Approach of pulmonologists in Turkey to noninvasive mechanical ventilation use at home for chronic respiratory failure

WOS: 000386262800001PubMed ID: 27266279Introduction: To define approach of pulmonologists in Turkey to noninvasive mechanical ventilation ( NIV) use for chronic respiratory failure ( CRF), the most currently applied technique for home mechanical ventilation. Patients and Methods: A 38-question survey, developed and tested by the authors, was distributed throughout Turkey to 2205 pulmonologists by e-mail. Results: Twenty-seven percent of the pulmonologists responded ( n= 596). Domiciliary NIV was reported to be prescribed by 340 physicians [ 57.1% of all responders and 81% of pulmonologists practicing NIV at clinical practice ( n= 420)]. NIV prescription was associated with physician's title, type of hospital, duration of medical license, total number of patients treated with NIV during residency and current number of patients treated with NIV per week ( p< 0.05). Main estimated indications were listed as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ( median, 25-75 percentile of the prescriptions: 75%, 60-85), obesity hypoventilation syndrome ( 10%, 2-15), overlap syndrome ( 10%, 0-20) and restrictive lung disease ( 5%, 2-10). For utilization of NIV at home, Bilevel positive airway pressure-spontaneous mode ( 40%, 0-80) and oronasal mask ( 90%, 60-100) were stated as the most frequently recommended mode and interface, respectively. Pressure settings were most often titrated based on arterial blood gas findings ( 79.2%). Humidifier was stated not to be prescribed by approximately half of the physicians recommending domicilliary NIV, and the main reason for this ( 59.2%) was being un-refundable by social security foundation. Conclusion: There is a wide variation in Turkey for prescription of NIV, which is supposed to improve clinical course of patients with CRF. Further studies are required to determine the possible causes of these differences, frequency of use and patient outcomes in this setting

Approach of pulmonologists in Turkey to noninvasive mechanical ventilation use at home for chronic respiratory failure

WOS: 000386262800001PubMed ID: 27266279Introduction: To define approach of pulmonologists in Turkey to noninvasive mechanical ventilation ( NIV) use for chronic respiratory failure ( CRF), the most currently applied technique for home mechanical ventilation. Patients and Methods: A 38-question survey, developed and tested by the authors, was distributed throughout Turkey to 2205 pulmonologists by e-mail. Results: Twenty-seven percent of the pulmonologists responded ( n= 596). Domiciliary NIV was reported to be prescribed by 340 physicians [ 57.1% of all responders and 81% of pulmonologists practicing NIV at clinical practice ( n= 420)]. NIV prescription was associated with physician's title, type of hospital, duration of medical license, total number of patients treated with NIV during residency and current number of patients treated with NIV per week ( p< 0.05). Main estimated indications were listed as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ( median, 25-75 percentile of the prescriptions: 75%, 60-85), obesity hypoventilation syndrome ( 10%, 2-15), overlap syndrome ( 10%, 0-20) and restrictive lung disease ( 5%, 2-10). For utilization of NIV at home, Bilevel positive airway pressure-spontaneous mode ( 40%, 0-80) and oronasal mask ( 90%, 60-100) were stated as the most frequently recommended mode and interface, respectively. Pressure settings were most often titrated based on arterial blood gas findings ( 79.2%). Humidifier was stated not to be prescribed by approximately half of the physicians recommending domicilliary NIV, and the main reason for this ( 59.2%) was being un-refundable by social security foundation. Conclusion: There is a wide variation in Turkey for prescription of NIV, which is supposed to improve clinical course of patients with CRF. Further studies are required to determine the possible causes of these differences, frequency of use and patient outcomes in this setting

Approach of pulmonologists in Turkey to noninvasive mechanical ventilation use in acute respiratory failure

Introduction: Noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) has been increasingly used worldwide for acute respiratory failure (ARF), especially in patients with chronic lung disorders. We aimed to define the approach of pulmonologists in Turkey to NIV use for ARF management. Materials and Methods: A 38-question survey, developed and tested by authors, was distributed by e-mail to a total of 2.205 pulmonologists in Turkey. Results: Response rate was 27% (n=596). Seventy-one percent of responders were practicing NIV in clinic. NIV use was found to be associated with responder's academic title, age, duration of medical license, type of physician's hospital and its region, patient load, NIV experience during residency, and duration of NIV and intensive care unit (ICU) experience (p 60% of patients with COPD, and success rate in COPD was reported as over 60% by 93% of users. Oronasal mask (median and IQR 90, 80-100%, respectively) and home care NIV ventilators (median and IQR 50, 10-85%, respectively) were the most commonly utilized equipment. Conclusion: NIV use in ARF varies based on hospital type, region and, especially, experience of the physician. Although consistent with guidelines and general practice, NIV use can still be improved and increased

Approach of pulmonologists in Turkey to noninvasive mechanical ventilation use at home for chronic respiratory failure

WOS: 000386262800001PubMed ID: 27266279Introduction: To define approach of pulmonologists in Turkey to noninvasive mechanical ventilation ( NIV) use for chronic respiratory failure ( CRF), the most currently applied technique for home mechanical ventilation. Patients and Methods: A 38-question survey, developed and tested by the authors, was distributed throughout Turkey to 2205 pulmonologists by e-mail. Results: Twenty-seven percent of the pulmonologists responded ( n= 596). Domiciliary NIV was reported to be prescribed by 340 physicians [ 57.1% of all responders and 81% of pulmonologists practicing NIV at clinical practice ( n= 420)]. NIV prescription was associated with physician's title, type of hospital, duration of medical license, total number of patients treated with NIV during residency and current number of patients treated with NIV per week ( p< 0.05). Main estimated indications were listed as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ( median, 25-75 percentile of the prescriptions: 75%, 60-85), obesity hypoventilation syndrome ( 10%, 2-15), overlap syndrome ( 10%, 0-20) and restrictive lung disease ( 5%, 2-10). For utilization of NIV at home, Bilevel positive airway pressure-spontaneous mode ( 40%, 0-80) and oronasal mask ( 90%, 60-100) were stated as the most frequently recommended mode and interface, respectively. Pressure settings were most often titrated based on arterial blood gas findings ( 79.2%). Humidifier was stated not to be prescribed by approximately half of the physicians recommending domicilliary NIV, and the main reason for this ( 59.2%) was being un-refundable by social security foundation. Conclusion: There is a wide variation in Turkey for prescription of NIV, which is supposed to improve clinical course of patients with CRF. Further studies are required to determine the possible causes of these differences, frequency of use and patient outcomes in this setting

A multicenter randomized trial for the effectiveness of structured discharge and follow-up protocol on readmission rate in COPD patients receiving LTOT/NIV: one-year interim analysis.

28th International Congress of the European-Respiratory-Society (ERS) -- SEP 15-19, 2018 -- Paris, FRANCEWOS: 000455567101063European Respiratory So