A review of multi-criteria decision making methods for enhanced maintenance delivery

Conventionally there is a strong relation between manufacturing and services in complex engineering industries. For companies which aim to last in the competitive manufacturing market choosing appropriate decision making methods to improve their maintenance delivery has a vital role. The aim of this paper is to review Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) models, evaluate each method and do a critical comparison to assess them from a maintenance management point of view. The first section of this paper reviews MCDM methods in different literature, and then the second part develops a set of criteria to classify different techniques. At the end methods are compared based on developed criteria. This paper assesses different MCDM models, and provides a framework to select approaches for maintenance management

Multicriteria Model for the Choice of Best Battery Provider

The choice of suppliers is a matter of great importance in organizations. The cost, quality and delivery time provided to customers may depend to a large extent on this decision. This paper, therefore, describes a model applicable to a real organization, using multicriteria decision techniques to choose the best supplier of batteries. In order to establish concordance and discordance thresholds the values provided by the decision-maker of the company will be compared with those obtained by the fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process. Both valuations of the thresholds will be applied in the ELECTRE II technique

APPLICATION OF FUZZY ELECTRE METHOD WITH TRAPEZOIDAL FUZZY NUMBERS

The article is devoted to the problem of multi-criteria decision-making. Methods for solving this problem can be divided into two large groups:methods using the aggregation of all alternatives according to all criteria and the solution of the resulting single-criterion problem. The second group isassociated with the procedure of pairwise comparisons and stepwise aggregation. The first group includes methods: weighted average sum,product and their various modifications, the second group includes - AHP, ELECTRE, TOPSIS, PROMETHEE, ELECTRE. For many problemsassessment of the criteria implemented by experts and presented in linguistic form. The effective approach for dealing with linguistic information is fuzzyset theory proposed by L. Zadeh. In this paper is proposed fuzzy ELECTRE method. This method is presented in details. As application problem is usedthe equipment selection problem The issues of practical implementation of this method are discussed in details. The results of the solution test problem at all stages are presented.The article is devoted to the problem of multi-criteria decision-making. Methods for solving this problem can be divided into two large groups:methods using the aggregation of all alternatives according to all criteria and the solution of the resulting single-criterion problem. The second group isassociated with the procedure of pairwise comparisons and stepwise aggregation. The first group includes methods: weighted average sum,product and their various modifications, the second group includes - AHP, ELECTRE, TOPSIS, PROMETHEE, ELECTRE. For many problemsassessment of the criteria implemented by experts and presented in linguistic form. The effective approach for dealing with linguistic information is fuzzyset theory proposed by L. Zadeh. In this paper is proposed fuzzy ELECTRE method. This method is presented in details. As application problem is usedthe equipment selection problem The issues of practical implementation of this method are discussed in details. The results of the solution test problem at all stages are presented

Synthesis of main criteria, methods and issues of multicriteria supplier selection

O objetivo do presente artigo é identificar na literatura quais são os principais critérios considerados no processo de decisão, os principais métodos individuais e combinados e os subproblemas da seleção de fornecedores no contexto multicritério. Cabe ressaltar que as tarefas de avaliar e identificar os melhores fornecedores para um novo produto ou serviço são essenciais ao gerenciamento da cadeia de suprimentos (GCS). Para executá-las apropriadamente, considerando-se a natureza multicritério da seleção de fornecedores, torna-se necessária a inclusão de uma abordagem de agregação dos critérios, cuja escolha depende basicamente dos objetivos da decisão, tipos de critérios a serem utilizados e racionalidade do decisor. Para atingir o objetivo proposto, optou-se por utilizar o procedimento da revisão sistemática da literatura que segue o protocolo proposto por Cronin, Ryan e Coughlan (2008), abrangendo artigos publicados nas bases ISI Web of Knowledge e Scopus, no período de 2001 a 2012. Além de sintetizar o conhecimento acerca do tema, o artigo ressalta os principais critérios, métodos e subproblemas da seleção de fornecedores, com isso, contribui ao identificar os aspectos que devem ser desenvolvidos em estudos futuros e ao apresentar aos gestores abordagens existentes para a tomada de decisões relativa à seleção de fornecedores de forma sistematizada.The purpose of this paper is to identify the main criteria considered in supplier selection, the main methods used and sub-problems in a multicriteria context. The tasks of identifying the best suppliers of new products or services or even for evaluating the performance of an existing supplier is essential to supply chain management (SCM). In order to perform these tasks properly, and considering the multicriteria nature of supplier selection, it is necessary to include an approach using aggregation of criteria, primarily chosen depending on the objectives of the decision, types of criteria to be used and the rationality of the decision maker. In order to achieve this objective this research used a systematic literature review of articles published in ISI Web of Knowledge and Scopus for the period 2001-2012 following the protocol proposed by Cronin, Ryan and Coughlan (2008). In addition to synthesizing knowledge about the subject, the article highlights the key criteria, methods and sub-problems of selection of suppliers, contributing by identifying the aspects that should be developed in future studies. It also provides managers with existing approaches to making decisions about supplier selection in a systematic way

Permutation based decision making under fuzzy environment using Tabu search

One of the techniques, which are used for Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) is the permutation. In the classical form of permutation, it is assumed that weights and decision matrix components are crisp. However, when group decision making is under consideration and decision makers could not agree on a crisp value for weights and decision matrix components, fuzzy numbers should be used. In this article, the fuzzy permutation technique for MCDM problems has been explained. The main deficiency of permutation is its big computational time, so a Tabu Search (TS) based algorithm has been proposed to reduce the computational time. A numerical example has illustrated the proposed approach clearly. Then, some benchmark instances extracted from literature are solved by proposed TS. The analyses of the results show the proper performance of the proposed method

Utilização de métodos de sobreclassificação para apoio na tomada de decisão em gestão de projetos

Monografia (graduação)—Universidade de Brasília, Faculdade de Tecnologia, Departamento de Engenharia de Produção, 2015.Este trabalho aborda, através da metodologia fundamentada na pesquisa bibliográfica e análise de conteúdo, a tomada de decisão no ambiente de gerenciamento de projetos envolvendo diferentes aspectos do seu ciclo de vida. Estas decisões são, por vezes, complexas e de difícil escolha, o que implica na necessidade do uso de métodos de apoio. Neste contexto, os métodos multicritério de apoio à decisão (Multi Criteria Decision Analysis - MCDA) podem auxiliar o decisor na estruturação e solução destes problemas. Dentre os métodos MCDA existentes, os métodos de sobreclassificação têm sido aplicados à gestão de projetos com bons resultados. Desta forma, é proposta uma análise destes métodos a fim de observar as características que levam a escolha de um determinado método de sobreclassificação para problemas específicos de gestão de projetos. Esta análise resultou na identificação de um padrão de utilização dos métodos de sobreclassificação para apoio na tomada de decisão de problemas relacionados à priorização de projeto, seleção de portfólio, seleção de fornecedores e priorização de atividades. ________________________________________________________________________________ ABSTRACTThis paper deals with decision making in the project management environment, involving different aspects of their life cycle through the methodology based on bibliographic research and content analysis. These decisions are sometimes complex and hard to choice, which implies the need to use methods of support. In this context, multi-criteria decision support methods (Multi Criteria Decision Analysis - MCDA) can help the decision maker in the structuring and solving these problems. Among the existing MCDA methods, outranking methods have been applied to the management of projects with good results. Thus, it is proposed an analysis of these methods in order to observe the characteristics that lead to choice of a particular outranking method for specific project management problems. This analysis resulted in the identification of a pattern of use of outranking methods to support the decision making of problems related to project prioritization, portfolio selection, vendor selection and prioritization of activitie

Bibliometric analysis of scientific production on methods to aid decision making in the last 40 years

Purpose: Multicriteria methods have gained traction in both academia and industry practices for effective decision-making over the years. This bibliometric study aims to explore and provide an overview of research carried out on multicriteria methods, in its various aspects, over the past forty-four years. Design/Methodology/Approach: The Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus databases were searched for publications from January 1945 to April 29, 2021, on multicriteria methods in titles, abstracts, and keywords. The bibliographic data were analyzed using the R bibliometrix package. Findings: This bibliometric study asserts that 29,050 authors have produced 20,861 documents on the theme of multicriteria methods in 131 countries in the last forty-four years. Scientific production in this area grows at a rate of 13.88 per year. China is the leading country in publications with 14.14%; India with 10.76%; and Iran with 8.09%. Islamic Azad University leads others with 504 publications, followed by the Vilnius Gediminas Technical University with 456 and the National Institute of Technology with 336. As for journals, Expert Systems With Applications; Sustainability; and Journal of Cleaner Production are the leading journals, which account for more than 4.67% of all indexed literature. Furthermore, Zavadskas E. and Wang J have the highest publications in the multicriteria methods domain regarding the authors. Regarding the most commonly used multicriteria decision-making methods, AHP is the most favored approach among the ten countries with the most publications in this research area, followed by TOPSIS, VIKOR, PROMETHEE, and ANP. Practical implications: The bibliometric literature review method allows the researchers to explore the multicriteria research area more extensively than the traditional literature review method. It enables a large dataset of bibliographic records to be systematically analyzed through statistical measures, yielding informative insights. Originality/value: The usefulness of this bibliometric study is summed in presenting an overview of the topic of the multicriteria methods during the previous forty-four years, allowing other academics to use this research as a starting point for their research