PANC Study (Pancreatitis: A National Cohort Study): national cohort study examining the first 30 days from presentation of acute pancreatitis in the UK

Abstract Background Acute pancreatitis is a common, yet complex, emergency surgical presentation. Multiple guidelines exist and management can vary significantly. The aim of this first UK, multicentre, prospective cohort study was to assess the variation in management of acute pancreatitis to guide resource planning and optimize treatment. Methods All patients aged greater than or equal to 18 years presenting with acute pancreatitis, as per the Atlanta criteria, from March to April 2021 were eligible for inclusion and followed up for 30 days. Anonymized data were uploaded to a secure electronic database in line with local governance approvals. Results A total of 113 hospitals contributed data on 2580 patients, with an equal sex distribution and a mean age of 57 years. The aetiology was gallstones in 50.6 per cent, with idiopathic the next most common (22.4 per cent). In addition to the 7.6 per cent with a diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis, 20.1 per cent of patients had a previous episode of acute pancreatitis. One in 20 patients were classed as having severe pancreatitis, as per the Atlanta criteria. The overall mortality rate was 2.3 per cent at 30 days, but rose to one in three in the severe group. Predictors of death included male sex, increased age, and frailty; previous acute pancreatitis and gallstones as aetiologies were protective. Smoking status and body mass index did not affect death. Conclusion Most patients presenting with acute pancreatitis have a mild, self-limiting disease. Rates of patients with idiopathic pancreatitis are high. Recurrent attacks of pancreatitis are common, but are likely to have reduced risk of death on subsequent admissions. </jats:sec

Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries

Background Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. Methods This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries. Results In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. Conclusion This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries

Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries

Abstract Background Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. Methods This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries. Results In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. Conclusion This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries

Spina bifida experience at SKIMS.

It analyzed 315 patients in terms of age, sex, signs and symptoms. A detailed history was taken and local, physical and systematic examinations were carried out .77.33% patients of these cases were of myelomeningocele , whereas 23.22% patients had a simple meningocela. In 130 patients had consecutive myelomeningocele, 106 patients had vertex presentation, 16 patients exhibited external cephalic version whereas 23 patients had breach presentation. 66 patients delivered spontaneous or low forceps, whereas 12 patients had mid cavity or ventous .Various forms of birth injuries were observed. One third of patients had spinal cord function resulting in paralysis loss of sensation ,reflexes two third of patients seem to have interruption of long spinal tracts. In more than 90 patients the spinal cord control of bladder was defective intermitted catherization was conducted in 32 patients, whereas, 22 patients undergo urinary diversion. 20 new born infants with myelomeningocele had ureteric born infants. Spine bifida means a defect in normal closure of the spinal column at any point. 80 patients underwent shunt surgery for the control of hydrocephalous presented in 95 patients. 90 patients had repair of spina bifida lesions survival rate was 84%

Incidence, histopathology, and surgical outcome of tumors of spinal cord, nerve roots, meninges, and vertebral column-Data based on single institutional (Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences) experience

Context: In the absence of a community-based study on the spinal tumors in the Valley, medical records of the only Regional Neurosurgical Center are available. Aim: The aim of this study is to establish a hospital-based regional epidemiology of spinal tumors in the Valley since the data are derived from a single institution. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of 531 malignant and nonmalignant tumors of spinal cord, its coverings and vertebrae, which were managed in a Regional Neurosurgical Center under a standard and uniform medical-protocol over 30-year period from 1983 to 2014. Results: The hospital-based incidence for all spinal tumors was 0.24/100,000 persons per year. The malignant spinal cord and vertebral tumors comprised 32.58% (173/531) of all tumors, and benign spinal cord and vertebral tumors comprised 67.42% (358/531). The extradural–intradural tumors such as metastatic lesions and primary malignant vertebral tumors were on rise with 16.38% (87/531) cases. The children below 18 years were 5.46% (29/531), of which 55.17% (16/29) were below 9 years. The most common primary bone malignancy was multiple myeloma (54.54% =12/22). Histopathologically, the most common metastatic deposit in the spinal canal was non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (24.61% =16/65). A mortality of 3.20% (17/531) was noted. Recurrences were noted in 4.90% (26/531), and adjuvant therapies were given to 16.38% (87/531) patients. Conclusion: The malignant spinal cord and vertebral tumors, especially metastatic deposits, are on rise in elderly population. The surgical outcome, in terms of recovery and spinal stability, of benign tumors, is comparatively better than malignant ones. The study reveals a low regional incidence (hospital-based) of spinal tumors

Original Article - Role of methylprednisolone in acute cervical cord injuries

BACKGROUND: Management of acute cervical cord injury with neurodeficit continues to evoke debate. Glucocorticoid steroid methylprednisolone has been found to be effective in preventing secondary cord injury. Aims: This study was done to evaluate the role of methylprednisolone in acute cervical cord injury. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty patients of acute cervical cord injury with demonstrable neurological deficit were administered methylprednisolone within 8 hours of acute cervical cord injury while eighteen others were not administered this drug. The patients were assessed for neurological recovery. RESULTS: Patients who received methylprednisolone within 8 hours of injury had more motor recovery (P<0.001) than those who were not given the drug. Improvement in the pinprick scores and light touch scores were also greater at 6 weeks (P<0.001). Similar effect was also seen after 6 months. CONCLUSION: Methylprednisolone prevents secondary cord injury to a great extent and hence its administration in the immediate post injury period results in a better functional (motor and sensory) outcom

Original Article - Role of methylprednisolone in acute cervical cord injuries

BACKGROUND: Management of acute cervical cord injury with neurodeficit continues to evoke debate. Glucocorticoid steroid methylprednisolone has been found to be effective in preventing secondary cord injury. Aims: This study was done to evaluate the role of methylprednisolone in acute cervical cord injury. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty patients of acute cervical cord injury with demonstrable neurological deficit were administered methylprednisolone within 8 hours of acute cervical cord injury while eighteen others were not administered this drug. The patients were assessed for neurological recovery. RESULTS: Patients who received methylprednisolone within 8 hours of injury had more motor recovery (P<0.001) than those who were not given the drug. Improvement in the pinprick scores and light touch scores were also greater at 6 weeks (P<0.001). Similar effect was also seen after 6 months. CONCLUSION: Methylprednisolone prevents secondary cord injury to a great extent and hence its administration in the immediate post injury period results in a better functional (motor and sensory) outcome

Improved diagnosis of central nervous system tuberculosis by MPB64-Target PCR Diagnóstico da tuberculose do sistema nervoso central por MPB64-Target PCR

Central nervous system (CNS) tuberculosis is a serious clinical problem, the treatment of which is sometimes hampered by delayed diagnosis. Clearly, prompt laboratory diagnosis is of vital importance as the spectrum of disease is wideand abnormalities of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are incredibly variable. Since delayed hypersensitivity is the underlying immune response, bacterial load is very low. The conventional bacteriological methods rarely detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis in CSF and are of limited use in diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis (TBM). This double blind study was, therefore, directed to the molecular analysis of CNS tuberculosis by an in-house-developed PCR targeted for amplification of a 240bp nucleotidesequence coding for MPB64 protein specific for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Based on the clinical criteria, 47 patients with CNS tuberculosis and a control group of 10 patients having non-tubercular lesions of the CNS were included in the study. Analyses were done in three groups; one group consisting of 27 patients of TBM, a second group of 20 patients with intracranial tuberculomas and a third group of 10 patients having non-tubercular lesions of the CNS acted as control. There were no false positive results by PCR and the specificity worked out to be 100%. In the three study groups, routine CSF analysis (cells and chemistry), CSF for AFB smear and culture were negative in all cases. PCR was positive for 21/27 patients (77.7% sensitivity) of the first group of TBM patients, 6/20 patients (30% sensitivity) of the second group with intracranial tuberculomas were positive by PCR and none was PCR-positive (100% specificity) in the third group. Thus, PCR was found to be more sensitive than any other conventional method in the diagnosis of clinically suspected tubercular meningitis.<br>A tuberculose do sistema nervoso central (CNS) é um problema clínico sério, cujo tratamento é dificultado pelo diagnóstico tardio. O diagnóstico laboratorial rápido é de importância vital considerando que o espectro da doença é amplo e as anormalidades do liquor são muito variáveis. Considerando que a hipersensibilidade tardia é a resposta imune fundamental, a carga bacteriana é muito baixa. Os métodos bacteriológicos convencionais raramente detectam Mycobacterium tuberculosis no liquor e são de uso limitado para diagnóstico da meningite tuberculosa (TBM). O presente estudo duplo-cego objetivou a análise molecular da tuberculose do CNS através de um PCR desenvolvido in-house direcionado para a amplificação de uma seqüência de nucleotídios de 240pb que codificam a proteína MPB64 especifica de Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Baseando-se em critérios clínicos, selecionou-se 47 pacientes com tuberculose do CNS e um grupo controle de 10 pacientes com lesões não-tuberculosas no CNS. As análises foram divididas em três grupos: um grupo de 27 pacientes com TBM, um segundo grupo com 20 pacientes com tuberculomas intracraniais e um terceiro grupo de 10 pacientes com lesões não-tuberculosas no CNS (controles). O PCR não forneceu nenhum resultado falso-positivo, com 100% de especificidade. Em todos os três grupos de estudo, os resultados das análises de rotina do liquor por histologia, química e baciloscopia e também cultura foram negativos em todos os casos. No primeiro grupo de pacientes com TBM, PCR foi positivo em 21/27 pacientes (sensibilidade de 77,7%). No segundo grupo de pacientes com tuberculomas intracraniais, 6/20 foram positivos (sensibilidade de 30%). Nenhum dos pacientes do grupo controle foi positivo (100% de especificidade). Dessa forma, o PCR mostrou-se mais sensível que os métodos convencionais no diagnóstico de casos suspeitos de meningite tuberculosa