Re-storying autism: a body becoming disability studies in education approach

This paper presents and analyzes six short first-person films produced through a collaborative multimedia storytelling workshop series focused on experiences of autism, education and inclusion. The aim of the project is to co-create new understandings of autism beyond functionalist and biomedical ones that reify autism as a problem of disordered brains and underpin special education. We fashion a body becoming disability studies in education approach to proliferate stories of autism outside received cultural scripts – autism as biomedical disorder, brain-based difference, otherworldliness, lost or stolen child and more. Our approach keeps the meaning of autism moving, always emerging, resisting, fading away and becoming again in relation to context, time, space, material oppressions, cultural scripts, intersecting differences, surprising bodies and interpretative engagement. We argue that the films we present and analyse not only significantly change and critique traditional special education approaches based on assumptions of the normative human as non-autistic, they also enact ‘autism’ as a becoming process and relation with implications for inclusive educators. By this we mean that the stories shift what autism might be and become, and open space for a proliferation of representations and practices of difference in and beyond educational contexts that support flourishing for all

Crop Updates 2007 - Cereals

This session covers twenty six papers from different authors: CEREAL BREEDING 1. Strategies for aligning producer and market imperatives in cereal breeding in Western Australia, R. Loughman, R. Lance, I. Barclay, G. Crosbie, S. Harasymow, W. Lambe, C. Li, R. McLean, C. Moore, K. Stefanova, A. Tarr and R. Wilson, Department of Agriculture and Food 2. LongReach plant breeders wheat variety trials – 2006, Matu Peipi and Matt Whiting, LongReach Plant Breeders WHEAT AGRONOMY 3. Response of wheat varieties to sowing time in the northern agricultural region in 2006, Christine Zaicou, Department of Agriculture and Food 4. Response of wheat varieties to sowing time in the central agricultural region in 2006, Shahajahan Miyan, Department of Agriculture and Food 5. Response of wheat varieties to sowing time in the Great Southern and Lakes region, Brenda Shackleyand Ian Hartley, Department of Agriculture and Food 6. Response of wheat varieties to time of sowing time in Esperance region in 2006, Christine Zaicou, Ben Curtis and Ian Hartley, Department of Agriculture and Food 7. Performance of wheat varieties in National Variety Testing (NVT) WA: Year 2, Peter Burgess, Agritech Crop Research 8. Flowering dates of wheat varieties in Western Australia in 2006, Darshan Sharma, Brenda Shackley and Christine Zaicou, Department of Agriculture and Food 9. Prospects for perennial wheat: A feasibility study, Len J. Wade, Lindsay W. Bell, Felicity Byrne (nee Flugge) and Mike A. Ewing, School of Plant Biology and CRC for Plant-based Management of Dryland Salinity, The University of Western Australia BARLEY AGRONOMY 10. Barley agronomy highlights: Time of sowing x variety, Blakely Paynter and Andrea Hills, Department of Agriculture and Food 11. Barley agronomy highlights: Weeds and row spacing, Blakely Paynter and Andrea Hills, Department of Agriculture and Food 12. Barley agronomy highlights: Weeds and barley variety, Blakely Paynter and Andrea Hills, Department of Agriculture and Food OAT AGRONOMY 13. Agronomic performance of dwarf potential milling oat varieties in varied environments of WA, Raj Malik, Blakely Paynter and Kellie Winfield, Department of Agriculture and Food 14. Sourcing oat production information in 2007, Kellie Winfield, Department of Agriculture and Food HERBICIDE TOLERANCE 15. Response of new wheat varieties to herbicides, Harmohinder Dhammu, Department of Agriculture and Food 16. Herbicide tolerance of new barley varieties, Harmohinder Dhammu, Vince Lambert and Chris Roberts, Department of Agriculture and Food 17. Herbicide tolerance of new oat varieties, Harmohinder Dhammu, Vince Lambert and Chris Roberts, Department of Agriculture and Food NUTRITION 18. Nitrogen Decision Tools – choose your weapon, Jeremy Lemon, Department of Agriculture and Food DISEASES 19. Barley agronomy highlights: Canopy management, Andrea Hills and Blakely Paynter, Department of Agriculture and Food 20. Barley agronomy highlights: Leaf diseases and spots, Andrea Hills and Blakely Paynter, Department of Agriculture and Food 21. Fungicide applications for stripe rust management in adult plant resistant (APR) wheat varieties, Geoff Thomas, Rob Loughman, Ian Hartley and Andrew Taylor; Department of Agriculture and Food 22. Effect of seed treatment with Jockey on time of onset and disease severity of stripe rust in wheat, Manisha Shankar, John Majewski and Rob Loughman, Department of Agriculture and Food 23. Rotations for management of Cereal Cyst Nematode, Vivien Vanstone, Department of Agriculture and Food 24. Occurrence of Wheat Streak Mosaic Virus in Western Australian grainbelt during the 2006 growing season, Brenda Coutts, Monica Kehoe and Roger Jones, Department of Agriculture and Food 25. Development of a seed test for Wheat Streak Mosaic Virus in bulk samples of wheat, Geoffrey Dwyer, Belinda Welsh, Cuiping Wang and Roger Jones, Department of Agriculture and Food MARKETS 26. Developing the Australian barley value chain, Linda Price, Barley Australi

31st Annual Meeting and Associated Programs of the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC 2016) : part two

Background The immunological escape of tumors represents one of the main ob- stacles to the treatment of malignancies. The blockade of PD-1 or CTLA-4 receptors represented a milestone in the history of immunotherapy. However, immune checkpoint inhibitors seem to be effective in specific cohorts of patients. It has been proposed that their efficacy relies on the presence of an immunological response. Thus, we hypothesized that disruption of the PD-L1/PD-1 axis would synergize with our oncolytic vaccine platform PeptiCRAd. Methods We used murine B16OVA in vivo tumor models and flow cytometry analysis to investigate the immunological background. Results First, we found that high-burden B16OVA tumors were refractory to combination immunotherapy. However, with a more aggressive schedule, tumors with a lower burden were more susceptible to the combination of PeptiCRAd and PD-L1 blockade. The therapy signifi- cantly increased the median survival of mice (Fig. 7). Interestingly, the reduced growth of contralaterally injected B16F10 cells sug- gested the presence of a long lasting immunological memory also against non-targeted antigens. Concerning the functional state of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), we found that all the immune therapies would enhance the percentage of activated (PD-1pos TIM- 3neg) T lymphocytes and reduce the amount of exhausted (PD-1pos TIM-3pos) cells compared to placebo. As expected, we found that PeptiCRAd monotherapy could increase the number of antigen spe- cific CD8+ T cells compared to other treatments. However, only the combination with PD-L1 blockade could significantly increase the ra- tio between activated and exhausted pentamer positive cells (p= 0.0058), suggesting that by disrupting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis we could decrease the amount of dysfunctional antigen specific T cells. We ob- served that the anatomical location deeply influenced the state of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes. In fact, TIM-3 expression was in- creased by 2 fold on TILs compared to splenic and lymphoid T cells. In the CD8+ compartment, the expression of PD-1 on the surface seemed to be restricted to the tumor micro-environment, while CD4 + T cells had a high expression of PD-1 also in lymphoid organs. Interestingly, we found that the levels of PD-1 were significantly higher on CD8+ T cells than on CD4+ T cells into the tumor micro- environment (p < 0.0001). Conclusions In conclusion, we demonstrated that the efficacy of immune check- point inhibitors might be strongly enhanced by their combination with cancer vaccines. PeptiCRAd was able to increase the number of antigen-specific T cells and PD-L1 blockade prevented their exhaus- tion, resulting in long-lasting immunological memory and increased median survival

Baseline Competency Assessment of Pharmacists Prescribing and Managing Vancomycin Therapy in the Regina Qu’Appelle Health Region

ABSTRACTBackground: Pharmacists in the Regina Qu’Appelle Health Region (RQHR), Saskatchewan, independently dose, monitor, and adjust vancomycin therapy. No framework exists for ongoing competency assessment of pharmacists.Objectives: The primary objective was to determine pharmacists’ overall level of competency for all components of the vancomycin prescribing procedure. The secondary objectives were to determine competency for individual prescribing phases, to stratify overall competency in relation to pharmacist and patient factors, and to identify the 3 most frequent errors.Methods: A retrospective chart audit was performed of patients who received a prescription for vancomycin between November 1, 2015, and January 31, 2016. Patients were included if they received pharmacistprescribed vancomycin as an inpatient or outpatient of an RQHR facility. Patients under the care of a pediatrician, those receiving vancomycin for surgical prophylaxis or via any route other than the IV route, and those whose vancomycin was prescribed by a current pharmacy resident were excluded. A rubric was created that assigned a numeric value for the appropriate completion of various procedure criteria.Results: A total of 326 patients received vancomycin during the study period, of whom 200 met the inclusion criteria, representing 511 discrete episodes of prescribing by 42 pharmacists. The median overall competency rate, for all phases of prescribing, was 100% (interquartile range [IQR] 90.1%–100%). The median competency rates for the empiric therapy and monitoring phases were 94.4% (IQR 88.9%–100%) and 100% (IQR 87.5%–100%), respectively. No statistically significant differences were found in relation to pharmacists’ experience or postbaccalaureate education, patients’ level of acuity, or timing of prescribing. The competency score was significantly higher among pharmacists prescribing for patients with normal renal function than among those prescribing for patients with reduced renal function (p = 0.008). The 3 most common errors were failure to document risk factors for nephrotoxicity, failure to document requirement to obtain future trough levels, and failure to document that samples for trough levels had been drawn correctly.Conclusions: During the study period, pharmacists at RQHR showed competency in all phases of vancomycin prescribing using the approved procedure. Documentation of clinical plans and assessments was identified as an area for improvement.RÉSUMÉContexte : Des pharmaciens de la régie régionale de la santé de Regina Qu’Appelle (RRSRQ) en Saskatchewan s’occupent eux-mêmes de doser la vancomycine ainsi que d’en surveiller et d’en ajuster la posologie. Or, à ce jour, aucun cadre n’entoure l’évaluation continue de la compétence de ces pharmaciens.Objectifs : L’objectif principal était de déterminer le niveau global de compétence des pharmaciens pour tous les éléments de la marche à suivre pour prescrire la vancomycine. Les objectifs secondaires consistaient à déterminer le niveau de compétence pour chaque étape de la prescription, à stratifier le niveau global de compétence en fonction de facteurs se rapportant au pharmacien et au patient et à identifier les trois erreurs les plus courantes.Méthodes : On a réalisé une vérification rétrospective des dossiers médicaux de patients qui se sont fait prescrire la vancomycine entre le 1er novembre 2015 et le 31 janvier 2016. Les patients admis à l’étude devaient avoir reçu la vancomycine sur la prescription d’un pharmacien alors qu’ils étaient hospitalisés ou en consultation externe dans un établissement de la RRSRQ. Les patients soignés par un pédiatre, ceux ayant reçu un traitement prophylactique de vancomycine pour une intervention chirurgicale, ceux ayant reçu le médicament autrement que par voie intraveineuse et ceux dont la vancomycine a été prescrite par un résident en pharmacie à l’époque ont été exclus. Une grille d’évaluation a été créée afin d’accorder une valeur numérique selon le degré de conformité de l’exécution aux différents critères de la marche à suivre.Résultats : Au total, 326 patients ont reçu la vancomycine pendant la période d’étude. Parmi eux, 200 répondaient aux critères d’inclusion, ce qui représentait 511 actes distincts de prescription réalisés par 42 pharmaciens. Le taux de compétence global médian pour toutes les phases de la prescription était de 100 % (écart interquartile [ÉIQ] de 90,1 % à 100 %). Les taux de compétence médians pour les phases de l’antibiothérapie empirique et du suivi étaient respectivement de 94,4 % (ÉIQ de 88,9 % à 100 %) et de 100 % (ÉIQ de 87,5 % à 100 %). Aucune différence statistiquement significative quant à la compétence n’a été relevée par rapport à l’expérience du pharmacien, aux études universitaires de cycles supérieurs, à la gravité de l’état du patient ou au moment de la réalisation de la prescription. Le score de compétence était significativement plus élevé chez les pharmaciens prescrivant à des patients dont la fonction rénale est normale que pour ceux prescrivant à des patients atteints d’insuffisance rénale (p = 0,008). Les trois erreurs les plus courantes étaient : négliger de consigner les facteurs de risque néphrotoxique, négliger de consigner que l’obtention de futures concentrations minimales était nécessaire et négliger de consigner que les échantillons pour les concentrations minimales avaient été prélevés correctement.Conclusions : Pendant la période d’étude, les pharmaciens travaillant à la RRSRQ ont fait preuve de compétence dans l’ensemble des phases de prescription de la vancomycine en utilisant la marche à suivre approuvée. On a noté qu’il fallait améliorer la consignation des plans cliniques et des évaluations

Perennial wheat: a review of environmental and agronomic prospects for development in Australia

Perennial wheat could improve grain production systems in Australia by rectifying many environmental problems such as hydrological imbalance, nutrient losses, soil erosion, and declining soil carbon and soil health. There are also potential direct production benefits from reduced external inputs, providing extra grazing for livestock in mixed farming systems, as well as benefits for whole-farm management which may offset lower grain yields. In addition to universal issues of domestication and breeding of perennial wheat, specific challenges for perennial wheat in Australia's dryland systems will include tolerance of water deficit and poor soil environments, and the risks of hosting foliar pathogens over summer. Temperate perennial forage grasses could indicate the potential distribution and traits required in perennial wheat adapted to more arid environments (e.g. summer dormancy). Several Australian native and exotic perennial relatives of wheat could also provide sources of disease resistance, and tolerance of soil acidity, drought, salinity and waterlogging. Still, several farming systems could accommodate perennial wheat with inconsistent persistence in some environments. While developing perennial wheat will be challenging, there is significant opportunity in Australia for perennial wheat to diversify current cropping options. The risks may be minimised by staged investment and interim products with some immediate applications could be produced along the way

A preliminary whole-farm economic analysis of perennial wheat in an Australian dryland farming system

The development of perennial wheat could have a number of advantages for improving the sustainability of Australian dryland agricultural systems. The profitability that might be expected from perennial wheat of different types was investigated using MIDAS (Model of an Integrated Dryland Agricultural System), a bioeconomic model of a mixed crop/livestock farming system. Although perennial wheat may produce a lower grain yield and quality than annual wheat, it is expected inputs of fertiliser, herbicide and sowing costs will be lower. Perennial wheat used solely for grain production was not selected as part of an optimal farm plan under the standard assumptions. In contrast, dual-purpose perennial wheat that produces grain and additional forage during summer and autumn than annual wheat can increase farm profitability substantially (AU$20/ha over the whole farm) and 20% of farm area was selected on the optimal farm plan under standard assumptions. Forage from perennial wheat replaced stubble over summer and grain supplement at the break of season and increased farm stock numbers. The additional value added by grazing also reduced the relative yield required for perennial wheat to be profitable. This analysis suggests perennial wheat used for the dual purposes of grain and forage production could be developed as a profitable option for mixed crop/livestock producers