Logic programming with pseudo-Boolean constraints

Boolean constraints play an important role in various constraint logic programming languages. In this paper we consider pseudo-Boolean constraints, that is equations and inequalities between pseudo-Boolean functions. A pseudo-Boolean function is an integer-valued function of Boolean variables and thus a generalization of a Boolean function. Pseudo-Boolean functions occur in many application areas, in particular in problems from operations research. An interesting connection to logic is that inference problems in propositional logic can be translated into linear pseudo-Boolean optimization problems. More generally, pseudo-Boolean constraints can be seen as a particular way of combining two of the most important domains in constraint logic programming: arithmetic and Boolean algebra. In this paper we define a new constraint logic programming language {\em CLP(PB)} for logic progamming with pseudo-Boolean constraints. The language is an instance of the general constraint logic programming language scheme {\em CLP(X)} and inherits all the typical semantic properties. We show that any pseudo-Boolean constraint has a most general solution and give variable elimination algorithms for pseudo-Boolean unification and unconstrained pseudo-Boolean optimization. Both algorithms subsume the well-known Boolean unification algorithm of B\"uttner and Simonis

Pseudo-Boolean Constraint Encodings for Conjunctive Normal Form and their Applications

In contrast to a single clause a pseudo-Boolean (PB) constraint is much more expressive and hence it is easier to define problems with the help of PB constraints. But while PB constraints provide us with a high-level problem description, it has been shown that solving PB constraints can be done faster with the help of a SAT solver. To apply such a solver to a PB constraint we have to encode it with clauses into conjunctive normal form (CNF). While we can find a basic encoding into CNF which is equivalent to a given PB constraint, the solving time of a SAT solver significantly depends on different properties of an encoding, e.g. the number of clauses or if generalized arc consistency (GAC) is maintained during the search for a solution. There are various PB encodings that try to optimize or balance these properties. This thesis is about such encodings. For a better understanding of the research field an overview about the state-of-the art encodings is given. The focus of the overview is a simple but complete description of each encoding, such that any reader could use, implement and extent them in his own work. In addition two novel encodings are presented: The Sequential Weight Counter (SWC) encoding and the Binary Merger Encoding. While the SWC encoding provides a very simple structure – it is listed in four lines – empirical evaluation showed its practical usefulness in various applications. The Binary Merger encoding reduces the number of clauses a PB encoding needs while having the important GAC property. To the best of our knowledge currently no other encoding has a lower upper bound for the number of clauses produced by a PB encoding with this property. This is an important improvement of the state-of-the art, since both GAC and a low number of clauses are vital for an improved solving time of the SAT solver. The thesis also contributes to the development of new applications for PB constraint encodings. The programming library PBLib provides researchers with an open source implementation of almost all PB encodings – including the encodings for the special cases at-most-one and cardinality constraints. The PBLib is also the foundation of the presented weighted MaxSAT solver optimax, the PBO solver pbsolver and the WBO, PBO and weighted MaxSAT solver npSolver

A generic, collaborative framework for internal constraint solving

Esta tesis propone un esquema genérico y cooperativo para CLP(Interval(X)) donde X es cualquier dominio de computación con estructura de retículo. El esquema, que está basado en la teoría de retículos, es un enfoque general para la satisfacción y op-timización de restricciones de intervalo así como para la cooperación de resolutores de intervalo definidos sobre dominios de computación con estructura de retículos, independientemente de la cardinalidad de estos. Nuestra propuesta asegura un enfoque transparente sobre el cual las restricciones, los dominios de computación y los mecanismos de propagación y cooperación, definidos entre las variables restringidas, pueden ser fácilmente especificados a nivel del usuario. La parte principal de la tesis presenta una especificación formal de este esquema.Los principales resultados conseguidos en esta tesis son los siguientes:Una comparativa global de la eficiencia y algunos aspectos de la expresividad de ocho sistemas de restricciones. Esta comparativa, realizada sobre el dominio finito y el dominio Booleano, muestra diferencias principales entre los sistemas de restricciones existentes.Para formalizar el marco de satisfacción de restricciones para CLP(Interval(X))hemos descrito el proceso global de resolución de restricciones de intervalo sobre cualquier retículo, separando claramente los procesos de propagación y división (ramificación) de intervalos. Una de las ventajas de nuestra propuesta es que la monótona de las restricciones esta implícitamente definida en la teoría. Además, declaramos un conjunto de propiedades interesantes que, bajo ciertas condiciones, son satisfechas por cualquier instancia del esquema genérico. Mas aún, mostramos que muchos sistemas de restricciones actualmente existentes satisfacen estas condiciones y, además, proporcionamos indicaciones sobre como extender el sistema mediante la especificación de otras instancias interesantes y novedosas. Nuestro esquema para CLP(Interval(X)) permite la cooperación de resolutores de manera que la información puede ⁰uir entre diferentes dominios de computación.Además, es posible combinar distintas instancias del esquema: por ejemplo, instancias bien conocidas tales como CLP(Interval(<)), CLP(Interval(Integer)),CLP(Interval(Set)), CLP(Interval(Bool)), y otras novedosas que son el resultado de la generación de nuevos dominios de computación definidos por el usuario, o incluso que surgen de la combinación de dominios ya existentes como puede ser CLP(Interval(X1 £ : : : £ Xn)). Por lo tanto, X puede ser instanciado a cualquier conjunto de dominios de computación con estructura de retículo de forma que su correspondiente instancia CLP(Interval(X)) permite una amplia flexibilidad en la definición de dominios en X (probablemente definidos por el usuario) y en la interaccion entre estos dominios.Mediante la implementacion de un prototipo, demostramos que un unico sistema,que este basado en nuestro esquema para CLP(Interval(X)), puede proporcionarsoporte para la satisfaccion y la optimizacion de restricciones as como para la cooperacion de resolutores sobre un conjunto conteniendo multiples dominios decomputacion. Ademas, el sistema sigue un novedoso enfoque transparente sujeto a una doble perspectiva ya que el usuario puede definir no solo nuevas restricciones y su mecanismo de propagacion, sino tambien nuevos dominios sobre los cuales nuevas restricciones pueden ser resueltas as como el mecanismo de cooperacion entre todos los dominios de computación (ya sean definidos por el usuario o predefinidos por el sistema).En nuestra opinión, esta tesis apunta nuevas y potenciales direcciones de investigación dentro de la comunidad de las restricciones de intervalo.Para alcanzar los resultados expuestos, hemos seguido los siguientes pasos (1) la elección de un enfoque adecuado sobre el cual construir los fundamentos teóricos de nuestro esquema genérico; (2) la construcción de un marco teórico genérico (que llamaremos el marco básico) para la propagación de restricciones de intervalo sobre cualquier retículo; (3) la integración, en el marco básico, de una técnica novedosa que facilita la cooperación de resolutores y que surge de la definición, sobre múltiples dominios, de operadores de restricciones y (4) la extensión del marco resultante para la resolución y optimización completa de las restricciones de intervalo.Finalmente presentamos clp(L), un lenguaje de programación lógica de restricciones de intervalo que posibilita la resolución de restricciones sobre cualquier conjunto de retículos y que esta implementado a partir de las ideas formalizadas en el marco teórico. Describimos una primera implementación de este lenguaje y desarrollamos algunos ejemplos de como usarla. Este prototipo demuestra que nuestro esquema para CLP(Interval(X)) puede ser implementado en un sistema único que, como consecuencia, proporciona, bajo un enfoque transparente sobre dominios y restricciones, cooperación de resolutores así como satisfacción y optimización completa de restricciones sobre diferentes dominios de computación

Solving hard industrial combinatorial problems with SAT

The topic of this thesis is the development of SAT-based techniques and tools for solving industrial combinatorial problems. First, it describes the architecture of state-of-the-art SAT and SMT Solvers based on the classical DPLL procedure. These systems can be used as black boxes for solving combinatorial problems. However, sometimes we can increase their efficiency with slight modifications of the basic algorithm. Therefore, the study and development of techniques for adjusting SAT Solvers to specific combinatorial problems is the first goal of this thesis. Namely, SAT Solvers can only deal with propositional logic. For solving general combinatorial problems, two different approaches are possible: - Reducing the complex constraints into propositional clauses. - Enriching the SAT Solver language. The first approach corresponds to encoding the constraint into SAT. The second one corresponds to using propagators, the basis for SMT Solvers. Regarding the first approach, in this document we improve the encoding of two of the most important combinatorial constraints: cardinality constraints and pseudo-Boolean constraints. After that, we present a new mixed approach, called lazy decomposition, which combines the advantages of encodings and propagators. The other part of the thesis uses these theoretical improvements in industrial combinatorial problems. We give a method for efficiently scheduling some professional sport leagues with SAT. The results are promising and show that a SAT approach is valid for these problems. However, the chaotical behavior of CDCL-based SAT Solvers due to VSIDS heuristics makes it difficult to obtain a similar solution for two similar problems. This may be inconvenient in real-world problems, since a user expects similar solutions when it makes slight modifications to the problem specification. In order to overcome this limitation, we have studied and solved the close solution problem, i.e., the problem of quickly finding a close solution when a similar problem is considered

Solving pseudo-Boolean constraints

Pseudo-Boolean constraints are equations or inequalities between integer polynomials in 0-1 variables. On the one hand, they generalize Boolean constraints, on the other hand, they are a restricted form of finite domain constraints. In this paper, we present special constraint solving techniques for the domain {0,1} originating from mathematical programming. The key concepts are the generation of strong valid inequalities for the solution set of a constraint system and the notion of branch-and-cut

SAT-Based Software Certification

This report formalizes a notion of witnesses as the basis of certifying the correctness of software. The first part of the report is concerned with witnesses for the satisfaction of linear temporal logic specifications by infinite state programs and shows how such witnesses may be constructed via predicate abstraction and validated by generating and proving verification conditions. In addition, the first part of this report proposes the use of theorem provers based on Boolean propositional satisfiability (SAT) and resolution proofs in validating these verification conditions. In addition to yielding extremely compact proofs, a SAT-based approach overcomes several limitations of conventional theorem provers when applied to the verification of programs written in real-life programming languages. The second part of this report formalizes a notion of witnesses of simulation conformance between infinite state programs and finite state machine specifications. The report also proves that computing a minimal simulation relation between two finite state machines is an NP-hard problem. Finally, the report presents algorithms to construct simulation witnesses of minimal size by solving pseudo-Boolean constraints. The author's experiments on several nontrivial benchmarks suggest that a SAT-based approach can yield extremely compact proofs