Validation of the Montreal cognitive assessment against the RBANS in a healthy South African cohort

Background: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) represents an intermediate state between normal cognition and dementia. Early detection and treatment of reversible contributing factors to progressive cognitive decline currently forms the cornerstone of management. As the population at risk of developing dementia is projected to increase significantly in many low- and middle-income countries where health care services continue to operate under clinical and human resource constraints, there is a need for low-cost, quick and reliable screening tools. The Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) was developed as a brief screening tool with high sensitivity and specificity for detecting MCI. The initial validation sample for the MoCA consisted of English and French speaking Canadians. Studies undertaken in a variety of countries show that the reliability and validity of the MoCA in screening for MCI is good; however, it has been recommended that some item modification and adjustment of cut-offs for the diagnosis of MCI in these populations may be needed to account for cultural differences. To date, no studies have evaluated the MoCA in the South African population. We aimed to compare the validity of the MoCA to the RBANS, evaluate the effectiveness of the MoCA as a screening tool for MCI and generate normative data for the MoCA. Methods: A cross-sectional observational study comprising a sample of 370 cognitively healthy males and females aged 18 years and older of mixed race (Coloured ethnicity) who were administered the MoCA and RBANS during screening. Results: The MoCA showed acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha of 0.624). MoCA scores were significantly associated with gender (r = -0.199, p = 0.000), and correlated with age (r = -0.203, p = 0.000) and education (r = 0.326, p = 0.000). There was a strong correlation between total scores on the MoCA and RBANS (r = 513; p = 0.000), indicating good criterion-related validity. The MoCA also showed good agreement with the RBANS according to the Bland–Altman plot. ROC statistics demonstrated that the performance of the MoCA for predicting MCI compared to the RBANS was fair with an AUC of 0.794. Using the recommended cut-off score of 26, the MoCA showed high sensitivity (94.23%) but low specificity (28.16%). When the cut-off score was lowered to 23, the sensitivity was 75% and specificity 66.77%, while a cut-off of 24 demonstrated a sensitivity of 84.62% and a specificity of 52.53%. Conclusion: Although the MoCA appears fairly reliable at identifying MCI in this population, our findings suggest that some modification to certain domains and items is needed to improve the differentiation between normal ageing and MCI. Until such time that a culturally adapted version of the MoCA has been developed and validated for this population, we suggest lowering the cut-off score to 24 in order to reduce false-positive diagnoses of MCI

Factors affecting specialist psychiatry training in South Africa: Bullying during specialist psychiatric training?

CITATION: Beath, N. et al. 2021. Factors affecting specialist psychiatry training in South Africa : bullying during specialist psychiatric training? South African Medical Journal, 111(4):280, doi:10.7196/SAMJ.2021.v111i4.15518.The original publication is available at http://www.samj.org.zaAs many of us served as members of the Council of Psychiatrists, Colleges of Medicine of South Africa, for the triennium 2017 - 2020, we were keen to understand how workplace experiences and supervision could affect training and examination outcomes in South African (SA) centres. We conducted a cross-sectional, descriptive study of registrar trainees in psychiatry at the University of the Witwatersrand, the University of Cape Town, the University of KwaZulu-Natal, the University of Pretoria, the University of the Free State, Stellenbosch University, the University of Limpopo, and Walter Sisulu University between 1 June and 30 November 2019. We made use of an online survey that included questions on bullying/discrimination. All questions were closed-ended.Publisher's versio

South Africa’s Psychiatric training capacity in 2008 and in 2018. Has training capacity improved?

Background: There is a deficit of psychiatrists in South Africa, and to our knowledge, there is no situational analysis of training posts for psychiatrists in the country. Aim: To compare the number of specialists and subspecialists in training and training posts available in 2008 and 2018. Setting: South African medical schools with departments of psychiatry. Methods: A situational analysis involving data collection through a survey completed by eight heads of academic psychiatric departments followed by a comparative analysis of the two aforementioned years. Results: Data shows an 11% increase in funded and unfunded posts combined and a 9.3% increase in funded posts. The occupancy of funded posts decreased (92% in 2008 to 82% in 2018). When considering both funded and unfunded posts, only three more psychiatrists were being trained in 2018. Supernumeraries appointed in unfunded posts can be expected to return to their countries of origin. As such, a decrease in filled funded posts likely reflects a decrease in training psychiatrists destined to work in South Africa. While child and adolescent psychiatry was the only sub-speciality with accredited training posts in 2008, all sub-specialities included on the questionnaire had accredited training posts in 2018, and the number of accredited training posts in child and adolescent psychiatry doubled. That said, many of the posts were unfunded and vacant. Conclusion: While there was an increase in posts from 2008 to 2018, many posts remained unfilled. As such, not only are additional funded training posts required but also strategies to increase post-occupancy and successful completion of training. Contribution: This study is the first situational analysis of specialist and subspecialist training posts in Psychiatry in South Africa, at two time points over a 10 year period, that draws on academic heads of departments of psychiatry as respondents. The study highlights the nominal increase in funded training posts over this period, especially subspecialist training posts. The majority of Health Professions Council of South Africa (HPCSA) accredited subspecialities in Psychiatry have no funded training posts which is particularly concerning

Factors affecting specialist psychiatry training in South Africa : are psychiatry residents satisfied with their training?

OBJECTIVE : The authors investigated South African psychiatry residents’ satisfaction with their training, physical, and mental health to inform the development of a strategy to improve the quality and experiences of training. METHOD : A cross-sectional online survey was undertaken to assess the factors affecting residents’ satisfaction with their current training program. The authors conducted a comparative analysis of residents across the training institutions in South Africa. RESULTS : Of 179 psychiatry residents in the country, 70 responses were received (39.1% response rate). Most were satisfied with the overall quality of their training, various aspects of training, and access to training resources. However, significant differences across universities were identified with regard to residents’ perception of the quality of their training, quality of their experiences, access to training resources, quality of supervision, and clinical workload. More than a quarter were dissatisfied with their mental and/or physical health. The top four factors contributing to stress were all training-related. CONCLUSION : While most residents were satisfied with their specialist training, institutional differences in access to training and training resources, quality of training, and availability of quality supervision were evident and need to be addressed to ensure equitable training. There is a need to actively address staff shortages not only for clinical cover during protected academic time but also to meet training needs. A centralized examination process should remain in place to ensure that there is a national standard. Workplace-based assessments could facilitate standardization across institutions, should these assessments be standardized and accompanied by rigorous training of supervisors.https://www.springer.com/journal/405962022-05-10hj2022Psychiatr