768 research outputs found

    Packet Loss in Terrestrial Wireless and Hybrid Networks

    Get PDF
    The presence of both a geostationary satellite link and a terrestrial local wireless link on the same path of a given network connection is becoming increasingly common, thanks to the popularity of the IEEE 802.11 protocol. The most common situation where a hybrid network comes into play is having a Wi-Fi link at the network edge and the satellite link somewhere in the network core. Example of scenarios where this can happen are ships or airplanes where Internet connection on board is provided through a Wi-Fi access point and a satellite link with a geostationary satellite; a small office located in remote or isolated area without cabled Internet access; a rescue team using a mobile ad hoc Wi-Fi network connected to the Internet or to a command centre through a mobile gateway using a satellite link. The serialisation of terrestrial and satellite wireless links is problematic from the point of view of a number of applications, be they based on video streaming, interactive audio or TCP. The reason is the combination of high latency, caused by the geostationary satellite link, and frequent, correlated packet losses caused by the local wireless terrestrial link. In fact, GEO satellites are placed in equatorial orbit at 36,000 km altitude, which takes the radio signal about 250 ms to travel up and down. Satellite systems exhibit low packet loss most of the time, with typical project constraints of 10−8 bit error rate 99% of the time, which translates into a packet error rate of 10−4, except for a few days a year. Wi-Fi links, on the other hand, have quite different characteristics. While the delay introduced by the MAC level is in the order of the milliseconds, and is consequently too small to affect most applications, its packet loss characteristics are generally far from negligible. In fact, multipath fading, interference and collisions affect most environments, causing correlated packet losses: this means that often more than one packet at a time is lost for a single fading even

    Real-Time Localization Using Software Defined Radio

    Get PDF
    Service providers make use of cost-effective wireless solutions to identify, localize, and possibly track users using their carried MDs to support added services, such as geo-advertisement, security, and management. Indoor and outdoor hotspot areas play a significant role for such services. However, GPS does not work in many of these areas. To solve this problem, service providers leverage available indoor radio technologies, such as WiFi, GSM, and LTE, to identify and localize users. We focus our research on passive services provided by third parties, which are responsible for (i) data acquisition and (ii) processing, and network-based services, where (i) and (ii) are done inside the serving network. For better understanding of parameters that affect indoor localization, we investigate several factors that affect indoor signal propagation for both Bluetooth and WiFi technologies. For GSM-based passive services, we developed first a data acquisition module: a GSM receiver that can overhear GSM uplink messages transmitted by MDs while being invisible. A set of optimizations were made for the receiver components to support wideband capturing of the GSM spectrum while operating in real-time. Processing the wide-spectrum of the GSM is possible using a proposed distributed processing approach over an IP network. Then, to overcome the lack of information about tracked devices’ radio settings, we developed two novel localization algorithms that rely on proximity-based solutions to estimate in real environments devices’ locations. Given the challenging indoor environment on radio signals, such as NLOS reception and multipath propagation, we developed an original algorithm to detect and remove contaminated radio signals before being fed to the localization algorithm. To improve the localization algorithm, we extended our work with a hybrid based approach that uses both WiFi and GSM interfaces to localize users. For network-based services, we used a software implementation of a LTE base station to develop our algorithms, which characterize the indoor environment before applying the localization algorithm. Experiments were conducted without any special hardware, any prior knowledge of the indoor layout or any offline calibration of the system

    Aerial base station placement in temporary-event scenarios

    Get PDF
    Die Anforderungen an den Netzdatenverkehr sind in den letzten Jahren dramatisch gestiegen, was ein großes Interesse an der Entwicklung neuartiger Lösungen zur Erhöhung der NetzkapazitĂ€t in Mobilfunknetzen erzeugt hat. Besonderes Augenmerk wurde auf das Problem der KapazitĂ€tsverbesserung bei temporĂ€ren Veranstaltungen gelegt, bei denen das Umfeld im Wesentlichen dynamisch ist. Um der Dynamik der sich verĂ€ndernden Umgebung gerecht zu werden und die Bodeninfrastruktur durch zusĂ€tzliche KapazitĂ€t zu unterstĂŒtzen, wurde der Einsatz von Luftbasisstationen vorgeschlagen. Die Luftbasisstationen können in der NĂ€he des Nutzers platziert werden und aufgrund der im Vergleich zur Bodeninfrastruktur höheren Lage die Vorteile der Sichtlinienkommunikation nutzen. Dies reduziert den Pfadverlust und ermöglicht eine höhere KanalkapazitĂ€t. Das Optimierungsproblem der Maximierung der NetzkapazitĂ€t durch die richtige Platzierung von Luftbasisstationen bildet einen Schwerpunkt der Arbeit. Es ist notwendig, das Optimierungsproblem rechtzeitig zu lösen, um auf VerĂ€nderungen in der dynamischen Funkumgebung zu reagieren. Die optimale Platzierung von Luftbasisstationen stellt jedoch ein NP-schweres Problem dar, wodurch die Lösung nicht trivial ist. Daher besteht ein Bedarf an schnellen und skalierbaren Optimierungsalgorithmen. Als Erstes wird ein neuartiger Hybrid-Algorithmus (Projected Clustering) vorgeschlagen, der mehrere Lösungen auf der Grundlage der schnellen entfernungsbasierten KapazitĂ€tsapproximierung berechnet und sie auf dem genauen SINR-basierten KapazitĂ€tsmodell bewertet. Dabei werden suboptimale Lösungen vermieden. Als Zweites wird ein neuartiges verteiltes, selbstorganisiertes Framework (AIDA) vorgeschlagen, welches nur lokales Wissen verwendet, den Netzwerkmehraufwand verringert und die Anforderungen an die Kommunikation zwischen Luftbasisstationen lockert. Bei der Formulierung des Platzierungsproblems konnte festgestellt werden, dass Unsicherheiten in Bezug auf die Modellierung der Luft-Bodensignalausbreitung bestehen. Da dieser Aspekt im Rahmen der Analyse eine wichtige Rolle spielt, erfolgte eine Validierung moderner Luft-Bodensignalausbreitungsmodelle, indem reale Messungen gesammelt und das genaueste Modell fĂŒr die Simulationen ausgewĂ€hlt wurden.As the traffic demands have grown dramatically in recent years, so has the interest in developing novel solutions that increase the network capacity in cellular networks. The problem of capacity improvement is even more complex when applied to a dynamic environment during a disaster or temporary event. The use of aerial base stations has received much attention in the last ten years as the solution to cope with the dynamics of the changing environment and to supplement the ground infrastructure with extra capacity. Due to higher elevations and possibility to place aerial base stations in close proximity to the user, path loss is significantly smaller in comparison to the ground infrastructure, which in turn enables high data capacity. We are studying the optimization problem of maximizing network capacity by proper placement of aerial base stations. To handle the changes in the dynamic radio environment, it is necessary to promptly solve the optimization problem. However, we show that the optimal placement of aerial base stations is the NP-hard problem and its solution is non-trivial, and thus, there is a need for fast and scalable optimization algorithms. This dissertation investigates how to solve the placement problem efficiently and to support the dynamics of temporary events. First, we propose a novel hybrid algorithm (Projected Clustering), which calculates multiple solutions based on the fast distance-based capacity approximation and evaluates them on the accurate SINR-based capacity model, avoiding sub-optimal solutions. Second, we propose a novel distributed, self-organized framework (AIDA), which conducts a decision-making process using only local knowledge, decreasing the network overhead and relaxing the requirements for communication between aerial base stations. During the formulation of the placement problem, we found that there is still considerable uncertainty with regard to air-to-ground propagation modeling. Since this aspect plays an important role in our analysis, we validated state-of-the-art air-to-ground propagation models by collecting real measurements and chose the most accurate model for the simulations

    Final report on the evaluation of RRM/CRRM algorithms

    Get PDF
    Deliverable public del projecte EVERESTThis deliverable provides a definition and a complete evaluation of the RRM/CRRM algorithms selected in D11 and D15, and evolved and refined on an iterative process. The evaluation will be carried out by means of simulations using the simulators provided at D07, and D14.Preprin

    Proceedings of the Second International Mobile Satellite Conference (IMSC 1990)

    Get PDF
    Presented here are the proceedings of the Second International Mobile Satellite Conference (IMSC), held June 17-20, 1990 in Ottawa, Canada. Topics covered include future mobile satellite communications concepts, aeronautical applications, modulation and coding, propagation and experimental systems, mobile terminal equipment, network architecture and control, regulatory and policy considerations, vehicle antennas, and speech compression

    Lightweight mobile and wireless systems: technologies, architectures, and services

    Get PDF
    1Department of Information and Communication Systems Engineering (ICSE), University of the Aegean, 81100 Mytilene, Greece 2Department of Information Engineering and Computer Science (DISI), University of Trento, 38123 Trento, Italy 3Department of Informatics, Alexander Technological Educational Institute of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, 574 00 Macedonia, Greece 4Centre Tecnologic de Telecomunicacions de Catalunya (CTTC), 08860 Barcelona, Spain 5North Carolina State University (NCSU), Raleigh, NC 27695, US
    • 

    corecore