Framing the collaborative economy - Voices of contestation

Within the context of multiple crises and change, a range of practices discussed under the umbrella term of collaborative (or sharing) economy have been gaining considerable attention. Supporters build an idealistic vision of collaborative societies. Critics have been stripping the concept of its visionary potential, questioning its revolutionary nature. In the study, these debates are brought down to the local level in search for common perceptions among the co-creators of the concept in Vienna, Austria. Towards this aim a Q study is conducted, i.e. a mixed method enabling analyses of subjective perceptions on socially contested topics. Four framings are identified: Visionary Supporters, Market Optimists, Visionary Critics, and Skeptics, each bringing their values, visions, and practical goals characteristic of different understanding of the collaborative economy. The study questions the need for building a globally-applicable definition of the concept, calls for more context-sensitivity, exploratory studies, and city-level multi-stakeholder dialogues

System Dynamics in Transition Management : Participative modeling for transitioning towards a circular construction material industry

Climate change and biodiversity degradation are only two of humanity's major social and environmental issues. Scientists, global policy experts, and the general public are increasingly concluding that traditional interventions to reduce un-sustainability are inadequate and that change in all sectors of society is needed. Change processes of societal innovations are complex, non-linear, and dynamic transitions, for which scientific research increased in recent years. However, the concept of transitions and the proper role of science in promoting change is still debated. In this dissertation, I am especially interested in using scientific methods to understand drivers and barriers of societal innovation, engaging with societal actors, and increasing the effectiveness of interventions. To test the adequacy of System Dynamics modeling as a tool to support transition management, I conduct a case study in the construction material industry in Switzerland. The construction material industry is a traditional industry sector that faces public pressure to change dominant practices towards more sustainability. Yet recycling activities stagnate, and the potential of secondary resources is not utilized. I use six participative modeling workshops with public policy experts and seven interviews with extraction, disposal, recycling companies to develop a quantitative simulation model. This simulation model allows for virtual experiments to accelerate the transition of Switzerland's mineral construction material industry towards a circular economy. In this simulation model, I explain how the dynamic interaction between public policy and industry actors complicates the management of natural resource stocks. The co-production of extraction and disposal policies emerges as the central structure that forms a barrier to a circular economy. These spatial planning policies increase the incentive for companies to extract resources to generate volume for waste disposal. The resulting oversupply of primary resources locks out the use of secondary resources. I suggest experimenting with cooperative spatial planning between urban resource consumers and the hinterlands as a resource supplier to overcome this barrier. This cooperative spatial planning format is a leverage point for the local utilization of secondary resources without increasing material transports between regions. Based on this case study, I discuss integrating system dynamics in applied research for sustainability transitions, providing an empirical perspective on the intersection of System Dynamics (SD) and Transition Management (TM). Beyond the empirical findings for the governance of the transition of the industry sector in the case study, I focus on the methodological contribution of SD for TM. The findings are twofold. Firstly, by documenting participants' mental models during the participative modeling workshops, I gain insights into their learning process. These insights are essential to understand common misperceptions about the governance of the industry sector. For example, identifying the informal policy of extending gravel licenses rather than foreclosing after the expiration of the licensed duration was a critical insight. Furthermore, the discussion surrounding this policy clarified the role of adaptive expectations for the uptake of secondary resources. If new licensing processes do not consider the potential of secondary resources, a structural oversupply of primary resources results. Secondly, SD modeling adds operational guidance to the identification of fields for governance experimentation. These fields for governance experimentation are presented as more than just policy recommendations. They intend to induce more systemic changes, e.g., move from local spatial planning towards interregional spatial planning concepts. The insight that such systemic changes are necessary results from a formal model that clarified the scale of the problem (e.g., interregional arbitrage inhibits local recycling initiatives) and scope for required solutions (interregional spatial planning instead of local policy adjustments). I conclude that SD adds to the orientation phase of TM processes by providing an operational toolbox to engage with policy-relevant actors in a learning process and point at fields for experimentation. However, I also identify that the formal SD perspective in parts inhibited more daring and radical propositions for experimentation. While some might argue this is a weakness, I respond that SD modeling provides feasible recommendations based on identifying leverage points for long-term change.Doktorgradsavhandlin

Epistemic Optimism, Speculation, and the Historical Sciences

This is the final version. Available from Michigan Publishing via the DOI in this record.I summarize the central ideas and arguments of Rock, Bone and Ruin: An Optimist’s Guide to the Historical Sciences, before responding to criticisms from Leonard Finkelman, Joyce Havstad, Derek Turner and Alison Wylie. These cover whether, and to what extent, we can establish optimism about the historical sciences, the distinctions between ‘trace-based’ and ‘non-trace’ evidence, and between experiments and models, and the purpose and limits of speculation in scientific reasoning.John Templeton Foundatio

Social Bricolage in Arts Entrepreneurship: Building a Jazz Society From Scratch

abstract: This paper applies the social bricolage construct to arts entrepreneurship, utilizing an indepth case study for illustration. The importance of six key elements including: making do, a refusal to be constrained by limitations, improvisation, social value creation, stakeholder participation, and persuasion, are identified and discussed in light of the recent formation of the Grand River Jazz Society. Bricolage is shown to be a process whereby entrepreneurs with local knowledge and access to local resources are best able to create enterprises using the materials at hand, rather than overextending their efforts with externally directed attributes requiring unattainable resources. As such, entrepreneurial process elements may be emulated from successful social bricolage examples, recognizing that each context, community, and circumstances will require their own unique solutions

Naming the parts: a case-study of a gender equality initiative with academic women

YesThis paper aims to seek to contribute to current debates about the effectiveness of different types of gender equality interventions in the academic context. This paper presents an argument for the need to move beyond an individual-structural dichotomy in how such interventions are perceived. The paper draws on an action-research case-study, the Through the Glass Ceiling project, to challenge the idea that “individual”/single-actor interventions serve only to reinforce underlying inequalities by attempting to “fix the women”.It is suggested that actions that support women in their careers have the potential to achieve a degree of transformation at individual, cultural and structural levels when such actions are designed with an understanding of how individuals embody the gendered and gendering social structures and values that are constantly being produced and reproduced within society and academia. The case study highlights the benefits of supporting individuals as gendered actors in gendering institutions and of facilitating the development of critical gender awareness, suggesting that such interventions are most effective when undertaken as part of an integrated institutional equality agenda. By calling attention to the ongoing mutual construction of actors and practices in organizations, this paper seeks to make both a conceptual contribution to how we understand the (re)production and potential transformation of gender relations in academia and to influence wider policy dialogues on diversity at work.FP

Hunting in times of change: Uncovering indigenous strategies in the Colombian amazon using a role-playing game

Despite growing industrialization, the shift to a cash economy and natural resource overexploitation, indigenous people of the Amazon region hunt and trade wildlife in order to meet their livelihood requirements. Individual strategies, shaped by the hunters' values and expectations, are changing in response to the region's economic development, but they still face the contrasting challenges of poverty and overhunting. For conservation initiatives to be implemented effectively, it is crucial to take into account people's strategies with their underlying drivers and their adaptive capabilities within a transforming socio-economic environment. To uncover hunting strategies in the Colombian Amazon and their evolution under the current transition, we co-designed a role-playing game together with the local stakeholders. The game revolves around the tension between ecological sustainability and food security—hunters' current main concern. It simulates the mosaic of activities that indigenous people perform in the wet and dry season, while also allowing for specific hunting strategies. Socio-economic conditions change while the game unfolds, opening up to emerging alternative potential scenarios suggested by the stakeholders themselves. Do hunters give up hunting when given the opportunity of an alternative income and protein source? Do institutional changes affect their livelihoods? We played the game between October and December 2016 with 39 players—all of them hunters—from 9 different communities within the Ticoya reserve. Our results show that providing alternatives would decrease overall hunting effort, but impacts are not spatially homogenous. Legalizing trade could lead to overhunting except when market rules and competition come into place. When it comes to coupled human-nature systems, the best way forward to produce socially just and resilient conservation strategies might be to trigger an adaptive process of experiential learning and scenario exploration. The use of games as “boundary objects” can guide stakeholders through the process, eliciting the plurality of their strategies, their drivers and how outside change affects them