3,514 research outputs found
REGISTER GAMES
The complexity of parity games is a long standing open problem that saw a
major breakthrough in 2017 when two quasi-polynomial algorithms were published.
This article presents a third, independent approach to solving parity games in
quasi-polynomial time, based on the notion of register game, a parameterised
variant of a parity game. The analysis of register games leads to a
quasi-polynomial algorithm for parity games, a polynomial algorithm for
restricted classes of parity games and a novel measure of complexity, the
register index, which aims to capture the combined complexity of the priority
assignement and the underlying game graph.
We further present a translation of alternating parity word automata into
alternating weak automata with only a quasi-polynomial increase in size, based
on register games; this improves on the previous exponential translation.
We also use register games to investigate the parity index hierarchy: while
for words the index hierarchy of alternating parity automata collapses to the
weak level, and for trees it is strict, for structures between trees and words,
it collapses logarithmically, in the sense that any parity tree automaton of
size n is equivalent, on these particular classes of structures, to an
automaton with a number of priorities logarithmic in n
On the Succinctness of Alternating Parity Good-For-Games Automata
We study alternating parity good-for-games (GFG) automata, i.e., alternating parity automata where both conjunctive and disjunctive choices can be resolved in an online manner, without knowledge of the suffix of the input word still to be read.
We show that they can be exponentially more succinct than both their nondeterministic and universal counterparts. Furthermore, we present a single exponential determinisation procedure and an Exptime upper bound to the problem of recognising whether an alternating automaton is GFG.
We also study the complexity of deciding "half-GFGness", a property specific to alternating automata that only requires nondeterministic choices to be resolved in an online manner. We show that this problem is PSpace-hard already for alternating automata on finite words
On Determinisation of Good-for-Games Automata
International audienceIn this work we study Good-For-Games (GFG) automata over ω-words: non-deterministic automata where the non-determinism can be resolved by a strategy depending only on the prefix of the ω-word read so far. These automata retain some advantages of determinism: they can be composed with games and trees in a sound way, and inclusion LpAq Ě LpBq can be reduced to a parity game over A ˆ B if A is GFG. Therefore, they could be used to some advantage in verification, for instance as solutions to the synthesis problem. The main results of this work answer the question whether parity GFG automata actually present an improvement in terms of state-complexity (the number of states) compared to the deterministic ones. We show that a frontier lies between the Büchi condition, where GFG automata can be determinised with only quadratic blow-up in state-complexity; and the co-Büchi condition, where GFG automata can be exponentially smaller than any deterministic automaton for the same language. We also study the complexity of deciding whether a given automaton is GFG
Finitary languages
The class of omega-regular languages provides a robust specification language
in verification. Every omega-regular condition can be decomposed into a safety
part and a liveness part. The liveness part ensures that something good happens
"eventually". Finitary liveness was proposed by Alur and Henzinger as a
stronger formulation of liveness. It requires that there exists an unknown,
fixed bound b such that something good happens within b transitions. In this
work we consider automata with finitary acceptance conditions defined by
finitary Buchi, parity and Streett languages. We study languages expressible by
such automata: we give their topological complexity and present a
regular-expression characterization. We compare the expressive power of
finitary automata and give optimal algorithms for classical decisions
questions. We show that the finitary languages are Sigma 2-complete; we present
a complete picture of the expressive power of various classes of automata with
finitary and infinitary acceptance conditions; we show that the languages
defined by finitary parity automata exactly characterize the star-free fragment
of omega B-regular languages; and we show that emptiness is NLOGSPACE-complete
and universality as well as language inclusion are PSPACE-complete for finitary
parity and Streett automata
Decision Problems for Deterministic Pushdown Automata on Infinite Words
The article surveys some decidability results for DPDAs on infinite words
(omega-DPDA). We summarize some recent results on the decidability of the
regularity and the equivalence problem for the class of weak omega-DPDAs.
Furthermore, we present some new results on the parity index problem for
omega-DPDAs. For the specification of a parity condition, the states of the
omega-DPDA are assigned priorities (natural numbers), and a run is accepting if
the highest priority that appears infinitely often during a run is even. The
basic simplification question asks whether one can determine the minimal number
of priorities that are needed to accept the language of a given omega-DPDA. We
provide some decidability results on variations of this question for some
classes of omega-DPDAs.Comment: In Proceedings AFL 2014, arXiv:1405.527
How Much Lookahead is Needed to Win Infinite Games?
Delay games are two-player games of infinite duration in which one player may
delay her moves to obtain a lookahead on her opponent's moves. For
-regular winning conditions it is known that such games can be solved
in doubly-exponential time and that doubly-exponential lookahead is sufficient.
We improve upon both results by giving an exponential time algorithm and an
exponential upper bound on the necessary lookahead. This is complemented by
showing EXPTIME-hardness of the solution problem and tight exponential lower
bounds on the lookahead. Both lower bounds already hold for safety conditions.
Furthermore, solving delay games with reachability conditions is shown to be
PSPACE-complete.
This is a corrected version of the paper https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.3701v4
published originally on August 26, 2016
The Complexity of Enriched Mu-Calculi
The fully enriched μ-calculus is the extension of the propositional
μ-calculus with inverse programs, graded modalities, and nominals. While
satisfiability in several expressive fragments of the fully enriched
μ-calculus is known to be decidable and ExpTime-complete, it has recently
been proved that the full calculus is undecidable. In this paper, we study the
fragments of the fully enriched μ-calculus that are obtained by dropping at
least one of the additional constructs. We show that, in all fragments obtained
in this way, satisfiability is decidable and ExpTime-complete. Thus, we
identify a family of decidable logics that are maximal (and incomparable) in
expressive power. Our results are obtained by introducing two new automata
models, showing that their emptiness problems are ExpTime-complete, and then
reducing satisfiability in the relevant logics to these problems. The automata
models we introduce are two-way graded alternating parity automata over
infinite trees (2GAPTs) and fully enriched automata (FEAs) over infinite
forests. The former are a common generalization of two incomparable automata
models from the literature. The latter extend alternating automata in a similar
way as the fully enriched μ-calculus extends the standard μ-calculus.Comment: A preliminary version of this paper appears in the Proceedings of the
33rd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP),
2006. This paper has been selected for a special issue in LMC
State of B\"uchi Complementation
Complementation of B\"uchi automata has been studied for over five decades
since the formalism was introduced in 1960. Known complementation constructions
can be classified into Ramsey-based, determinization-based, rank-based, and
slice-based approaches. Regarding the performance of these approaches, there
have been several complexity analyses but very few experimental results. What
especially lacks is a comparative experiment on all of the four approaches to
see how they perform in practice. In this paper, we review the four approaches,
propose several optimization heuristics, and perform comparative
experimentation on four representative constructions that are considered the
most efficient in each approach. The experimental results show that (1) the
determinization-based Safra-Piterman construction outperforms the other three
in producing smaller complements and finishing more tasks in the allocated time
and (2) the proposed heuristics substantially improve the Safra-Piterman and
the slice-based constructions.Comment: 28 pages, 4 figures, a preliminary version of this paper appeared in
the Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Implementation and
Application of Automata (CIAA
Can Nondeterminism Help Complementation?
Complementation and determinization are two fundamental notions in automata
theory. The close relationship between the two has been well observed in the
literature. In the case of nondeterministic finite automata on finite words
(NFA), complementation and determinization have the same state complexity,
namely Theta(2^n) where n is the state size. The same similarity between
determinization and complementation was found for Buchi automata, where both
operations were shown to have 2^\Theta(n lg n) state complexity. An intriguing
question is whether there exists a type of omega-automata whose determinization
is considerably harder than its complementation. In this paper, we show that
for all common types of omega-automata, the determinization problem has the
same state complexity as the corresponding complementation problem at the
granularity of 2^\Theta(.).Comment: In Proceedings GandALF 2012, arXiv:1210.202
- …