Solving disequations

We present a general study of equations (objects of form s=t and disequations (objects of form s \ne t) solving. The problem is approached from its fully general mathematical definition clearly separating universally and existentially quantified variables. In addition it is showed to have many connections with unification in equational theories like associativity commutativity, in particular methods similar to those used to solve equational unification problem works in solving disequations. This abstract framework is then applied to study the sufficient completeness of a rewrite rule based definition of a function

Nominal disunification

Dissertação (mestrado)—Universidade de Brasília, Instituto de Ciências Exatas, Departamento de Matemática, 2019.Propõe-se uma extensão para problemas de disunificação de primeira-ordem adicionando suporte a operadores de ligação de acordo com a abordagem nominal. Nesta abordagem, abstração é implementada usando átomos nominais ao invés de variáveis de ligação como na representação clássica de termos e renomeamento de átomos é implementado por permutações. Em lógica nominal problemas de unificação consistem de perguntas equacionais da forma s ≈α ? t (lê-se: s é α-equivalente a t?) consideradas sobre problemas de freshness da forma a# ? t (lê-se: a é fresco em t?) que restringem soluções proibindo ocorrências livres de átomos na instanciação de variáveis. Além dessas questões equacionais e freshness, problemas de disunificação nominal incluem restrições na forma de disequações s ̸≈α ? t (lê-se: s é αdiferente de t?) com soluções dadas por pares consistindo de uma substituição σ e um conjunto de restrições de freshness na forma a#X tal que sobre estas restrições a σ-instanciação de equações, disequações, e problemas de freshness são válidas. Mostra-se, reutilizando noções de unificação nominal, como decidir se dois termos nominais podem ser feitos diferentes módulo α-equivalência. Isso é feito extendendo resultados anteriores sobre disunificação de primeira ordem e definindo a noção de soluções com exceção na linguagem nominal. Uma discussão sobre a semântica de restrições em forma de disequações também é apresentada.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq).An extension of first-order disunification problems is proposed by taking into account binding operators according to the nominal approach. In this approach, bindings are implemented through nominal atoms used instead of binding variables and renaming of atoms are implemented by atom permutations. In the nominal setting, unification problems consist of equational questions of the form s ≈α ? t (read: is s α-equivalent to t?) considered under freshness problems a# ? t (read: is a fresh for t?) that restrict solutions by forbidding free occurrences of atoms in the instantiations of variables. In addition to equational and freshness problems, nominal disunification problems also include nominal disunification constraints in the form of disequations s ̸≈α ? t (read: is s α-different to t?) and their solutions consist of pairs of a substitution σ and a finite set of freshness constraints in the form of a#X such that under these restrictions the σ-instantiation of the equations, disequations, and freshness problems holds. By re-using nominal unification techniques, it is shown how to decide whether two nominal terms can be made different modulo α-equivalence. This is done by extending previous results on first-order disunification and by defining the notion of solutions with exceptions in the nominal syntax. A discussion on the semantics of disunification constraints is also given

Combination techniques and decision problems for disunification

Previous work on combination techniques considered the question of how to combine unification algorithms for disjoint equational theories E_{1} ,...,E_{n} in order to obtain a unification algorithm for the union E1 unified ... unified En of the theories. Here we want to show that variants of this method may be used to decide solvability and ground solvability of disunification problems in E_{1}cup...cup E_{n}. Our first result says that solvability of disunification problems in the free algebra of the combined theory E_{1}cup...cup E_{n} is decidable if solvability of disunification problems with linear constant restrictions in the free algebras of the theories E_{i}(i = 1,...,n) is decidable. In order to decide ground solvability (i.e., solvability in the initial algebra) of disunification problems in E_{1}cup...cup E_{n} we have to consider a new kind of subproblem for the particular theories Ei, namely solvability (in the free algebra) of disunification problems with linear constant restriction under the additional constraint that values of variables are not Ei-equivalent to variables. The correspondence between ground solvability and this new kind of solvability holds, (1) if one theory Ei is the free theory with at least one function symbol and one constant, or (2) if the initial algebras of all theories Ei are infinite. Our results can be used to show that the existential fragment of the theory of the (ground) term algebra modulo associativity of a finite number of function symbols is decidable; the same result follows for function symbols which are associative and commutative, or associative, commutative and idempotent

Combination techniques and decision problems for disunification

Previous work on combination techniques considered the question of how to combine unification algorithms for disjoint equational theories E_{1} ,...,E_{n} in order to obtain a unification algorithm for the union E1 unified ... unified En of the theories. Here we want to show that variants of this method may be used to decide solvability and ground solvability of disunification problems in E_{1}cup...cup E_{n}. Our first result says that solvability of disunification problems in the free algebra of the combined theory E_{1}cup...cup E_{n} is decidable if solvability of disunification problems with linear constant restrictions in the free algebras of the theories E_{i}(i = 1,...,n) is decidable. In order to decide ground solvability (i.e., solvability in the initial algebra) of disunification problems in E_{1}cup...cup E_{n} we have to consider a new kind of subproblem for the particular theories Ei, namely solvability (in the free algebra) of disunification problems with linear constant restriction under the additional constraint that values of variables are not Ei-equivalent to variables. The correspondence between ground solvability and this new kind of solvability holds, (1) if one theory Ei is the free theory with at least one function symbol and one constant, or (2) if the initial algebras of all theories Ei are infinite. Our results can be used to show that the existential fragment of the theory of the (ground) term algebra modulo associativity of a finite number of function symbols is decidable; the same result follows for function symbols which are associative and commutative, or associative, commutative and idempotent

Dismatching and Local Disunification in EL

Unification in Description Logics has been introduced as a means to detect redundancies in ontologies. We try to extend the known decidability results for unification in the Description Logic EL to disunification since negative constraints on unifiers can be used to avoid unwanted unifiers. While decidability of the solvability of general EL-disunification problems remains an open problem, we obtain NP-completeness results for two interesting special cases: dismatching problems, where one side of each negative constraint must be ground, and local solvability of disunification problems, where we restrict the attention to solutions that are built from so-called atoms occurring in the input problem. More precisely, we first show that dismatching can be reduced to local disunification, and then provide two complementary NP-algorithms for finding local solutions of (general) disunification problems

Decomposable Theories

We present in this paper a general algorithm for solving first-order formulas in particular theories called "decomposable theories". First of all, using special quantifiers, we give a formal characterization of decomposable theories and show some of their properties. Then, we present a general algorithm for solving first-order formulas in any decomposable theory "T". The algorithm is given in the form of five rewriting rules. It transforms a first-order formula "P", which can possibly contain free variables, into a conjunction "Q" of solved formulas easily transformable into a Boolean combination of existentially quantified conjunctions of atomic formulas. In particular, if "P" has no free variables then "Q" is either the formula "true" or "false". The correctness of our algorithm proves the completeness of the decomposable theories. Finally, we show that the theory "Tr" of finite or infinite trees is a decomposable theory and give some benchmarks realized by an implementation of our algorithm, solving formulas on two-partner games in "Tr" with more than 160 nested alternated quantifiers

Deciding equivalence-based properties using constraint solving

Formal methods have proved their usefulness for analyzing the security of protocols. Most existing results focus on trace properties like secrecy or authentication. There are however several security properties, which cannot be defined (or cannot be naturally defined) as trace properties and require a notion of behavioural equivalence. Typical examples are anonymity, privacy related properties or statements closer to security properties used in cryptography. In this paper, we consider three notions of equivalence defined in the applied pi calculus: observational equivalence, may-testing equivalence, and trace equivalence. First, we study the relationship between these three notions. We show that for determinate processes, observational equivalence actually coincides with trace equivalence, a notion simpler to reason with. We exhibit a large class of determinate processes, called simple processes, that capture most existing protocols and cryptographic primitives. While trace equivalence and may-testing equivalence seem very similar, we show that may-testing equivalence is actually strictly stronger than trace equivalence. We prove that the two notions coincide for image-finite processes, such as processes without replication. Second, we reduce the decidability of trace equivalence (for finite processes) to deciding symbolic equivalence between sets of constraint systems. For simple processes without replication and with trivial else branches, it turns out that it is actually sufficient to decide symbolic equivalence between pairs of positive constraint systems. Thanks to this reduction and relying on a result first proved by M. Baudet, this yields the first decidability result of observational equivalence for a general class of equational theories (for processes without else branch nor replication). Moreover, based on another decidability result for deciding equivalence between sets of constraint systems, we get decidability of trace equivalence for processes with else branch for standard primitives