A practical approach for outdoors distributed target localization in wireless sensor networks

Wireless sensor networks are posed as the new communication paradigm where the use of small, low-complexity, and low-power devices is preferred over costly centralized systems. The spectra of potential applications of sensor networks is very wide, ranging from monitoring, surveillance, and localization, among others. Localization is a key application in sensor networks and the use of simple, efficient, and distributed algorithms is of paramount practical importance. Combining convex optimization tools with consensus algorithms we propose a distributed localization algorithm for scenarios where received signal strength indicator readings are used. We approach the localization problem by formulating an alternative problem that uses distance estimates locally computed at each node. The formulated problem is solved by a relaxed version using semidefinite relaxation technique. Conditions under which the relaxed problem yields to the same solution as the original problem are given and a distributed consensusbased implementation of the algorithm is proposed based on an augmented Lagrangian approach and primaldual decomposition methods. Although suboptimal, the proposed approach is very suitable for its implementation in real sensor networks, i.e., it is scalable, robust against node failures and requires only local communication among neighboring nodes. Simulation results show that running an additional local search around the found solution can yield performance close to the maximum likelihood estimate

A survey of localization in wireless sensor network

Localization is one of the key techniques in wireless sensor network. The location estimation methods can be classified into target/source localization and node self-localization. In target localization, we mainly introduce the energy-based method. Then we investigate the node self-localization methods. Since the widespread adoption of the wireless sensor network, the localization methods are different in various applications. And there are several challenges in some special scenarios. In this paper, we present a comprehensive survey of these challenges: localization in non-line-of-sight, node selection criteria for localization in energy-constrained network, scheduling the sensor node to optimize the tradeoff between localization performance and energy consumption, cooperative node localization, and localization algorithm in heterogeneous network. Finally, we introduce the evaluation criteria for localization in wireless sensor network

Distributed Maximum Likelihood Sensor Network Localization

We propose a class of convex relaxations to solve the sensor network localization problem, based on a maximum likelihood (ML) formulation. This class, as well as the tightness of the relaxations, depends on the noise probability density function (PDF) of the collected measurements. We derive a computational efficient edge-based version of this ML convex relaxation class and we design a distributed algorithm that enables the sensor nodes to solve these edge-based convex programs locally by communicating only with their close neighbors. This algorithm relies on the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM), it converges to the centralized solution, it can run asynchronously, and it is computation error-resilient. Finally, we compare our proposed distributed scheme with other available methods, both analytically and numerically, and we argue the added value of ADMM, especially for large-scale networks

Social Network Analysis Based Localization Technique with Clustered Closeness Centrality for 3D Wireless Sensor Networks

[EN] In this paper, we proposed a new wireless localization technique based on the ideology of social network analysis (SNA), to study the different properties of networks as a graph. Centrality is a main concept in SNA, so we propose using closeness centrality (CC) as a measurement to denote the importance of the node inside the network due to its geo-location to others. The node with highest degree of CC is chosen as a cluster heads, then each cluster head can form its trilateration process to collect data from its cluster. The selection of closest cluster based on CC values, and the unknown node's location can be estimated through the trilateration process. To form a perfect trilateration, the cluster head chooses three anchor nodes. The proposed algorithm provides high accuracy even in different network topologies like concave shape, O shape, and C shape as compared to existing received signal strength indicator (RSSI) techniques. Matlab simulation results based on practical radio propagation data sets showed a localization error of 0.32 m with standard deviation of 0.26 m.This work was fully supported by the Vice Chancellor Doctoral Scholarship at Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand.Ahmad, T.; Li, XJ.; Seet, B.; Cano, J. (2020). Social Network Analysis Based Localization Technique with Clustered Closeness Centrality for 3D Wireless Sensor Networks. Electronics. 9(5):1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9050738S11995Zhou, B., Yao, X., Yang, L., Yang, S., Wu, S., Kim, Y., & Ai, L. (2019). Accurate Rigid Body Localization Using DoA Measurements from a Single Base Station. Electronics, 8(6), 622. doi:10.3390/electronics8060622Ahmad, T., Li, X., & Seet, B.-C. (2017). Parametric Loop Division for 3D Localization in Wireless Sensor Networks. Sensors, 17(7), 1697. doi:10.3390/s17071697Kaur, A., Kumar, P., & Gupta, G. P. (2019). A weighted centroid localization algorithm for randomly deployed wireless sensor networks. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, 31(1), 82-91. doi:10.1016/j.jksuci.2017.01.007Khelifi, F., Bradai, A., Benslimane, A., Rawat, P., & Atri, M. (2018). A Survey of Localization Systems in Internet of Things. Mobile Networks and Applications, 24(3), 761-785. doi:10.1007/s11036-018-1090-3Sanchez-Iborra, R., G. Liaño, I., Simoes, C., Couñago, E., & Skarmeta, A. (2018). Tracking and Monitoring System Based on LoRa Technology for Lightweight Boats. Electronics, 8(1), 15. doi:10.3390/electronics8010015Sayed, A. H., Tarighat, A., & Khajehnouri, N. (2005). Network-based wireless location: challenges faced in developing techniques for accurate wireless location information. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 22(4), 24-40. doi:10.1109/msp.2005.1458275Maşazade, E., Ruixin Niu, Varshney, P. K., & Keskinoz, M. (2010). Energy Aware Iterative Source Localization for Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 58(9), 4824-4835. doi:10.1109/tsp.2010.2051433Yang, X., Kong, Q., & Xie, X. (2009). One-Dimensional Localization Algorithm Based on Signal Strength Ratio. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 5(1), 79-79. doi:10.1080/15501320802571822Xie, S., Wang, T., Hao, X., Yang, M., Zhu, Y., & Li, Y. (2019). Localization and Frequency Identification of Large-Range Wide-Band Electromagnetic Interference Sources in Electromagnetic Imaging System. Electronics, 8(5), 499. doi:10.3390/electronics8050499Zhu, X., Wu, X., & Chen, G. (2013). Relative localization for wireless sensor networks with linear topology. Computer Communications, 36(15-16), 1581-1591. doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2013.07.007Meng, W., Xiao, W., & Xie, L. (2011). An Efficient EM Algorithm for Energy-Based Multisource Localization in Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 60(3), 1017-1027. doi:10.1109/tim.2010.2047035Lim, H., & Hou, J. C. (2009). Distributed localization for anisotropic sensor networks. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks, 5(2), 1-26. doi:10.1145/1498915.1498917Xiaohong Sheng, & Yu-Hen Hu. (2005). Maximum likelihood multiple-source localization using acoustic energy measurements with wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 53(1), 44-53. doi:10.1109/tsp.2004.838930Yun Wang, Xiaodong Wang, Demin Wang, & Agrawal, D. P. (2009). Range-Free Localization Using Expected Hop Progress in Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 20(10), 1540-1552. doi:10.1109/tpds.2008.239Huang, H., & Zheng, Y. R. (2018). Node localization with AoA assistance in multi-hop underwater sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 78, 32-41. doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2018.05.005Zàruba, G. V., Huber, M., Kamangar, F. A., & Chlamtac, I. (2006). Indoor location tracking using RSSI readings from a single Wi-Fi access point. Wireless Networks, 13(2), 221-235. doi:10.1007/s11276-006-5064-1Singh, M., & Khilar, P. M. (2015). An analytical geometric range free localization scheme based on mobile beacon points in wireless sensor network. Wireless Networks, 22(8), 2537-2550. doi:10.1007/s11276-015-1116-8Yiqiang Chen, Qiang Yang, Jie Yin, & Xiaoyong Chai. (2006). Power-efficient access-point selection for indoor location estimation. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 18(7), 877-888. doi:10.1109/tkde.2006.112Alzoubi, K., Li, X.-Y., Wang, Y., Wan, P.-J., & Frieder, O. (2003). Geometric spanners for wireless ad hoc networks. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 14(4), 408-421. doi:10.1109/tpds.2003.1195412Safa, H. (2014). A novel localization algorithm for large scale wireless sensor networks. Computer Communications, 45, 32-46. doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2014.03.020Kaemarungsi, K., & Krishnamurthy, P. (2012). Analysis of WLAN’s received signal strength indication for indoor location fingerprinting. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 8(2), 292-316. doi:10.1016/j.pmcj.2011.09.003Patwari, N., Hero, A. O., Perkins, M., Correal, N. S., & O’Dea, R. J. (2003). Relative location estimation in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 51(8), 2137-2148. doi:10.1109/tsp.2003.814469Niculescu, D. (2003). Telecommunication Systems, 22(1/4), 267-280. doi:10.1023/a:1023403323460Mahyar, H., Hasheminezhad, R., Ghalebi K., E., Nazemian, A., Grosu, R., Movaghar, A., & Rabiee, H. R. (2018). Compressive sensing of high betweenness centrality nodes in networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 497, 166-184. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2017.12.145Plets, D., Bastiaens, S., Martens, L., & Joseph, W. (2019). An Analysis of the Impact of LED Tilt on Visible Light Positioning Accuracy. Electronics, 8(4), 389. doi:10.3390/electronics8040389RSSI Datasethttps://github.com/pspachos/RSSI-DatasetAhmad, T., Li, X. J., & Seet, B.-C. (2019). Noise Reduction Scheme for Parametric Loop Division 3D Wireless Localization Algorithm Based on Extended Kalman Filtering. Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks, 8(2), 24. doi:10.3390/jsan8020024Benson, S. J., Ye, Y., & Zhang, X. (2000). Solving Large-Scale Sparse Semidefinite Programs for Combinatorial Optimization. SIAM Journal on Optimization, 10(2), 443-461. doi:10.1137/s105262349732800