9 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
Novel, Genetically Informed Statistical Frameworks for Examining The Causes and Consequences of Familial Resemblance
Although parents and offspring resemble one another on a wide variety of traits, the underlying causes of this similarity have proven challenging for researchers to disentangle. Parents not only share half of their additive genetic effects with their children, but they also play an active role in shaping their child’s environment—thus creating a covariance between genes and environment and obscuring the boundary between the two. While numerous past approaches have attempted to separate genetic and non-genetic parental effects, they have historically struggled in large part due to the stringent assumptions they entail and the inability to fully account for assortative mating— the tendency for individuals to preferentially choose mates who are similar to themselves—among the offspring’s parents and other ancestors. The present dissertation focuses on a number of topics within the study of familial similarity, particularly as it relates to genetic and non-genetic parental effects and assortative mating. Chapter 1 provides an overview of approaches that have previously been used to study parent-offspring resemblance, including both traditional family-based designs and modern approaches that leverage measured genomic data. Next, Chapter 2 describes a novel structural equation modeling framework that jointly models parental polygenic scores and offspring phenotypic data to obtain unbiased estimates of genetic and environmental parental effects. Chapter 3 subsequently introduces a second novel approach that compares genetic and phenotypic similarity between mates, as well as between-haplotype covariances within individuals, to examine assortative mating. Using a sample of 428,949 individuals from the UK Biobank, including over 67K spousal pairs, we provide estimates of the magnitude or assortment, its underlying mechanisms, and the degree to which it has changed continuously over a six-decade span. Finally, we conclude with a discussion of significance and future directions.</p
Within-sibship genome-wide association analyses decrease bias in estimates of direct genetic effects
Estimates from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of unrelated individuals capture effects of inherited variation (direct effects), demography (population stratification, assortative mating) and relatives (indirect genetic effects). Family-based GWAS designs can control for demographic and indirect genetic effects, but large-scale family datasets have been lacking. We combined data from 178,086 siblings from 19 cohorts to generate population (between-family) and within-sibship (within-family) GWAS estimates for 25 phenotypes. Within-sibship GWAS estimates were smaller than population estimates for height, educational attainment, age at first birth, number of children, cognitive ability, depressive symptoms and smoking. Some differences were observed in downstream SNP heritability, genetic correlations and Mendelian randomization analyses. For example, the within-sibship genetic correlation between educational attainment and body mass index attenuated towards zero. In contrast, analyses of most molecular phenotypes (for example, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol) were generally consistent. We also found within-sibship evidence of polygenic adaptation on taller height. Here, we illustrate the importance of family-based GWAS data for phenotypes influenced by demographic and indirect genetic effects
PsychGen research skills workgroup
Files and documentation for the research skills workgroup, which meets weekly with the explicit aim improving our individual and collective research practice
Recommended from our members
Within-sibship genome-wide association analyses decrease bias in estimates of direct genetic effects
Estimates from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of unrelated individuals capture effects of inherited variation (direct effects), demography (population stratification, assortative mating) and relatives (indirect genetic effects). Family-based GWAS designs can control for demographic and indirect genetic effects, but large-scale family datasets have been lacking. We combined data from 178,086 siblings from 19 cohorts to generate population (between-family) and within-sibship (within-family) GWAS estimates for 25 phenotypes. Within-sibship GWAS estimates were smaller than population estimates for height, educational attainment, age at first birth, number of children, cognitive ability, depressive symptoms and smoking. Some differences were observed in downstream SNP heritability, genetic correlations and Mendelian randomization analyses. For example, the within-sibship genetic correlation between educational attainment and body mass index attenuated towards zero. In contrast, analyses of most molecular phenotypes (for example, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol) were generally consistent. We also found within-sibship evidence of polygenic adaptation on taller height. Here, we illustrate the importance of family-based GWAS data for phenotypes influenced by demographic and indirect genetic effects
Within-sibship genome-wide association analyses decrease bias in estimates of direct genetic effects
Within-sibship genome-wide association analyses decrease bias in estimates of direct genetic effects
Within-sibship genome-wide association analyses decrease bias in estimates of direct genetic effects
Estimates from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of unrelated individuals capture effects of inherited variation (direct effects), demography (population stratification, assortative mating) and relatives (indirect genetic effects). Family-based GWAS designs can control for demographic and indirect genetic effects, but large-scale family datasets have been lacking. We combined data from 178,086 siblings from 19 cohorts to generate population (between-family) and within-sibship (within-family) GWAS estimates for 25 phenotypes. Within-sibship GWAS estimates were smaller than population estimates for height, educational attainment, age at first birth, number of children, cognitive ability, depressive symptoms and smoking. Some differences were observed in downstream SNP heritability, genetic correlations and Mendelian randomization analyses. For example, the within-sibship genetic correlation between educational attainment and body mass index attenuated towards zero. In contrast, analyses of most molecular phenotypes (for example, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol) were generally consistent. We also found within-sibship evidence of polygenic adaptation on taller height. Here, we illustrate the importance of family-based GWAS data for phenotypes influenced by demographic and indirect genetic effects
Within-sibship genome-wide association analyses decrease bias in estimates of direct genetic effects
Estimates from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of unrelated individuals capture effects of inherited variation (direct effects), demography (population stratification, assortative mating) and relatives (indirect genetic effects). Family-based GWAS designs can control for demographic and indirect genetic effects, but large-scale family datasets have been lacking. We combined data from 178,086 siblings from 19 cohorts to generate population (between-family) and within-sibship (within-family) GWAS estimates for 25 phenotypes. Within-sibship GWAS estimates were smaller than population estimates for height, educational attainment, age at first birth, number of children, cognitive ability, depressive symptoms and smoking. Some differences were observed in downstream SNP heritability, genetic correlations and Mendelian randomization analyses. For example, the within-sibship genetic correlation between educational attainment and body mass index attenuated towards zero. In contrast, analyses of most molecular phenotypes (for example, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol) were generally consistent. We also found within-sibship evidence of polygenic adaptation on taller height. Here, we illustrate the importance of family-based GWAS data for phenotypes influenced by demographic and indirect genetic effects
Within-sibship genome-wide association analyses decrease bias in estimates of direct genetic effects.
Funder: Jacobs FoundationEstimates from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of unrelated individuals capture effects of inherited variation (direct effects), demography (population stratification, assortative mating) and relatives (indirect genetic effects). Family-based GWAS designs can control for demographic and indirect genetic effects, but large-scale family datasets have been lacking. We combined data from 178,086 siblings from 19 cohorts to generate population (between-family) and within-sibship (within-family) GWAS estimates for 25 phenotypes. Within-sibship GWAS estimates were smaller than population estimates for height, educational attainment, age at first birth, number of children, cognitive ability, depressive symptoms and smoking. Some differences were observed in downstream SNP heritability, genetic correlations and Mendelian randomization analyses. For example, the within-sibship genetic correlation between educational attainment and body mass index attenuated towards zero. In contrast, analyses of most molecular phenotypes (for example, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol) were generally consistent. We also found within-sibship evidence of polygenic adaptation on taller height. Here, we illustrate the importance of family-based GWAS data for phenotypes influenced by demographic and indirect genetic effects