17 research outputs found

    Hamilton cycles in 5-connected line graphs

    Get PDF
    A conjecture of Carsten Thomassen states that every 4-connected line graph is hamiltonian. It is known that the conjecture is true for 7-connected line graphs. We improve this by showing that any 5-connected line graph of minimum degree at least 6 is hamiltonian. The result extends to claw-free graphs and to Hamilton-connectedness

    Quasigraphs and skeletal partitions

    Get PDF
    We give a new proof of the Skeletal Lemma, which is the main technical tool in our paper on Hamilton cycles in line graphs [T. Kaiser and P. Vr\'ana, Hamilton cycles in 5-connected line graphs, European J. Combin. 33 (2012), 924-947]. It generalises results on disjoint spanning trees in graphs to the context of 3-hypergraphs. The lemma is proved in a slightly stronger version that is more suitable for applications. The proof is simplified and formulated in a more accessible way

    A short proof of the tree-packing theorem

    Get PDF
    We give a short elementary proof of Tutte and Nash-Williams' characterization of graphs with k edge-disjoint spanning trees

    A Survey of Line Graphs and Hamiltonian Paths

    Get PDF
    In this paper, we are going to explore a survey of line graphs and hamiltonian paths. Research concerning line graphs and hamiltonian paths started in the 1960\u27s. We will investigate some recent theorems and proofs covering this topic. At the end, we will prove a main result involving line graphs and hamiltonian paths

    How tough is toughness?

    Get PDF
    The concept of toughness was introduced by Chvátal [34] more than forty years ago. Toughness resembles vertex connectivity, but is different in the sense that it takes into account what the effect of deleting a vertex cut is on the number of resulting components. As we will see, this difference has major consequences in terms of computational complexity and on the implications with respect to cycle structure, in particular the existence of Hamilton cycles and k-factors

    On Eulerian subgraphs and hamiltonian line graphs

    Get PDF
    A graph {\color{black}GG} is Hamilton-connected if for any pair of distinct vertices {\color{black}u,vV(G)u, v \in V(G)}, {\color{black}GG} has a spanning (u,v)(u,v)-path; {\color{black}GG} is 1-hamiltonian if for any vertex subset SV(G)S \subseteq {\color{black}V(G)} with S1|S| \le 1, GSG - S has a spanning cycle. Let δ(G)\delta(G), α2˘7(G)\alpha\u27(G) and L(G)L(G) denote the minimum degree, the matching number and the line graph of a graph GG, respectively. The following result is obtained. {\color{black} Let GG be a simple graph} with E(G)3|E(G)| \ge 3. If δ(G)α2˘7(G)\delta(G) \geq \alpha\u27(G), then each of the following holds. \\ (i) L(G)L(G) is Hamilton-connected if and only if κ(L(G))3\kappa(L(G))\ge 3. \\ (ii) L(G)L(G) is 1-hamiltonian if and only if κ(L(G))3\kappa(L(G))\ge 3. %==========sp For a graph GG, an integer s0s \ge 0 and distinct vertices u,vV(G)u, v \in V(G), an (s;u,v)(s; u, v)-path-system of GG is a subgraph HH consisting of ss internally disjoint (u,v)(u,v)-paths. The spanning connectivity κ(G)\kappa^*(G) is the largest integer ss such that for any kk with 0ks0 \le k \le s and for any u,vV(G)u, v \in V(G) with uvu \neq v, GG has a spanning (k;u,v)(k; u,v)-path-system. It is known that κ(G)κ(G)\kappa^*(G) \le \kappa(G), and determining if κ(G)3˘e0\kappa^*(G) \u3e 0 is an NP-complete problem. A graph GG is maximally spanning connected if κ(G)=κ(G)\kappa^*(G) = \kappa(G). Let msc(G)msc(G) and sk(G)s_k(G) be the smallest integers mm and m2˘7m\u27 such that Lm(G)L^m(G) is maximally spanning connected and κ(Lm2˘7(G))k\kappa^*(L^{m\u27}(G)) \ge k, respectively. We show that every locally-connected line graph with connectivity at least 3 is maximally spanning connected, and that the spanning connectivity of a locally-connected line graph can be polynomially determined. As applications, we also determined best possible upper bounds for msc(G)msc(G) and sk(G)s_k(G), and characterized the extremal graphs reaching the upper bounds. %==============st For integers s0s \ge 0 and t0t \ge 0, a graph GG is (s,t)(s,t)-supereulerian if for any disjoint edge sets X,YE(G)X, Y \subseteq E(G) with Xs|X|\le s and Yt|Y|\le t, GG has a spanning closed trail that contains XX and avoids YY. Pulleyblank in [J. Graph Theory, 3 (1979) 309-310] showed that determining whether a graph is (0,0)(0,0)-supereulerian, even when restricted to planar graphs, is NP-complete. Settling an open problem of Bauer, Catlin in [J. Graph Theory, 12 (1988) 29-45] showed that every simple graph GG on nn vertices with δ(G)n51\delta(G) \ge \frac{n}{5} -1, when nn is sufficiently large, is (0,0)(0,0)-supereulerian or is contractible to K2,3K_{2,3}. We prove the following for any nonnegative integers ss and tt. \\ (i) For any real numbers aa and bb with 03˘ca3˘c10 \u3c a \u3c 1, there exists a family of finitely many graphs \F(a,b;s,t) such that if GG is a simple graph on nn vertices with κ2˘7(G)t+2\kappa\u27(G) \ge t+2 and δ(G)an+b\delta(G) \ge an + b, then either GG is (s,t)(s,t)-supereulerian, or GG is contractible to a member in \F(a,b;s,t). \\ (ii) Let K2\ell K_2 denote the connected loopless graph with two vertices and \ell parallel edges. If GG is a simple graph on nn vertices with κ2˘7(G)t+2\kappa\u27(G) \ge t+2 and δ(G)n21\delta(G) \ge \frac{n}{2}-1, then when nn is sufficiently large, either GG is (s,t)(s,t)-supereulerian, or for some integer jj with t+2js+tt+2 \le j \le s+t, GG is contractible to a jK2j K_2. %==================index For a hamiltonian property \cp, Clark and Wormold introduced the problem of investigating the value \cp(a,b) = \max\{\min\{n: L^n(G) has property \cp\}: κ2˘7(G)a\kappa\u27(G) \ge a and δ(G)b}\delta(G) \ge b\}, and proposed a few problems to determine \cp(a,b) with ba4b \ge a \ge 4 when \cp is being hamiltonian, edge-hamiltonian and hamiltonian-connected. Zhan in 1986 proved that the line graph of a 4-edge-connected graph is Hamilton-connected, which implies a solution to the unsettled cases of above-mentioned problem. We consider an extended version of the problem. Let ess2˘7(G)ess\u27(G) denote the essential edge-connectivity of a graph GG, and define \cp\u27(a,b) = \max\{\min\{n: L^n(G) has property \cp\}: ess2˘7(G)aess\u27(G) \ge a and δ(G)b}\delta(G) \ge b\}. We investigate the values of \cp\u27(a,b) when \cp is one of these hamiltonian properties. In particular, we show that for any values of b1b \ge 1, \cp\u27(4,b) \le 2 and \cp\u27(4,b) = 1 if and only if Thomassen\u27s conjecture that every 4-connected line graph is hamiltonian is valid

    Pancyclicity of 4-connected {Claw, Generalized Bull}-free Graphs

    Get PDF
    A graph G is pancyclic if it contains cycles of each length ℓ, 3 ≤ ℓ ≤ |V (G)|. The generalized bull B(i, j) is obtained by associating one endpoint of each of the paths P i+1 and P j+1 with distinct vertices of a triangle. Gould, Luczak and Pfende

    On 1-Hamilton-connected claw-free graphs

    Get PDF
    A graph G is k-Hamilton-connected (k-hamiltonian) if G−X is Hamilton-connected (hamiltonian) for every set X ⊂ V (G) with |X| = k. In the paper, we prove that (i) every 5-connected claw-free graph with minimum degree at least 6 is 1-Hamilton-connected, (ii) every 4-connected claw-free hourglass-free graph is 1-Hamilton-connected. As a byproduct, we also show that every 5-connected line graph with minimum degree at least 6 is 3-hamiltonian
    corecore