Ultrasound bladder wall thickness and detrusor overactivity:A multicentre test accuracy study

OBJECTIVE: Women with overactive bladder (OAB) often undergo urodynamics before invasive treatments are considered. Ultrasound measurement of bladder wall thickness (BWT) is a less invasive, less expensive and widely available test. It has the potential to diagnose the presence of detrusor overactivity (DO). We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of BWT in the diagnosis of DO. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Twenty-two UK clinics (university and district general hospitals). METHODS: Consecutive eligible women with OAB symptoms had transvaginal ultrasound to estimate BWT (index test). The reference standard for the diagnosis of DO was urodynamic testing with multichannel subtracted cystometry. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios using a BWT threshold of ≥5 mm were used to indicate the presence of DO, and the area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve to give an overall estimate of BWT accuracy. RESULTS: Between March 2011 and 2013, 644/687 (94%) women recruited had both tests. The mean age was 52.7 years (standard deviation 13.9) and DO was diagnosed in 399/666 (60%) women. BWT had a sensitivity of 43% [95% confidence interval (CI) 38-48%], specificity of 62% (95% CI 55-68%), and likelihood ratios of 1.11 (95% CI 0.92-1.35) and 0.93 (95% CI 0.82-1.06) for positive and negative tests, respectively. The area under the ROC curve was 0.53 (95% CI 0.48-0.57). Extensive sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses were carried out, but did not alter the interpretation. CONCLUSIONS: BWT is not a good replacement test for urodynamics in women with overactive bladder. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Bladder wall thickness is not a good replacement test for urodynamics in women with overactive bladder

Demystifying Oxidative Stress

: The hypothesis that reactive oxygen species (ROS) can be not just associated with but causally implicated in disease was first made in 1956, but so far, the oxidative stress theory of disease has not led to major therapeutic breakthrough, and the use of antioxidant is now confined to the field of complementary medicine. This chapter reviews the lack of high-level clinical evidence for the effectiveness of antioxidants in preventing disease and the epistemological problems of the oxidative stress theory of disease. We conclude on possible ways forward to test this hypothesis with approaches that take into account personalized medicine. The previous oxidative stress model has helped neither to diagnose nor to treat possibly ROS-related or ROS-dependent diseases. The redox balance concept that low ROS levels are beneficial or tolerable and high levels are disease triggers and best reduced is apparently wrong. Physiological ROS signalling may become dysfunctional or a disease trigger by at least five mechanisms: a physiological source may appear at an unphysiological site, a physiological source may be underactivated (less common) or overactivated (more common), a new source may appear, a physiological source may be overactivated or underactivated, and a toxifying enzyme may convert an ROS signal molecule into a more reactive molecule. The latter three mechanisms may reach a physiological or nonphysiological target. All of these dysregulations may be the direct and essential cause of a disease (rarely the case) or just a secondary epiphenomenon, which will disappear once the non-ROS-related cause of the disease is cured (much more common). Importantly, these mechanisms are the same for almost every signalling system. Causal target validation (sources, toxifiers and targets) is essential in order to identify effective drugs and therapies for ROSopathies