Patient Involvement and Communication Council

Patient-Centered Care (nothing about me without me) is the best approach to improve outcomes and provide value to each patient. The Council is involved in the following: Act as champions of patient experience andbring ideas, thoughts, and opinions on various topics and processes. Review patient and family communications to ensure engagement in health care services. Provide feedback regarding communication gaps between patients and providers. Revise and improve materials to be understood by patients and their caregivers.https://scholarlycommons.henryford.com/perc2023/1004/thumbnail.jp

Еволюція підходів до виділення факторів зміцнення конкурентних позицій підприємств

В статье исследовано развитие теоретической базы дисциплин, которые рассматривают конкурентное позиционирование предприятий. На основе обобщения дисциплинарных подходов к определению факторов укрепления конкурентных позиций предприятий выделено и охарактеризовано этапы развития последних. Сформулированы выводы относительно пригодности использования различных подходов для формирования адекватного современным условиям функционирования предприятий механизма достижения, поддержки и укрепления их конкурентных позиций.У статті досліджено розвиток теоретичної бази дисциплін, що розглядають конкурентне позиціонування підприємств. На основі узагальнення дисциплінарних підходів до визначення факторів зміцнення конкурентних позицій підприємств виділено та охарактеризовано етапи розвитку останніх. Сформульовано висновки відносно придатності використання різних підходів для формування адекватного сучасним умовам функціонування підприємств механізму досягнення, підтримки і зміцнення їх конкурентних позицій.Development of theoretical base of disciplines which examine the competition positioning is explored in the article. On the basis of generalization of disciplinary approaches to determination of factors of competition positions of enterprises it is selected and described the stages of development of it. Conclusions are formulated in relation to the fitness of the use of different approaches for forming of functioning of enterprises of mechanism of achievement, support and strengthening of their competition positions adequate to the modern terms

Project #65: Senior Care Navigator Program: Using Care Navigation to Improve Patient-Reported Outcomes Amongst Older Adult Patients

Problem Statement: Older adults struggle to navigate health and social care systems, resulting in poorer patient health and satisfaction. Improvement (Goal) Statement: Design and implement a patient navigation program to help older adult patients and their caregivers navigate the health and social care systems resulting in improved patient health and satisfaction.https://scholarlycommons.henryford.com/qualityexpo2024/1061/thumbnail.jp

Using Care Navigation to Improve Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Older Adult Patients: Preliminary Results From a Pilot Study

Navigating health and social care in the United States can be difficult for people of all ages, but older adults often have multiple health problems, chronic illnesses, and disabilities that can increase the complexities of their care. To assist older adult patients and/or their caregivers with coordinating care, and providing information, advocacy, and resources, Henry Ford Health (HFH) implemented a Senior Care Navigation Program (SCNP). Older HFH patients or their caregivers were referred to the SCNP either by a provider or another member of their care team. A senior navigator (SN) then reached out to the patient/caregiver by telephone to discuss the SCNP and their support/care needs. The SN scheduled follow-up calls as needed. Patients/caregivers enrolled in Phase 1 of this pilot program were given the option to join the evaluation group. These patients were interviewed by an independent research interviewer at baseline, 3-, 6-, and 9-month post initial contact to complete 5 patient-reported outcomes measures. Our Phase 1 pilot has demonstrated significant improvements in the EQ5D (health-related quality of life) and two patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) measures (depression and anxiety) suggesting that the SCNP program at HFH is having a positive impact on older adult patients’ health and well-being. In Phase 2, we will further evaluate the impact of the SCNP on healthcare utilization

Editor's Choice – Vascular Registries Contributing to VASCUNET Collaborative Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Outcome Projects: A Scoping Review

Objective: Vascular surgery registries report on procedures and outcomes to promote patient safety and drive quality improvement. International registries have contributed significantly to the VASCUNET collaborative abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) outcome projects. This scoping review aimed to outline the national registries in vascular surgery that currently participate in the VASCUNET collaborative AAA projects. Methods: A scoping review of all published VASCUNET AAA studies and validation reports between 1997 and 2024 was undertaken. A survey was conducted among representatives of the international vascular registries contributing to VASCUNET collaborative AAA projects. Results: Currently, vascular registries from 10 countries (Australia, Denmark, Finland, Hungary, Iceland, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, and the UK) contribute to the current VASCUNET collaborative AAA project, of which eight have national coverage. In the past, three countries (Germany, Malta, and Italy) have participated in previous VASCUNET AAA projects, and a further three countries (Serbia, Greece, and Portugal) have planned participation in future projects. External validity is high for all current registries, with most reporting rates of > 90%. The majority have internal validation processes to assess data accuracy. VASCUNET mediated validation has also been performed by the consortium for five countries to date (Hungary, Sweden, Denmark, Malta, and Switzerland), for which a high degree of external and internal validity was identified. Most registries have established mechanisms for data linkage with national administrative datasets or insurance claims datasets and contribute to quality improvement through regular reporting to participating centres. Conclusion: National vascular registries from nations participating in the VASCUNET collaborative AAA projects are largely comprehensive, with high case ascertainment rates and good quality data with internal quality assurance. This provides a template for new registries wishing to join the VASCUNET collaboration and a benchmark for future research. © 2024 The Author

Income management and Indigenous peoples: nudged into a Stronger Future

Australian policy has been motivated by paternalism towards Indigenous peoples for the better part of Australia's colonial history. Contemporary forms of income management that disproportionately affect Indigenous peoples extend a paternalistic approach. The paternalism embedded within the income management discourse draws heavily upon the framework of ‘new paternalism’, which increases government supervision of those who receive welfare payments. However, in recent years, another form of paternalism has also been growing in popularity with Western governments – ‘nudge paternalism’ – which may have future implications for policy-making in the welfare context in Australia. This article comprises three parts. The first part explores specific problems that can arise with paternalistic policy-making directed towards Indigenous peoples, including nudge paternalism. The second part considers how income management departs from the principles of nudge paternalism, and the impact that income management has on Indigenous peoples. The final part explores some alternative suggestions for policy initiatives to address disadvantage experienced by Indigenous welfare recipients, particularly those living in the Northern Territory.Full Tex

Editor's Choice - Recommendations for Registry Data Collection for Revascularisations of Acute Limb Ischaemia : A Delphi Consensus from the International Consortium of Vascular Registries

Objective: To develop a minimum core data set for evaluation of acute limb ischaemia (ALI) revascularisation treatment and outcomes that would enable collaboration among international registries. Methods: A modified Delphi approach was used to achieve consensus among international multidisciplinary vascular specialists and registry members of the International Consortium of Vascular Registries (ICVR). Variables identified in the literature or suggested by the expert panel, and variables, including definitions, currently used in 15 countries in the ICVR, were assessed to define both a minimum core and an optimum data set to register ALI treatment. Clinical relevance and practicability were both assessed, and consensus was defined as &gt;= 80% agreement among participants. Results: Of 40 invited experts, 37 completed a preliminary survey and 31 completed the two subsequent Delphi rounds via internet exchange and face to face discussions. In total, 117 different items were generated from the various registry data forms, an extensive review of the literature, and additional suggestions from the experts, for potential inclusion in the data set. Ultimately, 35 items were recommended for inclusion in the minimum core data set, including 23 core items important for all registries, and an additional 12 more specific items for registries capable of capturing more detail. These 35 items supplement previous data elements recommended for registering chronic peripheral arterial occlusive disease treatment. Conclusion: A modified Delphi study allowed 37 international vascular registry experts to achieve a consensus recommendation for a minimum core and an optimum data set for registries covering patients who undergo ALI revascularisation. Continued global harmonisation of registry infrastructure and definition of items allows international comparisons and global quality improvement. Furthermore, it can help to define and monitor standards of care and enable international research collaboration.</p