On the minimum leaf number of cubic graphs

The \emph{minimum leaf number} $\hbox{ml} (G)$ of a connected graph $G$ is defined as the minimum number of leaves of the spanning trees of $G$. We present new results concerning the minimum leaf number of cubic graphs: we show that if $G$ is a connected cubic graph of order $n$, then $\mathrm{ml}(G) \leq \frac{n}6 + \frac13$, improving on the best known result in [Inf. Process. Lett. 105 (2008) 164-169] and proving the conjecture in [Electron. J. Graph Theory and Applications 5 (2017) 207-211]. We further prove that if $G$ is also 2-connected, then $\mathrm{ml}(G) \leq \frac{n}{6.53}$, improving on the best known bound in [Math. Program., Ser. A 144 (2014) 227-245]. We also present new conjectures concerning the minimum leaf number of several types of cubic graphs and examples showing that the bounds of the conjectures are best possible.Comment: 17 page

A 3/2-approximation algorithm for finding spanning trees with many leaves in cubic graphs

We consider the problem of finding a spanning tree that maximizes the number of leaves (Max Leaf). We provide a 3/2-approximation algorithm for this problem when restricted to cubic graphs, improving on the previous 5/3-approximation for this class. To obtain this approximation we define a graph parameter x(G), and construct a tree with at least (n-x(G)+4)/3 leaves, and prove that no tree with more than (n-x(G)+2)/2 leaves exists. In contrast to previous approximation algorithms for Max Leaf, our algorithm works with connected dominating sets instead of constructing a tree directly. The algorithm also yields a 4/3-approximation for Minimum Connected Dominating Set in cubic graphs

Spanning trees with many leaves: new extremal results and an improved FPT algorithm

We present two lower bounds for the maximum number of leaves in a spanning tree of a graph. For connected graphs without triangles, with minimum degree at least three, we show that a spanning tree with at least (n+4)/3 leaves exists, where n is the number of vertices of the graph. For connected graphs with minimum degree at least three, that contain D diamonds induced by vertices of degree three (a diamond is a K4 minus one edge), we show that a spanning tree exists with at least (2n-D+12)/7 leaves. The proofs use the fact that spanning trees with many leaves correspond to small connected dominating sets. Both of these bounds are best possible for their respective graph classes. For both bounds simple polynomial time algorithms are given that find spanning trees satisfying the bounds. \ud \ud The second bound is used to find a new fastest FPT algorithm for the Max-Leaf Spanning Tree problem. This problem asks whether a graph G on n vertices has a spanning tree with at least k leaves. The time complexity of our algorithm is f(k)g(n), where g(n) is a polynomial, and f(k) Î O(8.12k).\ud \ud \u

Max-Leaves Spanning Tree is APX-hard for Cubic Graphs

We consider the problem of finding a spanning tree with maximum number of leaves (MaxLeaf). A 2-approximation algorithm is known for this problem, and a 3/2-approximation algorithm when restricted to graphs where every vertex has degree 3 (cubic graphs). MaxLeaf is known to be APX-hard in general, and NP-hard for cubic graphs. We show that the problem is also APX-hard for cubic graphs. The APX-hardness of the related problem Minimum Connected Dominating Set for cubic graphs follows

Spanning Trees with Many Leaves in Graphs without Diamonds and Blossoms

It is known that graphs on n vertices with minimum degree at least 3 have spanning trees with at least n/4+2 leaves and that this can be improved to (n+4)/3 for cubic graphs without the diamond K_4-e as a subgraph. We generalize the second result by proving that every graph with minimum degree at least 3, without diamonds and certain subgraphs called blossoms, has a spanning tree with at least (n+4)/3 leaves, and generalize this further by allowing vertices of lower degree. We show that it is necessary to exclude blossoms in order to obtain a bound of the form n/3+c. We use the new bound to obtain a simple FPT algorithm, which decides in O(m)+O^*(6.75^k) time whether a graph of size m has a spanning tree with at least k leaves. This improves the best known time complexity for MAX LEAF SPANNING TREE.Comment: 25 pages, 27 Figure

On the algorithmic complexity of twelve covering and independence parameters of graphs

The definitions of four previously studied parameters related to total coverings and total matchings of graphs can be restricted, thereby obtaining eight parameters related to covering and independence, each of which has been studied previously in some form. Here we survey briefly results concerning total coverings and total matchings of graphs, and consider the aforementioned 12 covering and independence parameters with regard to algorithmic complexity. We survey briefly known results for several graph classes, and obtain new NP-completeness results for the minimum total cover and maximum minimal total cover problems in planar graphs, the minimum maximal total matching problem in bipartite and chordal graphs, and the minimum independent dominating set problem in planar cubic graphs

The VC-Dimension of Graphs with Respect to k-Connected Subgraphs

We study the VC-dimension of the set system on the vertex set of some graph which is induced by the family of its $k$-connected subgraphs. In particular, we give tight upper and lower bounds for the VC-dimension. Moreover, we show that computing the VC-dimension is $\mathsf{NP}$-complete and that it remains $\mathsf{NP}$-complete for split graphs and for some subclasses of planar bipartite graphs in the cases $k = 1$ and $k = 2$. On the positive side, we observe it can be decided in linear time for graphs of bounded clique-width