1,139 research outputs found

    Deep Learning -- A first Meta-Survey of selected Reviews across Scientific Disciplines, their Commonalities, Challenges and Research Impact

    Full text link
    Deep learning belongs to the field of artificial intelligence, where machines perform tasks that typically require some kind of human intelligence. Similar to the basic structure of a brain, a deep learning algorithm consists of an artificial neural network, which resembles the biological brain structure. Mimicking the learning process of humans with their senses, deep learning networks are fed with (sensory) data, like texts, images, videos or sounds. These networks outperform the state-of-the-art methods in different tasks and, because of this, the whole field saw an exponential growth during the last years. This growth resulted in way over 10,000 publications per year in the last years. For example, the search engine PubMed alone, which covers only a sub-set of all publications in the medical field, provides already over 11,000 results in Q3 2020 for the search term 'deep learning', and around 90% of these results are from the last three years. Consequently, a complete overview over the field of deep learning is already impossible to obtain and, in the near future, it will potentially become difficult to obtain an overview over a subfield. However, there are several review articles about deep learning, which are focused on specific scientific fields or applications, for example deep learning advances in computer vision or in specific tasks like object detection. With these surveys as a foundation, the aim of this contribution is to provide a first high-level, categorized meta-survey of selected reviews on deep learning across different scientific disciplines. The categories (computer vision, language processing, medical informatics and additional works) have been chosen according to the underlying data sources (image, language, medical, mixed). In addition, we review the common architectures, methods, pros, cons, evaluations, challenges and future directions for every sub-category.Comment: 83 pages, 22 figures, 9 tables, 100 reference

    Using ODIN for a PharmGKB revalidation experiment

    Get PDF
    The need for efficient text-mining tools that support curation of the biomedical literature is ever increasing. In this article, we describe an experiment aimed at verifying whether a text-mining tool capable of extracting meaningful relationships among domain entities can be successfully integrated into the curation workflow of a major biological database. We evaluate in particular (i) the usability of the system's interface, as perceived by users, and (ii) the correlation of the ranking of interactions, as provided by the text-mining system, with the choices of the curators

    Using Neural Networks for Relation Extraction from Biomedical Literature

    Full text link
    Using different sources of information to support automated extracting of relations between biomedical concepts contributes to the development of our understanding of biological systems. The primary comprehensive source of these relations is biomedical literature. Several relation extraction approaches have been proposed to identify relations between concepts in biomedical literature, namely, using neural networks algorithms. The use of multichannel architectures composed of multiple data representations, as in deep neural networks, is leading to state-of-the-art results. The right combination of data representations can eventually lead us to even higher evaluation scores in relation extraction tasks. Thus, biomedical ontologies play a fundamental role by providing semantic and ancestry information about an entity. The incorporation of biomedical ontologies has already been proved to enhance previous state-of-the-art results.Comment: Artificial Neural Networks book (Springer) - Chapter 1

    Privacy in the Genomic Era

    Get PDF
    Genome sequencing technology has advanced at a rapid pace and it is now possible to generate highly-detailed genotypes inexpensively. The collection and analysis of such data has the potential to support various applications, including personalized medical services. While the benefits of the genomics revolution are trumpeted by the biomedical community, the increased availability of such data has major implications for personal privacy; notably because the genome has certain essential features, which include (but are not limited to) (i) an association with traits and certain diseases, (ii) identification capability (e.g., forensics), and (iii) revelation of family relationships. Moreover, direct-to-consumer DNA testing increases the likelihood that genome data will be made available in less regulated environments, such as the Internet and for-profit companies. The problem of genome data privacy thus resides at the crossroads of computer science, medicine, and public policy. While the computer scientists have addressed data privacy for various data types, there has been less attention dedicated to genomic data. Thus, the goal of this paper is to provide a systematization of knowledge for the computer science community. In doing so, we address some of the (sometimes erroneous) beliefs of this field and we report on a survey we conducted about genome data privacy with biomedical specialists. Then, after characterizing the genome privacy problem, we review the state-of-the-art regarding privacy attacks on genomic data and strategies for mitigating such attacks, as well as contextualizing these attacks from the perspective of medicine and public policy. This paper concludes with an enumeration of the challenges for genome data privacy and presents a framework to systematize the analysis of threats and the design of countermeasures as the field moves forward

    ์ƒ๋ฌผํ•™์  ์‚ฌ์ „ ์ง€์‹์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ๊ณ ์ฐจ์›์˜ ๋‹ค์ค‘ ์˜ค๋ฏน์Šค ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์ฐพ๋Š” ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ ๊ณตํ•™์  ์ ‘๊ทผ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2021.8. ๊น€์„ .์„ธํฌ๊ฐ€ ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅํ•˜๊ณ  ์™ธ๋ถ€ ์ž๊ทน์— ๋ฐ˜์‘ํ•˜๋Š”์ง€ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ์ƒ๋ฌผํ•™, ์˜ํ•™์—์„œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ๊ด€์‹ฌ์‚ฌ ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜์ด๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์˜ ๋ฐœ์ „์œผ๋กœ ๊ณผํ•™์ž๋“ค์€ ๋‹จ์ผ ์ƒ๋ฌผํ•™์  ์‹คํ—˜์œผ๋กœ ์„ธํฌ์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”์š”์ธ๋“ค์„ ์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ์ธก์ •ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ฒŒ ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฃผ๋ชฉํ• ๋งŒํ•œ ์˜ˆ์‹œ๋กœ ๊ฒŒ๋†ˆ ์‹œํ€€์‹ฑ, ์œ ์ „์ž ๋ฐœํ˜„๋Ÿ‰ ์ธก์ •, ์œ ์ „์ž ๋ฐœํ˜„์„ ์กฐ์ ˆํ•˜๋Š” ํ›„์„ฑ ์œ ์ „์ฒด ์ธก์ • ๊ฐ™์€ ๋‹ค์ค‘ ์˜ค๋ฏน์Šค ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์„ธํฌ์˜ ์ƒํƒœ๋ฅผ ๋” ์ž์„ธํžˆ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ ๋‹ค์ค‘ ์˜ค๋ฏน์Šค ์กฐ์ ˆ์ž์™€ ์œ ์ „์ž ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ์กฐ์ ˆ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์•Œ์•„๋‚ด๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ๋‹ค์ค‘ ์˜ค๋ฏน์Šค ์กฐ์ ˆ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋Š” ๋งค์šฐ ๋ณต์žกํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ชจ๋“  ์„ธํฌ ์ƒํƒœ ํŠน์ด์ ์ธ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์‹คํ—˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ๋ถˆ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ, ์„œ๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์œ ํ˜•์˜ ๊ณ ์ฐจ์› ์˜ค๋ฏน์Šค ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ํšจ์œจ์ ์ธ ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ ๊ณตํ•™์  ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ์š”๊ตฌ๋œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ณ ์ฐจ์› ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌํ•˜๋Š” ํ•œ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฒ ์ด์Šค์—์„œ ์„ ๋ณ„๋œ ์œ ์ „์ž์˜ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ๊ณผ ์˜ค๋ฏน์Šค ๊ฐ„์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ์™ธ๋ถ€ ์ƒ๋ฌผํ•™์  ์ง€์‹์„ ํ†ตํ•ฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋ฐ•์‚ฌํ•™์œ„ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ์ƒ๋ฌผํ•™์  ์‚ฌ์ „ ์ง€์‹์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‹ค์ค‘ ์˜ค๋ฏน์Šค ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์œ ์ „์ž์˜ ๋ฐœํ˜„์„ ์กฐ์ ˆํ•˜๋Š” ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ ๊ณตํ•™์ ์ธ ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ๋Š” ๋งˆ์ดํฌ๋กœ ์•Œ์—”์—์ด์™€ ์œ ์ „์ž์˜ ์ผ๋Œ€๋‹ค ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์ด๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ดํฌ๋กœ ์•Œ์—”์—์ด ํ‘œ์  ์˜ˆ์ธก ๋ฌธ์ œ๋Š” ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ํ‘œ์  ์œ ์ „์ž์˜ ๊ฐœ์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ๋„ˆ๋ฌด ๋งŽ์œผ๋ฉฐ ๊ฑฐ์ง“ ์–‘์„ฑ๊ณผ ๊ฑฐ์ง“์Œ์„ฑ์˜ ๋น„์œจ์„ ์กฐ์ ˆํ•ด์•ผ ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฌธ์ œ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋งˆ์ดํฌ๋กœ ์•Œ์—”์—์ด-์œ ์ „์ž์™€ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์˜ ๋งฅ๋ฝ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ์—ฐ๊ด€์„ฑ์„ ๋ฌธํ—Œ ์ง€์‹์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•˜๊ณ  ๋งˆ์ดํฌ๋กœ ์•Œ์—”์—์ด-์œ ์ „์ž ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ContextMMIA๋ฅผ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ContextMMIA๋Š” ํ†ต๊ณ„์  ์œ ์˜์„ฑ๊ณผ ๋ฌธํ—Œ ๊ด€๋ จ์„ฑ์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ๋งˆ์ดํฌ๋กœ ์•Œ์—”์—์ด-์œ ์ „์ž ๊ด€๊ณ„์˜ ์ ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ด€๊ณ„์˜ ์šฐ์„ ์ˆœ์œ„๋ฅผ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์˜ˆํ›„๊ฐ€ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์œ ๋ฐฉ์•” ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‹คํ—˜์—์„œ ContextMMIA๋Š” ์˜ˆํ›„๊ฐ€ ๋‚˜์œ ์œ ๋ฐฉ์•”์—์„œ ํ™œ์„ฑํ™”๋œ ๋งˆ์ดํฌ๋กœ ์•Œ์—”์—์ด-์œ ์ „์ž ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  ๊ธฐ์กด ์‹คํ—˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฒ€์ฆ๋œ ๊ด€๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ๋†’์€ ์šฐ์„ ์ˆœ์œ„๋กœ ์˜ˆ์ธก๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ํ•ด๋‹น ์œ ์ „์ž๋“ค์ด ์œ ๋ฐฉ์•” ๊ด€๋ จ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ์— ๊ด€์—ฌํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์•Œ๋ ค์กŒ๋‹ค. ๋‘ ๋ฒˆ์งธ๋Š” ์•ฝ๋ฌผ ๋ฐ˜์‘์„ ์ผ์œผํ‚ค๋Š” ์œ ์ „์ž์˜ ๋‹ค๋Œ€์ผ ์กฐ์ ˆ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์ด๋‹ค. ์•ฝ๋ฌผ ๋ฐ˜์‘ ์˜ˆ์ธก์„ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ ์•ฝ๋ฌผ ๋ฐ˜์‘ ๋งค๊ฐœ ์œ ์ „์ž๋ฅผ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•˜๋ฉฐ ์ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด 20,000๊ฐœ ์œ ์ „์ž์˜ ๋‹ค์ค‘ ์˜ค๋ฏน์Šค ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ฉ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ์ด ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ €์ฐจ์› ์ž„๋ฒ ๋”ฉ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•, ์•ฝ๋ฌผ-์œ ์ „์ž ์—ฐ๊ด€์„ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ฌธํ—Œ ์ง€์‹ ๋ฐ ์œ ์ „์ž-์œ ์ „์ž ์ƒํ˜ธ ์ž‘์šฉ ์ง€์‹์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์•ฝ๋ฌผ ๋ฐ˜์‘์„ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ DRIM์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. DRIM์€ ์˜คํ† ์ธ์ฝ”๋”, ํ…์„œ ๋ถ„ํ•ด, ์•ฝ๋ฌผ-์œ ์ „์ž ์—ฐ๊ด€์„ฑ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‹ค์ค‘ ์˜ค๋ฏน์Šค ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์—์„œ ๋‹ค๋Œ€์ผ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ์ •๋œ ๋งค๊ฐœ ์œ ์ „์ž์˜ ์กฐ์ ˆ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์œ ์ „์ž-์œ ์ „์ž ์ƒํ˜ธ ์ž‘์šฉ ์ง€์‹๊ณผ ์•ฝ๋ฌผ ๋ฐ˜์‘ ์‹œ๊ณ„์—ด ์œ ์ „์ž ๋ฐœํ˜„ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์˜ ์ƒํ˜ธ ์ƒ๊ด€๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์œ ๋ฐฉ์•” ์„ธํฌ์ฃผ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‹คํ—˜์—์„œ DRIM์€ ๋ผํŒŒํ‹ฐ๋‹™์ด ํ‘œ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜๋Š” PI3K-Akt ํŒจ์Šค์›จ์ด์— ๊ด€์—ฌํ•˜๋Š” ์œ ์ „์ž๋“ค์˜ ์•ฝ๋ฌผ ๋ฐ˜์‘ ์กฐ์ ˆ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  ๋ผํŒŒํ‹ฐ๋‹™ ๋ฐ˜์‘์„ฑ๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ๋งค๊ฐœ ์œ ์ „์ž๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์˜ˆ์ธก๋œ ์กฐ์ ˆ ๊ด€๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ์„ธํฌ์ฃผ ํŠน์ด์ ์ธ ํŒจํ„ด์„ ๋ณด์ด๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์„ธ ๋ฒˆ์งธ๋Š” ์„ธํฌ์˜ ์ƒํƒœ๋ฅผ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•˜๋Š” ์กฐ์ ˆ์ž์™€ ์œ ์ „์ž์˜ ๋‹ค๋Œ€๋‹ค ์กฐ์ ˆ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์ด๋‹ค. ๋‹ค๋Œ€๋‹ค ๊ด€๊ณ„ ์˜ˆ์ธก์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋œ ์œ ์ „์ž ๋ฐœํ˜„ ๊ฐ’๊ณผ ์œ ์ „์ž ์กฐ์ ˆ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ถ”์ •๋œ ์œ ์ „์ž ๋ฐœํ˜„ ๊ฐ’ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ชฉ์  ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๋งŒ๋“ค์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ชฉ์  ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์กฐ์ ˆ์ธ์ž์™€ ์œ ์ „์ž์˜ ์ˆ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๊ธฐํ•˜๊ธ‰์ˆ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒ€์ƒ‰ ๊ณต๊ฐ„์„ ํƒ์ƒ‰ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์กฐ์ ˆ์ž-์œ ์ „์ž ์ƒํ˜ธ ์ž‘์šฉ ์ง€์‹์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์—ฐ์‚ฐ์„ ๋ฐ˜๋ณตํ•˜์—ฌ ์กฐ์ ˆ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์ฐพ๋Š” ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ๋‹จ๊ณ„๋Š” ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์— ๊ฐ„์„ ์„ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๊ฐ•ํ™” ํ•™์Šต ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ํœด๋ฆฌ์Šคํ‹ฑ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์กฐ์ ˆ์ž๋ฅผ ์„ ํƒํ•˜๋Š” ๋‹ค๋Œ€์ผ ์œ ์ „์ž ์ค‘์‹ฌ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ํƒ์ƒ‰ํ•˜๋Š” ๋‹จ๊ณ„์ด๋‹ค. ๋‘ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ๋‹จ๊ณ„๋Š” ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์—์„œ ๊ฐ„์„ ์„ ์ œ๊ฑฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์œ ์ „์ž๋ฅผ ํ™•๋ฅ ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์„ ํƒํ•˜๋Š” ์ผ๋Œ€๋‹ค ์กฐ์ ˆ์ž ์ค‘์‹ฌ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ํƒ์ƒ‰ํ•˜๋Š” ๋‹จ๊ณ„์ด๋‹ค. ์œ ๋ฐฉ์•” ์„ธํฌ์ฃผ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‹คํ—˜์—์„œ ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ์ด์ „์˜ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ณด๋‹ค ๋” ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ์œ ์ „์ž ๋ฐœํ˜„๋Ÿ‰ ์ถ”์ •์„ ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  ์กฐ์ ˆ์ž ๋ฐ ์œ ์ „์ž ๋ฐœํ˜„ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋กœ ์œ ๋ฐฉ์•” ์•„ํ˜• ํŠน์ด์  ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ์œ ๋ฐฉ์•” ์•„ํ˜• ๊ด€๋ จ ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฒ€์ฆ๋œ ์กฐ์ ˆ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์š”์•ฝํ•˜๋ฉด, ๋ณธ ๋ฐ•์‚ฌํ•™์œ„ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ๋‹ค์ค‘ ์˜ค๋ฏน์Šค ์กฐ์ ˆ์ž์™€ ์œ ์ „์ž์˜ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ์ผ๋Œ€๋‹ค, ๋‹ค๋Œ€์ผ, ๋‹ค๋Œ€๋‹ค ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ƒ๋ฌผํ•™์  ์ง€์‹์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ ๊ณตํ•™์  ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ถ„์ž ์ƒ๋ฌผํ•™ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์œ ์ „์ž ์กฐ์ ˆ ์ƒํ˜ธ ์ž‘์šฉ์„ ์ดํ•ดํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ์„ธํฌ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‹ฌ์ธต์ ์ธ ์ดํ•ด๋ฅผ ๋„์™€์ค„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๊ธฐ๋Œ€๋œ๋‹ค.Understanding how cells function or respond to external stimuli is one of the most important questions in biology and medicine. Thanks to the advances in instrumental technologies, scientists can routinely measure events within cells in single biological experiments. Notable examples are multi-omics data: sequencing of genomes, quantifications of gene expression, and identification of epigenetic events that regulate expression of genes. In order to better understand cellular mechanisms, it is essential to identify regulatory relationships between multi-omics regulators and genes. However, regulatory relationships are very complex and it is infeasible to validate all condition-specific relationships experimentally. Thus, there is an urgent need for an efficient computational method to extract relationships from different types of high-dimensional omics data. One way to address these high-dimensional data is to incorporate external biological knowledge such as relationships between omics and functions of genes curated in various databases. In my doctoral study, I developed three computational approaches to identify the regulatory relationships from multi-omics data utilizing biological prior knowledge. The first study proposes a method to predict one-to-m relationships between miRNA and genes. The computational challenge of miRNA target prediction is that there are many miRNA target candidates, and the ratio of false positives to false negatives needs to be adjusted. This challenge is addressed by utilizing literature knowledge for determining the association between miRNA-gene and a given context. In this study, I developed ContextMMIA to predict miRNA-gene relationships from miRNA and gene expression data. ContextMMIA computes scores of miRNA-gene relationships based on statistical significance and literature relevance and prioritizes the relationships based on the scores. In experiments on breast cancer data with different prognosis, ContextMMIA predicted differentially activated miRNA-gene relationships in invasive breast cancer. The experimentally verified miRNA-gene relationships were predicted with high priority and those genes are known to be involved in breast cancer-related pathways. The second study proposes a method to predict n-to-one relationships between regulators and gene on drug response. The computational challenge of drug response prediction is how to integrate multi-omics data of 20,000 genes for determining drug response mediator genes. This challenge is addressed by utilizing low-dimensional embedding methods, literature knowledge of drug-gene associations, and gene-gene interaction knowledge. For this problem, I developed DRIM to predict drug response relationships from the multi-omics data and drug-induced time-series gene expression data. DRIM uses autoencoder, tensor decomposition, and drug-gene association to determine n-to-one relationships from multi-omics data. Then, regulatory relationships of mediator genes are determined by gene-gene interaction knowledge and cross-correlation of drug-induced time-series gene expression data. In experiments on breast cancer cell line data, DRIM extracted mediator genes relevant to drug response and regulatory relationships of genes involved in the PI3K-Akt pathway targeted by lapatinib. In addition, DRIM revealed distinguished patterns of relationships in breast cancer cell lines with different lapatinib resistance. The third study proposes a method to predict n-to-m relationships between regulators and genes. In order to predict n-to-m relationships, this study formulated an objective function that measures the deviation between observed gene expression values and estimated gene expression values derived from gene regulatory networks. The computational challenge of minimizing the objective function is to navigate the search space of relationships exponentially increasing according to the number of regulators and genes. This challenge is addressed by the iterative local optimization with regulator-gene interaction knowledge. In this study, I developed a two-step iterative RL-based method to predict n-to-m relationships from regulator and gene expression data. The first step is to explore the n-to-one gene-oriented step that selects regulators by reinforcement learning based heuristic to add edges to the network. The second step is to explore the one-to-m regulator-oriented step that stochastically selects genes to remove edges from the network. In experiments on breast cancer cell line data, the proposed method constructed breast cancer subtype-specific networks from the regulator and gene expression profiles with a more accurate gene expression estimation than previous combinatorial optimization methods. Moreover, regulatory relationships involved in the networks were associated with breast cancer subtypes. In summary, in this thesis, I proposed computational methods for predicting one-to-m, n-to-one, and n-to-m relationships between multi-omics regulators and genes utilizing external domain knowledge. The proposed methods are expected to deepen our knowledge of cellular mechanisms by understanding gene regulatory interactions by analyzing the ever-increasing molecular biology data such as The Cancer Genome Atlas, Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia.Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Biological background 1 1.1.1 Multi-omics analysis 1 1.1.2 Multi-omics relationships indicating cell state 2 1.1.3 Biological prior knowledge 4 1.2 Research problems for the multi-omics relationship 6 1.3 Computational challenges and approaches in the exploring multiomics relationship 6 1.4 Outline of the thesis 12 Chapter 2 Literature-based condition-specific miRNA-mRNA target prediction 13 2.1 Computational Problem & Evaluation criterion 14 2.2 Related works 15 2.3 Motivation 17 2.4 Methods 20 2.4.1 Identifying genes and miRNAs based on the user-provided context 22 2.4.2 Omics Score 23 2.4.3 Context Score 24 2.4.4 Confidence Score 26 2.5 Results 26 2.5.1 Pathway analysis 27 2.5.2 Reproducibility of validated targets in humans 31 2.5.3 Sensitivity tests when different keywords are used 33 2.6 Summary 34 Chapter 3 DRIM: A web-based system for investigating drug response at the molecular level by condition-specific multi-omics data integration 36 3.1 Computational Problem & Evaluation criterion 37 3.2 Related works 38 3.3 Motivation 42 3.4 Methods 44 3.4.1 Step 1: Input 45 3.4.2 Step 2: Identifying perturbed sub-pathway with time-series 45 3.4.3 Step 3: Embedding multi-omics for selecting potential mediator genes 47 3.4.4 Step 4: Construct TF-regulatory time-bounded network and identify regulatory path 52 3.4.5 Step 5: Analysis result on the web 52 3.5 Case study: Comparative analysis of breast cancer cell lines that have different sensitivity with lapatinib 54 3.5.1 Multi-omics analysis result before drug treatment 56 3.5.2 Time-series gene expression analysis after drug treatment 57 3.6 Summary 61 Chapter 4 Combinatorial modeling and optimization using iterative RL search for inferring sample-specific regulatory network 63 4.1 Computational Problem & Evaluation criterion 64 4.2 Related works 64 4.3 Motivation 66 4.4 Methods 68 4.4.1 Formulating an objective function 68 4.4.2 Overview of an iterative search method 70 4.4.3 G-step for exploring n-to-one gene-oriented relationship 73 4.4.4 R-step for exploring one-to-m regulator-oriented relationship 79 4.5 Results 80 4.5.1 Cancer cell line data 80 4.5.2 Hyperparameters 81 4.5.3 Quantitative evaluation 82 4.5.4 Qualitative evaluation 83 4.6 Summary 86 Chapter 5 Conclusions 88 ๊ตญ๋ฌธ์ดˆ๋ก 111๋ฐ•

    Warfarin Dose Estimation on High-dimensional and Incomplete Data

    Get PDF
    Warfarin is a widely used oral anticoagulant worldwide. However, due to the complex relationship between individual factors, it is challenging to estimate the optimal warfarin dose to give full play to its ideal ef๏ฌcacy. Currently, there are plenty of studies using machine learning or deep learning techniques to help with the optimal warfarin dose selection. But few of them can resolve missing values and high-dimensional data naturally, that are two main concerns when analyzing clinical real world data. In this work, we propose to regard each patientโ€™s record as a set of observed individual factors, and represent them in an embedding space, that enables our method can learn from the incomplete date directly and avoid the negative impact from the high-dimensional feature set. Then, a novel neural network is proposed to combine the set of embedded vectors non-linearly, that are capable of capturing their correlations and locating the informative ones for prediction. After comparing with the baseline models on the open source data from International Warfarin Pharmacogenetics Consortium, the experimental results demonstrate that our proposed method outperform others by a signi๏ฌcant margin. After further analyzing the model performance in different dosing subgroups, we can conclude that the proposed method has the high application value in clinical, especially for the patients in high-dose and medium-dose subgroups
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore