2,913 research outputs found

    Optimal design and optimal control of structures undergoing finite rotations and elastic deformations

    Full text link
    In this work we deal with the optimal design and optimal control of structures undergoing large rotations. In other words, we show how to find the corresponding initial configuration and the corresponding set of multiple load parameters in order to recover a desired deformed configuration or some desirable features of the deformed configuration as specified more precisely by the objective or cost function. The model problem chosen to illustrate the proposed optimal design and optimal control methodologies is the one of geometrically exact beam. First, we present a non-standard formulation of the optimal design and optimal control problems, relying on the method of Lagrange multipliers in order to make the mechanics state variables independent from either design or control variables and thus provide the most general basis for developing the best possible solution procedure. Two different solution procedures are then explored, one based on the diffuse approximation of response function and gradient method and the other one based on genetic algorithm. A number of numerical examples are given in order to illustrate both the advantages and potential drawbacks of each of the presented procedures.Comment: 35 pages, 11 figure

    Efficient handling of stability problems in shell optimization by asymmetric โ€˜worst-caseโ€™ shape imperfection

    Get PDF
    The paper presents an approach to shape optimization of proportionally loaded elastic shell structures under stability constraints. To reduce the stability-related problems, a special technique is utilized, by which the response analysis is always terminated before the first critical point is reached. In this way, the optimization is always related to a precritical structural state. The necessary load-carrying capability of the optimal structure is assured by extending the usual formulation of the optimization problem by a constraint on an estimated critical load factor. Since limit points are easier to handle, the possible presence of bifurcation points is avoided by introducing imperfection parameters. They are related to an asymmetric shape perturbation of the structure. During the optimization, the imperfection parameters are updated to get automatically the โ€˜worst-caseโ€™ pattern and amplitude of the imperfection. Both, the imperfection parameters and the design variables are related to the structural shape via the design element technique. A gradient-based optimizer is employed to solve the optimization problem. Three examples illustrate the proposed approach. Copyright ยฉ 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

    Analysis of Elastic and Viscoelastic Smart Flexible and Foldable Systems

    Get PDF
    Smart or adaptive structures that use multifunctional materials to control the response of a structure have been of considerable interest in recent years. Some examples are foldable and flexible structures that can be actuated by non-mechanical stimuli (thermal, electrical, magnetic, solvent, light, etc.). This study presents analyses of smart flexible and foldable structures, such as slender beams and thin plates/shells integrated with distributed polarized piezoelectric patches. The studied smart flexible and foldable structures are undergoing large rotations and relatively small strains that are triggered by electro-mechanical actuations. The electric actuation is done by stimulating the bonded patches with electric voltages, while the mechanical actuation is in the form of prescribed external surface- and/or body forces. Both elastic and viscoelastic material responses are considered for the foldable and flexible host structures. For the behavior of piezoelectric material, a nonlinear electro-mechanical constitutive equation is taken into account to incorporate large electric field inputs. Two types of piezoelectric patches are considered, namely piezoelectric wafer and active fiber composites. The governing equation of the Reissnerโ€™s beam theory is first adopted in order to describe the large deformations of the flexible and foldable systems, and modified for the electro-active beams to derive analytical solutions. This study is then extended to 3-D deformation of plates and shells with considering bending and membrane stiffness subjected to large rotation and displacements. Co-rotational finite element method is used to numerically solve the governing equation of the smart flexible plates. Simulations of various shape changes in smart flexible and foldable systems are presented and parametric studies are also conducted in order to examine the effects of material and geometrical parameters on the overall performance of smart systems

    Dynamic problems for metamaterials: Review of existing models and ideas for further research

    Get PDF
    Metamaterials are materials especially engineered to have a peculiar physical behaviour, to be exploited for some well-specified technological application. In this context we focus on the conception of general micro-structured continua, with particular attention to piezoelectromechanical structures, having a strong coupling between macroscopic motion and some internal degrees of freedom, which may be electric or, more generally, related to some micro-motion. An interesting class of problems in this context regards the design of wave-guides aimed to control wave propagation. The description of the state of the art is followed by some hints addressed to describe some possible research developments and in particular to design optimal design techniques for bone reconstruction or systems which may block wave propagation in some frequency ranges, in both linear and non-linear fields. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved

    Optimal thickness distributions of aeroelastic flapping shells

    Get PDF
    The severe weight limitations of flapping wing micro air vehicles necessitates the use of thin flexible wings, which in turn requires an aeroelastic modeling tool for proper numerical characterization. Furthermore, due to the unconventional nature of these vehicles, wing design guidelines for thrust and/or power considerations are not generally available; numerical design optimization then becomes a valuable tool. This work couples a nonlinear shell model to an unsteady vortex lattice solver, and then computes analytical design gradients: the derivative of aerodynamic force/power quantities with respect to a large vector of thickness variables. Gradient-based optimization is then used to locate the wing structure that maximizes the thrust, or minimizes the power under a thrust constraint, for a variety of shell boundary conditions. Changes in the topological features of the optimal wing thicknesses highlight important aeroelastic interactions that can be exploited for efficient flapping wings

    ๊ธฐํ•˜ํ•™์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ •๋ฐ€ํ•œ ๋น„์„ ํ˜• ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ์˜ ์•„์ด์†Œ-์ง€์˜ค๋ฉ”ํŠธ๋ฆญ ํ˜•์ƒ ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋ฏผ๊ฐ๋„ ํ•ด์„

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์กฐ์„ ํ•ด์–‘๊ณตํ•™๊ณผ, 2019. 2. ์กฐ์„ ํ˜ธ.In this thesis, a continuum-based analytical adjoint configuration design sensitivity analysis (DSA) method is developed for gradient-based optimal design of curved built-up structures undergoing finite deformations. First, we investigate basic invariance property of linearized strain measures of a planar Timoshenko beam model which is combined with the selective reduced integration and B-bar projection method to alleviate shear and membrane locking. For a nonlinear structural analysis, geometrically exact beam and shell structural models are basically employed. A planar Kirchhoff beam problem is solved using the rotation-free discretization capability of isogeometric analysis (IGA) due to higher order continuity of NURBS basis function whose superior per-DOF(degree-of-freedom) accuracy over the conventional finite element analysis using Hermite basis function is verified. Various inter-patch continuity conditions including rotation continuity are enforced using Lagrage multiplier and penalty methods. This formulation is combined with a phenomenological constitutive model of shape memory polymer (SMP), and shape programming and recovery processes of SMP structures are simulated. Furthermore, for shear-deformable structures, a multiplicative update of finite rotations by an exponential map of a skew-symmetric matrix is employed. A procedure of explicit parameterization of local orthonormal frames in a spatial curve is presented using the smallest rotation method within the IGA framework. In the configuration DSA, the material derivative is applied to a variational equation, and an orientation design variation of curved structure is identified as a change of embedded local orthonormal frames. In a shell model, we use a regularized variational equation with a drilling rotational DOF. The material derivative of the orthogonal transformation matrix can be evaluated at final equilibrium configuration, which enables to compute design sensitivity using the tangent stiffness at the equilibrium without further iterations. A design optimization method for a constrained structure in a curved domain is also developed, which focuses on a lattice structure design on a specified surface. We define a lattice structure and its design variables on a rectangular plane, and utilize a concept of free-form deformation and a global curve interpolation to obtain an analytical expression for the control net of the structure on curved surface. The material derivative of the analytical expression eventually leads to precise design velocity field. Using this method, the number of design variables is reduced and design parameterization becomes more straightforward. In demonstrative examples, we verify the developed analytical adjoint DSA method in beam and shell structural problems undergoing finite deformations with various kinematic and force boundary conditions. The method is also applied to practical optimal design problems of curved built-up structures. For example, we extremize auxeticity of lattice structures, and experimentally verify nearly constant negative Poisson's ratio during large tensile and compressive deformations by using the 3-D printing and optical deformation measurement technologies. Also, we architect phononic band gap structures having significantly large band gap for mitigating noise in low audible frequency ranges.๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋Œ€๋ณ€ํ˜•์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ ํœ˜์–ด์ง„ ์กฐ๋ฆฝ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ์˜ ์—ฐ์†์ฒด ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ํ•ด์„์  ์• ์กฐ์ธ ํ˜•์ƒ ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋ฏผ๊ฐ๋„ ํ•ด์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํ‰๋ฉด Timoshenko ๋น”์˜ ์„ ํ˜•ํ™”๋œ ๋ณ€ํ˜•๋ฅ ์˜ invariance ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๊ณ ์ฐฐํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  invariant ์ •์‹ํ™”๋ฅผ ์„ ํƒ์  ์ถ•์†Œ์ ๋ถ„(selective reduced integration) ๊ธฐ๋ฒ• ๋ฐ B-bar projection ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•๊ณผ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉํ•˜์—ฌ shear ๋ฐ membrane ์ž ๊น€ ํ˜„์ƒ์„ ํ•ด์†Œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋น„์„ ํ˜• ๊ตฌ์กฐ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋กœ์„œ ๊ธฐํ•˜ํ•™์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ •๋ฐ€ํ•œ ๋น” ๋ฐ ์‰˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํ‰๋ฉด Kirchhoff ๋น” ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ NURBS ๊ธฐ์ €ํ•จ์ˆ˜์˜ ๊ณ ์ฐจ ์—ฐ์†์„ฑ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์•„์ด์†Œ-์ง€์˜ค๋ฉ”ํŠธ๋ฆญ ํ•ด์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ rotation-free ์ด์‚ฐํ™”๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‹ค๋ฃจ์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ Hermite ๊ธฐ์ €ํ•จ์ˆ˜ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์œ ํ•œ์š”์†Œ๋ฒ•์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์ž์œ ๋„๋‹น ํ•ด์˜ ์ •ํ™•๋„๊ฐ€ ๋†’์Œ์„ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ผ๊ทธ๋ž‘์ง€ ์Šน์ˆ˜๋ฒ• ๋ฐ ๋ฒŒ์น™ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ๋„์ž…ํ•˜์—ฌ ํšŒ์ „์˜ ์—ฐ์†์„ฑ์„ ํฌํ•จํ•œ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋‹ค์ค‘ํŒจ์น˜๊ฐ„ ์—ฐ์† ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ํ˜„์ƒํ•™์  (phenomenological) ํ˜•์ƒ๊ธฐ์–ตํด๋ฆฌ๋จธ (SMP) ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹๊ณผ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํ˜•์ƒ์˜ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋ž˜๋ฐ๊ณผ ํšŒ๋ณต ๊ณผ์ •์„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ „๋‹จ๋ณ€ํ˜•์„ ๊ฒช๋Š” (shear-deformable) ๊ตฌ์กฐ ๋ชจ๋ธ์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋Œ€ํšŒ์ „์˜ ๊ฐฑ์‹ ์„ ๊ต๋Œ€ ํ–‰๋ ฌ์˜ exponential map์— ์˜ํ•œ ๊ณฑ์˜ ํ˜•ํƒœ๋กœ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ƒ์˜ ๊ณก์„  ๋ชจ๋ธ์—์„œ ์ตœ์†ŒํšŒ์ „ (smallest rotation) ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ตญ์†Œ ์ •๊ทœ์ง๊ต์ขŒํ‘œ๊ณ„์˜ ๋ช…์‹œ์  ๋งค๊ฐœํ™”๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํ˜•์ƒ ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋ฏผ๊ฐ๋„ ํ•ด์„์„ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ „๋ฏธ๋ถ„์„ ๋ณ€๋ถ„ ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์— ์ ์šฉํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ํœ˜์–ด์ง„ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ์˜ ๋ฐฐํ–ฅ ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋Š” ๊ตญ์†Œ ์ •๊ทœ์ง๊ต์ขŒํ‘œ๊ณ„์˜ ํšŒ์ „์— ์˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ๋œ๋‹ค. ์ตœ์ข… ๋ณ€ํ˜• ํ˜•์ƒ์—์„œ ์ง๊ต ๋ณ€ํ™˜ ํ–‰๋ ฌ์˜ ์ „๋ฏธ๋ถ„์„ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ๋Œ€ํšŒ์ „ ๋ฌธ์ œ์—์„œ ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์ธ ๋ฐ˜๋ณต ๊ณ„์‚ฐ์—†์ด ๋ณ€ํ˜• ํ•ด์„์—์„œ์˜ ์ ‘์„ ๊ฐ•์„ฑํ–‰๋ ฌ์— ์˜ํ•ด ํ•ด์„์  ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋ฏผ๊ฐ๋„๋ฅผ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์‰˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๋ฉด๋‚ด ํšŒ์ „ ์ž์œ ๋„ ๋ฐ ์•ˆ์ •ํ™”๋œ ๋ณ€๋ถ„ ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณด๊ฐ•์žฌ(stiffener)์˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง์„ ์šฉ์ดํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ํœ˜์–ด์ง„ ์˜์—ญ์— ๊ตฌ์†๋˜์–ด์žˆ๋Š” ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์„ค๊ณ„ ์†๋„์žฅ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ๋ฐ ์ตœ์  ์„ค๊ณ„๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜๋ฉฐ ํŠนํžˆ ๊ณก๋ฉด์— ๊ตฌ์†๋œ ๋น” ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ์˜ ์„ค๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์ง‘์ค‘์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฃฌ๋‹ค. ์ž์œ ํ˜•์ƒ๋ณ€ํ˜•(Free-form deformation)๊ธฐ๋ฒ•๊ณผ ์ „์—ญ ๊ณก์„  ๋ณด๊ฐ„๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ง์‚ฌ๊ฐ ํ‰๋ฉด์—์„œ ํ˜•์ƒ ๋ฐ ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ •์˜ํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ณก๋ฉด์ƒ์˜ ๊ณก์„  ํ˜•์ƒ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด๋Š” ์กฐ์ •์  ์œ„์น˜๋ฅผ ํ•ด์„์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ‘œํ˜„ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ์ด์˜ ์ „๋ฏธ๋ถ„์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ์„ค๊ณ„์†๋„์žฅ์„ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์˜ ๊ฐœ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ค„์ผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ณ  ์„ค๊ณ„์˜ ๋งค๊ฐœํ™”๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ„ํŽธํ•ด์ง„๋‹ค. ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์€ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ํ•˜์ค‘ ๋ฐ ์šด๋™ํ•™์  ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๊ฐ–๋Š” ๋น”๊ณผ ์‰˜์˜ ๋Œ€๋ณ€ํ˜• ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ฒ€์ฆ๋˜๋ฉฐ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ๊ฐ€์ง€ ํœ˜์–ด์ง„ ์กฐ๋ฆฝ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ์˜ ์ตœ์  ์„ค๊ณ„์— ์ ์šฉ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋Œ€ํ‘œ์ ์œผ๋กœ, ์ „๋‹จ ๊ฐ•์„ฑ ๋ฐ ์ถฉ๊ฒฉ ํก์ˆ˜ ํŠน์„ฑ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„์  ๋ฌผ์„ฑ์น˜์˜ ๊ฐœ์„ ์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ํ™œ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ์˜ค๊ทธ์ œํ‹ฑ (auxetic) ํŠน์„ฑ์ด ๊ทน๋Œ€ํ™”๋œ ๊ฒฉ์ž ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ•˜๋ฉฐ ์ธ์žฅ ๋ฐ ์••์ถ• ๋Œ€๋ณ€ํ˜• ๋ชจ๋‘์—์„œ ์ผ์ •ํ•œ ์Œ์˜ ํฌ์•„์†ก๋น„๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒ„์„ 3์ฐจ์› ํ”„๋ฆฐํŒ…๊ณผ ๊ด‘ํ•™์  ๋ณ€ํ˜• ์ธก์ • ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹คํ—˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ์†Œ์Œ์˜ ์ €๊ฐ์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ํ™œ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ๊ฐ€์ฒญ ์ €์ฃผํŒŒ์ˆ˜ ์˜์—ญ๋Œ€์—์„œ์˜ ๋ฐด๋“œ๊ฐญ์ด ๊ทน๋Œ€ํ™”๋œ ๊ฒฉ์ž ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ๋‹ค.Abstract 1. Introduction 2. Isogeometric analysis of geometrically exact nonlinear structures 3. Isogeometric confinguration DSA of geometrically exact nonlinear structures 4. Numerical examples 5. Conclusions and future works A. Supplements to the geometrically exact Kirchhoff beam model B. Supplements to the geometrically exact shear-deformable beam model C. Supplements to the geometrically exact shear-deformable shell model D. Supplements to the invariant formulations E. Supplements to the geometric constraints in design optimization F. Supplements to the design of auxetic structures ์ดˆ๋กDocto

    Approaches and possible improvements in the area of multibody dynamics modeling

    Get PDF
    A wide ranging look is taken at issues involved in the dynamic modeling of complex, multibodied orbiting space systems. Capabilities and limitations of two major codes (DISCOS, TREETOPS) are assessed and possible extensions to the CONTOPS software are outlined. In addition, recommendations are made concerning the direction future development should take in order to achieve higher fidelity, more computationally efficient multibody software solutions
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore