Robust controller design for input-delayed systems using predictive feedback and an uncertainty estimator

[EN] This paper deals with the problem of stabilizing a class of input-delayed systems with (possibly) nonlinear uncertainties by using explicit delay compensation. It is well known that plain predictive schemes lack robustness with respect to uncertain model parameters. In this work, an uncertainty estimator is derived for input-delay systems and combined with a modified state predictor, which uses current available information of the estimated uncertainties. Furthermore, based on Lyapunov-Krasovskii functionals, a computable criterion to check robust stability of the closed-loop is developed and cast into a minimization problem constrained to an LMI. Additionally, for a given input delay, an iterative-LMI algorithm is proposed to design stabilizing tuning parameters. The main results are illustrated and validated using a numerical example with a second-order dynamic system.This work was partially supported by projects PROMETEOII/2013/004, Conselleria d Educació, Generalitat Valenciana, and TIN2014-56158-C4-4-P-AR, Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Spain.Sanz Diaz, R.; García Gil, PJ.; Albertos Pérez, P.; Zhong, Q. (2017). Robust controller design for input-delayed systems using predictive feedback and an uncertainty estimator. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control. 27(10):1826-1840. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.3639S182618402710Stability and Stabilization of Systems with Time Delay. (2011). IEEE Control Systems, 31(1), 38-65. doi:10.1109/mcs.2010.939135Normey-Rico, J. E., Bordons, C., & Camacho, E. F. (1997). Improving the robustness of dead-time compensating PI controllers. Control Engineering Practice, 5(6), 801-810. doi:10.1016/s0967-0661(97)00064-6Michiels, W., & Niculescu, S.-I. (2003). On the delay sensitivity of Smith Predictors. International Journal of Systems Science, 34(8-9), 543-551. doi:10.1080/00207720310001609057Normey-Rico, J. E., & Camacho, E. F. (2008). Dead-time compensators: A survey. Control Engineering Practice, 16(4), 407-428. doi:10.1016/j.conengprac.2007.05.006Guzmán, J. L., García, P., Hägglund, T., Dormido, S., Albertos, P., & Berenguel, M. (2008). Interactive tool for analysis of time-delay systems with dead-time compensators. Control Engineering Practice, 16(7), 824-835. doi:10.1016/j.conengprac.2007.09.002Manitius, A., & Olbrot, A. (1979). Finite spectrum assignment problem for systems with delays. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 24(4), 541-552. doi:10.1109/tac.1979.1102124Artstein, Z. (1982). Linear systems with delayed controls: A reduction. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 27(4), 869-879. doi:10.1109/tac.1982.1103023Moon, Y. S., Park, P., & Kwon, W. H. (2001). Robust stabilization of uncertain input-delayed systems using reduction method. Automatica, 37(2), 307-312. doi:10.1016/s0005-1098(00)00145-xYue, D. (2004). Robust stabilization of uncertain systems with unknown input delay. Automatica, 40(2), 331-336. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2003.10.005Yue, D., & Han, Q.-L. (2005). Delayed feedback control of uncertain systems with time-varying input delay. Automatica, 41(2), 233-240. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2004.09.006Lozano, R., Castillo, P., Garcia, P., & Dzul, A. (2004). Robust prediction-based control for unstable delay systems: Application to the yaw control of a mini-helicopter. Automatica, 40(4), 603-612. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2003.10.007Gonzalez, A., Garcia, P., Albertos, P., Castillo, P., & Lozano, R. (2012). Robustness of a discrete-time predictor-based controller for time-varying measurement delay. Control Engineering Practice, 20(2), 102-110. doi:10.1016/j.conengprac.2011.09.001Karafyllis, I., & Krstic, M. (2013). Robust predictor feedback for discrete-time systems with input delays. International Journal of Control, 86(9), 1652-1663. doi:10.1080/00207179.2013.792005Krstic, M. (2010). Input Delay Compensation for Forward Complete and Strict-Feedforward Nonlinear Systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 55(2), 287-303. doi:10.1109/tac.2009.2034923Bekiaris-Liberis, N., & Krstic, M. (2011). Compensation of Time-Varying Input and State Delays for Nonlinear Systems. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 134(1). doi:10.1115/1.4005278Karafyllis, I., Malisoff, M., Mazenc, F., & Pepe, P. (Eds.). (2016). Recent Results on Nonlinear Delay Control Systems. Advances in Delays and Dynamics. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-18072-4Cacace, F., Conte, F., Germani, A., & Pepe, P. (2016). Stabilization of strict-feedback nonlinear systems with input delay using closed-loop predictors. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 26(16), 3524-3540. doi:10.1002/rnc.3517Fridman, E., & Shaked, U. (2002). An improved stabilization method for linear time-delay systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 47(11), 1931-1937. doi:10.1109/tac.2002.804462Fridman, E., & Shaked, U. (2002). A descriptor system approach to H/sub ∞/ control of linear time-delay systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 47(2), 253-270. doi:10.1109/9.983353Chen, W.-H., & Zheng, W. X. (2006). On improved robust stabilization of uncertain systems with unknown input delay. Automatica, 42(6), 1067-1072. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2006.02.015Krstic, M. (2008). Lyapunov tools for predictor feedbacks for delay systems: Inverse optimality and robustness to delay mismatch. Automatica, 44(11), 2930-2935. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2008.04.010Léchappé, V., Moulay, E., Plestan, F., Glumineau, A., & Chriette, A. (2015). New predictive scheme for the control of LTI systems with input delay and unknown disturbances. Automatica, 52, 179-184. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2014.11.003Roh, Y.-H., & Oh, J.-H. (1999). Robust stabilization of uncertain input-delay systems by sliding mode control with delay compensation. Automatica, 35(11), 1861-1865. doi:10.1016/s0005-1098(99)00106-5Bresch-Pietri, D., & Krstic, M. (2009). Adaptive trajectory tracking despite unknown input delay and plant parameters. Automatica, 45(9), 2074-2081. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2009.04.027Kamalapurkar, R., Fischer, N., Obuz, S., & Dixon, W. E. (2016). Time-Varying Input and State Delay Compensation for Uncertain Nonlinear Systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 61(3), 834-839. doi:10.1109/tac.2015.2451472Chen, W.-H., Ohnishi, K., & Guo, L. (2015). Advances in Disturbance/Uncertainty Estimation and Attenuation [Guest editors’ introduction]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 62(9), 5758-5762. doi:10.1109/tie.2015.2453347Chen, W.-H., Yang, J., Guo, L., & Li, S. (2016). Disturbance-Observer-Based Control and Related Methods—An Overview. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 63(2), 1083-1095. doi:10.1109/tie.2015.2478397Sariyildiz E Ohnishi K Design constraints of disturbance observer in the presence of time delay 2013 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics (ICM) Vicenza, Italy 2013 69 74Wang, Q.-G., Hang, C. C., & Yang, X.-P. (2001). Single-loop controller design via IMC principles. Automatica, 37(12), 2041-2048. doi:10.1016/s0005-1098(01)00170-4Zheng, Q., & Gao, Z. (2014). Predictive active disturbance rejection control for processes with time delay. ISA Transactions, 53(4), 873-881. doi:10.1016/j.isatra.2013.09.021Chen, M., & Chen, W.-H. (2010). Disturbance-observer-based robust control for time delay uncertain systems. International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, 8(2), 445-453. doi:10.1007/s12555-010-0233-5Guo, L., & Chen, W.-H. (2005). Disturbance attenuation and rejection for systems with nonlinearity via DOBC approach. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 15(3), 109-125. doi:10.1002/rnc.978Zhong, Q.-C., & Rees, D. (2004). Control of Uncertain LTI Systems Based on an Uncertainty and Disturbance Estimator. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 126(4), 905-910. doi:10.1115/1.1850529Yong He, Min Wu, & Jin-Hua She. (2005). Improved bounded-real-lemma representation and H/sub /spl infin// control of systems with polytopic uncertainties. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs, 52(7), 380-383. doi:10.1109/tcsii.2005.850418CAO, Y.-Y., LAM, J., & SUN, Y.-X. (1998). Static Output Feedback Stabilization: An ILMI Approach. Automatica, 34(12), 1641-1645. doi:10.1016/s0005-1098(98)80021-6Marler, R. T., & Arora, J. S. (2009). The weighted sum method for multi-objective optimization: new insights. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 41(6), 853-862. doi:10.1007/s00158-009-0460-7Fridman, E. (2014). Introduction to Time-Delay Systems. Systems & Control: Foundations & Applications. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-09393-2Solomon, O., & Fridman, E. (2013). New stability conditions for systems with distributed delays. Automatica, 49(11), 3467-3475. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2013.08.025Huaizhong Li, & Minyue Fu. (1997). A linear matrix inequality approach to robust H/sub ∞/ filtering. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 45(9), 2338-2350. doi:10.1109/78.622956Šiljak, D. D., & Stipanovic, D. M. (2000). Robust stabilization of nonlinear systems: The LMI approach. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 6(5), 461-493. doi:10.1155/s1024123x0000143

Rejection of mismatched disturbances for systems with input delay via a predictive extended state observer

[EN] The problem of output stabilization and disturbance rejection for input-delayed systems is tackled in this work. First, a suitable transformation is introduced to translate mismatched disturbances into an equivalent input disturbance. Then, an extended state observer is combined with a predictive observer structure to obtain a future estimation of both the state and the disturbance. A disturbance model is assumed to be known but attenuation of unmodeled components is also considered. The stabilization is proved via Lyapunov-Krasovskii functionals, leading to sufficient conditions in terms of linear matrix inequalities for the closed-loop analysis and parameter tuning. The proposed strategy is illustrated through a numerical example.PROMETEOII/2013/004; Conselleria d'Educacio; Generalitat Valenciana, Grant/Award Number: TIN2014-56158-C4-4-P-AR; Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad, Grant/Award Number: FPI-UPV 2014; Universitat Politecnica de ValenciaSanz Diaz, R.; García Gil, PJ.; Fridman, E.; Albertos Pérez, P. (2018). Rejection of mismatched disturbances for systems with input delay via a predictive extended state observer. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control. 28(6):2457-2467. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.4027S24572467286Stability and Stabilization of Systems with Time Delay. (2011). IEEE Control Systems, 31(1), 38-65. doi:10.1109/mcs.2010.939135Fridman, E. (2014). Introduction to Time-Delay Systems. Systems & Control: Foundations & Applications. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-09393-2Watanabe, K., & Ito, M. (1981). A process-model control for linear systems with delay. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 26(6), 1261-1269. doi:10.1109/tac.1981.1102802Astrom, K. J., Hang, C. C., & Lim, B. C. (1994). A new Smith predictor for controlling a process with an integrator and long dead-time. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 39(2), 343-345. doi:10.1109/9.272329Matausek, M. R., & Micic, A. D. (1996). A modified Smith predictor for controlling a process with an integrator and long dead-time. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 41(8), 1199-1203. doi:10.1109/9.533684García, P., & Albertos, P. (2008). A new dead-time compensator to control stable and integrating processes with long dead-time. Automatica, 44(4), 1062-1071. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2007.08.022Normey-Rico, J. E., & Camacho, E. F. (2009). Unified approach for robust dead-time compensator design. Journal of Process Control, 19(1), 38-47. doi:10.1016/j.jprocont.2008.02.003Manitius, A., & Olbrot, A. (1979). Finite spectrum assignment problem for systems with delays. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 24(4), 541-552. doi:10.1109/tac.1979.1102124Artstein, Z. (1982). Linear systems with delayed controls: A reduction. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 27(4), 869-879. doi:10.1109/tac.1982.1103023Krstic, M. (2008). Lyapunov tools for predictor feedbacks for delay systems: Inverse optimality and robustness to delay mismatch. Automatica, 44(11), 2930-2935. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2008.04.010Léchappé, V., Moulay, E., Plestan, F., Glumineau, A., & Chriette, A. (2015). New predictive scheme for the control of LTI systems with input delay and unknown disturbances. Automatica, 52, 179-184. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2014.11.003Sanz, R., Garcia, P., & Albertos, P. (2016). Enhanced disturbance rejection for a predictor-based control of LTI systems with input delay. Automatica, 72, 205-208. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2016.05.019Basturk, H. I., & Krstic, M. (2015). Adaptive sinusoidal disturbance cancellation for unknown LTI systems despite input delay. Automatica, 58, 131-138. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2015.05.013Basturk, H. I. (2017). Cancellation of unmatched biased sinusoidal disturbances for unknown LTI systems in the presence of state delay. Automatica, 76, 169-176. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2016.10.006Sanz, R., Garcia, P., Albertos, P., & Zhong, Q.-C. (2016). Robust controller design for input-delayed systems using predictive feedback and an uncertainty estimator. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 27(10), 1826-1840. doi:10.1002/rnc.3639Mondie, S., & Michiels, W. (2003). Finite spectrum assignment of unstable time-delay systems with a safe implementation. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 48(12), 2207-2212. doi:10.1109/tac.2003.820147Zhong, Q.-C. (2004). On Distributed Delay in Linear Control Laws—Part I: Discrete-Delay Implementations. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 49(11), 2074-2080. doi:10.1109/tac.2004.837531Zhou, B., Lin, Z., & Duan, G.-R. (2012). Truncated predictor feedback for linear systems with long time-varying input delays. Automatica, 48(10), 2387-2399. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2012.06.032Zhou, B., Li, Z.-Y., & Lin, Z. (2013). On higher-order truncated predictor feedback for linear systems with input delay. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 24(17), 2609-2627. doi:10.1002/rnc.3012Besançon G Georges D Benayache Z Asymptotic state prediction for continuous-time systems with delayed input and application to control IEEE 2007 Kos, GreeceNajafi, M., Hosseinnia, S., Sheikholeslam, F., & Karimadini, M. (2013). Closed-loop control of dead time systems via sequential sub-predictors. International Journal of Control, 86(4), 599-609. doi:10.1080/00207179.2012.751627Léchappé V Moulay E Plestan F Dynamic observation-prediction for LTI systems with a time-varying delay in the input IEEE 2016 Las Vegas, NVCacace, F., Conte, F., Germani, A., & Pepe, P. (2016). Stabilization of strict-feedback nonlinear systems with input delay using closed-loop predictors. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 26(16), 3524-3540. doi:10.1002/rnc.3517Mazenc, F., & Malisoff, M. (2017). Stabilization of Nonlinear Time-Varying Systems Through a New Prediction Based Approach. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 62(6), 2908-2915. doi:10.1109/tac.2016.2600500Guo, L., & Chen, W.-H. (2005). Disturbance attenuation and rejection for systems with nonlinearity via DOBC approach. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 15(3), 109-125. doi:10.1002/rnc.978Fridman, E. (2003). Output regulation of nonlinear systems with delay. Systems & Control Letters, 50(2), 81-93. doi:10.1016/s0167-6911(03)00131-2Isidori, A., & Byrnes, C. I. (1990). Output regulation of nonlinear systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 35(2), 131-140. doi:10.1109/9.45168Ding, Z. (2003). Global stabilization and disturbance suppression of a class of nonlinear systems with uncertain internal model. Automatica, 39(3), 471-479. doi:10.1016/s0005-1098(02)00251-0Chen, W.-H., Yang, J., Guo, L., & Li, S. (2016). Disturbance-Observer-Based Control and Related Methods—An Overview. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 63(2), 1083-1095. doi:10.1109/tie.2015.2478397Fridman, E., & Shaked, U. (2002). An improved stabilization method for linear time-delay systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 47(11), 1931-1937. doi:10.1109/tac.2002.804462Fridman, E., & Orlov, Y. (2009). Exponential stability of linear distributed parameter systems with time-varying delays. Automatica, 45(1), 194-201. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2008.06.00

Delay-dependent stabilization of stochastic interval delay systems with nonlinear disturbances

This is the post print version of the article. The official published version can be obtained from the link below - Copyright 2007 Elsevier Ltd.In this paper, a delay-dependent approach is developed to deal with the robust stabilization problem for a class of stochastic time-delay interval systems with nonlinear disturbances. The system matrices are assumed to be uncertain within given intervals, the time delays appear in both the system states and the nonlinear disturbances, and the stochastic perturbation is in the form of a Brownian motion. The purpose of the addressed stochastic stabilization problem is to design a memoryless state feedback controller such that, for all admissible interval uncertainties and nonlinear disturbances, the closed-loop system is asymptotically stable in the mean square, where the stability criteria are dependent on the length of the time delay and therefore less conservative. By using Itô's differential formula and the Lyapunov stability theory, sufficient conditions are first derived for ensuring the stability of the stochastic interval delay systems. Then, the controller gain is characterized in terms of the solution to a delay-dependent linear matrix inequality (LMI), which can be easily solved by using available software packages. A numerical example is exploited to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed design procedure.This work was supported in part by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) of the UK under Grant GR/S27658/01, the Nuffield Foundation of the UK under Grant NAL/00630/G, and the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation of Germany

Robustness analysis of discrete predictor-based controllers for input-delay systems

In this article, robustness to model uncertainties are analysed in the context of discrete predictor-based state-feedback controllers for discrete-time input-delay systems with time-varying delay, in an LMI framework. The goal is comparing robustness of predictor-based strategies with respect to other (sub)optimal state feedback ones. A numerical example illustrates that improvements in tolerance to modelling errors can be achieved by using the predictor framework.The authors are grateful for grant nos. DPI2008-06737-C02-01, DPI2008-06731-C02-01, DPI2011-27845-C02-01 and PROMETEO/2008/088 from the Spanish and Valencian governments.González Sorribes, A.; Sala, A.; García Gil, PJ.; Albertos Pérez, P. (2013). Robustness analysis of discrete predictor-based controllers for input-delay systems. International Journal of Systems Science. 44(2):232-239. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207721.2011.600469S232239442Boukas, E.-K. (2006). Discrete-time systems with time-varying time delay: Stability and stabilizability. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2006, 1-10. doi:10.1155/mpe/2006/42489Du, D., Jiang, B., & Zhou, S. (2008). Delay-dependent robust stabilisation of uncertain discrete-time switched systems with time-varying state delay. International Journal of Systems Science, 39(3), 305-313. doi:10.1080/00207720701805982El Ghaoui, L., Oustry, F., & AitRami, M. (1997). A cone complementarity linearization algorithm for static output-feedback and related problems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 42(8), 1171-1176. doi:10.1109/9.618250Gao, H., & Chen, T. (2007). New Results on Stability of Discrete-Time Systems With Time-Varying State Delay. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 52(2), 328-334. doi:10.1109/tac.2006.890320Gao, H., Wang, C., Lam, J., & Wang, Y. (2004). Delay-dependent output-feedback stabilisation of discrete-time systems with time-varying state delay. IEE Proceedings - Control Theory and Applications, 151(6), 691-698. doi:10.1049/ip-cta:20040822Gao, H., Chen, T., & Lam, J. (2008). A new delay system approach to network-based control. Automatica, 44(1), 39-52. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2007.04.020Garcia , P , Castillo , P , Lozano , R and Albertos , P . 2006 . Robustness with Respect to Delay Uncertainties of a Predictor Observer Based Discrete-time Controller . Proceeding of the 45th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control . 2006 . pp. 199 – 204 .Guo , Y and Li , S . 2009 . New Stability Criterion for Discrete-time Systems with Interval Time-varying State Delay . Joint 48th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and 28th Chinese Control Conference . 2009 . pp. 1342 – 1347 .Hägglund, T. (1996). An industrial dead-time compensating PI controller. Control Engineering Practice, 4(6), 749-756. doi:10.1016/0967-0661(96)00065-2V.J.S. Leite, and Miranda, M.F. (2008), ‘Robust Stabilization of Discrete-time Systems with Time-varying Delay: An LMI Approach’,Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2008, 15 pages (doi:10.1155/2008/875609)Liu, X. G., Tang, M. L., Martin, R. R., & Wu, M. (2006). Delay-dependent robust stabilisation of discrete-time systems with time-varying delay. IEE Proceedings - Control Theory and Applications, 153(6), 689-702. doi:10.1049/ip-cta:20050223Lozano, R., Castillo, P., Garcia, P., & Dzul, A. (2004). Robust prediction-based control for unstable delay systems: Application to the yaw control of a mini-helicopter. Automatica, 40(4), 603-612. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2003.10.007Manitius, A., & Olbrot, A. (1979). Finite spectrum assignment problem for systems with delays. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 24(4), 541-552. doi:10.1109/tac.1979.1102124Michiels, W., & Niculescu, S.-I. (2003). On the delay sensitivity of Smith Predictors. International Journal of Systems Science, 34(8-9), 543-551. doi:10.1080/00207720310001609057Palmor, Z.J. (1996), ‘Time-delay Compensation – Smith Predictor and Its Modifications’, inThe Control Handbook, ed. W.S. Levine, Boca Raton: CRC Press, pp. 224–237Pan, Y.-J., Marquez, H. J., & Chen, T. (2006). Stabilization of remote control systems with unknown time varying delays by LMI techniques. International Journal of Control, 79(7), 752-763. doi:10.1080/00207170600654554Richard, J.-P. (2003). Time-delay systems: an overview of some recent advances and open problems. Automatica, 39(10), 1667-1694. doi:10.1016/s0005-1098(03)00167-5Wang, Q.-G., Lee, T. H., & Tan, K. K. (1999). Finite-Spectrum Assignment for Time-Delay Systems. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences. doi:10.1007/978-1-84628-531-8He, Y., Wu, M., Han, Q.-L., & She, J.-H. (2008). Delay-dependentH∞control of linear discrete-time systems with an interval-like time-varying delay. International Journal of Systems Science, 39(4), 427-436. doi:10.1080/00207720701832531Yue, D., & Han, Q.-L. (2005). Delayed feedback control of uncertain systems with time-varying input delay. Automatica, 41(2), 233-240. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2004.09.006Zhang, B., Xu, S., & Zou, Y. (2008). Improved stability criterion and its applications in delayed controller design for discrete-time systems. Automatica, 44(11), 2963-2967. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2008.04.01

Time-and event-driven communication process for networked control systems: A survey

Copyright © 2014 Lei Zou et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.In recent years, theoretical and practical research topics on networked control systems (NCSs) have gained an increasing interest from many researchers in a variety of disciplines owing to the extensive applications of NCSs in practice. In particular, an urgent need has arisen to understand the effects of communication processes on system performances. Sampling and protocol are two fundamental aspects of a communication process which have attracted a great deal of research attention. Most research focus has been on the analysis and control of dynamical behaviors under certain sampling procedures and communication protocols. In this paper, we aim to survey some recent advances on the analysis and synthesis issues of NCSs with different sampling procedures (time-and event-driven sampling) and protocols (static and dynamic protocols). First, these sampling procedures and protocols are introduced in detail according to their engineering backgrounds as well as dynamic natures. Then, the developments of the stabilization, control, and filtering problems are systematically reviewed and discussed in great detail. Finally, we conclude the paper by outlining future research challenges for analysis and synthesis problems of NCSs with different communication processes.This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grants 61329301, 61374127, and 61374010, the Royal Society of the UK, and the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation of Germany

A note on the robust stability of uncertain stochastic fuzzy systems with time-delays

Copyright [2004] IEEE. This material is posted here with permission of the IEEE. Such permission of the IEEE does not in any way imply IEEE endorsement of any of Brunel University's products or services. Internal or personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution must be obtained from the IEEE by writing to [email protected]. By choosing to view this document, you agree to all provisions of the copyright laws protecting it.Takagi-Sugeno (T-S) fuzzy models are now often used to describe complex nonlinear systems in terms of fuzzy sets and fuzzy reasoning applied to a set of linear submodels. In this note, the T-S fuzzy model approach is exploited to establish stability criteria for a class of nonlinear stochastic systems with time delay. Sufficient conditions are derived in the format of linear matrix inequalities (LMIs), such that for all admissible parameter uncertainties, the overall fuzzy system is stochastically exponentially stable in the mean square, independent of the time delay. Therefore, with the numerically attractive Matlab LMI toolbox, the robust stability of the uncertain stochastic fuzzy systems with time delays can be easily checked

Dissipative Stabilization of Linear Systems with Time-Varying General Distributed Delays (Complete Version)

New methods are developed for the stabilization of a linear system with general time-varying distributed delays existing at the system's states, inputs and outputs. In contrast to most existing literature where the function of time-varying delay is continuous and bounded, we assume it to be bounded and measurable. Furthermore, the distributed delay kernels can be any square-integrable function over a bounded interval, where the kernels are handled directly by using a decomposition scenario without using approximations. By constructing a Krasovski\u{i} functional via the application of a novel integral inequality, sufficient conditions for the existence of a dissipative state feedback controller are derived in terms of matrix inequalities without utilizing the existing reciprocally convex combination lemmas. The proposed synthesis (stability) conditions, which take dissipativity into account, can be either solved directly by a standard numerical solver of semidefinite programming if they are convex, or reshaped into linear matrix inequalities, or solved via a proposed iterative algorithm. To the best of our knowledge, no existing methods can handle the synthesis problem investigated in this paper. Finally, numerical examples are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed methodologies.Comment: Accepted by Automatic

Robust H∞ fuzzy output-feedback control with multiple probabilistic delays and multiple missing measurements

Copyright [2010] IEEE. This material is posted here with permission of the IEEE. Such permission of the IEEE does not in any way imply IEEE endorsement of any of Brunel University's products or services. Internal or personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution must be obtained from the IEEE by writing to [email protected]. By choosing to view this document, you agree to all provisions of the copyright laws protecting it.In this paper, the robust H∞-control problem is investigated for a class of uncertain discrete-time fuzzy systems with both multiple probabilistic delays and multiple missing measurements. A sequence of random variables, all of which are mutually independent but obey the Bernoulli distribution, is introduced to account for the probabilistic communication delays. The measurement-missing phenomenon occurs in a random way. The missing probability for each sensor satisfies a certain probabilistic distribution in the interval. Here, the attention is focused on the analysis and design of H∞ fuzzy output-feedback controllers such that the closed-loop Takagi-Sugeno (T-S) fuzzy-control system is exponentially stable in the mean square. The disturbance-rejection attenuation is constrained to a given level by means of the H∞-performance index. Intensive analysis is carried out to obtain sufficient conditions for the existence of admissible output feedback controllers, which ensures the exponential stability as well as the prescribed H∞ performance. The cone-complementarity-linearization procedure is employed to cast the controller-design problem into a sequential minimization one that is solved by the semi-definite program method. Simulation results are utilized to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed design technique in this paper.This work was supported in part by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, U.K., under Grant GR/S27658/01, in part by the Royal Society, U.K., in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 60825303, in part by the National 973 Project of China under Grant 2009CB320600, in part by the Heilongjiang Outstanding Youth Science Fund of China under Grant JC200809, in part by the Youth Science Fund of Heilongjiang Province of China under Grant QC2009C63, and in part by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation of Germany

Disturbance Observer-based Robust Control and Its Applications: 35th Anniversary Overview

Disturbance Observer has been one of the most widely used robust control tools since it was proposed in 1983. This paper introduces the origins of Disturbance Observer and presents a survey of the major results on Disturbance Observer-based robust control in the last thirty-five years. Furthermore, it explains the analysis and synthesis techniques of Disturbance Observer-based robust control for linear and nonlinear systems by using a unified framework. In the last section, this paper presents concluding remarks on Disturbance Observer-based robust control and its engineering applications.Comment: 12 pages, 4 figure

Robust normalization and guaranteed cost control for a class of uncertain singular Markovian jump systems via hybrid impulsive control

This paper investigates the problem of robust normalization and guaranteed cost control for a class of uncertain singular Markovian jump systems. The uncertainties exhibit in both system matrices and transition rate matrix of the Markovian chain. A new impulsive and proportional-derivative control strategy is presented, where the derivative gain is to make the closed-loop system of the singular plant to be a normal one, and the impulsive control part is to make the value of the Lyapunov function does not increase at each time instant of the Markovian switching. A linearization approach via congruence transformations is proposed to solve the controller design problem. The cost function is minimized via solving an optimization problem under the designed control scheme. Finally, three examples (two numerical examples and an RC pulse divider circuit example) are provided to illustrate the effectiveness and applicability of the proposed methods