Parameterized Compilation Lower Bounds for Restricted CNF-formulas

We show unconditional parameterized lower bounds in the area of knowledge compilation, more specifically on the size of circuits in decomposable negation normal form (DNNF) that encode CNF-formulas restricted by several graph width measures. In particular, we show that - there are CNF formulas of size $n$ and modular incidence treewidth $k$ whose smallest DNNF-encoding has size $n^{\Omega(k)}$, and - there are CNF formulas of size $n$ and incidence neighborhood diversity $k$ whose smallest DNNF-encoding has size $n^{\Omega(\sqrt{k})}$. These results complement recent upper bounds for compiling CNF into DNNF and strengthen---quantitatively and qualitatively---known conditional low\-er bounds for cliquewidth. Moreover, they show that, unlike for many graph problems, the parameters considered here behave significantly differently from treewidth

An Analysis of Core-Guided Maximum Satisfiability Solvers Using Linear Programming

Many current complete MaxSAT algorithms fall into two categories: core-guided or implicit hitting set. The two kinds of algorithms seem to have complementary strengths in practice, so that each kind of solver is better able to handle different families of instances. This suggests that a hybrid might match and outperform either, but the techniques used seem incompatible. In this paper, we focus on PMRES and OLL, two core-guided algorithms based on max resolution and soft cardinality constraints, respectively. We show that these algorithms implicitly discover cores of the original formula, as has been previously shown for PM1. Moreover, we show that in some cases, including unweighted instances, they compute the optimum hitting set of these cores at each iteration. We also give compact integer linear programs for each which encode this hitting set problem. Importantly, their continuous relaxation has an optimum that matches the bound computed by the respective algorithms. This goes some way towards resolving the incompatibility of implicit hitting set and core-guided algorithms, since solvers based on the implicit hitting set algorithm typically solve the problem by encoding it as a linear program

Propagators and Solvers for the Algebra of Modular Systems

To appear in the proceedings of LPAR 21. Solving complex problems can involve non-trivial combinations of distinct knowledge bases and problem solvers. The Algebra of Modular Systems is a knowledge representation framework that provides a method for formally specifying such systems in purely semantic terms. Formally, an expression of the algebra defines a class of structures. Many expressive formalism used in practice solve the model expansion task, where a structure is given on the input and an expansion of this structure in the defined class of structures is searched (this practice overcomes the common undecidability problem for expressive logics). In this paper, we construct a solver for the model expansion task for a complex modular systems from an expression in the algebra and black-box propagators or solvers for the primitive modules. To this end, we define a general notion of propagators equipped with an explanation mechanism, an extension of the alge- bra to propagators, and a lazy conflict-driven learning algorithm. The result is a framework for seamlessly combining solving technology from different domains to produce a solver for a combined system.Comment: To appear in the proceedings of LPAR 2

Approaches to grid-based SAT solving

In this work we develop techniques for using distributed computing resources to efficiently solve instances of the propositional satisfiability problem (SAT). The computing resources considered in this work are assumed to be geographically distributed and connected by a non-dedicated network. Such systems are typically referred to as computational grid environments. The time a modern SAT solver consumes while solving an instance varies according to a random distribution. Unlike many other methods for distributed SAT solving, this work identifies the random distribution as a valuable resource for solving-time reduction. The methods which use randomness in the run times of a search algorithm, such as the ones discussed in this work, are examples of multi-search. The main contribution of this work is in developing and analyzing the multi-search approach in SAT solving and showing its efficiency with several experiments. For the purpose of the analysis, the work introduces a grid simulation model which captures several of the properties of a grid environment which are not observed in more traditional parallel computing systems. The work develops two algorithmic frameworks for multi-search in SAT. The first, SDSAT, is based on using properties of the distribution of the solving time so that the expected time required to solve an instance is reduced. Based on the analysis of SDSAT, the work proposes an algorithm for efficiently using large number of computing resources simultaneously to solve collections of SAT instances. The analysis of SDSAT also motivates the second algorithmic framework, CL-SDSAT. The framework is used to efficiently solve many industrial SAT instances by carefully combining information learned in the distributed SAT solvers. All methods described in the work are directly applicable in a wide range of grid environments and can be used together with virtually unmodified state-of-the-art SAT solvers. The methods are experimentally verified using standard benchmark SAT instances in a production-level grid environment. The experiments show that using the relatively simple methods developed in the work, SAT instances which cannot be solved efficiently in sequential settings can be now solved in a grid environment

Reducing SAT to Max2SAT

In the literature we find reductions from 3SAT to Max2SAT. These reductions are based on the usage of a gadget, i.e., a combinatorial structure that allows translating constraints of one problem to constraints of another. Unfortunately, the generation of these gadgets lacks an intuitive or efficient method. In this paper, we provide an efficient and constructive method for Reducing SAT to Max2SAT and show empirical results of how MaxSAT solvers are more efficient than SAT solvers solving the translation of hard formulas for Resolution.Supported by projects PROOFS (PID2019-109137GB-C21) and EU-H2020-RIP LOGISTAR (No. 769142)

Combining VSIDS and CHB Using Restarts in SAT

Conflict Driven Clause Learning (CDCL) solvers are known to be efficient on structured instances and manage to solve ones with a large number of variables and clauses. An important component in such solvers is the branching heuristic which picks the next variable to branch on. In this paper, we evaluate different strategies which combine two state-of-the-art heuristics, namely the Variable State Independent Decaying Sum (VSIDS) and the Conflict History-Based (CHB) branching heuristic. These strategies take advantage of the restart mechanism, which helps to deal with the heavy-tailed phenomena in SAT, to switch between these heuristics thus ensuring a better and more diverse exploration of the search space. Our experimental evaluation shows that combining VSIDS and CHB using restarts achieves competitive results and even significantly outperforms both heuristics for some chosen strategies