A hyper-heuristic is any algorithm that searches or operates in the space of
heuristics as opposed to the space of solutions. Hyper-heuristics are
increasingly used in function and combinatorial optimization. Rather than
attempt to solve a problem using a fixed heuristic, a hyper-heuristic
approach attempts to find a combination of heuristics that solve a problem
(and in turn may be directly suitable for a class of problem instances).
Hyper-heuristics have been little explored in data mining. This work presents
novel hyper-heuristic approaches to data mining, by searching a space of
attribute selection criteria for decision tree building algorithm. The search is
conducted by a genetic algorithm. The result of the hyper-heuristic search in
this case is a strategy for selecting attributes while building decision trees.
Most hyper-heuristics work by trying to adapt the heuristic to the state of
the problem being solved. Our hyper-heuristic is no different. It employs a
strategy for adapting the heuristic used to build decision tree nodes
according to some set of features of the training set it is working on. We
introduce, explore and evaluate five different ways in which this problem
state can be represented for a hyper-heuristic that operates within a decisiontree
building algorithm. In each case, the hyper-heuristic is guided by a rule
set that tries to map features of the data set to be split by the decision tree
building algorithm to a heuristic to be used for splitting the same data set.
We also explore and evaluate three different sets of low-level heuristics that
could be employed by such a hyper-heuristic.
This work also makes a distinction between specialist hyper-heuristics and
generalist hyper-heuristics. The main difference between these two hyperheuristcs
is the number of training sets used by the hyper-heuristic genetic
algorithm. Specialist hyper-heuristics are created using a single data set from
a particular domain for evolving the hyper-heurisic rule set. Such algorithms
are expected to outperform standard algorithms on the kind of data set used
by the hyper-heuristic genetic algorithm. Generalist hyper-heuristics are
trained on multiple data sets from different domains and are expected to
deliver a robust and competitive performance over these data sets when
compared to standard algorithms.
We evaluate both approaches for each kind of hyper-heuristic presented in
this thesis. We use both real data sets as well as synthetic data sets. Our
results suggest that none of the hyper-heuristics presented in this work are
suited for specialization – in most cases, the hyper-heuristic’s performance on
the data set it was specialized for was not significantly better than that of
the best performing standard algorithm. On the other hand, the generalist
hyper-heuristics delivered results that were very competitive to the best
standard methods. In some cases we even achieved a significantly better
overall performance than all of the standard methods
