Avaliação da eficácia do artesunato associado à tetraciclina na terapêutica da malária falciparum

Realizou-se um ensaio clínico, randomizado e controlado, comparando o artesunato com o quinino e a mefloquina, em casos de malária não grave. Foram tratados 42 pacientes em regime de internação e o seguimento durou 28 dias. Realizou-se exame de gota espessa cada 12 horas até sua negativação, hemograma e bioquímica sanguínea, pré e pós-tratamento. A média da parasitemia inicial foi 42.568 parasitas/ml. Vinte e seis pacientes foram acompanhados durante 28 dias e 16 durante menos de 28 dias. Um paciente de cada grupo apresentou R I tardia e um paciente do grupo do quinino apresentou R III. As porcentagens de cura foram 88,8%, 85,7% e 81,8% para o artesunato, a mefloquina e o quinino, respectivamente, sem mostrar diferença significativa. O tempo de desaparecimento da febre não mostrou diferença significativa entre os grupos. O grupo do artesunato teve um tempo menor de clareamento da parasitemia (37,33 ± 11,52 horas) quando comparado com o quinino (65,25 ± 17,44 horas), sendo estatisticamente significativa (p = 0,0016). O grupo da mefloquina (58,9 ± 16,68 horas) não mostrou diferença com os outros grupos. Não se apresentaram efeitos adversos importantes em nenhum dos esquemas usados, sendo bem tolerados pelos pacientes.A controlled clinical therapeutic study in hospitalized patients compared artesunate with quinine and mefloquine in patients with uncomplicated falciparum malaria. Forty two patients entered the trial and the follow up was for 28 days with thick blood film taken every 12 hours untill became negative. Laboratory examinations included haematological and biochemical tests before and after treatment. Patients had a mean parasitaemia of 42.568 per microlitre. Twenty six patients completed 28 days of follow up but 16 did not fulfil this protocol. One in each of the therapeutic groups showed delayed R I resistance. A further patient in the quinine group showed R III resistance. The cure rate was 88.8% for artesunate, 85.7% for mefloquine and 81.8% for quinine; no significant difference was found, the same occurring with the clearance of fever. The artesunate group had a quicker parasitaemia clearance time (37.3 ± 11.5 hours) when compared with quinine (65.2 ± 17.4) showing a significant diference (p = 0.0016). Parasite clearance with mefloquine, was intermediate (58.9 ± 16.6 ours) between the artesunate and quinine. No important side effects were observed with any of the therapeutic regimens and no deaths registered

Toxoplasma gondii, Neospora caninum and Leishmania amazonensis antibodies in domestic dogs in the western Brazilian Amazon region

Amostras de sangue de 99 cães domiciliados foram coletadas no meio urbano (n = 33) e rural (n = 66) do município de Lábrea, estado do Amazonas, Brasil. Dentre as amostras rurais, 40 foram obtidas em comunidades ribeirinhas e 26 em comunidades indígenas, ambas ao longo do rio Purus. Durante a amostragem foi aplicado um questionário com informações sobre sexo, idade, viver em áreas secas ou alagadiças, acesso ou não às ruas (cães urbanos) e acesso à floresta. A presença de anticorpos contra Toxoplasma gondii, Neospora caninum, Leishmania infantum chagasi e Leishmania amazonensis foi detectada pela reação de imunofluorescência indireta (RIFI) com ponto de corte de, respectivamente, 16, 50, 40 e 40. Associação entre as variáveis qualitativas e a positividade para cada um dos parasitos foi avaliada pelo teste do χ2 (p < 0,05). A ocorrência de animais com anticorpos contra T. gondii, N. caninum e L. amazonensis foi de, respectivamente, 61,6%; 7,1% e 8,1%. Nenhuma amostra foi positiva para L. infantum chagasi. A variável viver em área urbana (p=0,041) apresentou associação com ocorrência de T. gondii e o número de cães positivos a T. gondii aumentou com a idade (p = 0,0006). A variável sexo (machos) apresentou associação com N. caninum (p = 0,018) e nenhuma variável apresentou associação com L. amazonensis. Os títulos de anticorpos contra T. gondii variaram de 64 a 32.768; contra N. caninum de 100 a 800 e contra L. amazonensis de 40 a 640. T. gondii e L. amazonensis são dois agentes de importantes zoonoses e encontram-se ativos na região. O município estudado, especialmente as comunidades ribeirinhas, possuem peculiaridades geográficas, sociais e ecológicas distintas e necessitam maior atenção das autoridades para o controle desses agentes.Blood samples from 99 domestic dogs were collected in the urban area (n = 33) and rural area (n = 66) of the municipality of Lábrea, state of Amazonas, Brazil. Among the rural samples, 40 were collected in riverine communities and 26 were collected in Indian communities, both along the Purus River. During the sampling, a questionnaire was applied to obtain information relating to sex, age, living in dryland or seasonally flooded areas, access to the streets (for urban dogs) and access to forests. The presence of antibodies against Toxoplasma gondii, Neospora caninum, Leishmania infantum chagasi and Leishmania amazonensis was detected by means of the indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT) with cutoffs of 16, 50, 40 and 40, respectively. The association of each qualitative variable, with each parasite and positivity for each of them, were evaluated using the χ2 test (p < 0.05). T. gondii, N. caninum and L. amazonensis antibodies were found, respectively, in 61.6%, 7.1% and 8.1% of the animals examined. None of the samples were positive for L. infantum chagasi. The variable of living in an urban area (p = 0.041) presented an association with occurrence of T. gondii and the positivity for T. gondii increased with age of the dogs (p = 0.0006). The variable of male sex presented an association with N. caninum (p = 0.018) and no variable presented any association with L. amazonensis. The antibody titers against T. gondii ranged from 64 to 32,768; against N. caninum from 100 to 800; and against L. amazonensis from 40 to 640. Both T. gondii and L. amazonensis are important zoonotic agents and are active in this region. The municipality studied, and especially its riverine communities, has geographic, social and ecological peculiarities. This region requires greater attention from the authorities for controlling these agents

Toxoplasma gondii, Neospora caninum and Leishmania amazonensis antibodies in domestic dogs in the western Brazilian Amazon region

Amostras de sangue de 99 cães domiciliados foram coletadas no meio urbano (n = 33) e rural (n = 66) do município de Lábrea, estado do Amazonas, Brasil. Dentre as amostras rurais, 40 foram obtidas em comunidades ribeirinhas e 26 em comunidades indígenas, ambas ao longo do rio Purus. Durante a amostragem foi aplicado um questionário com informações sobre sexo, idade, viver em áreas secas ou alagadiças, acesso ou não às ruas (cães urbanos) e acesso à floresta. A presença de anticorpos contra Toxoplasma gondii, Neospora caninum, Leishmania infantum chagasi e Leishmania amazonensis foi detectada pela reação de imunofluorescência indireta (RIFI) com ponto de corte de, respectivamente, 16, 50, 40 e 40. Associação entre as variáveis qualitativas e a positividade para cada um dos parasitos foi avaliada pelo teste do χ2 (p < 0,05). A ocorrência de animais com anticorpos contra T. gondii, N. caninum e L. amazonensis foi de, respectivamente, 61,6%; 7,1% e 8,1%. Nenhuma amostra foi positiva para L. infantum chagasi. A variável viver em área urbana (p=0,041) apresentou associação com ocorrência de T. gondii e o número de cães positivos a T. gondii aumentou com a idade (p = 0,0006). A variável sexo (machos) apresentou associação com N. caninum (p = 0,018) e nenhuma variável apresentou associação com L. amazonensis. Os títulos de anticorpos contra T. gondii variaram de 64 a 32.768; contra N. caninum de 100 a 800 e contra L. amazonensis de 40 a 640. T. gondii e L. amazonensis são dois agentes de importantes zoonoses e encontram-se ativos na região. O município estudado, especialmente as comunidades ribeirinhas, possuem peculiaridades geográficas, sociais e ecológicas distintas e necessitam maior atenção das autoridades para o controle desses agentes.Blood samples from 99 domestic dogs were collected in the urban area (n = 33) and rural area (n = 66) of the municipality of Lábrea, state of Amazonas, Brazil. Among the rural samples, 40 were collected in riverine communities and 26 were collected in Indian communities, both along the Purus River. During the sampling, a questionnaire was applied to obtain information relating to sex, age, living in dryland or seasonally flooded areas, access to the streets (for urban dogs) and access to forests. The presence of antibodies against Toxoplasma gondii, Neospora caninum, Leishmania infantum chagasi and Leishmania amazonensis was detected by means of the indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT) with cutoffs of 16, 50, 40 and 40, respectively. The association of each qualitative variable, with each parasite and positivity for each of them, were evaluated using the χ2 test (p < 0.05). T. gondii, N. caninum and L. amazonensis antibodies were found, respectively, in 61.6%, 7.1% and 8.1% of the animals examined. None of the samples were positive for L. infantum chagasi. The variable of living in an urban area (p = 0.041) presented an association with occurrence of T. gondii and the positivity for T. gondii increased with age of the dogs (p = 0.0006). The variable of male sex presented an association with N. caninum (p = 0.018) and no variable presented any association with L. amazonensis. The antibody titers against T. gondii ranged from 64 to 32,768; against N. caninum from 100 to 800; and against L. amazonensis from 40 to 640. Both T. gondii and L. amazonensis are important zoonotic agents and are active in this region. The municipality studied, and especially its riverine communities, has geographic, social and ecological peculiarities. This region requires greater attention from the authorities for controlling these agents

Entre a poeira e o silêncio: sobre exposições e construções da memória no Museu do Ceará (1932-1997)

This article discusses some manners to construct the meanings of the past into Museu do Ceará's exhibitions between 1932 and 1997. Based on issues of Social History of Memory, the meanings of dust and silence are highlighted in a way that the past is configured in the space of the exhibitions. The artifacts are treated taking into account underlying values and expectations that guide, in certain circumstances, connections and separations between past and present

Pervasive gaps in Amazonian ecological research

Biodiversity loss is one of the main challenges of our time,1,2 and attempts to address it require a clear un derstanding of how ecological communities respond to environmental change across time and space.3,4 While the increasing availability of global databases on ecological communities has advanced our knowledge of biodiversity sensitivity to environmental changes,5–7 vast areas of the tropics remain understudied.8–11 In the American tropics, Amazonia stands out as the world’s most diverse rainforest and the primary source of Neotropical biodiversity,12 but it remains among the least known forests in America and is often underrepre sented in biodiversity databases.13–15 To worsen this situation, human-induced modifications16,17 may elim inate pieces of the Amazon’s biodiversity puzzle before we can use them to understand how ecological com munities are responding. To increase generalization and applicability of biodiversity knowledge,18,19 it is thus crucial to reduce biases in ecological research, particularly in regions projected to face the most pronounced environmental changes. We integrate ecological community metadata of 7,694 sampling sites for multiple or ganism groups in a machine learning model framework to map the research probability across the Brazilian Amazonia, while identifying the region’s vulnerability to environmental change. 15%–18% of the most ne glected areas in ecological research are expected to experience severe climate or land use changes by 2050. This means that unless we take immediate action, we will not be able to establish their current status, much less monitor how it is changing and what is being lostinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

Pervasive gaps in Amazonian ecological research

Biodiversity loss is one of the main challenges of our time,1,2 and attempts to address it require a clear understanding of how ecological communities respond to environmental change across time and space.3,4 While the increasing availability of global databases on ecological communities has advanced our knowledge of biodiversity sensitivity to environmental changes,5,6,7 vast areas of the tropics remain understudied.8,9,10,11 In the American tropics, Amazonia stands out as the world's most diverse rainforest and the primary source of Neotropical biodiversity,12 but it remains among the least known forests in America and is often underrepresented in biodiversity databases.13,14,15 To worsen this situation, human-induced modifications16,17 may eliminate pieces of the Amazon's biodiversity puzzle before we can use them to understand how ecological communities are responding. To increase generalization and applicability of biodiversity knowledge,18,19 it is thus crucial to reduce biases in ecological research, particularly in regions projected to face the most pronounced environmental changes. We integrate ecological community metadata of 7,694 sampling sites for multiple organism groups in a machine learning model framework to map the research probability across the Brazilian Amazonia, while identifying the region's vulnerability to environmental change. 15%–18% of the most neglected areas in ecological research are expected to experience severe climate or land use changes by 2050. This means that unless we take immediate action, we will not be able to establish their current status, much less monitor how it is changing and what is being lost

Pervasive gaps in Amazonian ecological research

Biodiversity loss is one of the main challenges of our time,1,2 and attempts to address it require a clear understanding of how ecological communities respond to environmental change across time and space.3,4 While the increasing availability of global databases on ecological communities has advanced our knowledge of biodiversity sensitivity to environmental changes,5,6,7 vast areas of the tropics remain understudied.8,9,10,11 In the American tropics, Amazonia stands out as the world's most diverse rainforest and the primary source of Neotropical biodiversity,12 but it remains among the least known forests in America and is often underrepresented in biodiversity databases.13,14,15 To worsen this situation, human-induced modifications16,17 may eliminate pieces of the Amazon's biodiversity puzzle before we can use them to understand how ecological communities are responding. To increase generalization and applicability of biodiversity knowledge,18,19 it is thus crucial to reduce biases in ecological research, particularly in regions projected to face the most pronounced environmental changes. We integrate ecological community metadata of 7,694 sampling sites for multiple organism groups in a machine learning model framework to map the research probability across the Brazilian Amazonia, while identifying the region's vulnerability to environmental change. 15%–18% of the most neglected areas in ecological research are expected to experience severe climate or land use changes by 2050. This means that unless we take immediate action, we will not be able to establish their current status, much less monitor how it is changing and what is being lost