17 research outputs found
Hamilton cycles in 5-connected line graphs
A conjecture of Carsten Thomassen states that every 4-connected line graph is
hamiltonian. It is known that the conjecture is true for 7-connected line
graphs. We improve this by showing that any 5-connected line graph of minimum
degree at least 6 is hamiltonian. The result extends to claw-free graphs and to
Hamilton-connectedness
Quasigraphs and skeletal partitions
We give a new proof of the Skeletal Lemma, which is the main technical tool
in our paper on Hamilton cycles in line graphs [T. Kaiser and P. Vr\'ana,
Hamilton cycles in 5-connected line graphs, European J. Combin. 33 (2012),
924-947]. It generalises results on disjoint spanning trees in graphs to the
context of 3-hypergraphs. The lemma is proved in a slightly stronger version
that is more suitable for applications. The proof is simplified and formulated
in a more accessible way
A short proof of the tree-packing theorem
We give a short elementary proof of Tutte and Nash-Williams' characterization
of graphs with k edge-disjoint spanning trees
A Survey of Line Graphs and Hamiltonian Paths
In this paper, we are going to explore a survey of line graphs and hamiltonian paths. Research concerning line graphs and hamiltonian paths started in the 1960\u27s. We will investigate some recent theorems and proofs covering this topic. At the end, we will prove a main result involving line graphs and hamiltonian paths
How tough is toughness?
The concept of toughness was introduced by Chvátal [34] more than forty years ago. Toughness resembles vertex connectivity, but is different in the sense that it takes into account what the effect of deleting a vertex cut is on the number of resulting components. As we will see, this difference has major consequences in terms of computational complexity and on the implications with respect to cycle structure, in particular the existence of Hamilton cycles and k-factors
On Eulerian subgraphs and hamiltonian line graphs
A graph {\color{black}} is Hamilton-connected if for any pair of distinct vertices {\color{black}}, {\color{black}} has a spanning -path; {\color{black}} is 1-hamiltonian if for any vertex subset with , has a spanning cycle. Let , and denote the minimum degree, the matching number and the line graph of a graph , respectively. The following result is obtained. {\color{black} Let be a simple graph} with . If , then each of the following holds. \\ (i) is Hamilton-connected if and only if . \\ (ii) is 1-hamiltonian if and only if . %==========sp For a graph , an integer and distinct vertices , an -path-system of is a subgraph consisting of internally disjoint -paths. The spanning connectivity is the largest integer such that for any with and for any with , has a spanning -path-system. It is known that , and determining if is an NP-complete problem. A graph is maximally spanning connected if . Let and be the smallest integers and such that is maximally spanning connected and , respectively. We show that every locally-connected line graph with connectivity at least 3 is maximally spanning connected, and that the spanning connectivity of a locally-connected line graph can be polynomially determined. As applications, we also determined best possible upper bounds for and , and characterized the extremal graphs reaching the upper bounds. %==============st For integers and , a graph is -supereulerian if for any disjoint edge sets with and , has a spanning closed trail that contains and avoids . Pulleyblank in [J. Graph Theory, 3 (1979) 309-310] showed that determining whether a graph is -supereulerian, even when restricted to planar graphs, is NP-complete. Settling an open problem of Bauer, Catlin in [J. Graph Theory, 12 (1988) 29-45] showed that every simple graph on vertices with , when is sufficiently large, is -supereulerian or is contractible to . We prove the following for any nonnegative integers and . \\ (i) For any real numbers and with , there exists a family of finitely many graphs \F(a,b;s,t) such that if is a simple graph on vertices with and , then either is -supereulerian, or is contractible to a member in \F(a,b;s,t). \\ (ii) Let denote the connected loopless graph with two vertices and parallel edges. If is a simple graph on vertices with and , then when is sufficiently large, either is -supereulerian, or for some integer with , is contractible to a . %==================index For a hamiltonian property \cp, Clark and Wormold introduced the problem of investigating the value \cp(a,b) = \max\{\min\{n: L^n(G) has property \cp\}: and , and proposed a few problems to determine \cp(a,b) with when \cp is being hamiltonian, edge-hamiltonian and hamiltonian-connected. Zhan in 1986 proved that the line graph of a 4-edge-connected graph is Hamilton-connected, which implies a solution to the unsettled cases of above-mentioned problem. We consider an extended version of the problem. Let denote the essential edge-connectivity of a graph , and define \cp\u27(a,b) = \max\{\min\{n: L^n(G) has property \cp\}: and . We investigate the values of \cp\u27(a,b) when \cp is one of these hamiltonian properties. In particular, we show that for any values of , \cp\u27(4,b) \le 2 and \cp\u27(4,b) = 1 if and only if Thomassen\u27s conjecture that every 4-connected line graph is hamiltonian is valid
Pancyclicity of 4-connected {Claw, Generalized Bull}-free Graphs
A graph G is pancyclic if it contains cycles of each length ℓ, 3 ≤ ℓ ≤ |V (G)|. The generalized bull B(i, j) is obtained by associating one endpoint of each of the paths P i+1 and P j+1 with distinct vertices of a triangle. Gould, Luczak and Pfende
On 1-Hamilton-connected claw-free graphs
A graph G is k-Hamilton-connected (k-hamiltonian) if G−X is Hamilton-connected (hamiltonian) for every set X ⊂ V (G) with |X| = k. In the paper, we prove that (i) every 5-connected claw-free graph with minimum degree at least 6 is 1-Hamilton-connected, (ii) every 4-connected claw-free hourglass-free graph is 1-Hamilton-connected. As a byproduct, we also show that every 5-connected line graph with minimum degree at least 6 is 3-hamiltonian