Bilateral vibrant soundbridge implantation: audiologic and subjective benefits in quiet and noisy environments.

Abstract Conclusions. The results support bilateral sequential implantation for patients who are not completely satisfied after implantation of one side. Objective. To evaluate the benefit of bilateral Vibrant Soundbridge middle ear implantation as compared with unilateral implantation in quiet and noisy environments. Methods. This was a multicentric and retrospective study of 15 patients with symmetrical sensorineural hearing loss who were implanted sequentially in both ears. The performance of each subject was compared under three conditions: with the right implant activated, with the left implant activated, and with both implants activated. Audiometric tests were compared with self-assessment subjective evaluation by questionnaire. Results. Both qualitative and quantitative assessments demonstrated improvement in speech intelligibility, especially in background noise, but also for low voice intensity in quiet

Surgery of cerebellopontine angle epidermoid cysts: role of the widened retrolabyrinthine approach combined with endoscopy.

To evaluate the use of the retrolabyrinthine approach (RLA) combined with endoscopy with particular reference to preservation of cranial nerve function and completeness of excision in surgery of epidermoid cysts. A retrospective study was performed on a series of 8 consecutive patients of whom 7 have undergone surgery. Main outcome measures Measures include audiological and neurological status preoperatively and postoperatively, size of the lesion, the surgical approach, completeness of excision, and operative morbidity. The tumors were all large, ranging from 2 x 3 cm to 6 x 6 cm. Presenting symptoms were headache (75%), dysequilibrium (62%), trigeminal nerve palsy (38%), abducens nerve palsy (25%), and, rarely, auditory symptoms. Seven patients underwent surgery, 5 by the RLA, 1 by a translabyrinthine approach (TLA), and 1 by a transcochlear approach. Complete excision was achieved in 5 of the 7 patients. A transtentorial approach was combined in 2 cases (1 RLA, 1 TLA). Endoscopy was used in 3 cases. It allowed a complete tumor excision. One case of keratinous meningitis was observed. Trigeminal nerve function returned to normal in all patients. Postoperative facial nerve function was grade I in 5 cases and grade III in 2 cases. Hearing was preserved in 3 cases as class A, 1 case as class B. In the 2 cases presenting with abducens nerve palsy preoperative symptoms were initially aggravated before returning to normal function by 1 year postoperatively. The RLA with endoscopy allowed less invasive surgery and preservation of hearing in 4 of the 5 cases where it was attempted. Tumor control appeared better than with the suboccipital approach. Mortality and postoperative morbidity also appear reduced. RLA combined with endoscopy should be considered as the standard approach for excision of epidermoid cysts. Extension of this approach into a TLA or transcochlear approach will depend on preoperative difficulties and preoperative hearing

Multicenter evaluation of Neurelec Digisonic implant reliability

Over the past decade, the adoption of universal hearing screening in newborns has led to earlier detection of hearing problems and significant lowering of the age of first cochlear implantation. As a consequence, recipients are now expected to keep their cochlear implants (CIs) for a longer period of time. Comprehensive longitudinal information on CI reliability is essential for device choice. The aim of this study was to assess the reliability (in children and adults) of the latest generation of the Digisonic® SP CI launched in 2006 by Neurelec. Failure rate (FR) and cumulative survival rate (CSR) for a 5-year period were calculated. This survey is a multicenter retrospective study. A questionnaire was sent to nine CI centers requesting information about patients implanted with Neurelec Digisonic® SP CIs. FR and CSR over a 5-year period were calculated on this group. Collaborating centers collected data on 672 patients (362 children and 310 adults) implanted between March 2006 and March 2011. The overall rate of explantation was 2.23 % (15 cases): six devices were explanted due to device failure (0.89 %) and nine were explanted for medical reasons (1.34 %). Four patients were lost to follow-up. The CSR at 5 years was 98.51 % on all patients, 98.48 % for children and 98.57 % for adults. FR was 0.97 % for adults and 0.83 % for children. This first independent study that assesses FR and CSR on the current generation of Digisonic® SP CI represents an important resource that can help clinicians and patients during their device choice

Five-Year Hearing Outcomes in Bilateral Simultaneously Cochlear-Implanted Adult Patients

International audienceOBJECTIVE: To report the speech performance and sound localization in adult patients 5 years after bilateral simultaneous cochlear implantation and to evaluate the change in speech scores between 1 and 5 years. DESIGN: In this prospective multicenter study, 26 patients were evaluated 5 years after implantation using long straight electrode arrays (MED-EL Combi 40+, standard electrode array, 31 mm). Speech perception was measured using disyllabic words in quiet and noise, with the speech coming from the front and a cocktail party background noise coming from 5 loudspeakers. Speech localization measurements were performed in noise under the same test conditions. These results were compared to those obtained at 1 year reported in a previous study. RESULTS: Five years after implantation, an improvement in speech performance scores compared to 1 year after implantation was found for the poorer ear both in quiet and in noise (+12.1 ± 2.6%, p \textless 0.001). The lower the speech score of the poorer ear at 1 year, the greater the improvement at 5 years, both in quiet (r = -0.62) and at a signal-to-noise ratio of +15 dB (r = -0.58). The sound localization on the horizontal plane in noise provided by bilateral implantation was better than the unilateral one and remained stable after the results observed at 1 year. CONCLUSION: In adult patients simultaneously and bilaterally implanted, the poorest speech scores improved between 1 and 5 years after implantation. These findings are an additional element to recommend bilateral implantation in adult patients. The use of both cochlear implants and speech training sessions for patients with poor performance should continue in the period after 1 year following implantation, since the speech scores will improve over time

Speech Performance and Sound Localization in a Complex Noisy Environment in Bilaterally Implanted Adult Patients.

International audienceObjective: To evaluate speech performance, in quiet and noise, and localization ability in adult patients who had undergone bilateral and simultaneous implantation. Study Design: Prospective multi-center study. Methods: Twenty-seven adult patients with profound or total hearing loss were bilaterally implanted in a single-stage procedure, and simultaneously activated (Med-El, Combi 40/40+). Subjects were assessed before implantation and at 3, 6 and 12 months after switch-on. Speech perception tests in monaural and binaural conditions were performed in quiet and in noise using disyllabic words, with speech coming from the front and a cocktail party background noise coming from 5 loudspeakers. Sound localization measurements were also performed in background noise coming from 5 loudspeakers positioned from -90 degrees to +90 degrees azimuth in the horizontal plane, and using a speech stimulus. Results: There was a bilateral advantage at 12 months in quiet (77 +/- 5.0% in bilateral condition, 67 +/- 5.3% for the better ear, p /=60% for the better ear, n = 19) and 'poor performers' (n = 8). Subjects were also categorized as 'asymmetrical' (difference between their 2 unilateral speech scores >/=20%, n = 11) or 'symmetrical' (n = 16). The largest advantage (bilateral compared to the better ear) was obtained in poor performers: +19% compared to +7% in good performers (p < 0.05). In the group of good performers, there was a bilateral advantage only in cases of symmetrical results between the 2 ears (n = 10). In the group of poor performers, the bilateral advantage was shown in both patients with symmetrical (n = 6) and asymmetrical results (n = 2). In bilateral conditions, the sound localization ability in noise was improved compared to monaural conditions in patients with symmetrical and asymmetrical performance between the 2 ears. No preoperative factor (age, duration of deafness, use of hearing aids, etiology, etc.) could predict the asymmetrical performance, nor which ear would be the best. Conclusion: This study demonstrates a bilateral advantage (at 12 months after the implantation) in speech intelligibility and sound localization in a complex noisy environment. In quiet, this bilateral advantage is shown in cases of poor performance of both ears, and in cases of good performance with symmetrical results between the 2 ears. No preoperative factor can predict the best candidates for a simultaneous bilateral implantation

Benefit of the Vibrant Soundbridge device in patients implanted for 5 to 8 years.

International audienceOBJECTIVES: To assess audiological performance, satisfaction rate, and side effects of 100 patients who have been using the middle ear implant Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB) for 5 to 8 yr when compared with data collected from 3 to 18 mo postsurgery. DESIGN: Audiological testing and subjective evaluation using self-assessment scales were performed in 77 out of the 100 patients using the VSB for 5 to 8 years. The results were compared to data collected 3 months (audiological testing) and 18 months (self-assessment scales) after surgery. Twenty-three patients have not been evaluated for different reported reasons. RESULTS: Pure-tone hearing thresholds decreased similarly in both implanted and contralateral ears. The satisfaction ratings and the functional gain provided by the VSB remained stable. Speech comprehension in quiet conditions without the VSB decreased from 56 to 37% in 5 to 8 yr, but an 81% score was achieved with the VSB. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the performance of the VSB does not deteriorate for more than 5 yr, without adverse effect. These results confirm the safety and the effectiveness of the VSB with a long-term follow-up

Predictive factors of cochlear implant outcomes in the elderly

International audienceObjective - To analyze predictive factors of cochlear implant outcomes and postoperative complications in the elderly. Study design - Prospective, longitudinal study performed in 10 tertiary referral centers. Methods - Ninety-four patients aged 65-85 years with a profound, postlingual hearing loss were evaluated before implantation, at time of activation, and 6 and 12 months after cochlear implantation. Speech perception and lipreading were measured using disyllabic word recognition in quiet and noise, and lipreading using disyllabic words and sentences. The influence of preoperative factors on speech perception in quiet and noise at 12 months was tested in a multivariate analysis. Complications, presence of tinnitus and of vestibular symptoms were collected at each evaluation. Results - The effect of age was observed only in difficult noisy conditions at SNR 0 dB. Lipreading ability for words and sentences was negatively correlated with speech perception in quiet and noise. Better speech perception scores were observed in patients with shorter duration of hearing deprivation, persistence of residual hearing for the low frequencies, the use of a hearing aid before implantation, the absence of cardiovascular risk factors, and in those with implantation in the right ear. General and surgical complications were very rare, and the percentage of vestibular symptoms remained stable over time. Conclusion - This study demonstrates that cochlear implantation in the elderly is a well-tolerated procedure and an effective method to improve communication ability. Advanced age has a low effect on cochlear implant outcome. Analyses of predictive factors in this population provide a convincing argument to recommend treatment with cochlear implantation as early as possible in elderly patients with confirmed diagnosis of a severe-to-profound hearing loss and with only limited benefit from hearing aid use in one ear