12 research outputs found

    L' anémie réfractaire sidéroblastique avec thrombocytose est-elle une entité indépendante?

    No full text
    L'AnĂ©mie RĂ©fractaire avec SidĂ©roblastes en couronne (ARS) et Thrombocytose (ARS-T) a Ă©tĂ© proposĂ©e comme entitĂ© provisoire dans les classifications OMS 2001 et 2008, dans la mesure oĂč son existence en tant qu'entitĂ© indĂ©pendante est contestĂ©e. Certains auteurs pensent que l'ARS-T est une forme particuliĂšre de ThrombocythĂ©mie Essentielle (TE). D'autres pensent que l'ARS-T est une forme d'ARS qui aurait dĂ©veloppĂ© secondairement une thrombocytose suite Ă  l'acquisition de la mutation JAK2V617F ou de la mutation MPLW515L/K. En l'absence d'Ă©tude menĂ©e sur une large cohorte de patients, il Ă©tait difficile de tirer une conclusion dĂ©finitive sur la façon de caractĂ©riser et de classer cette pathologie. C est pourquoi nous avons rĂ©alisĂ© une Ă©tude rĂ©trospective multicentrique europĂ©enne, et rĂ©uni la plus grande cohorte publiĂ©e Ă  ce jour, qui regroupe 200 cas d'ARS-T, auxquels nous avons comparĂ©, pour ce qui est des caractĂ©ristiques cliniques, biologiques et pronostiques, 165 ARS et 454 TE. Les ARS-T avaient, au diagnostic, un nombre de globules blancs supĂ©rieur aux ARS, mais infĂ©rieur Ă  la TE, et un compte plaquettaire infĂ©rieur et un volume globulaire moyen supĂ©rieur Ă  celui de la TE. Au diagnostic, 42,9 % des ARS-T se prĂ©sentaient avec une mutation JAK2V617F contre 72,6 % pour les TE et 10 % pour les ARS, sans que sa prĂ©sence ait un impact sur la survie. Le risque de complications thrombotiques des ARS-T Ă©tait Ă©quivalent Ă  celui des TE, mais supĂ©rieur Ă  celui des ARS, alors que le risque de transformation leucĂ©mique Ă©tait Ă©quivalent Ă  celui des ARS, mais supĂ©rieur Ă  celui des TE. Quant Ă  la survie globale des ARS-T, elle Ă©tait meilleure que celle des ARS, mais plus pĂ©jorative que celle des TE. Le risque Ă©quivalent de complications thrombotiques entre ARS-T et TE suggĂšre que le recours Ă  un traitement antiagrĂ©gant devrait ĂȘtre envisagĂ© dans les ARS-T. L hypothĂšse d une Ă©volution des ARS en ARS-T par l acquisition d une mutation de type JAK2 et/ou MPL semble la plus probable, avec un profil gĂ©nĂ©tique particulier, associant une mutation responsable de la thrombocytose et une mutation responsable de l'apparition de sidĂ©roblastes en couronne. La description rĂ©cente des mutations du spliceosome de type SF3B1, fortement associĂ©es aux syndromes myĂ©lodysplasiques avec sidĂ©roblastes en couronne, renforce cette hypothĂšse.DIJON-BU MĂ©decine Pharmacie (212312103) / SudocSudocFranceF

    Clinical Features And Course Of Refractory Anemia With Ring Sideroblasts Associated With Marked Thrombocytosis

    Get PDF
    Background: Refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts associated with marked thrombocytosis was proposed as a provisional entity in the 2001 World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and also in the 2008 version, but its existence as a single entity is contested. We wish to define the clinical features of this rare myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm and to compare its clinical outcome with that of refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts and essential thrombocythemia. Design and Methods: We conducted a collaborative retrospective study across Europe. Our database included 200 patients diagnosed with refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts and marked thrombocytosis. For each of these patients, each patient diagnosed with refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts was matched for age and sex. At the same time, a cohort of 454 patients with essential thrombocythemia was used to compare outcomes of the two diseases. Results: In patients with refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts and marked thrombocytosis, depending on the Janus Kinase 2 V617F mutational status (positive or negative) or platelet threshold (over or below 600x10(9)/L), no difference in survival was noted. However, these patients had shorter overall survival and leukemia-free survival with a lower risk of thrombotic complications than did patients with essential thrombocythemia (P<0.001) but better survival (P<0.001) and a higher risk of thrombosis (P=0.039) than patients with refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts. Conclusions: The clinical course of refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts and marked thrombocytosis is better than that of refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts and worse than that of essential thrombocythemia. The higher risk of thrombotic events in this disorder suggests that anti-platelet therapy might be considered in this subset of patients. From a clinical point of view, it appears to be important to consider refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts and marked thrombocytosis as a distinct entity

    Clinical Features And Course Of Refractory Anemia With Ring Sideroblasts Associated With Marked Thrombocytosis

    No full text
    Background: Refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts associated with marked thrombocytosis was proposed as a provisional entity in the 2001 World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and also in the 2008 version, but its existence as a single entity is contested. We wish to define the clinical features of this rare myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm and to compare its clinical outcome with that of refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts and essential thrombocythemia. Design and Methods: We conducted a collaborative retrospective study across Europe. Our database included 200 patients diagnosed with refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts and marked thrombocytosis. For each of these patients, each patient diagnosed with refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts was matched for age and sex. At the same time, a cohort of 454 patients with essential thrombocythemia was used to compare outcomes of the two diseases. Results: In patients with refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts and marked thrombocytosis, depending on the Janus Kinase 2 V617F mutational status (positive or negative) or platelet threshold (over or below 600x10(9)/L), no difference in survival was noted. However, these patients had shorter overall survival and leukemia-free survival with a lower risk of thrombotic complications than did patients with essential thrombocythemia (P<0.001) but better survival (P<0.001) and a higher risk of thrombosis (P=0.039) than patients with refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts. Conclusions: The clinical course of refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts and marked thrombocytosis is better than that of refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts and worse than that of essential thrombocythemia. The higher risk of thrombotic events in this disorder suggests that anti-platelet therapy might be considered in this subset of patients. From a clinical point of view, it appears to be important to consider refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts and marked thrombocytosis as a distinct entity
    corecore