Evaluation of multiple protein docking structures using correctly predicted pairwise subunits

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Many functionally important proteins in a cell form complexes with multiple chains. Therefore, computational prediction of multiple protein complexes is an important task in bioinformatics. In the development of multiple protein docking methods, it is important to establish a metric for evaluating prediction results in a reasonable and practical fashion. However, since there are only few works done in developing methods for multiple protein docking, there is no study that investigates how accurate structural models of multiple protein complexes should be to allow scientists to gain biological insights.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We generated a series of predicted models (decoys) of various accuracies by our multiple protein docking pipeline, Multi-LZerD, for three multi-chain complexes with 3, 4, and 6 chains. We analyzed the decoys in terms of the number of correctly predicted pair conformations in the decoys.</p> <p>Results and conclusion</p> <p>We found that pairs of chains with the correct mutual orientation exist even in the decoys with a large overall root mean square deviation (RMSD) to the native. Therefore, in addition to a global structure similarity measure, such as the global RMSD, the quality of models for multiple chain complexes can be better evaluated by using the local measurement, the number of chain pairs with correct mutual orientation. We termed the fraction of correctly predicted pairs (RMSD at the interface of less than 4.0Å) as <it>fpair </it>and propose to use it for evaluation of the accuracy of multiple protein docking.</p

Development of an Automatic Pipeline for Participation in the CELPP Challenge

The prediction of how a ligand binds to its target is an essential step for Structure-Based Drug Design (SBDD) methods. Molecular docking is a standard tool to predict the binding mode of a ligand to its macromolecular receptor and to quantify their mutual complementarity, with multiple applications in drug design. However, docking programs do not always find correct solutions, either because they are not sampled or due to inaccuracies in the scoring functions. Quantifying the docking performance in real scenarios is essential to understanding their limitations, managing expectations and guiding future developments. Here, we present a fully automated pipeline for pose prediction validated by participating in the Continuous Evaluation of Ligand Pose Prediction (CELPP) Challenge. Acknowledging the intrinsic limitations of the docking method, we devised a strategy to automatically mine and exploit pre-existing data, defining-whenever possible-empirical restraints to guide the docking process. We prove that the pipeline is able to generate predictions for most of the proposed targets as well as obtain poses with low RMSD values when compared to the crystal structure. All things considered, our pipeline highlights some major challenges in the automatic prediction of protein-ligand complexes, which will be addressed in future versions of the pipeline. Keywords: D3R; automated pipeline; binding mode prediction; docking; pocket detection

Computational structure‐based drug design: Predicting target flexibility

The role of molecular modeling in drug design has experienced a significant revamp in the last decade. The increase in computational resources and molecular models, along with software developments, is finally introducing a competitive advantage in early phases of drug discovery. Medium and small companies with strong focus on computational chemistry are being created, some of them having introduced important leads in drug design pipelines. An important source for this success is the extraordinary development of faster and more efficient techniques for describing flexibility in three‐dimensional structural molecular modeling. At different levels, from docking techniques to atomistic molecular dynamics, conformational sampling between receptor and drug results in improved predictions, such as screening enrichment, discovery of transient cavities, etc. In this review article we perform an extensive analysis of these modeling techniques, dividing them into high and low throughput, and emphasizing in their application to drug design studies. We finalize the review with a section describing our Monte Carlo method, PELE, recently highlighted as an outstanding advance in an international blind competition and industrial benchmarks.We acknowledge the BSC-CRG-IRB Joint Research Program in Computational Biology. This work was supported by a grant from the Spanish Government CTQ2016-79138-R.J.I. acknowledges support from SVP-2014-068797, awarded by the Spanish Government.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft

Predicting the accuracy of protein-ligand docking on homology models

Ligand-protein docking is increasingly used in Drug Discovery. The initial limitations imposed by a reduced availability of target protein structures have been overcome by the use of theoretical models, especially those derived by homology modeling techniques. While this greatly extended the use of docking simulations, it also introduced the need for general and robust criteria to estimate the reliability of docking results given the model quality. To this end, a large-scale experiment was performed on a diverse set including experimental structures and homology models for a group of representative ligand-protein complexes. A wide spectrum of model quality was sampled using templates at different evolutionary distances and different strategies for target-template alignment and modeling. The obtained models were scored by a selection of the most used model quality indices. The binding geometries were generated using AutoDock, one of the most common docking programs. An important result of this study is that indeed quantitative and robust correlations exist between the accuracy of docking results and the model quality, especially in the binding site. Moreover, state-of-the-art indices for model quality assessment are already an effective tool for an a priori prediction of the accuracy of docking experiments in the context of groups of proteins with conserved structural characteristics.Contract/grant sponsor: National Institutes of Health; contract/grant numbers: ES00768

A coarse-grained force field for Protein–RNA docking

The awareness of important biological role played by functional, non coding (nc) RNA has grown tremendously in recent years. To perform their tasks, ncRNA molecules typically unite with protein partners, forming ribonucleoprotein complexes. Structural insight into their architectures can be greatly supplemented by computational docking techniques, as they provide means for the integration and refinement of experimental data that is often limited to fragments of larger assemblies or represents multiple levels of spatial resolution. Here, we present a coarse-grained force field for protein-RNA docking, implemented within the framework of the ATTRACT program. Complex structure prediction is based on energy minimization in rotational and translational degrees of freedom of binding partners, with possible extension to include structural flexibility. The coarse-grained representation allows for fast and efficient systematic docking search without any prior knowledge about complex geometry

From Nonspecific DNA–Protein Encounter Complexes to the Prediction of DNA–Protein Interactions

©2009 Gao, Skolnick. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000341DNA–protein interactions are involved in many essential biological activities. Because there is no simple mapping code between DNA base pairs and protein amino acids, the prediction of DNA–protein interactions is a challenging problem. Here, we present a novel computational approach for predicting DNA-binding protein residues and DNA–protein interaction modes without knowing its specific DNA target sequence. Given the structure of a DNA-binding protein, the method first generates an ensemble of complex structures obtained by rigid-body docking with a nonspecific canonical B-DNA. Representative models are subsequently selected through clustering and ranking by their DNA–protein interfacial energy. Analysis of these encounter complex models suggests that the recognition sites for specific DNA binding are usually favorable interaction sites for the nonspecific DNA probe and that nonspecific DNA–protein interaction modes exhibit some similarity to specific DNA–protein binding modes. Although the method requires as input the knowledge that the protein binds DNA, in benchmark tests, it achieves better performance in identifying DNA-binding sites than three previously established methods, which are based on sophisticated machine-learning techniques. We further apply our method to protein structures predicted through modeling and demonstrate that our method performs satisfactorily on protein models whose root-mean-square Ca deviation from native is up to 5 Å from their native structures. This study provides valuable structural insights into how a specific DNA-binding protein interacts with a nonspecific DNA sequence. The similarity between the specific DNA–protein interaction mode and nonspecific interaction modes may reflect an important sampling step in search of its specific DNA targets by a DNA-binding protein

GAPDOCK: A genetic algorithm approach to protein docking in CAPRI round 1

As part of the first Critical Assessment of PRotein Interactions, round 1, we predict the structure of two protein-protein complexes, by using a genetic algorithm, GAPDOCK, in combination with surface complementarity, buried surface area, biochemical information, and human intervention. Among the five models submitted for target 1, HPr phosphocarrier protein (B. subtilis) and the hexameric HPr kinase (L. lactis), the best correctly predicts 17 of 52 interprotein contacts, whereas for target 2, bovine rotavirus VP6 protein-monoclonal antibody, the best model predicts 27 of 52 correct contacts. Given the difficult nature of the targets, these predictions are very encouraging and compare well with those obtained by other methods. Nevertheless, it is clear that there is a need for improved methods for distinguishing between correct and plausible but incorrect complexes. Proteins 2003;52:10-14