3,416 research outputs found
There are no realizable 15_4- and 16_4-configurations
There exist a finite number of natural numbers n for which we do not know
whether a realizable n_4-configuration does exist. We settle the two smallest
unknown cases n=15 and n=16. In these cases realizable n_4-configurations
cannot exist even in the more general setting of pseudoline-arrangements. The
proof in the case n=15 can be generalized to n_k-configurations. We show that a
necessary condition for the existence of a realizable n_k-configuration is that
n > k^2+k-5 holds.Comment: 11 pages, 8 figures, added pseudoline realizations by Branko
Gr{\"u}nbau
Determinising Parity Automata
Parity word automata and their determinisation play an important role in
automata and game theory. We discuss a determinisation procedure for
nondeterministic parity automata through deterministic Rabin to deterministic
parity automata. We prove that the intermediate determinisation to Rabin
automata is optimal. We show that the resulting determinisation to parity
automata is optimal up to a small constant. Moreover, the lower bound refers to
the more liberal Streett acceptance. We thus show that determinisation to
Streett would not lead to better bounds than determinisation to parity. As a
side-result, this optimality extends to the determinisation of B\"uchi
automata
Time and Parallelizability Results for Parity Games with Bounded Tree and DAG Width
Parity games are a much researched class of games in NP intersect CoNP that
are not known to be in P. Consequently, researchers have considered specialised
algorithms for the case where certain graph parameters are small. In this
paper, we study parity games on graphs with bounded treewidth, and graphs with
bounded DAG width. We show that parity games with bounded DAG width can be
solved in O(n^(k+3) k^(k + 2) (d + 1)^(3k + 2)) time, where n, k, and d are the
size, treewidth, and number of priorities in the parity game. This is an
improvement over the previous best algorithm, given by Berwanger et al., which
runs in n^O(k^2) time. We also show that, if a tree decomposition is provided,
then parity games with bounded treewidth can be solved in O(n k^(k + 5) (d +
1)^(3k + 5)) time. This improves over previous best algorithm, given by
Obdrzalek, which runs in O(n d^(2(k+1)^2)) time. Our techniques can also be
adapted to show that the problem of solving parity games with bounded treewidth
lies in the complexity class NC^2, which is the class of problems that can be
efficiently parallelized. This is in stark contrast to the general parity game
problem, which is known to be P-hard, and thus unlikely to be contained in NC
- …