3,919 research outputs found
On Second-Order Monadic Monoidal and Groupoidal Quantifiers
We study logics defined in terms of second-order monadic monoidal and
groupoidal quantifiers. These are generalized quantifiers defined by monoid and
groupoid word-problems, equivalently, by regular and context-free languages. We
give a computational classification of the expressive power of these logics
over strings with varying built-in predicates. In particular, we show that
ATIME(n) can be logically characterized in terms of second-order monadic
monoidal quantifiers
Efficiency characterization of a large neuronal network: a causal information approach
When inhibitory neurons constitute about 40% of neurons they could have an
important antinociceptive role, as they would easily regulate the level of
activity of other neurons. We consider a simple network of cortical spiking
neurons with axonal conduction delays and spike timing dependent plasticity,
representative of a cortical column or hypercolumn with large proportion of
inhibitory neurons. Each neuron fires following a Hodgkin-Huxley like dynamics
and it is interconnected randomly to other neurons. The network dynamics is
investigated estimating Bandt and Pompe probability distribution function
associated to the interspike intervals and taking different degrees of
inter-connectivity across neurons. More specifically we take into account the
fine temporal ``structures'' of the complex neuronal signals not just by using
the probability distributions associated to the inter spike intervals, but
instead considering much more subtle measures accounting for their causal
information: the Shannon permutation entropy, Fisher permutation information
and permutation statistical complexity. This allows us to investigate how the
information of the system might saturate to a finite value as the degree of
inter-connectivity across neurons grows, inferring the emergent dynamical
properties of the system.Comment: 26 pages, 3 Figures; Physica A, in pres
The Complexity of Reasoning with FODD and GFODD
Recent work introduced Generalized First Order Decision Diagrams (GFODD) as a
knowledge representation that is useful in mechanizing decision theoretic
planning in relational domains. GFODDs generalize function-free first order
logic and include numerical values and numerical generalizations of existential
and universal quantification. Previous work presented heuristic inference
algorithms for GFODDs and implemented these heuristics in systems for decision
theoretic planning. In this paper, we study the complexity of the computational
problems addressed by such implementations. In particular, we study the
evaluation problem, the satisfiability problem, and the equivalence problem for
GFODDs under the assumption that the size of the intended model is given with
the problem, a restriction that guarantees decidability. Our results provide a
complete characterization placing these problems within the polynomial
hierarchy. The same characterization applies to the corresponding restriction
of problems in first order logic, giving an interesting new avenue for
efficient inference when the number of objects is bounded. Our results show
that for formulas, and for corresponding GFODDs, evaluation and
satisfiability are complete, and equivalence is
complete. For formulas evaluation is complete, satisfiability
is one level higher and is complete, and equivalence is
complete.Comment: A short version of this paper appears in AAAI 2014. Version 2
includes a reorganization and some expanded proof
The descriptive complexity approach to LOGCFL
Building upon the known generalized-quantifier-based first-order
characterization of LOGCFL, we lay the groundwork for a deeper investigation.
Specifically, we examine subclasses of LOGCFL arising from varying the arity
and nesting of groupoidal quantifiers. Our work extends the elaborate theory
relating monoidal quantifiers to NC1 and its subclasses. In the absence of the
BIT predicate, we resolve the main issues: we show in particular that no single
outermost unary groupoidal quantifier with FO can capture all the context-free
languages, and we obtain the surprising result that a variant of Greibach's
``hardest context-free language'' is LOGCFL-complete under quantifier-free
BIT-free projections. We then prove that FO with unary groupoidal quantifiers
is strictly more expressive with the BIT predicate than without. Considering a
particular groupoidal quantifier, we prove that first-order logic with majority
of pairs is strictly more expressive than first-order with majority of
individuals. As a technical tool of independent interest, we define the notion
of an aperiodic nondeterministic finite automaton and prove that FO
translations are precisely the mappings computed by single-valued aperiodic
nondeterministic finite transducers.Comment: 10 pages, 1 figur
Ehrenfeucht-Fraisse Games on Omega-Terms
Fragments of first-order logic over words can often be characterized in terms
of finite monoids or finite semigroups. Usually these algebraic descriptions
yield decidability of the question whether a given regular language is
definable in a particular fragment. An effective algebraic characterization can
be obtained from identities of so-called omega-terms. In order to show that a
given fragment satisfies some identity of omega-terms, one can use
Ehrenfeucht-Fraisse games on word instances of the omega-terms. The resulting
proofs often require a significant amount of book-keeping with respect to the
constants involved. In this paper we introduce Ehrenfeucht-Fraisse games on
omega-terms. To this end we assign a labeled linear order to every omega-term.
Our main theorem shows that a given fragment satisfies some identity of
omega-terms if and only if Duplicator has a winning strategy for the game on
the resulting linear orders. This allows to avoid the book-keeping. As an
application of our main result, we show that one can decide in exponential time
whether all aperiodic monoids satisfy some given identity of omega-terms,
thereby improving a result of McCammond (Int. J. Algebra Comput., 2001)
Formulas as Programs
We provide here a computational interpretation of first-order logic based on
a constructive interpretation of satisfiability w.r.t. a fixed but arbitrary
interpretation. In this approach the formulas themselves are programs. This
contrasts with the so-called formulas as types approach in which the proofs of
the formulas are typed terms that can be taken as programs. This view of
computing is inspired by logic programming and constraint logic programming but
differs from them in a number of crucial aspects.
Formulas as programs is argued to yield a realistic approach to programming
that has been realized in the implemented programming language ALMA-0 (Apt et
al.) that combines the advantages of imperative and logic programming. The work
here reported can also be used to reason about the correctness of non-recursive
ALMA-0 programs that do not include destructive assignment.Comment: 34 pages, appears in: The Logic Programming Paradigm: a 25 Years
Perspective, K.R. Apt, V. Marek, M. Truszczynski and D.S. Warren (eds),
Springer-Verlag, Artificial Intelligence Serie
Logic Programming as Constructivism
The features of logic programming that
seem unconventional from the viewpoint of classical logic
can be explained in terms of constructivistic logic. We
motivate and propose a constructivistic proof theory of
non-Horn logic programming. Then, we apply this formalization
for establishing results of practical interest.
First, we show that 'stratification can be motivated in a
simple and intuitive way. Relying on similar motivations,
we introduce the larger classes of 'loosely stratified' and
'constructively consistent' programs. Second, we give a
formal basis for introducing quantifiers into queries and
logic programs by defining 'constructively domain
independent* formulas. Third, we extend the Generalized
Magic Sets procedure to loosely stratified and constructively
consistent programs, by relying on a 'conditional
fixpoini procedure
- …