Enhanced motorcycle roll stability by use of a reaction wheel actuator

The paper presents a preliminary study on the use of the reaction wheel for improving the roll stability of motorcycles. The development of the controller is based on the dynamics of the reaction wheel pendulum. A feedback linearization approach is employed for the control of the reaction wheel pendulum and the resulting controller is subsequently implemented in a 12 degree-of-freedom non-linear motorcycle model. Simulations reveal the effectiveness of the controller, as well as some problems related to unrealistic power requirements and gyroscopic effects of the reaction wheel during cornering. The latter are treated by introduction of a moving roll-angle reference, while some proposals for reducing the required power to realistic levels are also discussed

Sliding mode control of the reaction wheel pendulum

textThe Reaction Wheel Pendulum (RWP) is an interesting nonlinear system. A prototypical control problem for the RWP is to stabilize it around the upright position starting from the bottom, which is generally divided into at least 2 phases: (1) Swing-up phase: where the pendulum is swung up and moves toward the upright position. (2) Stabilization phase: here, the pendulum is controlled to be balanced around the upright position. Previous studies mainly focused on an energy method in swing-up phase and a linearization method in stabilization phase. However, several limitations exist. The energy method in swing-up mode usually takes a long time to approach the upright position. Moreover, its trajectory is not controlled which prevents further extensions. The linearization method in the stabilization phase, can only work for a very small range of angles around the equilibrium point, limiting its applicability. In this thesis, we took the 2nd order state space model and solved it for a constant torque input generating the family of phase-plane trajectories (see Appendix A). Therefore, we are able to plan the motion of the reaction wheel pendulum in the phase plane and a sliding mode controller may be implemented around these trajectories. The control strategy presented here is divided into three phases. (1) In the swing up phase a switching torque controller is designed to oscillate the pendulum until the system’s energy is enough to drive the system to the upright position. Our approach is more generic than previous approaches; (2) In the catching phase a sliding surface is designed in the phase plane based on the zero torque trajectories, and a 2nd order sliding mode controller is implemented to drive the pendulum moving along the sliding surface, which improves the robustness compared to the previous method in which the controller switches to stabilization mode when it reaches a pre-defined region. (3) In the stabilization phase a 2nd order sliding mode integral controller is used to solve the balancing problem, which has the potential to stabilize the pendulum in a larger angular region when compared to the previous linearization methods. At last we combine the 3 phases together in a combined strategy. Both simulation results and experimental results are shown. The control unit is National Instruments CompactRIO 9014 with NI 9505 module for module driving and NI 9411 module for encoding. The Reaction Wheel Pendulum is built by Quanser Consulting Inc. and placed in UT’s Advanced Mechatronics Lab.Mechanical Engineerin

Stabilising an Inverted Pendulum with PID Controller

Inverted pendulum is a system in which the centre of the mass is above the pivot point, where the mass can freely rotate. The inverted pendulum has a unique trait; it is unpredictable, non-linear and consists of multiple variables. Balancing by PID controller is a continuous process where it corrects the feedback system error from the difference between the measured value and the desired value. This research mainly focusses on balancing an inverted pendulum with reaction wheel. The research objectives are to construct a self-balanced inverted pendulum and using PID controller to control the stability of the pendulum. The PID configuration is then evaluated based on the response of the system. The idea is to use the reaction torque generated by the motor to counter balance the inverted pendulum. The factor which governs the amount of torque generated is the height of the pendulum and the mass of the wheel. To balance the pendulum, tuning the PID gain is essential. Proportional gain is tuned first to get oscillation, next is to tune the integral and derivative gain to get a smoother and quicker response. Idea is to get short settling time, and minimum overshoot percentage. Hypothesis is that higher proportional gain will give a faster response rate and the acceleration of the motor is the key on generating torque. A simulation of the pendulum falling is simulated and the results are recorded in term of the response of the pendulum against time. At initial point, proportional gain, integral gain and derivative gain are set to zero to validate the simulation. The finding in this research is that torque is generated by the acceleration of the reaction wheel. Higher acceleration gives a high torque. Others findings is the PID parameter; Proportional gain increases the response rate; Integral gain is used to eliminate steady state error; Derivative gain is used to lessen the overshoot.</p

Stabilization, pointing and command control of a balloon-borne 1-meter telescope

A 1-meter balloon-borne telescope has been constructed and flown to observe far-infrared radiation from celestial sources. The attitude control systems must perform to the diffraction limit of the telescope for stabilization and have positioning capability for source acquisition. These and associated systems are discussed in detail, as is the command control of the payload as a whole

Synchronization of clocks

Peer reviewedPostprin