Direct and Indirect Effectiveness of mRNA Vaccination against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 in Long-Term Care Facilities, Spain

We conducted a registries-based cohort study of long-term care facility residents >65 years of age offered vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 before March 10, 2021, in Spain. Risk for infection in vaccinated and nonvaccinated persons was compared with risk in the same persons in a period before the vaccination campaign, adjusted by daily-varying incidence and reproduction number. We selected 299,209 persons; 99.0% had >1 dose, 92.6% had 2 doses, and 99.8% of vaccines were Pfizer/BioNTech (BNT162b2). For vaccinated persons with no previous infection, vaccine effectiveness was 81.8% (95% CI 81.0%-82.7%), and 11.6 (95% CI 11.3-11.9) cases were prevented per 10,000 vaccinated/day. In those with previous infection, effectiveness was 56.8% (95% CI 47.1%-67.7%). In nonvaccinated residents with no previous infection, risk decreased by up to 81.4% (95% CI 73.3%-90.3%). Our results confirm vaccine effectiveness in this population and suggest indirect protection in nonvaccinated persons.S

Effectiveness of mRNA vaccine boosters against infection with the SARS-CoV-2 omicron (B.1.1.529) variant in Spain: a nationwide cohort study

Factor de impacto: 25,71 Q1Background: The omicron (B.1.1.529) variant of SARS-CoV-2 has increased capacity to elude immunity and cause breakthrough infections. The aim of this study was to estimate the effectiveness of mRNA-based vaccine boosters (third dose) against infection with the omicron variant by age, sex, time since complete vaccination, type of primary vaccine, and type of booster. Methods: In this nationwide cohort study, we linked data from three nationwide population registries in Spain (Vaccination Registry, Laboratory Results Registry, and National Health System registry) to select community-dwelling individuals aged 40 years or older, who completed their primary vaccine schedule at least 3 months before the start of follow-up, and had not tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 since the start of the pandemic. On each day between Jan 3, and Feb 6, 2022, we matched individuals who received a booster mRNA vaccine and controls of the same sex, age group, postal code, type of vaccine, time since primary vaccination, and number of previous tests. We estimated risk of laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared groups using risk ratios (RR) and risk differences. Vaccine effectiveness was calculated as one minus RR. Findings: Between Jan 3, and Feb 6, 2022, 3 111 159 matched pairs were included in our study. Overall, the estimated effectiveness from day 7 to 34 after a booster was 51·3% (95% CI 50·2-52·4). Estimated effectiveness was 52·5% (51·3-53·7) for an mRNA-1273 booster and 46·2% (43·5-48·7) for a BNT162b2 booster. Effectiveness was 58·6% (55·5-61·6) if primary vaccination had been with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Oxford-AstraZeneca), 55·3% (52·3-58·2) with mRNA-1273 (Moderna), 49·7% (48·3-51·1) with BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech), and 48·0% (42·5-53·7) with Ad26.COV2.S (Janssen). Estimated effectiveness was 43·6% (40·0-47·1) when the booster was administered between 151 days and 180 days after complete vaccination and 52·2% (51·0-53·3) if administered more than 180 days after primary scheduled completion. Interpretation: Booster mRNA vaccine-doses were moderately effective in preventing infection with the omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 for over a month after administration, which indicates their suitability as a strategy to limit the health effects of COVID-19 in periods of omicron variant domination. Estimated effectiveness was higher for mRNA-1273 compared with BNT162b2 and increased with time between completed primary vaccination and booster.S

Effectiveness of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infections and COVID-19 hospitalisations and deaths in elderly long-term care facility residents, Spain, weeks 53 2020 to 13 2021

Residents in long-term care facilities (LTCF) experienced a large morbidity and mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain and were prioritised for early COVID-19 vaccination. We used the screening method and population-based data sources to obtain estimates of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness for elderly LTCF residents. The estimates were 71% (95% CI: 56-82%), 88% (95% CI: 75-95%), and 97% (95% CI: 92-99%), against SARS-CoV-2 infections (symptomatic and asymptomatic), and COVID-19 hospitalisations and deaths, respectively.S

Predictions of three mathematical models related with the COVID-19 Vaccination Strategy in Spain

El Ministerio de Sanidad ha coordinado tres estudios que han estimado el impacto de la Estrategia de Vacunación frente a COVID-19 en España. El objetivo era que los modelos ayudaran a establecer los grupos de población prioritarios para la vacunación, en un contex-to inicial de limitación de dosis. A partir de la misma información epidemiológica y de va-cunas se han elaborado tres modelos matemá-ticos distintos cuyos resultados apuntan en la misma dirección: combinada con el distancia-miento físico, la vacunación escalonada, em-pezando por los grupos de mayor riesgo de complicaciones, evitaría el 60% de las infec-ciones, el 42% de las hospitalizaciones y el 60% de la mortalidad en la población. Estos modelos, que pueden adaptarse a la nueva evi-dencia científica disponible, son herramientas dinámicas y potentes para la evaluación y el ajuste de los programas de vacunación, impul-sando el desarrollo de este campo de inves-tigación, y ayudando a lograr resultados más eficientes en salud

Plan estratégico para la eliminación del sarampión y la rubeola en España 2021-2025

Consejo Interterritorial del Sistema Nacional de Salud. Plan estratégico para la eliminación del sarampión y la rubeola en España. Ministerio de Sanidad. Enero 2021[ES] El sarampión y la rubeola constituyen importantes problemas de salud pública y ambas enfermedades son potencialmente candidatas a erradicarse mediante vacunación. La Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) coordina a nivel mundial la eliminación del sarampión y la rubeola y realiza un seguimiento anual de los progresos que se van alcanzando en las diferentes Regiones. La Comisión Regional de Verificación de la eliminación del sarampión y la rubeola declaró que España está en situación de eliminación de la rubeola desde 2015 y del sarampión desde 2016, manteniéndose esta situación en las evaluaciones anuales sucesivas. El 2º Estudio de Seroprevalencia en España, realizado en 2017-2018, muestra un descenso de la población con títulos de anticuerpos frente a sarampión protectores en la población que los ha obtenido mediante vacunación, en un contexto sin circulación del virus salvaje. En relación a la rubeola, se observa una muy elevada inmunidad de la población frente al virus de la rubeola en todos los grupos de edad, demostrando el mantenimiento de la inmunidad conferida por la vacunación. Este Plan Estratégico para la Eliminación del Sarampión y la Rubeola en España 2021-2025, en adelante el Plan, actualiza el Plan Nacional de Eliminación del Sarampión, del año 2000 y el Protocolo de Vigilancia de la Rubeola y el Síndrome de Rubeola Congénita, de 2007, que juntos formaban el Plan de Eliminación del Sarampión y la Rubeola para España. El Plan para 2021-2025 está estructurado en tres estrategias y seis objetivos: Estrategia 1 – Fortalecer la inmunidad de la población: Objetivo 1 – Alcanzar y mantener coberturas de vacunación de al menos el 95% con dos dosis de vacuna triple vírica en España y en cada una de las CCAA y ciudades de Ceuta y Melilla mediante el programa sistemático de vacunación. Objetivo 2 – Identificar, captar y asegurar la vacunación de la población susceptible. Estrategia 2 – Fortalecer el sistema de vigilancia y la actuación en brotes: Objetivo 3 – Detectar, investigar y controlar los casos aislados y los brotes de sarampión y rubeola. Objetivo 4 – Garantizar una investigación de laboratorio de calidad. Objetivo 5 – Implementar de forma rápida las medidas de control de brotes que supongan un evento de salud pública e importancia nacional o internacional. Estrategia 3 – Crear y reforzar estrategias de comunicación, información y asesoría: Objetivo 6 – Informar, capacitar, relacionar e involucrar a todos los agentes de los que depende directa o indirectamente la eliminación del sarampión y la rubeola. Para cada uno de los objetivos se han establecido actividades para su consecución. Se realizará un seguimiento anual del Plan, en el que se recogerá una evaluación de las actividades realizadas mediante la recogida de los indicadores que se han definido para cada una de las estrategias y objetivos. El informe técnico anual se revisa y evalúa por el Comité Nacional de Verificación y se envía online para la evaluación que a su vez realiza la Comisión Regional Europea de Verificación de la Eliminación del Sarampión y la Rubeola. [EN] Measles and rubella are major public health problems, and both diseases are potentially candidates for eradication by vaccination. The World Health Organization (WHO) coordinates the elimination of measles and rubella at a global level and annually monitors the progress made in the different Regions. The Regional Commission for the Verification of the elimination of measles and rubella at European level declared that Spain has been in a situation of elimination of rubella since 2015 and measles since 2016, maintaining this situation in successive annual evaluations. The 2nd Seroprevalence Study in Spain carried out in 2017-2018, shows a decrease in the population with protective measles antibody titers is observed in those that obtained immunity by vaccination, and in a context without circulation of the wild virus. Regarding rubella, a very high immunity of the population against the virus is observed in all age groups, demonstrating the maintenance of the immunity conferred by vaccination. The Strategic Plan for the Elimination of Measles and Rubella in Spain 2021-2025, hereinafter the Plan, updates the National Plan for the Elimination of Measles, of the year 2000 and the Protocol for the Surveillance of Rubella and Congenital Rubella Syndrome, of 2007, which together formed the Measles and Rubella Elimination Plan for Spain. The Plan for 2021-2025 is structured in three strategies and six objectives: Strategy 1 - Strengthen the immunity of the population: Objective 1 - Achieve and maintain vaccination coverage of at least 95% with two doses of MMR vaccine in Spain and in each of the Autonomous Communities and cities of Ceuta and Melilla through the systematic vaccination program. Objective 2 - Identify, capture and ensure vaccination of the susceptible population. Strategy 2 - Strengthen the surveillance system and action in outbreaks: Objective 3 - Detect, investigate and control isolated cases and outbreaks of measles and rubella. Objective 4 - Guarantee quality laboratory research. Objective 5 - Quickly implement outbreak control measures that involve a public health event of national or international importance. Strategy 3 - Create and reinforce communication, information and advice strategies: Objective 6 - Inform, train, relate and involve all the agents on whom the elimination of measles and rubella depends directly or indirectly. Activities have been established for each of the objectives. Annual monitoring of the Plan, including an evaluation of the activities, will be carried out by collecting the defined indicators for each of the strategies and objectives. The National Verification Committee will review and evaluate the annual technical report that will be sent for the assessment conducted by the European Regional Commission for the Verification of the Elimination of Measles and Rubella.N

An imported case of vaccine-derived poliovirus type 2, Spain in the context of the ongoing polio Public Health Emergency of International Concern, September 2021

The monthly retrospective search for unreported acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) cases conducted as a complementary component of the Spanish AFP surveillance system identified a case of AFP in a child admitted in Spain from Senegal during August 2021. Vaccine-derived poliovirus 2 was identified in the stool in September 2021. We present public health implications and response undertaken within the framework of the National Action Plan for Polio Eradication and the Public Health Emergency of International Concern.S

Effectiveness of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 used in Spain: infection, hospitalization and mortality in people aged fifty/fifty-nine

[ES] En este trabajo se comparó la efectividad de la vacuna contra la COVID-19 (EV) durante agosto de 2021, en personas nacidas entre 1962 y 1971 y vacunadas durante junio, según la marca utilizada. La protección frente a infección por SARS-CoV-2 sintomática fue menor para la vacuna de Janssen (56%; IC95%: 53-59) y AstraZeneca [Vaxzevria] (68%; IC95%: 65-70), en comparación con Pfizer [Comirnaty] (78%; IC95%: 77-78), AZ/Pfizer (86%; IC95%: 80-90) y Moderna [Spikevax] (89%; IC95%: 88-90). La EV contra la hospitalización osciló entre el 86% de Janssen y el 97%-98% de las demás vacunas. [EN]In this paper we compared brand-specific COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (VE) during August 2021 in persons born 1962-1971 and vaccinated during June. For SARS-CoV-2 symptomatic infection, protection was lower for Janssen (56%; CI95%: 53-59) or AstraZeneca [Vaxzevria] (68%; CI95%: 65-70), compared to Pfizer-BioNTech [Comirnaty] (78%; CI95%: 77-78), AstraZeneca/Pfizer (86%; CI95%: 80-90) or Moderna [Spikevax] (89%; CI95%: 88-90). VE against hospitalization was ranged 86% for Janssen to 97%-98% for other vaccines.S

Immunisation of migrants in EU/EEA countries: Policies and practices

In recent years various EU/EEA countries have experienced an influx of migrants from low and middle-income countries. In 2018, the “Vaccine European New Integrated Collaboration Effort (VENICE)” survey group conducted a survey among 30 EU/EEA countries to investigate immunisation policies and practices targeting irregular migrants, refugees and asylum seekers (later called “migrants” in this report). Twenty-nine countries participated in the survey. Twenty-eight countries reported having national policies targeting children/adolescent and adult migrants, however vaccinations offered to adult migrants are limited to specific conditions in seven countries. All the vaccinations included in the National Immunisation Programme (NIP) are offered to children/adolescents in 27/28 countries and to adults in 13/28 countries. In the 15 countries offering only certain vaccinations to adults, priority is given to diphtheria-tetanus, measles-mumps-rubella and polio vaccinations. Information about the vaccines given to child/adolescent migrants is recorded in 22 countries and to adult migrants in 19 countries with a large variation in recording methods found across countries. Individual and aggregated data are reportedly not shared with other centres/institutions in 13 and 15 countries, respectively. Twenty countries reported not collecting data on vaccination uptake among migrants; only three countries have these data at the national level. Procedures to guarantee migrants’ access to vaccinations at the community level are available in 13 countries. In conclusion, although diversified, strategies for migrant vaccination are in place in all countries except for one, and the strategies are generally in line with international recommendations. Efforts are needed to strengthen partnerships and implement initiatives across countries of origin, transit and destination to develop and better share documentation in order to guarantee a completion of vaccination series and to avoid unnecessary re-vaccination. Development of migrant-friendly strategies to facilitate migrants' access to vaccination and collection of vaccination uptake data among migrants is needed to meet existing gaps

Epidemiologic Features and Control Measures during Monkeypox Outbreak, Spain, June 2022

During June 2022, Spain was one of the countries most affected worldwide by a multicountry monkeypox outbreak with chains of transmission without identified links to disease-endemic countries. We provide epidemiologic features of cases reported in Spain and the coordinated measures taken to respond to this outbreak.S