Landscape Impacts of Hydraulic Fracturing Development and Operations on Surface Water and Watersheds

Landscapes and watersheds are complex cultural biogeoclimatic systems that are not easily bounded, measured or understood by a single body of expertise. This makes it very challenging to locate and synthesize the best available science to identify what decision‐makers need to know about landscape and watershed impacts of hydraulic fracturing. ‘Landscape’ is not a physical object as much as it is a spatial context for multiple natural processes and human activities. As such, what decision‐makers need to know depends upon the specific locations and situational conditions in which hydraulic fracturing is operating. Fracking exists in landscape and watershed contexts that are highly variable at different scales and across different regions. There is a relatively high degree of certainty, within predictable engineered limits, about specific well‐based fracking operations. In contrast, there is a lot of uncertainty about how complex social ecological landscape and watershed systems function. Potential landscape and watershed impacts exist in the context of a complex and integrated system of spatial and functional inter‐connections and inter‐relationships and needs to be understood in this system context (Figure A‐1). We approached landscape and watershed impacts of hydraulic fracturing from a multi‐disciplinary social and natural science framework in order to try and capture this complexity. We emerged with common agreement around the difficulties presented by ‘silos’ of expertise when trying to deal with complex systems. The primary learning from our multidisciplinary approach is the need for greater institutional opportunities to integrate and coordinate a spectrum of approaches to address knowledge gaps in multiple system interactions across scales and involving system threshold effects that may be social in nature as well as biogeochemical

Home parenteral nutrition provision modalities for chronic intestinal failure in adult patients:An international survey

Background & aims: The safety and effectiveness of a home parenteral nutrition (HPN) program depends both on the expertise and the management approach of the HPN center. We aimed to evaluate both the approaches of different international HPN-centers in their provision of HPN and the types of intravenous supplementation (IVS)-admixtures prescribed to patients with chronic intestinal failure (CIF). Methods: In March 2015, 65 centers from 22 countries enrolled 3239 patients (benign disease 90.1%, malignant disease 9.9%), recording the patient, CIF and HPN characteristics in a structured database. The HPN-provider was categorized as health care system local pharmacy (LP) or independent home care company (HCC). The IVS-admixture was categorized as fluids and electrolytes alone (FE) or parenteral nutrition, either commercially premixed (PA) or customized to the individual patient (CA), alone or plus extra FE (PAFE or CAFE). Doctors of HPN centers were responsible for the IVS prescriptions. Results: HCC (66%) was the most common HPN provider, with no difference noted between benign-CIF and malignant-CIF. LP was the main modality in 11 countries; HCC prevailed in 4 European countries: Israel, USA, South America and Oceania (p < 0.001). IVS-admixture comprised: FE 10%, PA 17%, PAFE 17%, CA 38%, CAFE 18%. PA and PAFE prevailed in malignant-CIF while CA and CAFE use was greater in benign-CIF (p < 0.001). PA + PAFE prevailed in those countries where LP was the main HPN-provider and CA + CAFE prevailed where the main HPN-provider was HCC (p < 0.001). Conclusions: This is the first study to demonstrate that HPN provision and the IVS-admixture differ greatly among countries, among HPN centers and between benign-CIF and cancer-CIF. As both HPN provider and IVS-admixture types may play a role in the safety and effectiveness of HPN therapy, criteria to homogenize HPN programs are needed so that patients can have equal access to optimal CIF care

Evaluación del estado nutricional de pacientes con cirrosis hepática alcohólica atendidos en la Clínica de Hígado del Hospital General de México Nutritional assessment of alcoholic liver cirrhotic patients treated in the liver Clinic of the Mexico's General Hospital

La desnutrición en el paciente cirrótico se asocia a mayor morbi-mortalidad; sin embargo, su diagnóstico es complejo por lo que el objetivo del estudio fue evaluar el estado nutricional empleando distintos métodos. Se evaluaron pacientes adultos con cirrosis hepática de origen alcohólico que acudieron a la Clínica de Hígado del Hospital General de México. Se aplicó un recordatorio de 24 horas y antropometría, herramientas de tamizaje (Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool, Nutritional Risk Screening-2002) y de diagnóstico nutricional específica para pacientes con cirrosis hepática (Royal Free Hospital Global Assessment). Se incluyeron 62 pacientes y 51,6% fueron hombres. La desnutrición por área muscular de brazo fue de 31,3% en hombres y de 10% en mujeres, y por área grasa de brazo fue de 23,3% en mujeres y 3,1% en hombres (p Malnutrition in the cirrhotic patient is associated to a higher morbidity and mortality rate; however, the diagnosis is complex, so the study objective was to assess the nutritional status using different methods. Adult patients with alcoholic liver cirrhosis treated in the Liver Clinic of the Mexico's General Hospital were evaluated. Anthropometric measurements and a 24 hours recall were made; screening tools (Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool, Nutritional Risk Screening-2002) and a method for assessing nutritional status specifically in cirrhotic patients (Royal Free Hospital Global Assessment) were used. We included 62 patients, 51.6% of them were men. Malnutrition by arm muscle area was 31.3% in men and 10% in women, and by arm fat area was 23.3% in women and 3.1% in men (p < 0.05). With the screening tools the percentages of malnutrition risk were 43.5% and 54.8% respectively, vs. 1.6% identified as "low weight" with the Body Mass Index. With the Royal Free Hospital Global Assessment tool the percentage of malnutrition was 45.2%. Patients with malnutrition had an energy and protein intake significantly lower than the well-nourished: 19.7 kcal/kg and 0.89 g/kg vs 30 kcal/kg and 1.25 g/kg (p < 0.005). Malnutrition is a common complication in patients with liver cirrhosis. Men have higher depletion of muscle mass and women a higher loss of body fat. The Body Mass Index is not a reliable tool for assessing malnutrition. It's advisable to use tools with indicators of body composition such as the Royal Free Hospital Global Assessment