157 research outputs found
Locating-dominating sets and identifying codes in graphs of girth at least 5
Locating-dominating sets and identifying codes are two closely related
notions in the area of separating systems. Roughly speaking, they consist in a
dominating set of a graph such that every vertex is uniquely identified by its
neighbourhood within the dominating set. In this paper, we study the size of a
smallest locating-dominating set or identifying code for graphs of girth at
least 5 and of given minimum degree. We use the technique of vertex-disjoint
paths to provide upper bounds on the minimum size of such sets, and construct
graphs who come close to meet these bounds.Comment: 20 pages, 9 figure
Locating-dominating sets and identifying codes in Graphs of Girth at least 5
Locating-dominating sets and identifying codes are two closely related notions in the area of separating systems. Roughly speaking, they consist in a dominating set of a graph such that every vertex is uniquely identified by its neighbourhood within the dominating set. In this paper, we study the size of a smallest locating-dominating set or identifying code for graphs of girth at least 5 and of given minimum degree. We use the technique of vertex-disjoint paths to provide upper bounds on the minimum size of such sets, and construct graphs who come close to meeting these bounds.Award-winningPostprint (author’s final draft
On the size of identifying codes in triangle-free graphs
In an undirected graph , a subset such that is a
dominating set of , and each vertex in is dominated by a distinct
subset of vertices from , is called an identifying code of . The concept
of identifying codes was introduced by Karpovsky, Chakrabarty and Levitin in
1998. For a given identifiable graph , let \M(G) be the minimum
cardinality of an identifying code in . In this paper, we show that for any
connected identifiable triangle-free graph on vertices having maximum
degree , \M(G)\le n-\tfrac{n}{\Delta+o(\Delta)}. This bound is
asymptotically tight up to constants due to various classes of graphs including
-ary trees, which are known to have their minimum identifying code
of size . We also provide improved bounds for
restricted subfamilies of triangle-free graphs, and conjecture that there
exists some constant such that the bound \M(G)\le n-\tfrac{n}{\Delta}+c
holds for any nontrivial connected identifiable graph
Bounds for identifying codes in terms of degree parameters
An identifying code is a subset of vertices of a graph such that each vertex
is uniquely determined by its neighbourhood within the identifying code. If
\M(G) denotes the minimum size of an identifying code of a graph , it was
conjectured by F. Foucaud, R. Klasing, A. Kosowski and A. Raspaud that there
exists a constant such that if a connected graph with vertices and
maximum degree admits an identifying code, then \M(G)\leq
n-\tfrac{n}{d}+c. We use probabilistic tools to show that for any ,
\M(G)\leq n-\tfrac{n}{\Theta(d)} holds for a large class of graphs
containing, among others, all regular graphs and all graphs of bounded clique
number. This settles the conjecture (up to constants) for these classes of
graphs. In the general case, we prove \M(G)\leq n-\tfrac{n}{\Theta(d^{3})}.
In a second part, we prove that in any graph of minimum degree and
girth at least 5, \M(G)\leq(1+o_\delta(1))\tfrac{3\log\delta}{2\delta}n.
Using the former result, we give sharp estimates for the size of the minimum
identifying code of random -regular graphs, which is about
Sufficient conditions for a digraph to admit a (1,=l)-identifying code
A (1, = `)-identifying code in a digraph D is a subset C of vertices of D such that all distinct subsets of vertices of cardinality at most ` have distinct closed in-neighbourhoods within C. In this paper, we give some sufficient conditions for a digraph of minimum in-degree d - = 1 to admit a (1, = `)- identifying code for ` ¿ {d -, d- + 1}. As a corollary, we obtain the result by Laihonen that states that a graph of minimum degree d = 2 and girth at least 7 admits a (1, = d)-identifying code. Moreover, we prove that every 1-in-regular digraph has a (1, = 2)-identifying code if and only if the girth of the digraph is at least 5. We also characterize all the 2-in-regular digraphs admitting a (1, = `)-identifying code for ` ¿ {2, 3}.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft
Bounds and extremal graphs for total dominating identifying codes
An identifying code of a graph is a dominating set of such that
any two distinct vertices of have distinct closed neighbourhoods within
. The smallest size of an identifying code of is denoted
. When every vertex of also has a neighbour in ,
it is said to be a total dominating identifying code of , and the smallest
size of a total dominating identifying code of is denoted by
.
Extending similar characterizations for identifying codes from the
literature, we characterize those graphs of order with
(the only such connected graph is ) and
(such graphs either satisfy
or are built from certain such graphs by adding a
set of universal vertices, to each of which a private leaf is attached).
Then, using bounds from the literature, we remark that any (open and closed)
twin-free tree of order has a total dominating identifying code of size at
most . This bound is tight, and we characterize the trees
reaching it. Moreover, by a new proof, we show that this bound actually holds
for the larger class of all twin-free graphs of girth at least 5. The cycle
also attains this bound. We also provide a generalized bound for all
graphs of girth at least 5 (possibly with twins).
Finally, we relate to the related parameter
as well as the location-domination number of and
its variants, providing bounds that are either tight or almost tight
Location-domination in line graphs
A set of vertices of a graph is locating if every two distinct
vertices outside have distinct neighbors in ; that is, for distinct
vertices and outside , , where
denotes the open neighborhood of . If is also a dominating set (total
dominating set), it is called a locating-dominating set (respectively,
locating-total dominating set) of . A graph is twin-free if every two
distinct vertices of have distinct open and closed neighborhoods. It is
conjectured [D. Garijo, A. Gonzalez and A. Marquez, The difference between the
metric dimension and the determining number of a graph. Applied Mathematics and
Computation 249 (2014), 487--501] and [F. Foucaud and M. A. Henning.
Locating-total dominating sets in twin-free graphs: a conjecture. The
Electronic Journal of Combinatorics 23 (2016), P3.9] respectively, that any
twin-free graph without isolated vertices has a locating-dominating set of
size at most one-half its order and a locating-total dominating set of size at
most two-thirds its order. In this paper, we prove these two conjectures for
the class of line graphs. Both bounds are tight for this class, in the sense
that there are infinitely many connected line graphs for which equality holds
in the bounds.Comment: 23 pages, 2 figure
On Stronger Types of Locating-dominating Codes
Locating-dominating codes in a graph find their application in sensor
networks and have been studied extensively over the years. A
locating-dominating code can locate one object in a sensor network, but if
there is more than one object, it may lead to false conclusions. In this paper,
we consider stronger types of locating-dominating codes which can locate one
object and detect if there are multiple objects. We study the properties of
these codes and provide bounds on the smallest possible size of these codes,
for example, with the aid of the Dilworth number and Sperner families.
Moreover, these codes are studied in trees and Cartesian products of graphs. We
also give the complete realization theorems for the coexistence of the smallest
possible size of these codes and the optimal locating-dominating codes in a
graph
Metric-locating-dominating sets of graphs for constructing related subsets of vertices
© 2018. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/A dominating set S of a graph is a metric-locating-dominating set if each vertex of the graph is uniquely distinguished by its distances from the elements of S , and the minimum cardinality of such a set is called the metric-location-domination number. In this paper, we undertake a study that, in general graphs and specific families, relates metric-locating-dominating sets to other special sets: resolving sets, dominating sets, locating-dominating sets and doubly resolving sets. We first characterize the extremal trees of the bounds that naturally involve metric-location-domination number, metric dimension and domination number. Then, we prove that there is no polynomial upper bound on the location-domination number in terms of the metric-location-domination number, thus extending a result of Henning and Oellermann. Finally, we show different methods to transform metric-locating-dominating sets into locating-dominating sets and doubly resolving sets. Our methods produce new bounds on the minimum cardinalities of all those sets, some of them concerning parameters that have not been related so farPeer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft
- …