72 research outputs found
Le piattaforme del progetto SPES - CriticitĂ dovute alle alte tensioni in un ambiente fortemente ionizzato
Il lavoro presentato in questa tesi riguarda lo studio dei sistemi di alta tensione impiegati nel progetto SPES (Selective Production of Exotic Species) dellâ Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare.
SPES Ăš un progetto multidisciplinare e multiutente che sarĂ realizzato ai Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro (LNL) dell'INFN; produrrĂ fasci di ioni ricchi di neutroni e fasci di protoni e neutroni per le attivitĂ di ricerca di fisica nucleare e per applicazioni in campo medico, astrofisico, dei materiali e lo studio dei futuri reattori nucleari di quarta generazione. Questi reattori produrranno scorie con vita media molto piĂč breve e sono concepiti per minimizzare i rifiuti ed ottimizzare lâutilizzo del combustibile nucleare; per la loro realizzazione Ăš perĂČ necessario conoscere sezioni dâurto nucleari e caratteristiche dei materiali ancora in fase di studioope
Point-of-Care Diagnostics for Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance in Sub-Saharan Africa - A Narrative Review.
INTRODUCTION
Sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries are severely impacted by antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Due to gaps in access to diagnostics in SSA the true extent of AMR remains unknown. This diagnostic gap affects patient management and leads to significant antimicrobial overuse. This review explores how point-of-care (POC) testing for pathogen identification and AMR may be used to close the diagnostic gap in SSA countries.
METHODS
A narrative review exploring current clinical practice and novel developments in the field of point-of-care (POC) testing for infectious diseases and AMR.
FINDINGS
POC assays for identification of various pathogens have been successfully rolled out in SSA countries. While implementation studies have mostly highlighted impressive test performance of POC assays, there is limited data on effect of implementation on clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness. We did not encounter local studies of host-directed POC assays relevant to AMR. Novel POC assays using real-time PCR, isothermal amplification, microfluidics and other technologies are in various stages of development.
DISCUSSION
Available literature shows that POC testing for AMR applications is implementable in SSA and holds the potential to reduce the diagnostic gap. Implementation will require effective regulatory pathways, incorporation of POC testing in clinical and laboratory guidelines, and adequate value capture in existing health financing models
What does antimicrobial stewardship look like where you are? Global narratives from participants in a massive open online course
BACKGROUND
Whilst antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) is being implemented globally, contextual differences exist. We describe how the use of a massive open online course (MOOC) platform provided an opportunity to gather diverse narratives on AMS from around the world.
METHODS
A free 3âweek MOOC titled 'Tackling antimicrobial resistance: a social science approach' was launched in November 2019. Learners were asked specific questions about their experiences of AMS via 38 optional free-text prompts dispersed throughout the modules. Content analysis was used to identify key emerging themes from the learners' responses in the first three runs of the MOOC.
RESULTS
Between November 2019 and July 2020, 1464 learners enrolled from 114 countries. Overall, 199 individual learners provided a total of 1097 responses to the prompts. The diverse perspectives describe unique challenges present in different contexts including ill-defined roles for pharmacists and nurses in AMS; inadequate governance and policy inconsistencies in surveillance for antibiotic consumption and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in some countries; lack of ownership of antibiotic decision-making and buy-in from different clinical specialties; and human resource and technological constraints. Patients' knowledge, experiences and perspectives were recognized as a valuable source of information that should be incorporated in AMS initiatives to overcome cultural barriers to the judicious use of antibiotics.
CONCLUSIONS
Analysis of learner comments and reflections identified a range of enablers and barriers to AMS implementation across different healthcare economies. Common challenges to AMS implementation included the role of non-physician healthcare workers, resource limitations, gaps in knowledge of AMR, and patient engagement and involvement in AMS
Recommended from our members
Interventional research to tackle antimicrobial resistance in Low Middle Income Countries in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic: lessons in resilience from an international consortium
This article summarizes the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic, on an international project to tackle antimicrobial resistance (AMR). The research leadership and process, the access to data, and stakeholders were deeply disrupted by the national and international response to the pandemic, including the interruption of healthcare delivery, lockdowns, and quarantines. The key principles to deliver the research through the pandemic were mainly the high degree of interdisciplinary engagement with integrated teams, and equitable partnership across sites with capacity building and leadership training. The level of preexisting collaboration and partnership were also keys to sustaining connections and involvements throughout the pandemic. The pandemic offered opportunities for realigning research priorities. Flexibility in funding timelines and projects inputs are required to accommodate variance introduced by external factors. The current models for research collaboration and funding need to be critically evaluated and redesigned to retain the innovation that was shown to be successful through this pandemic
The elephant in the room: Exploring the influence and participation of patients in infection-related care across surgical pathways in South Africa and India
Data availability statement: Data on which this publication is based are available via a secure server. Access to the data can be provided upon reasonable request. The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Objective:
The irrational use of antibiotics is a leading contributor to antibiotic resistance. Antibiotic stewardship (AS) interventions predominantly focus on prescribers. This study investigated the influence and participation of inpatients in infection-related care, including antibiotic decision-making, within and across two tertiary hospitals in South Africa (Cape Town) and India (Kerala).
Methods:
Through ethnographic enquiry of clinical practice in surgical pathways, including direct nonparticipant observation of clinical practices, healthcare worker (HCW), patient and carer interactions in surgical ward rounds and face-to-face interviews with participants (HCWs and patients), we sought to capture the implicit and explicit influence that patients and carers have in infection-related care. Field notes and interview transcripts were thematically coded, aided by NVivo 12Âź Pro software.
Results:
Whilst observational data revealed the nuanced roles that patients/carers play in antibiotic decision-making, HCWs did not recognize these roles. Patients and carers, though invested in patient care, are not routinely involved, nor are they aware of the opportunities for engagement in infection-related decision-making. Patients associated clinical improvement with antibiotic use and did not consider hospitalization to be associated with infection acquisition or transmission, highlighting a lack of understanding of the threat of infection and antibiotic resistance. Patients' economic and cultural positionalities may influence their infection-related behaviours. In the study site in India, cultural norms mean that carers play widespread but unrecognized roles in inpatient care, participating in infection prevention activities.
Conclusion:
For patients to have a valuable role in AS and make informed decisions regarding their infection-related care, a mutual understanding of their role in this process among HCWs and patients is crucial. The observed differences between the two study sites indicate the critical need for understanding and addressing the contextual drivers that impact effective patient-centred healthcare delivery.
Patient or Public Contribution:
Ethnographic observations and interviews conducted in this study involved patients as participants. Patients were recruited for interviews after obtaining signed informed consent forms. Patients' identities were completely anonymized when presenting the study findings.Economic and Social Research Council. Grant Number: ES/P008313/1
Survey of healthcare worker perceptions of changes in infection control and antimicrobial stewardship practices in India and South Africa during the COVID-19 pandemic
OBJECTIVE: To identify perceptions and awareness of changes in infection prevention and control (IPC) and antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) practices among healthcare workers (HCWs) during the COVID-19 pandemic in India and South Africa (SA).
METHOD: A self-administered online survey which included participant demographics, knowledge and sources of COVID-19 infection, perceived risks and barriers, and self-efficacy. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics.
RESULTS: The study received 321 responses (response rate: 89.2%); 131/321 (40.8%) from India and 190/321 (59.2%) from SA; male to female response rate was 3:2, with majority of respondents aged 40-49 (89/321, 27.7%) and 30-39 (87/321, 27.1%) years. Doctors comprised 47.9% (57/119) of respondents in India and 74.6% (135/181) in SA. Majority of respondents in India (93/119, 78.2%) and SA (132/181, 72.9%) were from the private and public sectors, respectively, with more respondents in SA (123/174, 70.7%) than in India (38/104, 36.5%) involved in antimicrobial prescribing.Respondents reported increased IPC practices since the pandemic and noted a need for more training on case management, antibiotic and personal protective equipment (PPE) use. While they noted increased antibiotic prescribing since the pandemic, they did not generally associate their practice with such an increase. A willingness to be vaccinated, when vaccination becomes available, was expressed by 203/258 (78.7%) respondents.
CONCLUSIONS: HCWs reported improved IPC practices and changes in antibiotic prescribing during the COVID-19 pandemic. Targeted education on correct use of PPE was an identified gap. Although HCWs expressed concerns about antimicrobial resistance, their self-perceived antibiotic prescribing practices seemed unchanged. Additional studies in other settings could explore how our findings fit other contexts
Recommended from our members
What does antimicrobial stewardship look like where you are? Global narratives from participants in a massive open online course
Copyright © The Author(s) 2021. Background:
Whilst antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) is being implemented globally, contextual differences exist. We describe how the use of a massive open online course (MOOC) platform provided an opportunity to gather diverse narratives on AMS from around the world.
Methods:
A free 3âweek MOOC titled âTackling antimicrobial resistance: a social science approachâ was launched in November 2019. Learners were asked specific questions about their experiences of AMS via 38 optional free-text prompts dispersed throughout the modules. Content analysis was used to identify key emerging themes from the learnersâ responses in the first three runs of the MOOC.
Results:
Between November 2019 and July 2020, 1464 learners enrolled from 114 countries. Overall, 199 individual learners provided a total of 1097 responses to the prompts. The diverse perspectives describe unique challenges present in different contexts including ill-defined roles for pharmacists and nurses in AMS; inadequate governance and policy inconsistencies in surveillance for antibiotic consumption and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in some countries; lack of ownership of antibiotic decision-making and buy-in from different clinical specialties; and human resource and technological constraints. Patientsâ knowledge, experiences and perspectives were recognized as a valuable source of information that should be incorporated in AMS initiatives to overcome cultural barriers to the judicious use of antibiotics.
Conclusions:
Analysis of learner comments and reflections identified a range of enablers and barriers to AMS implementation across different healthcare economies. Common challenges to AMS implementation included the role of non-physician healthcare workers, resource limitations, gaps in knowledge of AMR, and patient engagement and involvement in AMS.NIHR Imperial Patient Safety Translational Research Centre (PSTRC-2016-004); Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) (Grant number: ES/P008313/1); associated projects, which include The National Institute for Health Research Antibiotic use across Surgical Pathways: Investigating, Redesigning and Evaluating Systems (ASPIRES) project (https://www.imperial.ac.uk/arc/aspires/) and Improve uptake and SusTainability of Effective interventions to promote Prudent antibiotic Use in Primary care (STEP-UP) project (https://www.expmedndm.ox.ac.uk/step-up/)
What does antimicrobial stewardship look like where you are? Global narratives from participants in a Massive Open Online Course
Introduction
Whilst Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS) is being implemented in different countries, different contexts continue to present unique challenges. We investigated the challenges to implementing AMS in different countries by examining comments from clinical, academic, and lay learners participating in a Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) on tackling antimicrobial resistance (AMR).
Methods
A 3-week MOOC titled âTackling AMR: A social science approachâ was developed with a global faculty in collaboration with the British Society of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy and Imperial College London and launched in November 2019. Learners were asked specific questions about their experiences of AMS throughout the MOOC which included 38 optional free text prompts. Learners' free text responses from first three-course runs (November 2019 â July 2020) were collated and coded in NVivo 12 using a conventional content analysis approach to identify challenges to implementing AMS across countries.
Results
Representing 114 countries, 1464 learners enrolled, with largest representation from the United Kingdom, India, Nigeria, Australia, and Pakistan. The learners described a range of AMS activities and team compositions. While recognising the importance of pharmacist and nurse roles in AMS, the learners reported that such roles remain ill-defined across countries, restricting the reach and potential of AMS strategies. A range of challenges to implementing AMS were described, including: limited awareness and engagement by the general public and healthcare workers (HCW) on the impact of AMR on human health, lack of adequate of governance and policy; inconsistencies in surveillance for antibiotic consumption and AMR, impeding feedback loops and improvement processes; human resource and technological constraints; variable access to key antibiotics; lack of ownership of antibiotic decision-making and buy-in from different clinical specialties. Patientsâ knowledge, experiences and perspectives were recognised as a valuable source of information that needed to be incorporated in AMS initiatives to overcome cultural barriers to the judicious use of antibiotics.
Conclusion
Analysis of learner comments and reflections identified a range of enablers and barriers to AMS implementation across different healthcare economies. Common challenges to AMS implementation included the role of non-physician health care professionals, resources, knowledge of AMR and patient engagement and involvement in AMS
- âŠ