2008 are provided. The notes include the number of accepted species, classification, type species (with location of the type material), culture availability, life-styles, distribution, and selected publications that have appeared since 2008. This work is intended to provide the foundation for updating the ascomycete component of the ``Without prejudice list of generic names of Fungi'' published in 2013, which will be developed into a list of protected generic names. This will be subjected to the XIXth International Botanical Congress in Shenzhen in July 2017 agreeing to a modification in the rules relating to protected lists, and scrutiny by procedures determined by the Nomenclature Committee for Fungi (NCF). The previously invalidly published generic names Barriopsis, Collophora (as Collophorina), Cryomyces, Dematiopleospora, Heterospora (as Heterosporicola), Lithophila, Palmomyces (as Palmaria) and Saxomyces are validated, as are two previously invalid family names, Bartaliniaceae and Wiesneriomycetaceae. Four species of Lalaria, which were invalidly published are transferred to Taphrina and validated as new combinations. Catenomycopsis Tibell Constant. is reduced under Chaenothecopsis Vain., while Dichomera Cooke is reduced under Botryosphaeria Ces. De Not. (Art. 59)