10 research outputs found

    Towards the Design of Heuristics by Means of Self-Assembly

    Get PDF
    The current investigations on hyper-heuristics design have sprung up in two different flavours: heuristics that choose heuristics and heuristics that generate heuristics. In the latter, the goal is to develop a problem-domain independent strategy to automatically generate a good performing heuristic for the problem at hand. This can be done, for example, by automatically selecting and combining different low-level heuristics into a problem specific and effective strategy. Hyper-heuristics raise the level of generality on automated problem solving by attempting to select and/or generate tailored heuristics for the problem at hand. Some approaches like genetic programming have been proposed for this. In this paper, we explore an elegant nature-inspired alternative based on self-assembly construction processes, in which structures emerge out of local interactions between autonomous components. This idea arises from previous works in which computational models of self-assembly were subject to evolutionary design in order to perform the automatic construction of user-defined structures. Then, the aim of this paper is to present a novel methodology for the automated design of heuristics by means of self-assembly

    New hyper-heuristic algorithm for gene fragment assembly

    Get PDF
    Gene assembly is a technique to construct a gene sequence by referring to gene fragments generated by sequencing machine. The gene fragments are often short and come in large number. As the number of gene fragments increases, the complexity of the problem increases, and this situation produces a wider solution space. To solve the gene assembly problem, the gene fragments need to be arranged in the right order. However, due to the complexity and wide solution space, the accurate solution to this problem is difficult to be found. By looking from the computational perspective, gene assembly problem is considered as nondeterministic-polynomial (NP) problem, where the gene assembly problem can be solved by using metaheuristic algorithms. Metaheuristic algorithms optimize the problem by searching for almost optimal solution. In this research, a hyper-heuristic algorithm is proposed to solve gene assembly problem due to its advantages that overcome the metaheuristic algorithms. This research is conducted based on three objectives. First, to analyze two metaheuristic algorithms, Chemical Reaction Optimization (CRO) and Quantum Inspired Evolutionary Algorithm (QIEA), to solve the problem. Second, a new hyper-heuristic algorithm (QCRO) is developed based on CRO and QIEA. Third, the solutions generated from all three algorithms are evaluated by using statistical analysis. The performance of the algorithms is evaluated by convergence analysis. The similarities of the draft gene sequence generated by the algorithms are analyzed by using Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST). The findings show that QCRO is competent in finding the right order of the fragments and solving the gene assembly problem. In conclusion, this research presented a new hyper-heuristic algorithm to solve gene fragment assembly problem that is derived from two metaheuristic algorithms. This algorithm is capable of finding the right order of the gene fragments and thus solves the gene assembly problem

    The General Combinatorial Optimization Problem: Towards Automated Algorithm Design

    Get PDF
    This paper defines a new combinatorial optimisation problem, namely General Combinatorial Optimisation Problem (GCOP), whose decision variables are a set of parametric algorithmic components, i.e. algorithm design decisions. The solutions of GCOP, i.e. compositions of algorithmic components, thus represent different generic search algorithms. The objective of GCOP is to find the optimal algorithmic compositions for solving the given optimisation problems. Solving the GCOP is thus equivalent to automatically designing the best algorithms for optimisation problems. Despite recent advances, the evolutionary computation and optimisation research communities are yet to embrace formal standards that underpin automated algorithm design. In this position paper, we establish GCOP as a new standard to define different search algorithms within one unified model. We demonstrate the new GCOP model to standardise various search algorithms as well as selection hyper-heuristics. A taxonomy is defined to distinguish several widely used terminologies in automated algorithm design, namely automated algorithm composition, configuration and selection. We would like to encourage a new line of exciting research directions addressing several challenging research issues including algorithm generality, algorithm reusability, and automated algorithm design

    An efficient robust hyperheuristic clustering algorithm

    Get PDF
    Observations on recent research of clustering problems illustrate that most of the approaches used to deal with these problems are based on meta-heuristic and hybrid meta-heuristic to improve the solutions. Hyperheuristic is a set of heuristics, meta- heuristics and high-level search strategies that work on the heuristic search space instead of solution search space. Hyperheuristics techniques have been employed to develop approaches that are more general than optimization search methods and traditional techniques. In the last few years, most studies have focused considerably on the hyperheuristic algorithms to find generalized solutions but highly required robust and efficient solutions. The main idea in this research is to develop techniques that are able to provide an appropriate level of efficiency and high performance to find a class of basic level heuristic over different type of combinatorial optimization problems. Clustering is an unsupervised method in the data mining and pattern recognition. Nevertheless, most of the clustering algorithms are unstable and very sensitive to their input parameters. This study, proposes an efficient and robust hyperheuristic clustering algorithm to find approximate solutions and attempts to generalize the algorithm for different cluster problem domains. Our proposed clustering algorithm has managed to minimize the dissimilarity of all points of a cluster using hyperheuristic method, from the gravity center of the cluster with respect to capacity constraints in each cluster. The algorithm of hyperheuristic has emerged from pool of heuristic techniques. Mapping between solution spaces is one of the powerful and prevalent techniques in optimization domains. Most of the existing algorithms work directly with solution spaces where in some cases is very difficult and is sometime impossible due to the dynamic behavior of data and algorithm. By mapping the heuristic space into solution spaces, it would be possible to make easy decision to solve clustering problems. The proposed hyperheuristic clustering algorithm performs four major components including selection, decision, admission and hybrid metaheuristic algorithm. The intensive experiments have proven that the proposed algorithm has successfully produced robust and efficient clustering results

    Grammatical evolution hyper-heuristic for combinatorial optimization problems

    Get PDF
    Designing generic problem solvers that perform well across a diverse set of problems is a challenging task. In this work, we propose a hyper-heuristic framework to automatically generate an effective and generic solution method by utilizing grammatical evolution. In the proposed framework, grammatical evolution is used as an online solver builder, which takes several heuristic components (e.g., different acceptance criteria and different neighborhood structures) as inputs and evolves templates of perturbation heuristics. The evolved templates are improvement heuristics, which represent a complete search method to solve the problem at hand. To test the generality and the performance of the proposed method, we consider two well-known combinatorial optimization problems: exam timetabling (Carter and ITC 2007 instances) and the capacitated vehicle routing problem (Christofides and Golden instances). We demonstrate that the proposed method is competitive, if not superior, when compared to state-of-the-art hyper-heuristics, as well as bespoke methods for these different problem domains. In order to further improve the performance of the proposed framework we utilize an adaptive memory mechanism, which contains a collection of both high quality and diverse solutions and is updated during the problem solving process. Experimental results show that the grammatical evolution hyper-heuristic, with an adaptive memory, performs better than the grammatical evolution hyper-heuristic without a memory. The improved framework also outperforms some bespoke methodologies, which have reported best known results for some instances in both problem domains

    Hyper-heuristic decision tree induction

    Get PDF
    A hyper-heuristic is any algorithm that searches or operates in the space of heuristics as opposed to the space of solutions. Hyper-heuristics are increasingly used in function and combinatorial optimization. Rather than attempt to solve a problem using a fixed heuristic, a hyper-heuristic approach attempts to find a combination of heuristics that solve a problem (and in turn may be directly suitable for a class of problem instances). Hyper-heuristics have been little explored in data mining. This work presents novel hyper-heuristic approaches to data mining, by searching a space of attribute selection criteria for decision tree building algorithm. The search is conducted by a genetic algorithm. The result of the hyper-heuristic search in this case is a strategy for selecting attributes while building decision trees. Most hyper-heuristics work by trying to adapt the heuristic to the state of the problem being solved. Our hyper-heuristic is no different. It employs a strategy for adapting the heuristic used to build decision tree nodes according to some set of features of the training set it is working on. We introduce, explore and evaluate five different ways in which this problem state can be represented for a hyper-heuristic that operates within a decisiontree building algorithm. In each case, the hyper-heuristic is guided by a rule set that tries to map features of the data set to be split by the decision tree building algorithm to a heuristic to be used for splitting the same data set. We also explore and evaluate three different sets of low-level heuristics that could be employed by such a hyper-heuristic. This work also makes a distinction between specialist hyper-heuristics and generalist hyper-heuristics. The main difference between these two hyperheuristcs is the number of training sets used by the hyper-heuristic genetic algorithm. Specialist hyper-heuristics are created using a single data set from a particular domain for evolving the hyper-heurisic rule set. Such algorithms are expected to outperform standard algorithms on the kind of data set used by the hyper-heuristic genetic algorithm. Generalist hyper-heuristics are trained on multiple data sets from different domains and are expected to deliver a robust and competitive performance over these data sets when compared to standard algorithms. We evaluate both approaches for each kind of hyper-heuristic presented in this thesis. We use both real data sets as well as synthetic data sets. Our results suggest that none of the hyper-heuristics presented in this work are suited for specialization – in most cases, the hyper-heuristic’s performance on the data set it was specialized for was not significantly better than that of the best performing standard algorithm. On the other hand, the generalist hyper-heuristics delivered results that were very competitive to the best standard methods. In some cases we even achieved a significantly better overall performance than all of the standard methods

    Applied (Meta)-Heuristic in Intelligent Systems

    Get PDF
    Engineering and business problems are becoming increasingly difficult to solve due to the new economics triggered by big data, artificial intelligence, and the internet of things. Exact algorithms and heuristics are insufficient for solving such large and unstructured problems; instead, metaheuristic algorithms have emerged as the prevailing methods. A generic metaheuristic framework guides the course of search trajectories beyond local optimality, thus overcoming the limitations of traditional computation methods. The application of modern metaheuristics ranges from unmanned aerial and ground surface vehicles, unmanned factories, resource-constrained production, and humanoids to green logistics, renewable energy, circular economy, agricultural technology, environmental protection, finance technology, and the entertainment industry. This Special Issue presents high-quality papers proposing modern metaheuristics in intelligent systems

    A study of evoluntionary perturbative hyper-heuristics for the nurse rostering problem.

    Get PDF
    Master of Science in Computer Science. University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg 2017.Hyper-heuristics are an emerging field of study for combinatorial optimization. The aim of a hyper-heuristic is to produce good results across a set of problems rather than producing the best results. There has been little investigation of hyper-heuristics for the nurse rostering problem. The majority of hyper-heuristics for the nurse rostering problem fit into a single type of hyper-heuristic, the selection perturbative hyper-heuristic. There is no work in using evolutionary algorithms employed as selection perturbative hyper-heuristics for the nurse rostering problem. There is also no work in using the generative perturbative type of hyper-heuristic for the nurse rostering problem. The first objective of this dissertation is to investigate the selection perturbative hyper-heuristic for the nurse rostering problem and the effectiveness of employing an evolutionary algorithm (SPHH). The second objective is to investigate a generative perturbative hyper-heuristic to evolve perturbation heuristics for the nurse rostering problem using genetic programming (GPHH). The third objective is to compare the performance of SPHH and GPHH. SPHH and GPHH were evaluated using the INRC2010 benchmark data set and the results obtained were compared to available results from literature. The INRC2010 benchmark set is comprised of sprint, medium and long instance types. SPHH and GPHH produced good results for the INRC2010 benchmark data set. GPHH and SPHH were found to have different strengths and weaknesses. SPHH found better results than GPHH for the medium instances. GPHH found better results than SPHH for the long instances. SPHH produced better average results. GPHH produced results that were closer to the best known results. These results suggest future research should investigate combining SPHH and GPHH to benefit from the strengths of both perturbative hyper-heuristics
    corecore