Decrease in thyroid adenoma associated (THADA) expression is a marker of dedifferentiation of thyroid tissue

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p><it>Thyroid adenoma associated (THADA) </it>has been identified as the target gene affected by chromosome 2p21 translocations in thyroid adenomas, but the role of THADA in the thyroid is still elusive. The aim of this study was to quantify <it>THADA </it>gene expression in normal tissues and in thyroid hyper- and neoplasias, using real-time PCR.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>For the analysis <it>THADA </it>and 18S rRNA gene expression assays were performed on 34 normal tissue samples, including thyroid, salivary gland, heart, endometrium, myometrium, lung, blood, and adipose tissue as well as on 85 thyroid hyper- and neoplasias, including three adenomas with a 2p21 translocation. In addition, <it>NIS </it>(<it>sodium-iodide symporter</it>) gene expression was measured on 34 of the pathological thyroid samples.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Results illustrated that <it>THADA </it>expression in normal thyroid tissue was significantly higher (<it>p </it>< 0.0001, exact Wilcoxon test) than in the other tissues. Significant differences were also found between non-malignant pathological thyroid samples (goiters and adenomas) and malignant tumors (<it>p </it>< 0.001, Wilcoxon test, t approximation), anaplastic carcinomas (ATCs) and all other samples and also between ATCs and all other malignant tumors (<it>p </it>< 0.05, Wilcoxon test, t approximation). Furthermore, in thyroid tumors <it>THADA </it>mRNA expression was found to be inversely correlated with <it>HMGA2 </it>mRNA. <it>HMGA2 </it>expression was recently identified as a marker revealing malignant transformation of thyroid follicular tumors. A correlation between <it>THADA </it>and <it>NIS </it>has also been found in thyroid normal tissue and malignant tumors.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The results suggest <it>THADA </it>being a marker of dedifferentiation of thyroid tissue.</p

EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA); Scientific Opinion related to the Tolerable Upper Intake Level of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and docosapentaenoic acid (DPA)

&lt;p&gt;Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the Tolerable Upper Intake Level (UL) of the n-3 LCPUFAs eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and docosapentaenoic acid (DPA). Available data are insufficient to establish a UL for n-3 LCPUFA (individually or combined) for any population group. At observed intake levels, consumption of n-3 LCPUFA has not been associated with adverse effects in healthy children or adults. Long-term supplemental intakes of EPA and DHA combined up to about 5 g/day do not appear to increase the risk of spontaneous bleeding episodes or bleeding complications, or affect glucose homeostasis immune function or lipid peroxidation, provided the oxidative stability of the n-3 LCPUFAs is guaranteed. Supplemental intakes of EPA and DHA combined at doses of 2 6 g/day, and of DHA at doses of 2 4 g/day, induce an increase in LDL-cholesterol concentrations of about 3 % which may not have an adverse effect on cardiovascular disease risk, whereas EPA at doses up to 4 g/day has no significant effect on LDL cholesterol. Supplemental intakes of EPA and DHA combined at doses up to 5 g/day, and supplemental intakes of EPA alone up to 1.8 g/day, do not raise safety concerns for adults. Dietary recommendations for EPA and DHA based on cardiovascular risk considerations for European adults are between 250 and 500 mg/day. Supplemental intakes of DHA alone up to about 1 g/day do not raise safety concerns for the general population. No data are available for DPA when consumed alone. In the majority of the human studies considered, fish oils, also containing DPA in generally unknown (but relatively low) amounts, were the source of EPA and DHA.&lt;/p&gt