30 research outputs found
Implementation science in nutrition: Concepts and frameworks for an emerging field of science and practice
Malnutrition in all its forms has risen on global and national agendas in recent years because of the recognition of its magnitude and its consequences for a wide range of human, social, and economic outcomes. Although the WHO, national governments, and other organizations have endorsed targets and identified appropriate policies, programs, and interventions, a major challenge lies in implementing these with the scale and quality needed to achieve population impact. This paper presents an approach to implementation science in nutrition (ISN) that builds upon concepts developed in other policy domains and addresses critical gaps in linking knowledge to effective action. ISN is defined here as an interdisciplinary body of theory, knowledge, frameworks, tools, and approaches whose purpose is to strengthen implementation quality and impact. It includes a wide range of methods and approaches to identify and address implementation bottlenecks; means to identify, evaluate, and scale up implementation innovations; and strategies to enhance the utilization of existing knowledge, tools, and frameworks based on the evolving science of implementation. The ISN framework recognizes that quality implementation requires alignment across 5 domains: the intervention, policy, or innovation being implemented; the implementing organization(s); the enabling environment of policies and stakeholders; the individuals, households, and communities of interest; and the strategies and decision processes used at various stages of the implementation process. The success of aligning these domains through implementation research requires a culture of inquiry, evaluation, learning, and response among program implementers; an action-oriented mission among the research partners; continuity of funding for implementation research; and resolving inherent tensions between program implementation and research. The Society for Implementation Science in Nutrition is a recently established membership society to advance the science and practice of nutrition implementation at various scales and in varied contexts.PRIFPRI3; CRP4; 1 Fostering Climate-Resilient and Sustainable Food Supply; 2 Promoting Healthy Diets and Nutrition for allPHND; A4NHCGIAR Research Program on Agriculture for Nutrition and Health (A4NH
Recommended from our members
Validation, Implementation, and Clinical Utility of Whole Genome Sequence-Based Bacterial Identification in the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory.
The application of next-generation sequencing extends from microbial identification to epidemiologic insight and antimicrobial resistance prediction. Despite this potential, the roadblock for clinical laboratories lies in implementation and validation of such complex technology and data analysis. Herein, a validation study used whole-genome sequencing (WGS) for pan-bacterial identification (ID) in a clinical laboratory, and assessed its clinical relevance. A diverse set of 125 bacterial isolates, including a subset without genus (25) and/or species (10) ID, were analyzed by de novo assembly and reference genome mapping. The 16S rRNA, rpoB, and groEL genes were used for ID. Using WGS, 100% (89 of 89) and 89% (79 of 89) of isolates were identified at the genus and species-levels, respectively. WGS also provided improved results for 71% (25/35) isolates originally reported with genus-only or descriptive IDs. Chart review identified cases in which improved genus and/or species-level ID by WGS may have had a positive impact on patient care. Reasons included the use of an ineffective antibiotic owing to unclear ID, use of antibiotics when not clinically indicated, and help with an outbreak investigation. The implementation of next-generation sequencing in a clinical microbiology setting is a challenging but necessary task. This study provides a model for the validation and implementation of bacterial ID by WGS in such a setting
Recommended from our members
Tilting the Scale: Current Provider Perspectives and Practices on Breastfeeding with HIV in the United States
The risk of vertical transmission from breastfeeding with HIV (BFHIV) has been found to be very low in optimal scenarios with sustained maternal viral suppression during pregnancy and postpartum. Medical providers must account for the risk of this serious adverse event alongside parental autonomy, breastfeeding benefits, and patient values. To assess provider practices, comfort, and challenges with BFHIV, an online mixed-method survey was sent to breastfeeding and HIV provider listservs from June to July 2021. The target population was US medical professionals from diverse practice settings with experience in clinical issues associated with BFHIV, including physicians, advanced practice providers, nurses, and lactation consultants. Data analysis utilized nonparametric hypothesis testing, ordinal regression, and reflexive thematic analysis. Most providers reported counseling pregnant people with HIV on infant feeding choices, but fewer specifically endorsed counseling about breastfeeding. Of 84 unique institutions identified by 100 included respondents, 10% had an institutional protocol supporting BFHIV. Institutional protocols were associated with higher degrees of provider comfort with BFHIV in optimal scenario clinical vignettes. Providers perceived that White patients faced fewer BFHIV barriers than patients with other racial identities. Discomfort balancing the goals to protect infants from infection risk and support the parent's role in infant feeding decisions was a key theme in free text responses; this manifested in a spectrum of management styles ranging from patient's informed choice to paternalism. This study highlights the tension providers navigate regarding BFHIV discussions, calling for patient care guidelines and protocols grounded in risk reduction and respect of patient autonomy