Improved Squeaky Wheel Optimisation for Driver Scheduling

This paper presents a technique called Improved Squeaky Wheel Optimisation for driver scheduling problems. It improves the original Squeaky Wheel Optimisations effectiveness and execution speed by incorporating two additional steps of Selection and Mutation which implement evolution within a single solution. In the ISWO, a cycle of Analysis-Selection-Mutation-Prioritization-Construction continues until stopping conditions are reached. The Analysis step first computes the fitness of a current solution to identify troublesome components. The Selection step then discards these troublesome components probabilistically by using the fitness measure, and the Mutation step follows to further discard a small number of components at random. After the above steps, an input solution becomes partial and thus the resulting partial solution needs to be repaired. The repair is carried out by using the Prioritization step to first produce priorities that determine an order by which the following Construction step then schedules the remaining components. Therefore, the optimisation in the ISWO is achieved by solution disruption, iterative improvement and an iterative constructive repair process performed. Encouraging experimental results are reported

A flexible system for scheduling drivers

A substantial part of the operating costs of public transport is attributable to drivers, whose efficient use therefore is important. The compilation of optimal work packages is difficult, being NP-hard. In practice, algorithmic advances and enhanced computing power have led to significant progress in achieving better schedules. However, differences in labor practices among modes of transport and operating companies make production of a truly general system with acceptable performance a difficult proposition. TRACS II has overcome these difficulties, being used with success by a substantial number of bus and train operators. Many theoretical aspects of the system have been published previously. This paper shows for the first time how theory and practice have been brought together, explaining the many features which have been added to the algorithmic kernel to provide a user-friendly and adaptable system designed to provide maximum flexibility in practice. We discuss the extent to which users have been involved in system development, leading to many practical successes, and we summarize some recent achievements

Solving real-world routing problems using evolutionary algorithms and multi-agent-systems

This thesis investigates the solving of routing problems using Evolutionary Algorithms (EAs). Routing problems are known to be hard and may possess complex search spaces. Evolutionary algorithms are potentially powerful tools for finding solutions within complex search spaces. The problem investigated is the routing of deliveries to households within an urban environment; the most common instance of this problem is that of daily postal deliveries. A representation known as Street Based Routing (SBR) is presented. This is a problem representation that makes use of the real world groupings of streets and houses. This representation is an indirect problem representation designed specifically for use with EAs. The SBR representation is incorporated within an EA and used to construct delivery routes around a variety of problem instances. The EA based system is compared against a Travelling Salesman Problem (TSP) solver, and the results are presented. The EA based system produces routes that are on average slightly longer than those produced by the TSP solver. Real world problems may often involve the construction of a network of delivery routes that are subject to multiple hard and soft constraints. A Multi Agent System (MAS) based framework for building delivery networks is presented that makes use of the SBR based EA presented earlier. Each agent within the system uses an EA to construct a single route. Agents may exchange work (via auctions or by directly negotiated exchanges) allowing the optimisation of their route. It is demonstrated that this approach has much potential and is capable of constructing delivery networks meeting set constraints, over a range of problem instances and constraint values.EThOS - Electronic Theses Online ServiceGBUnited Kingdo

Solving Real-World Routing Problems using Evolutionary Algorithms and Multi-Agent-Systems.

This thesis investigates the solving of routing problems using Evolutionary Algorithms (EAs). Routing problems are known to be hard and may possess complex search spaces. Evolutionary algorithms are potentially powerful tools for finding solutions within complex search spaces.The problem investigated is the routing of deliveries to households within an urban environment; the most common instance of this problem is that of daily postal deliveries. A representation known as Street Based Routing (SBR) is presented. This is a problem representation that makes use of the real world groupings of streets and houses. This representation is an indirect problem representationdesigned specifically for use with EAs. The SBR representation is incorporated within an EA and used to construct delivery routes around a variety of probleminstances. The EA based system is compared against a Travelling Salesman Problem (TSP) solver, and the results are presented. The EA based system producesroutes that are on average slightly longer than those produced by the TSP solver.Real world problems may often involve the construction of a network of delivery routes that are subject to multiple hard and soft constraints. A Multi Agent System (MAS) based framework for building delivery networks is presented thatmakes use of the SBR based EA presented earlier. Each agent within the system uses an EA to construct a single route. Agents may exchange work (via auctionsor by directly negotiated exchanges) allowing the optimisation of their route. It is demonstrated that this approach has much potential and is capable of constructingdelivery networks meeting set constraints, over a range of problem instances and constraint values