Erratum to: 36th International Symposium on Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1186/s13054-016-1208-6.]

Supplementary Material for: Associations of Serum Uromodulin and Urinary Epidermal Growth Factor with Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate and Interstitial Fibrosis in Kidney Transplantation

Introduction: Noninvasive biomarkers that reflect tubular health and allow early recognition of accelerated graft fibrosis development are warranted. Serum uromodulin (sUmod) and urinary epidermal growth factor (uEGF) originate from kidney tubules and may reflect functional nephron mass. The aim of this study was to investigate the associations between sUmod and uEGF with measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) and kidney allograft interstitial fibrosis percentage (IF%) score. Methods: sUmod and uEGF measurements, mGFR by iohexol-clearance and kidney allograft biopsies were obtained from kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) included in the Omega-3 fatty acids in Renal Transplantation (ORENTRA) trial at 8 weeks (baseline) and at 1 year after transplantation (end of study). Associations were analyzed with univariable and multivariable linear regression. Results: Ninety patients at baseline and 48 patients at end of study had complete study variable assessments. uEGF normalized to urinary creatinine (uEGF/Cr) was associated with mGFR both at baseline (standardized β-coefficient [Std. β-coeff] = 0.457 [p = p = p = 0.002]). uEGF/Cr, sUmod, and mGFR were associated with graft IF% score both at baseline (Std. β-coeff = −0.349 [p = 0.001], −0.274 [p = 0.009] and −0.289 [p = 0.006], respectively) and at end of study (Std. β-coeff = −0.365 [p = 0.011], −0.347 [p = 0.016] and −0.405 [p = 0.004], respectively). The results remained largely unchanged in multivariable analysis. Conclusion: uEGF/Cr and sUmod were associated with mGFR and graft IF% score. Our results indicate a possible role of uEGF/Cr and sUmod in the follow-up of KTRs

Mortality due to bleeding, myocardial infarction and stroke in dialysis patients.

To access publisher's full text version of this article click on the hyperlink belowEssentials Mortality due to bleeding vs. arterial thrombosis in dialysis patients is unknown. We compared death causes of 201 918 dialysis patients with the general population. Dialysis was associated with increased mortality risks of bleeding and arterial thrombosis. Clinicians should be aware of the increased bleeding and thrombosis risks. Background Dialysis has been associated with both bleeding and thrombotic events. However, there is limited information on bleeding as a cause of death versus arterial thrombosis as a cause of death. Objectives To investigate the occurrence of bleeding, myocardial infarction and stroke as causes of death in the dialysis population as compared with the general population. Methods We included 201 918 patients from 11 countries providing data to the ERA-EDTA Registry who started dialysis treatment between 1994 and 2011, and followed them for 3 years. Age-standardized and sex-standardized mortality rate ratios for bleeding, myocardial infarction and stroke as causes of death were calculated in dialysis patients as compared with the European general population. Associations between potential risk factors and these causes of death in dialysis patients were investigated by calculating hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) by the use of Cox proportional-hazards regression. Results As compared with the general population, the age-standardized and sex-standardized mortality rate ratios in dialysis patients were 12.8 (95% CI 11.9-13.7) for bleeding as a cause of death (6.2 per 1000 person-years among dialysis patients versus 0.3 per 1000 person-years in the general population), 13.4 (95% CI 13.0-13.9) for myocardial infarction (22.5 versus 0.9 per 1000 person-years), and 12.4 (95% CI 11.9-12.9) for stroke (14.3 versus 0.7 per 1000 person-years). Conclusion Dialysis patients have highly increased risks of death caused by bleeding and arterial thrombosis as compared with the general population. Clinicians should be aware of the increased mortality risks caused by these conditions.European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (ERA-EDTA

Renal Recovery for Patients with ANCA-Associated Vasculitis and Low eGFR in the ADVOCATE Trial of Avacopan

Introduction: In the 330-patient ADVOCATE trial of avacopan for the treatment of antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis, in which 81% of patients had renal involvement, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) increased on average 7.3 ml/min per 1.73 m2 in the avacopan group and 4.1 ml/min per 1.73 m2 in the prednisone group (P = 0.029) at week 52. This new analysis examines the results in the patient subgroup with severe renal insufficiency at enrollment into the trial, i.e., eGFR ≤20 ml/min per 1.73 m2. Methods: eGFR was determined at baseline and over the course of the trial. Changes in eGFR were compared between the 2 treatment groups. Results: In ADVOCATE, 27 of 166 patients (16%) in the avacopan group and 23 of 164 patients (14%) in the prednisone group had a baseline eGFR ≤20 ml/min per 1.73 m2. At week 52, eGFR increased on average 16.1 and 7.7 ml/min per 1.73 m2 in the avacopan and prednisone groups, respectively (P = 0.003). The last eGFR value measured during the 52-week treatment period was ≥2-fold higher than baseline in 41% of patients in the avacopan group compared to 13% in the prednisone group (P = 0.030). More patients in the avacopan group versus prednisone group had increases in eGFR above 20, 30, and 45 ml/min per 1.73 m2, respectively. Serious adverse events occurred in 13 of 27 patients (48%) in the avacopan group and 16 of 23 patients (70%) in the prednisone group. Conclusion: Among patients with baseline eGFR ≤20 ml/min per 1.73 m2 in the ADVOCATE trial, eGFR improved more in the avacopan group than in the prednisone group