Spooky Interaction and its Discontents: Compilers for Succinct Two-Message Argument Systems

We are interested in constructing short two-message arguments for various languages, where the complexity of the verifier is small (e.g. linear in the input size, or even sublinear if it is coded properly). Suppose that we have a low communication public-coin interactive protocol for proving (or arguing) membership in the language. We consider a ``compiler\u27\u27 from the literature that takes a protocol consisting of several rounds and produces a two-message argument system. The compiler is based on any Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE) scheme, or on PIR (under additional conditions on the protocol). This compiler has been used successfully in several proposed protocols. We investigate the question of whether this compiler can be proven to work under standard cryptographic assumptions. We prove: (i) If FHEs or PIR systems exist, then there is a sound interactive proof protocol that, when run through the compiler, results in a protocol that is not sound. (ii) If the verifier in the original protocol runs in logarithmic space and has no ``long-term\u27\u27 secret memory (a generalization of public coins), then the compiled protocol is sound. This yields a succinct two-message argument system for any language in NC, where the verifier\u27s work is linear (or even polylog if the input is coded appropriately). This is the first (non trivial) two-message succinct argument system that is based on a standard polynomial-time hardness assumption

Cryptography with anonymity in mind

Advances in information technologies gave a rise to powerful ubiquitous com- puting devices, and digital networks have enabled new ways of fast communication, which immediately found tons of applications and resulted in large amounts of data being transmitted. For decades, cryptographic schemes and privacy-preserving protocols have been studied and researched in order to offer end users privacy of their data and implement useful functionalities at the same time, often trading security properties for cryptographic assumptions and efficiency. In this plethora of cryptographic constructions, anonymity properties play a special role, as they are important in many real-life scenarios. However, many useful cryptographic primitives lack anonymity properties or imply prohibitive costs to achieve them. In this thesis, we expand the territory of cryptographic primitives with anonymity in mind. First, we define Anonymous RAM, a generalization of a single- user Oblivious RAM to multiple mistrusted users, and present two constructions thereof with different trade-offs between assumptions and efficiency. Second, we define an encryption scheme that allows to establish chains of ciphertexts anony- mously and verify their integrity. Furthermore, the aggregatable version of the scheme allows to build a Parallel Anonymous RAM, which enhances Anonymous RAM by supporting concurrent users. Third, we show our technique for construct- ing efficient non-interactive zero-knowledge proofs for statements that consist of both algebraic and arithmetic statements. Finally, we show our framework for constructing efficient single secret leader election protocols, which have been recently identified as an important component in proof-of-stake cryptocurrencies.Fortschritte in der Informationstechnik haben leistungsstarke allgegenwärtige Rechner hervorgerufen, während uns digitale Netzwerke neue Wege für die schnelle Kommunikation ermöglicht haben. Durch die Vielzahl von Anwendungen führte dies zur Übertragung von riesigen Datenvolumen. Seit Jahrzehnten wurden bereits verschiedene kryptographische Verfahren und Technologien zum Datenschutz erforscht und analysiert. Das Ziel ist die Privatsphäre der Benutzer zu schützen und gleichzeitig nützliche Funktionalität anzubieten, was oft mit einem Kompromiss zwischen Sicherheitseigenschaften, kryptographischen Annahmen und Effizienz verbunden ist. In einer Fülle von kryptographischen Konstruktionen spielen Anonymitätseigenschaften eine besondere Rolle, da sie in vielen realistischen Szenarien sehr wichtig sind. Allerdings fehlen vielen kryptographischen Primitive Anonymitätseigenschaften oder sie stehen im Zusammenhang mit erheblichen Kosten. In dieser Dissertation erweitern wir den Bereich von kryptographischen Prim- itiven mit einem Fokus auf Anonymität. Erstens definieren wir Anonymous RAM, eine Verallgemeinerung von Einzelbenutzer-Oblivious RAM für mehrere misstraute Benutzer, und stellen dazu zwei Konstruktionen mit verschiedenen Kompromissen zwischen Annahmen und Effizienz vor. Zweitens definieren wir ein Verschlüsselungsverfahren, das es erlaubt anonym eine Verbindung zwischen Geheimtexten herzustellen und deren Integrität zu überprüfen. Darüber hinaus bietet die aggregierbare Variante von diesem Verfahren an, Parallel Anonymous RAM zu bauen. Dieses verbessert Anonymous RAM, indem es mehrere Benutzer in einer parallelen Ausführung unterstützen kann. Drittens zeigen wir eine Meth- ode für das Konstruieren effizienter Zero-Knowledge-Protokolle, die gleichzeitig aus algebraischen und arithmetischen Teilen bestehen. Zuletzt zeigen wir ein Framework für das Konstruieren effizienter Single-Leader-Election-Protokolle, was kürzlich als ein wichtiger Bestandteil in den Proof-of-Stake Kryptowährungen erkannt worden ist

Adaptive Security of Multi-Party Protocols, Revisited

The goal of secure multi-party computation (MPC) is to allow a set of parties to perform an arbitrary computation task, where the security guarantees depend on the set of parties that are corrupted. The more parties are corrupted, the less is guaranteed, and typically the guarantees are completely lost when the number of corrupted parties exceeds a certain corruption bound. Early and also many recent protocols are only statically secure in the sense that they provide no security guarantees if the adversary is allowed to choose adaptively which parties to corrupt. Security against an adversary with such a strong capability is often called adaptive security and a significant body of literature is devoted to achieving adaptive security, which is known as a difficult problem. In particular, a main technical obstacle in this context is the so-called ``commitment problem\u27\u27, where the simulator is unable to consistently explain the internal state of a party with respect to its pre-corruption outputs. As a result, protocols typically resort to the use of cryptographic primitives like non-committing encryption, incurring a substantial efficiency loss. This paper provides a new, clean-slate treatment of adaptive security in MPC, exploiting the specification concept of constructive cryptography (CC). A new natural security notion, called CC-adaptive security, is proposed, which is technically weaker than standard adaptive security but nevertheless captures security against a fully adaptive adversary. Known protocol examples separating between adaptive and static security are also insecure in our notion. Moreover, our notion avoids the commitment problem and thereby the need to use non-committing or equivocal tools. We exemplify this by showing that the protocols by Cramer, Damgard and Nielsen (EUROCRYPT\u2701) for the honest majority setting, and (the variant without non-committing encryption) by Canetti, Lindell, Ostrovsky and Sahai (STOC\u2702) for the dishonest majority setting, achieve CC-adaptive security. The latter example is of special interest since all UC-adaptive protocols in the dishonest majority setting require some form of non-committing or equivocal encryption

Round-Preserving Parallel Composition of Probabilistic-Termination Protocols

An important benchmark for multi-party computation protocols (MPC) is their round complexity. For several important MPC tasks, (tight) lower bounds on the round complexity are known. However, for some of these tasks, such as broadcast, the lower bounds can be circumvented when the termination round of every party is not a priori known, and simultaneous termination is not guaranteed. Protocols with this property are called probabilistic-termination (PT) protocols. Running PT protocols in parallel affects the round complexity of the resulting protocol in somewhat unexpected ways. For instance, an execution of m protocols with constant expected round complexity might take O(log m) rounds to complete. In a seminal work, Ben-Or and El-Yaniv (Distributed Computing \u2703) developed a technique for parallel execution of arbitrarily many broadcast protocols, while preserving expected round complexity. More recently, Cohen et al. (CRYPTO \u2716) devised a framework for universal composition of PT protocols, and provided the first composable parallel-broadcast protocol with a simulation-based proof. These constructions crucially rely on the fact that broadcast is ``privacy free,\u27\u27 and do not generalize to arbitrary protocols in a straightforward way. This raises the question of whether it is possible to execute arbitrary PT protocols in parallel, without increasing the round complexity. In this paper we tackle this question and provide both feasibility and infeasibility results. We construct a round-preserving protocol compiler, secure against a dishonest minority of actively corrupted parties, that compiles arbitrary protocols into a protocol realizing their parallel composition, while having a black-box access to the underlying protocols. Furthermore, we prove that the same cannot be achieved, using known techniques, given only black-box access to the functionalities realized by the protocols, unless merely security against semi-honest corruptions is required, for which case we provide a protocol

IST Austria Thesis

Many security definitions come in two flavors: a stronger “adaptive” flavor, where the adversary can arbitrarily make various choices during the course of the attack, and a weaker “selective” flavor where the adversary must commit to some or all of their choices a-priori. For example, in the context of identity-based encryption, selective security requires the adversary to decide on the identity of the attacked party at the very beginning of the game whereas adaptive security allows the attacker to first see the master public key and some secret keys before making this choice. Often, it appears to be much easier to achieve selective security than it is to achieve adaptive security. A series of several recent works shows how to cleverly achieve adaptive security in several such scenarios including generalized selective decryption [Pan07][FJP15], constrained PRFs [FKPR14], and Yao’s garbled circuits [JW16]. Although the above works expressed vague intuition that they share a common technique, the connection was never made precise. In this work we present a new framework (published at Crypto ’17 [JKK+17a]) that connects all of these works and allows us to present them in a unified and simplified fashion. Having the framework in place, we show how to achieve adaptive security for proxy re-encryption schemes (published at PKC ’19 [FKKP19]) and provide the first adaptive security proofs for continuous group key agreement protocols (published at S&P ’21 [KPW+21]). Questioning optimality of our framework, we then show that currently used proof techniques cannot lead to significantly better security guarantees for "graph-building" games (published at TCC ’21 [KKPW21a]). These games cover generalized selective decryption, as well as the security of prominent constructions for constrained PRFs, continuous group key agreement, and proxy re-encryption. Finally, we revisit the adaptive security of Yao’s garbled circuits and extend the analysis of Jafargholi and Wichs in two directions: While they prove adaptive security only for a modified construction with increased online complexity, we provide the first positive results for the original construction by Yao (published at TCC ’21 [KKP21a]). On the negative side, we prove that the results of Jafargholi and Wichs are essentially optimal by showing that no black-box reduction can provide a significantly better security bound (published at Crypto ’21 [KKPW21c])

Commitment and Oblivious Transfer in the Bounded Storage Model with Errors

The bounded storage model restricts the memory of an adversary in a cryptographic protocol, rather than restricting its computational power, making information theoretically secure protocols feasible. We present the first protocols for commitment and oblivious transfer in the bounded storage model with errors, i.e., the model where the public random sources available to the two parties are not exactly the same, but instead are only required to have a small Hamming distance between themselves. Commitment and oblivious transfer protocols were known previously only for the error-free variant of the bounded storage model, which is harder to realize

Fully Key-Homomorphic Encryption, Arithmetic Circuit ABE and Compact Garbled Circuits

We construct the first (key-policy) attribute-based encryption (ABE) system with short secret keys: the size of keys in our system depends only on the depth of the policy circuit, not its size. Our constructions extend naturally to arithmetic circuits with arbitrary fan-in gates thereby further reducing the circuit depth. Building on this ABE system we obtain the first reusable circuit garbling scheme that produces garbled circuits whose size is the same as the original circuit plus an additive poly(λ,d) bits, where λ is the security parameter and d is the circuit depth. All previous constructions incurred a multiplicative poly(λ) blowup. We construct our ABE using a new mechanism we call fully key-homomorphic encryption, a public-key system that lets anyone translate a ciphertext encrypted under a public-key x into a ciphertext encrypted under the public-key (f(x),f) of the same plaintext, for any efficiently computable f. We show that this mechanism gives an ABE with short keys. Security of our construction relies on the subexponential hardness of the learning with errors problem. We also present a second (key-policy) ABE, using multilinear maps, with short ciphertexts: an encryption to an attribute vector x is the size of x plus poly(λ,d) additional bits. This gives a reusable circuit garbling scheme where the garbled input is short.United States. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (Grant FA8750-11-2-0225)Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (Sloan Research Fellowship

On Foundations of Protecting Computations

Information technology systems have become indispensable to uphold our way of living, our economy and our safety. Failure of these systems can have devastating effects. Consequently, securing these systems against malicious intentions deserves our utmost attention. Cryptography provides the necessary foundations for that purpose. In particular, it provides a set of building blocks which allow to secure larger information systems. Furthermore, cryptography develops concepts and tech- niques towards realizing these building blocks. The protection of computations is one invaluable concept for cryptography which paves the way towards realizing a multitude of cryptographic tools. In this thesis, we contribute to this concept of protecting computations in several ways. Protecting computations of probabilistic programs. An indis- tinguishability obfuscator (IO) compiles (deterministic) code such that it becomes provably unintelligible. This can be viewed as the ultimate way to protect (deterministic) computations. Due to very recent research, such obfuscators enjoy plausible candidate constructions. In certain settings, however, it is necessary to protect probabilistic com- putations. The only known construction of an obfuscator for probabilistic programs is due to Canetti, Lin, Tessaro, and Vaikuntanathan, TCC, 2015 and requires an indistinguishability obfuscator which satisfies extreme security guarantees. We improve this construction and thereby reduce the require- ments on the security of the underlying indistinguishability obfuscator. (Agrikola, Couteau, and Hofheinz, PKC, 2020) Protecting computations in cryptographic groups. To facilitate the analysis of building blocks which are based on cryptographic groups, these groups are often overidealized such that computations in the group are protected from the outside. Using such overidealizations allows to prove building blocks secure which are sometimes beyond the reach of standard model techniques. However, these overidealizations are subject to certain impossibility results. Recently, Fuchsbauer, Kiltz, and Loss, CRYPTO, 2018 introduced the algebraic group model (AGM) as a relaxation which is closer to the standard model but in several aspects preserves the power of said overidealizations. However, their model still suffers from implausibilities. We develop a framework which allows to transport several security proofs from the AGM into the standard model, thereby evading the above implausi- bility results, and instantiate this framework using an indistinguishability obfuscator. (Agrikola, Hofheinz, and Kastner, EUROCRYPT, 2020) Protecting computations using compression. Perfect compression algorithms admit the property that the compressed distribution is truly random leaving no room for any further compression. This property is invaluable for several cryptographic applications such as “honey encryption” or password-authenticated key exchange. However, perfect compression algorithms only exist for a very small number of distributions. We relax the notion of compression and rigorously study the resulting notion which we call “pseudorandom encodings”. As a result, we identify various surprising connections between seemingly unrelated areas of cryptography. Particularly, we derive novel results for adaptively secure multi-party computation which allows for protecting computations in distributed settings. Furthermore, we instantiate the weakest version of pseudorandom encodings which suffices for adaptively secure multi-party computation using an indistinguishability obfuscator. (Agrikola, Couteau, Ishai, Jarecki, and Sahai, TCC, 2020

Trapdoor commitment schemes and their applications

Informally, commitment schemes can be described by lockable steely boxes. In the commitment phase, the sender puts a message into the box, locks the box and hands it over to the receiver. On one hand, the receiver does not learn anything about the message. On the other hand, the sender cannot change the message in the box anymore. In the decommitment phase the sender gives the receiver the key, and the receiver then opens the box and retrieves the message. One application of such schemes are digital auctions where each participant places his secret bid into a box and submits it to the auctioneer. In this thesis we investigate trapdoor commitment schemes. Following the abstract viewpoint of lockable boxes, a trapdoor commitment is a box with a tiny secret door. If someone knows the secret door, then this person is still able to change the committed message in the box, even after the commitment phase. Such trapdoors turn out to be very useful for the design of secure cryptographic protocols involving commitment schemes. In the first part of the thesis, we formally introduce trapdoor commitments and extend the notion to identity-based trapdoors, where trapdoors can only be used in connection with certain identities. We then recall the most popular constructions of ordinary trapdoor protocols and present new solutions for identity-based trapdoors. In the second part of the thesis, we show the usefulness of trapdoors in commitment schemes. Deploying trapdoors we construct efficient non-malleable commitment schemes which basically guarantee indepency of commitments. Furthermore, applying (identity-based) trapdoor commitments we secure well-known identification protocols against a new kind of attack. And finally, by means of trapdoors, we show how to construct composable commitment schemes that can be securely executed as subprotocols within complex protocols