A geological cross-section along the Basque Pyrenees and the Parentis Basin (Western Pyrenees)

A new geological cross- section along the North Iberian Margin shows a complete image of the Western Pyrenees and the Parentis Basin as well as the geometric differences and age constraints between both Pyrenean fronts. The South Pyrenean front, developed during Uppermost Cretaceous- Middle Miocene, is represented by a major thrust which accumulates around 20 km of southward displacement. The Basque- Cantabrian basin is a mesozoic extensional basin which was inverted during Paleogene times as a consequence of the Pyrenean orogeny. A basement- involved thrust wedge with an upper south- directed back- thrust characterizes the North Pyrenean Frontal Thrust. The main thrust, emplaced during Late Eocene- Miocene times, shows a displacement around 2 km whereas the back- thrust detached in Paleocene materials shows a displacement about 1.5 km. Northwards, the Landes High, is interpreted as an uplifted plateau where a thick wedge of Upper Cretaceous- Cenozoic synorogenic deposits overlay unconformably the Hercinian basement. This package corresponds with the North Pyrenean foreland basin. More to the north, the Landes fault is the southern margin of the Mesozoic Parentis Basin, a semigraben infilled with a thick package of Triassic to Albian synrift sequence overlied by Cretaceous and Cenozoic deposits. There, inversion structures were poorly developed

Modulation of chiroptical and photophysical properties in helicenic rhenium(I) systems: the use of an N‐(aza[6]helicenyl)‐NHC ligand

The photophysical and chiroptical properties of a novel, chiral helicene-NHC−Re(I) complex bearing an N-(aza[6]helicenyl)-benzimidazolylidene ligand are described, showing its ability to emit yellow circularly polarized luminescence. A comparative analysis of this new system with other helicene-Re(I) complexes reported to date illustrates the impact of structural modifications on the emissive and absorptive properties

La estructura extensiva Mesozoica y su influencia en la posterior inversión de la cuenca de Organyà (Pirineo Central)

La Cuenca de Organyà (Pirineo Central) representa un claro ejemplo de cuenca extensiva desarrollada durante el Cretácico Inferior debido a la obertura del Golfo de Vizcaya despegada en un nivel salino del Triásico Superior (Keuper). La principal característica de esta cuenca es su geometría sinclinal asimétrica definida por la progresiva migración de sus depocentros hacia el sur durante la extensión del Cretácico Inferior (Aptiense y Albiense inferior). El relleno sedimentario sin-extensivo está caracterizado por carbonatos de aguas poco profundas y margas de cuenca (Berástegui et al., 1990). Posteriormente durante la compresión alpina (Santoniense superior - Paleoceno) las estructuras extensivas fueron invertidas e incorporadas al cinturón de pliegues y cabalgamientos del Pirineo Central

Origen y cinemática del saliente del frente surpirenaico central a partir del estudio paleomagnético de los materiales sinorogénicos de su margen este

: Los mantos de cabalgamiento de Bóixols, Montsec y Sierras Marginales constituyen la principal curvatura orogénica del frente surpirenaico central. La parte frontal de este saliente se caracteriza por unos antiformes con núcleo salino de orientación oblicua y despegados en los niveles evaporíticos sinorogénicos de la cuenca de antepaís del Ebro. Estas estructuras deforman los depósitos paleógenos de la cuenca de antepaís. Con la finalidad de explicar la evolución cinemática de estas estructuras y el papel de los niveles evaporíticos en la geometría del saliente, se llevó a cabo el estudio de las rotaciones de eje vertical (VAR) en el sector de Artesa de Segre-Cardona. Se muestrearon 80 estaciones de paleomagnetismo en los materiales detríticos del Eoceno superior-Oligoceno del sector. Su análisis muestra principalmente unas rotaciones antihorarias, relacionadas con el emplazamiento hacia el sur de los mantos de corrimiento surpirenaicos. Adicionalmente, el estudio magnetoestratigráfico de las series del Eoceno superior-Oligoceno permite acotar la edad de las rotaciones observada

Survival and dispersal routes of head-started loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta) post-hatchlings in the Mediterranean Sea

[EN] Several loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta) nesting events have been recorded along Spain's Mediterranean coast, outside its known nesting range, in recent years. In view of the possible expansion of its nesting range and considering the conservation status of this species, management measures like nest protection and head-start programs have been implemented. To study the dispersal behavior and survival of head-started loggerheads, 19 post-hatchlings from three nesting events were satellite tracked after their release in three consecutive years (2015-2017). This paper presents the first study of survival probabilities and dispersal movements of loggerhead post-hatchlings in the Mediterranean basin. Monitored post-hatchlings dispersed over large areas using variable routes, mainly off the continental shelf. Nonetheless, post-hatchlings dispersed to high-productivity warmer areas during the coldest months of monitoring. These areas might be optimum for their survival and development. We observed differences regarding dispersal orientation and routes among individuals, even from the same nest, release date, and location. Our survival models contributed to improving current survival estimates for sea turtle post-hatchlings. We observed a high probability of survival in head-started individuals during the first months after release, usually the most critical period after reintroduction. The data did not support an effect of habitat (neritic or oceanic) in survival, or an effect of the region (Balearic sea or Alboran sea) in survival probability. Differences in survival between nests were observed. These differences might be related to parasitic infections suffered during the head-starting period. This study shows that nest management measures may contribute to the conservation and range expansion of the loggerhead turtle population in the western Mediterranean.This satellite study was funded by Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, Ministerio de Agricultura y Medio Ambiente (ref: 16MNSV006), Ministerio de Economia, Industria y Competitividad (ref: CGL2011-30413), Fundacion CRAM, Fundacion Hombre y Territorio and Eduardo J. Belda. Corresponding author, S. Abalo, was supported by a Ph.D. grant (FPU) from Ministerio de Educacion, Cultura y Deporte (Spain). J. Tomas is also supported by project Prometeo II (2015) of Generalitat Valenciana and project INDICIT of the European Commission, Environment Directorate-General. We are extremely thankful to the entities that have collaborated: we thank all professionals at the Oceanografic, especially at the ARCA Rehabilitation Center, for their many efforts and whole-hearted dedication to the best animal care. In particular, we are grateful to the Conselleria d'Agricultura, Medi Ambient, Canvi Climatic i Desenvolupament Rural of the Valencia Community Regional Government. We also thank the professionals at Centro de Recuperacion de Animales Marinos (CRAM) for their dedication and animal care. We are thankful to the Marine Zoology Unit of the University of Valencia, NGO Xaloc, EQUINAC, Aquarium of Sevilla, Donana Biological Station (EBD-CSIC) and to involved professionals at Consejeria de Medio Ambiente y Ordenacion del Territorio (CMAOT) of Junta de Andalucia, especially at the Andalusian Marine Environment Management Center (CEGMA) for their efforts with animal care, logistics for release events and necropsy of "Rabiosa". We are particularly grateful to the people who called 112 to report a nesting event and to the nest custody volunteers. Thanks are due to the staff of Parador de El Saler for volunteering logistical support. The authors wish to acknowledge the use of the Maptool program for analysis and graphics in this paper. Maptool is a product of SEATURTLE.ORG (Information is available at www.seaturtle.org). Also, we acknowledge the use of the Douglas Argos Filter (DAF) utility in Movebank (www.movebank.org) and especially David Douglas for his help and recommendations. Finally, we thank the reviewers for their reviewing efforts.Abalo-Morla, S.; Marco, A.; Tomás, J.; Revuelta, O.; Abella, E.; Marco, V.; Crespo-Picazo, J.... (2018). Survival and dispersal routes of head-started loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta) post-hatchlings in the Mediterranean Sea. Marine Biology. 165(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-018-3306-2S1653Abella P, Marco A, Martins S, Hawkes LA (2016) Is this what a climate change-resilient population of marine turtles looks like? Biol Conserv 193:124–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.11.023Addison DS, Nelson KA (2000) Recapture of a tagged, captive reared juvenile loggerhead turtle—an example of habituation? Mar Turt Newsl 89:15–16Agostellini C, Lund U (2017) R package ‘circular’: Circular Statistics (version 0.4-93). https://r-forge.r-project.org/projects/circular/ . Accessed 05 July 2017Arendt MD, Schwenter JA, Boynton J, Segars AL, Byrd JI, David W, Parker L (2012) Temporal trends (2000–2011) and influences on fishery-independent catch rates for loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta) at an important coastal foraging region in the southeastern United States. Fish Bull 110:470–483Armstrong DP, Seddon PJ (2008) Directions in reintroduction biology. Trends Ecol Evol 23:20–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2007.10.003Baez J, Macias D, Antonio Caminas J, Ortiz de Urbina JM, Garcia-Barcelona S, Jesus Bellido J, Real R (2013) By-catch frequency and size differentiation in loggerhead turtles as a function of surface longline gear type in the western Mediterranean Sea. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 93:1423–1427. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315412001841Balbín R, Flexas MM, López-Jurado JL, Peña M, Amores A, Alemany F (2012) Vertical velocities and biological consequences at a front detected at the balearic sea. Cont Shelf Res 47:28–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2012.06.008Balbín R, López-Jurado JL, Flexas MM, Reglero P, Vélez-Velchí P, González-Pola C, Rodríguez JM, García A, Alemany F (2014) Interannual variability of the early summer circulation around the Balearic Islands: driving factors and potential effects on the marine ecosystem. J Mar Syst 138:70–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2013.07.004Batschelet E (1981) Circular statistics in biology. Academic Press, LondonBell C, Parsons J (2002) Cayman turtle farm head-starting project yields tangible success. Mar Turt Newsl 98:5–6Bjorndal K, Bolten A, Martins H (2000) Somatic growth model of juvenile loggerhead sea turtles Caretta caretta: duration of pelagic stage. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 202:265–272. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps202265Bolten B (2003) Variation in sea turtle life history patterns: neritic vs. oceanic developmental stages. In: Lutz PL, Musick J, Wyneken J (eds) The biology of sea turtles. CRC Press, Boca Ratón, pp 243–257Bowen BW, Karl SA (2007) Population genetics and phylogeography of sea turtles. Mol Ecol 16:4886–4907. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03542.xBowen B, Avise JC, Richardson JI, Meylan AB, Margaritoulis D, Hopkins-Murphy SR (1993) Population Structure of loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta) in the Northwestern Atlantic Ocean and Mediterranean Sea. Conserv Biol 7:834–844. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1993.740834.xBriscoe D, Parker D, Balazs GH, Kurita M, Saito T, Okamoto H, Rice M, Polovina JJ, Crowder LB (2016) Active dispersal in loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta) during the ‘lost years’. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 283:1832. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.0690Burke R (2015) Head-starting turtles: learning from experience. ‎Herpetol Conserv Biol 10(1):299–308Burnham KP, Anderson DR (1998) Model selection and inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New YorkCalenge C (2006) The package ‘adehabitat’ for the R software: a tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals. Ecol Model 197:516–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.03.017Cardona L, Hays GC (2018) Ocean currents, individual movements and genetic structuring of populations. Mar Biol 165:10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-017-3262-2Cardona L, Revelles M, Carreras C, San Félix M, Gazo M, Aguilar A (2005) Western Mediterranean immature loggerhead turtles: habitat use in spring and summer assessed through satellite tracking and aerial surveys. Mar Biol 147:583–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-005-1578-9Cardona L, Revelles M, Parga ML, Tomás J, Aguilar A, Alegre F, Raga A, Ferrer X (2009) Habitat use by loggerhead sea turtles Caretta caretta off the coast of eastern Spain results in a high vulnerability to neritic fishing gear. Mar Biol 156:2621–2630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-009-1288-9Cardona L, Fernández G, Revelles M, Aguilar A (2012) Readaptation to the wild of rehabilitated loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta) assessed by satellite telemetry. Aquatic Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 22:104–112. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.1242Carr A (1987) New perspectives on the pelagic stage of sea turtle development. Conserv Biol 1:103–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.1987.tb00020.xCarreras C, Cardona L, Aguilar A (2004) Incidental catch of the loggerhead turtle Caretta caretta off the Balearic Islands (western Mediterranean). Biol Conserv 117:321–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2003.12.010Carreras C, Pascual M, Tomás J, Marco A, Hochscheid S, Bellido J, Gozalbes P, Parga M, Piovano S, Cardona L (2015) From accidental nesters to potential colonisers, the sequencial colonisation of the mediterranean by the loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta). In: Kaska Y, Sonmez B, Turkecan O, Sezgin C. Book of abstracts of 35th Annual Symposium on Sea Turtle Biology and Conservation. MACART press, TurkeyCasale P (2011) Sea turtle by-catch in the Mediterranean. Fish Fish 12:299–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2010.00394.xCasale P, Heppell S (2016) How much sea turtle bycatch is too much? A stationary age distribution model for simulating population abundance and potential biological removal in the Mediterranean. Endanger Species Res 29:239–254. https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00714Casale P, Margaritoulis D (2010) Sea turtles in the Mediterranean: distribution, threats and conservation priorities. IUCN, GlandCasale P, Mariani P (2014) The first ‘lost year’ of Mediterranean Sea turtles: dispersal patterns indicate subregional management units for conservation. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 498:263–274. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps10640Casale P, Tucker AD (2015) Caretta caretta. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2015: e.T3897A83157651. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2015-4.RLTS.T3897A83157651.en . Accessed 29 March 2017Casale P, Mazaris AD, Freggi D, Basso R, Argano R (2007) Survival probabilities of loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta) estimated from capture-mark-recapture data in the Mediterranean Sea. Sci Mar 71:365–372Casale P, Mazaris AD, Freggi D, Vallini C, Argano R (2009) Growth rates and age at adult size of loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta) in the Mediterranean Sea, estimated through capture-mark-recapture records. Sci Mar 73:589–595. https://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.2009.73n3589Casale P, Mazaris A, Freggi D (2011) Estimation of age at maturity of loggerhead sea turtles Caretta caretta in the Mediterranean using length-frequency data. Endanger Species Res 13:123–129. https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00319Casale P, Freggi D, Furii G, Vallini C, Salvemini P, Deflorio M, Totaro G, Raimondi S, Fortuna C, Godley BJ (2015) Annual survival probabilities of juvenile loggerhead sea turtles indicate high anthropogenic impact on Mediterranean populations. Aquatic Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 25:551–561. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.2467Choquet R, Lebreton JD, Gimenez O, Reboulet AM, Pradel R (2009) U-CARE: Utilities for performing goodness of fit tests and manipulating CApture–REcapture data. Ecography 32:1071–1074. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.05968.xChristiansen F, Putman NF, Farman R, Parker DM, Rice MR, Polovina JJ, Balazs GH, Hays GC (2016) Spatial variation in directional swimming enables juvenile sea turtles to reach and remain in productive waters. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 557:247–259. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps11874CLS (2016) Argos User’s Manual. http://www.argos-system.org/manual/3-location/34_location_classes.htm . Accessed 8 Sep 2016Clusa M, Carreras C, Pascual M, Demetropoulos A, Margaritoulis D, Rees AF, Hamza AA, Khalil M, Aureggi M, Levy Y, Türkozan O, Marco A, Aguilar A, Cardona L (2013) Mitochondrial DNA reveals Pleistocenic colonisation of the Mediterranean by loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 439:15–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2012.10.011Clusa M, Carreras C, Pascual M, Gaughran SJ, Piovano S, Giacoma C, Fernández G, Levy Y, Tomás J, Raga JA, Maffucci F, Hochscheid S, Aguilar A, Cardona L (2014) Fine-scale distribution of juvenile Atlantic and Mediterranean loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta) in the Mediterranean Sea. Mar Biol 161:509–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-013-2353-yColes W, Musick JA (2000) Satellite sea surface temperature analysis and correlation with sea turtle distribution off North Carolina. Copeia 2000:551–554. https://doi.org/10.1643/0045-8511(2000)000[0551:SSSTAA]2.0.CO;2Conant TA, Dutton PH, Eguchi T Epperly SP, Fahy CC, Godfrey MH, MacPherson SL, Possardt EE, Schroeder BA, Seminoff JA, Snover ML, Upite CM, Witherington BE (2009) Loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta) 2009 status review under the US Endangered Species Act. Report of the Loggerhead Biological Review Team to the National Marine Fisheries Service, August 2009. NOAA Institutional Repository. https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/16204 . Accessed 1 January 2018Coyne M, Godley B (2005) Satellite tracking and analysis tool (STAT): an integrated system for archiving, analyzing and mapping animal tracking data. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 301:1–7Crespo-Picazo JL, García-Párraga D, Domènech F, Tomás J, Aznar FJ, Ortega J, Corpa JM (2017) Parasitic outbreak of the copepod Balaenophilus manatorum in neonate loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta) from a head-starting program. BMC Vet Res 13:154. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-1074-8Cribb TH, Crespo-Picazo JL, Cutmore SC, Stacy BA, Chapman PA, García-Párraga D (2017) Elucidation of the first definitively identified life cycle for a marine turtle blood fluke (Trematoda: Spirorchiidae) enables informed control. Int J Parasitol 47:61–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2016.11.002Delaugerre M, Cesarini C (2004) Confirmed nesting of the loggerhead turtle in Corsica. Mar Turt Newsl 104:12Demetropoulos A (2003) Impact of tourism development on marine turtle nesting: strategies and actions to minimise impact. In: Margaritoulis D, Demetropoulos A (eds) Proceedings of the First Mediterranean Conference on Marine Turtles. Barcelona Convention—Bern Convention—Bonn Convention (CMS). Nicosia, p 27–36Domènech F, Badillo FJ, Tomás J, Raga JA, Aznar FJ (2015) Epibiont communities of loggerhead marine turtles (Caretta caretta) in the western Mediterranean: influence of geographic and ecological factors. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 95:851–861. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315414001520Domènech F, Tomás J, Crespo-Picazo JL, García-Párraga D, Raga JA, Aznar FJ (2017) To swim or not to swim: potential transmission of Balaenophilus manatorum (Copepoda: Harpacticoida) in marine turtles. PLoS One 12:e0170789. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170789Douglas DC, Weinzierl R, Davidson CS, Kays R, Wikelski M, Bohrer G (2012) Moderating Argos location errors in animal tracking data. Methods Ecol Evol 3:999–1007. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00245.xEchwikhi K, Jribi I, Bradai MN, Bouain A (2012) Overview of loggerhead turtles coastal nets interactions in the Mediterranean Sea. Aquatic Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 22:827–835. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.2270Gaube P, Barceló C, McGillicuddy DJ, Domingo A, Miller P, Giffoni B, Marcovaldi N, Swimmer Y (2017) The use of mesoscale eddies by juvenile loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta) in the southwestern Atlantic. PLoS One 12:e0172839. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172839Godley BJ, Broderick AC, Glen F, Hays GC (2003) Post-nesting movements and submergence patterns of loggerhead marine turtles in the Mediterranean assessed by satellite tracking. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 287:119–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0981(02)00547-6González C, Bruno I, Maxwell S, Álvarez K, Albareda D, Acha EM, Campagna C (2016) Habitat use, site fidelity and conservation opportunities for juvenile loggerhead sea turtles in the Río de la Plata, Argentina. Mar Biol 163:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-015-2795-5Gueguen L (2000) Segmentation by maximal predictive partitioning according to composition biases. In: Gascuel O, Sagot MF (eds) Computational biology. lecture notes in computer science, 2066th edn. Springer, Berlin, pp 32–44Hays GC (2000) The implications of variable remigration intervals for the assessment of population size in marine turtles. J Therm Biol 206:221–227. https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.2000.2116Hays GC, Marsh R (1997) Estimating the age of juvenile loggerhead sea turtles in the North Atlantic. Can J Zool 75:40–46. https://doi.org/10.1139/z97-005Hays GC, Akesson S, Godley BJ, Luschi P, Santidrian P (2001) The implications of location accuracy for the interpretation of satellite-tracking data. Anim Behav 61:1035–1040. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2001.1685Hays GC, Fossette S, Katselidis KA, Mariani P, Schofield G (2010) Ontogenetic development of migration: lagrangian drift trajectories suggest a new paradigm for sea turtles. J R Soc Interface 7:1319–1327. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2010.0009Hays GC, Ferreira LC, Sequeira AMM, Meekan MG, Duarte CM, Bailey H, Bailleul F, Bowen WD, Caley MJ, Costa DP, Eguíluz VM, Fossette S, Friedlaender AS, Gales N, Gleiss AC, Gunn J, Harcourt R, Hazen EL, Heithaus MR, Heupel M, Holland K, Horning M, Jonsen I, Kooyman GL, Lowe CG, Madsen PT, Marsh H, Phillips RA, Righton D, Ropert-Coudert Y, Sato K, Shaffer SA, Simpfendorfer CA, Sims DW, Skomal G, Takahashi A, Trathan PN, Wikelski M, Womble JN, Thums M (2016) Key questions in marine megafauna movement ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 31:463–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2016.02.015Hazen EL, Maxwell SM, Bailey H, Bograd SJ, Hamann M, Gaspar P, Godley BJ, Shillinger GL (2012) Ontogeny in marine tagging and tracking science: technologies and data gaps. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 457:221–240. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps09857Heppell SS (1998) Application of life-history theory and population model analysis to turtle conservation. Copeia 1998:367–375. https://doi.org/10.2307/1447430Heppell SS, Crowder LB, Crouse DT (1996) Models to evaluate headstarting as a management tool for long-lived turtles. Ecol Appl 6:556–565. https://doi.org/10.2307/2269391Hines JE, Sauer JR (1989) Program CONTRAST–A general program for the analysis of several survival or recovery rate estimates. Fish and Wildlife Technical Report, 24Kobayashi DR, Farman R, Polovina JJ, Parker DM, Rice M, Balazs GH (2014) “Going with the Flow” or not: evidence of positive rheotaxis in oceanic juvenile loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta) in the South Pacific Ocean using satellite tags and ocean circulation data. PLoS One 9:e103701. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103701Kornaraki E, Matossian DA, Mazaris AD, Matsinos YG, Margaritoulis D (2006) Effectiveness of different conservation measures for loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta) nests at Zakynthos Island, Greece. Biol Conserv 130:324–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.12.027Lamont MM, Putman NF, Fujisaki I, Hart KM (2015) Spatial requirements of different life-stages of the loggerhead turtle (Caretta caretta) from a distinct population segment in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Herpetol Conserv Biol 10:2643Lebreton J-D, Burnham KP, Clobert J, Anderson DR (1992) Modelling survival and testing biological hypotheses using marked animals: a unified approach with case studies. Ecol Monogr 62:67–118. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937171Lohmann KJ, Putman NF, Lohmann CM (2012) The magnetic map of hatchling loggerhead sea turtles. Curr Opin Neurobiol 22:336–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2011.11.005Luschi P, Casale P (2014) Movement patterns of marine turtles in the Mediterranean Sea: a review. Ital J Zool 81:478–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/11250003.2014.963714Maffucci F, Corrado R, Palatella L, Borra M, Marullo S, Hochscheid S, Lacorata G, Iudicone D (2016) Seasonal heterogeneity of ocean warming: a mortality sink for ectotherm colonizers. Sci Rep 6:23983. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep23983MAGRAMA (2012) Estrategia Marina. Demarcación Marina Levantino-Balear, Parte I: Marco general, Evaluación inicial y buen estado ambiental. Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente. http://www.mapama.gob.es/es/costas/temas/proteccion-medio-marino/I_Marco_General_Levantino-Balear_tcm7-204338.pdf . Accessed 29 March 2017Mansfield KL, Wyneken J, Rittschof D, Walsh M, Lim CW, Richards PM et al (2012) Satellite tag attachment methods for tracking neonate sea turtles. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 457:181–192. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps09485Mansfield KL, Wyneken J, Porter WP, Luo J (2014) First satellite tracks of neonate sea turtles redefine the ‘lost years’ oceanic niche. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.3039Mansfield KL, Mendilaharsu ML, Putman NF, dei Marcovaldi MAG, Sacco AE, Lopez G, Pires T, Swimmer Y (2017) First satellite tracks of South Atlantic sea turtle ‘lost years’: seasonal variation in trans-equatorial movement. Proc R Soc B 284:20171730. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.1730Margaritoulis D, Argano R, Baran I, Bentivegna F, Bradai MN, Camiñas JA, Casale P (2003) Loggerhead turtles in the Mediterranean Sea: present knowledge and conservation perspectives. In: Bolten AB (ed) Loggerhead Sea Turtle, B.E. Witherington. Smithsonian Institution

37^th plenary meeting report of the scientific, technical and economic committee for fisheries (PLEN-11-02)

The Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries hold its 37th plenary on 11-15 July 2011 in Copenhagen (Denmark). The terms of reference included both issues assessments of STECF Expert Working Group reports and additional requests submitted to the STECF by the Commission. Topics dealt with ranged from fisheries economics to management plan evaluation issues

Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries. Evaluation of fishing effort regimes - Deep sea and Western waters (STECF-11-12)

EWG-11-11 meeting was held on 26 – 30 September 2011 in Cadiz (Spain). This Section of the report covers the Deep Sea and Western Waters and provides fleet specific trends in catch (including discards), nominal effort and catch (landings) per unit of effort in order to advise on fleet specific impacts on stocks under multiannual management plans. STECF reviewed the report during its November 2011 plenary meeting

Role of age and comorbidities in mortality of patients with infective endocarditis

Purpose: The aim of this study was to analyse the characteristics of patients with IE in three groups of age and to assess the ability of age and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) to predict mortality. Methods: Prospective cohort study of all patients with IE included in the GAMES Spanish database between 2008 and 2015. Patients were stratified into three age groups:<65 years, 65 to 80 years, and = 80 years.The area under the receiver-operating characteristic (AUROC) curve was calculated to quantify the diagnostic accuracy of the CCI to predict mortality risk. Results: A total of 3120 patients with IE (1327 < 65 years;1291 65-80 years;502 = 80 years) were enrolled.Fever and heart failure were the most common presentations of IE, with no differences among age groups.Patients =80 years who underwent surgery were significantly lower compared with other age groups (14.3%, 65 years; 20.5%, 65-79 years; 31.3%, =80 years). In-hospital mortality was lower in the <65-year group (20.3%, <65 years;30.1%, 65-79 years;34.7%, =80 years;p < 0.001) as well as 1-year mortality (3.2%, <65 years; 5.5%, 65-80 years;7.6%, =80 years; p = 0.003).Independent predictors of mortality were age = 80 years (hazard ratio [HR]:2.78;95% confidence interval [CI]:2.32–3.34), CCI = 3 (HR:1.62; 95% CI:1.39–1.88), and non-performed surgery (HR:1.64;95% CI:11.16–1.58).When the three age groups were compared, the AUROC curve for CCI was significantly larger for patients aged <65 years(p < 0.001) for both in-hospital and 1-year mortality. Conclusion: There were no differences in the clinical presentation of IE between the groups. Age = 80 years, high comorbidity (measured by CCI), and non-performance of surgery were independent predictors of mortality in patients with IE.CCI could help to identify those patients with IE and surgical indication who present a lower risk of in-hospital and 1-year mortality after surgery, especially in the <65-year group

Registro Español de Trasplante Cardiaco. XXXI Informe Oficial de la Asociación de Insuficiencia Cardiaca de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología

Introducción y objetivos Se presentan las características clínicas y los resultados de los trasplantes cardiacos realizados en España con la actualización correspondiente a 2019. Métodos Se describen las características clínicas y los resultados de los trasplantes cardiacos realizados en 2019, así como las tendencias de estos en el periodo 2010-2018. Resultados En 2019 se realizaron 300 trasplantes (8.794 desde 1984; 2.745 entre 2010 y 2019). Respecto a años previos, los cambios más llamativos son el descenso hasta el 38% de los trasplantes realizados en código urgente, y la consolidación en el cambio de asistencia circulatoria pretrasplante, con la práctica desaparición del balón de contrapulsación (0, 7%), la estabilización del uso del oxigenador extracorpóreo de membrana (9, 6%) y el aumento de los dispositivos de asistencia ventricular (29%). La supervivencia en el trienio 2016-2018 es similar a la del trienio 2013-2015 (p = 0, 34), y ambas mejores que la del trienio 2010-2012 (p = 0, 002 y p = 0, 01 respectivamente). Conclusiones Se mantienen estables tanto la actividad del trasplante cardiaco en España como los resultados en supervivencia en los últimos 2 trienios. Hay una tendencia a realizar menos trasplantes urgentes, la mayoría con dispositivos de asistencia ventricular. Introduction and objectives: The present report describes the clinical characteristics and outcomes of heart transplants in Spain and updates the data to 2019. Methods: We describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of heart transplants performed in Spain in 2019, as well as trends in this procedure from 2010 to 2018. Results: In 2019, 300 transplants were performed (8794 since 1984; 2745 between 2010 and 2019). Compared with previous years, the most notable findings were the decreasing rate of urgent transplants (38%), and the consolidation of the type of circulatory support prior to transplant, with an almost complete disappearance of counterpulsation balloon (0.7%), stabilization in the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (9.6%), and an increase in the use of ventricular assist devices (29.0%). Survival from 2016 to 2018 was similar to that from 2013 to 2015 (P = .34). Survival in both these periods was better than that from 2010 to 2012 (P = .002 and P = .01, respectively). Conclusions: Heart transplant activity has remained stable during the last few years, as have outcomes (in terms of survival). There has been a trend to a lower rate of urgent transplants and to a higher use of ventricular assist devices prior to transplant