266 research outputs found

    Development of a miniaturized motion sensor for tracking warning signs of low-back pain

    Full text link
    Low-back pain (LBP) is a widespread disease which can also be highly disabling, but physicians lack of basic understanding and diagnosis tools. During this study, we have designed and built a new wearable device capable of detecting features helpful in LBP follow-up while being non-invasive. The device has been carefully validated, and shows good metrological features, with small noise level (ฯƒ\sigma = 1{\textdegree}) and no observable drift. Two simple exercises were proposed to two young volunteers, one of them with LBP history. These exercises are designed to target two characteristics: the lumbar lordosis angle and the hip \& shoulder dissociation. Even if no general rules can be extracted from this study, we have shown that Inertial Measurement Units (IMU) are able to pick up those characteristics and the obtained values are meaningful refereeing to LBP disease. Henceforth, we are confident in going to clinical studies to investigate the link between back related feature and LBP, in particular the hip \& shoulder dissociation which is poorly documented

    Assessing the Utility of a Video-Based Motion Capture Alternative in the Assessment of Lumbar Spine Planar Angular Joint Kinematics

    Get PDF
    Markerless motion capture is a novel technique to measure human movement kinematics. The purpose of this research is to evaluate the markerless algorithm, DeepLabCut (DLC) against a 3D motion capture system (Vicon Motion Systems Ltd., Oxford, UK) in the analysis of planar spine and elbow flexion-extension movement. Data were acquired concurrently from DLC and Vicon for all movements. A novel DLC model was trained using data derived from a subset of participants (training group). Accuracy and precision were assessed from data derived from the training group as well as in a new set of participants (testing group). Two-way SPM ANOVAs were used to detect significant differences between the training vs. testing sets, capture methods (Vicon vs. DLC), as well as potential higher order interaction effect between these independent variables in the estimation of flexion extension angles and variability. No significant differences were observed in any planar angles, nor were any higher order interactions observed between each motion capture modality and the training vs. testing datasets. Bland Altman plots were also generated to depict the mean bias and level of agreement between DLC and Vicon for both training, and testing datasets. Supplemental analyses, suggest that these results are partially affected by the alignment of each participantโ€™s body segments with respect to each planar reference frame. This research suggests that DLC-derived planar kinematics of both the elbow and lumbar spine are of acceptable accuracy and precision when compared to conventional laboratory gold-standards (Vicon)

    Wearable Technology Supported Home Rehabilitation Services in Rural Areas:โ€“ Emphasis on Monitoring Structures and Activities of Functional Capacity Handbook

    Get PDF
    The sustainability of modern healthcare systems is under threat. โ€“ the ageing of the population, the prevalence of chronic disease and a need to focus on wellness and preventative health management, in parallel with the treatment of disease, pose significant social and economic challenges. The current economic situation has made these issues more acute. Across Europe, healthcare expenditure is expected to rice to almost 16% of GDP by 2020. (OECD Health Statistics 2018). Coupled with a shortage of qualified personnel, European nations are facing increasing challenges in their ability to provide better-integrated and sustainable health and social services. The focus is currently shifting from treatment in a care center to prevention and health promotion outside the care institute. Improvements in technology offers one solution to innovate health care and meet demand at a low cost. New technology has the potential to decrease the need for hospitals and health stations (Lankila et al., 2016. In the future the use of new technologies โ€“ including health technologies, sensor technologies, digital media, mobile technology etc. - and digital services will dramatically increase interaction between healthcare personnel and customers (Deloitte Center for Health Solutions, 2015a; Deloitte Center for Health Solutions 2015b). Introduction of technology is expected to drive a change in healthcare delivery models and the relationship between patients and healthcare providers. Applications of wearable sensors are the most promising technology to aid health and social care providers deliver safe, more efficient and cost-effective care as well as improving peopleโ€™s ability to self-manage their health and wellbeing, alert healthcare professionals to changes in their condition and support adherence to prescribed interventions. (Tedesco et al., 2017; Majumder et al., 2017). While it is true that wearable technology can change how healthcare is monitored and delivered, it is necessary to consider a few things when working towards the successful implementation of this new shift in health care. It raises challenges for the healthcare systems in how to implement these new technologies, and how the growing amount of information in clinical practice, integrates into the clinical workflows of healthcare providers. Future challenges for healthcare include how to use the developing technology in a way that will bring added value to healthcare professionals, healthcare organizations and patients without increasing the workload and cost of the healthcare services. For wearable technology developers, the challenge will be to develop solutions that can be easily integrated and used by healthcare professionals considering the existing constraints. This handbook summarizes key findings from clinical and laboratory-controlled demonstrator trials regarding wearables to assist rehabilitation professionals, who are planning the use of wearable sensors in rehabilitation processes. The handbook can also be used by those developing wearable sensor systems for clinical work and especially for use in hometype environments with specific emphasis on elderly patients, who are our major health care consumers

    Review of Wearable Devices and Data Collection Considerations for Connected Health

    Get PDF
    Wearable sensor technology has gradually extended its usability into a wide range of well-known applications. Wearable sensors can typically assess and quantify the wearerโ€™s physiology and are commonly employed for human activity detection and quantified self-assessment. Wearable sensors are increasingly utilised to monitor patient health, rapidly assist with disease diagnosis, and help predict and often improve patient outcomes. Clinicians use various self-report questionnaires and well-known tests to report patient symptoms and assess their functional ability. These assessments are time consuming and costly and depend on subjective patient recall. Moreover, measurements may not accurately demonstrate the patientโ€™s functional ability whilst at home. Wearable sensors can be used to detect and quantify specific movements in different applications. The volume of data collected by wearable sensors during long-term assessment of ambulatory movement can become immense in tuple size. This paper discusses current techniques used to track and record various human body movements, as well as techniques used to measure activity and sleep from long-term data collected by wearable technology devices

    Multisensory Wearable Motion Analysis in Spine Biomechanics

    Get PDF
    Textile based piezoresistive transducers are an innovative category of devices that use yarns made of conductive and elastic fibers or screen printed conductive rubber coatings to sense strain. They usually satisfy wearability requirements and are used in real-time information gathering systems, being comfortable, ubiquitous and available for long term monitoring. They include knitted fiber transducers (KFTs), sewed fiber transducers (SFTs) and smeared redundant elastomer (SRETs) transducers. In the latter category, SRETs constituted by Conductive Elastomers (CEs) have been commonly employed as strain sensors networks to detect human posture and gesture. Elastic interconnection wiring is also easily realized leading to monolithic fabrication techniques which avoid the presence of metal wires and multiple solderings. Despite this, there is a strong dependence of the system performance by the body structure garment fitting. Moreover, the non-linear dynamical behaviour of SRETs requires identification algorithms, functions which relate joint angles to electrical values presented by the sensor network. The construction of these functions is quite complex and time of computation dramatically increases with the number of degrees of freedom and with the accuracy required to the system to be resolved. Recent development of CEs sensor modeling overcomed some of their main limitations and introduced new fields of operability in SRETs networks. In particular, in strain applications, a useful data processing technique is presented for treating the non-linear dynamical response, considering the different behaviour in sensor elongation and relaxation: actually, when the sensor in stretched, the breakdown of carbon black agglomerates produces an increase in resistance. Inversely, when the sensor is relaxed, the cross-link readjustment lead to different electrically conductive paths in respect to the previous states. This technique has found its implementation in multisensory systems, leading to encouraging results in biomechanical reconstruction. Furthermore, a novel approach in CEs sensing is described, relating the global curvature of a layer to its electrical resistance value variation and exploring under which conditions the resistance can be considered uncorrelated with its particular local bending profile. These devices are called Smeared Conductive Elastomer Electrogoniometers (SCEEGs) and under particular configuration they can be employed as on-body electrogoniometers. The integration of SRET arrays and SCEEGs is definitely a powerful tool for human body posture and gesture reconstruction through efficient and fast algorithms. Moreover In this study we introduce a particular realization of CE strain sensors deposed on an adhesive taping, obtaining a very low skin artifact device (VLSA). We present an electrogoniometric system in which the inextensible insulating layer has been replaced by an elastic layer, allowing the system to be employed both as strain sensor and as electrogoniometer. Finally, we present a biomechanical application in lumbar spine posture monitorization. As a matter of fact, it is known from literature that in the sagittal balance there is a strong correlation with the torso angle and geometrical parameters of lumbar vertebraes, such as the angle between subsequent upper endplates. Data obtained from piezoresistive sensors are so suitable to be used in biomechanical analysis in order to predict forces and moments acting on the functional spinal units

    A wireless body sensor network for clinical assessment of the flexion-relaxation phenomenon

    Get PDF
    none5noAn accurate clinical assessment of the flexion-relaxation phenomenon on back muscles requires objective tools for the analysis of surface electromyography signals correlated with the real movement performed by the subject during the flexion-relaxation test. This paper deepens the evaluation of the flexion-relaxation phenomenon using a wireless body sensor network consisting of sEMG sensors in association with a wearable device that integrates accelerometer, gyroscope, and magnetometer. The raw data collected from the sensors during the flexion relaxation test are processed by an algorithm able to identify the phases of which the test is composed, provide an evaluation of the myoelectric activity and automatically detect the phenomenon presence/absence. The developed algorithm was used to process the data collected in an acquisition campaign conducted to evaluate the flexion-relaxation phenomenon on back muscles of subjects with and without Low Back Pain. The results have shown that the proposed method is significant for myoelectric silence detection and for clinical assessment of electromyography activity patterns.openPaoletti M.; Belli A.; Palma L.; Vallasciani M.; Pierleoni P.Paoletti, M.; Belli, A.; Palma, L.; Vallasciani, M.; Pierleoni, P

    Assessment of spinal and pelvic kinematics using inertial measurement units in clinical subgroups of persistent non-specific low back pain

    Get PDF
    Inertial measurement units (IMUs) offer a portable and quantitative solution for clinical movement analysis. However, their application in non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) remains underexplored. This study compared the spine and pelvis kinematics obtained from IMUs between individuals with and without NSLBP and across clinical subgroups of NSLBP. A total of 81 participants with NSLBP with flexion (FP; n = 38) and extension (EP; n = 43) motor control impairment and 26 controls (No-NSLBP) completed 10 repetitions of spine movements (flexion, extension, lateral flexion). IMUs were placed on the sacrum, fourth and second lumbar vertebrae, and seventh cervical vertebra to measure inclination at the pelvis, lower (LLx) and upper (ULx) lumbar spine, and lower cervical spine (LCx), respectively. At each location, the range of movement (ROM) was quantified as the range of IMU orientation in the primary plane of movement. The ROM was compared between NSLBP and No-NSLBP using unpaired t-tests and across FP-NSLBP, EP-NSLBP, and No-NSLBP subgroups using one-way ANOVA. Individuals with NSLBP exhibited a smaller ROM at the ULx (p = 0.005), LLx (p = 0.003) and LCx (p = 0.01) during forward flexion, smaller ROM at the LLx during extension (p = 0.03), and a smaller ROM at the pelvis during lateral flexion (p = 0.003). Those in the EP-NSLBP group had smaller ROM than those in the No-NSLBP group at LLx during forward flexion (Bonferroni-corrected p = 0.005), extension (p = 0.013), and lateral flexion (p = 0.038), and a smaller ROM at the pelvis during lateral flexion (p = 0.005). Those in the FP-NSLBP subgroup had smaller ROM than those in the No-NSLBP group at the ULx during forward flexion (p = 0.024). IMUs detected variations in kinematics at the trunk, lumbar spine, and pelvis among individuals with and without NSLBP and across clinical NSLBP subgroups during flexion, extension, and lateral flexion. These findings consistently point to reduced ROM in NSLBP. The identified subgroup differences highlight the potential of IMU for assessing spinal and pelvic kinematics in these clinically verified subgroups of NSLBP

    ์ž‘์—… ๊ด€๋ จ ๊ทผ๊ณจ๊ฒฉ๊ณ„ ์งˆํ™˜์˜ ์œ„ํ—˜์„ฑ ์ €๊ฐ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ž‘์—… ์ž์„ธ ๋ฐ ๋™์ž‘์˜ ์ธ๊ฐ„๊ณตํ•™ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์‚ฐ์—…๊ณตํ•™๊ณผ, 2022.2. ๋ฐ•์šฐ์ง„.์œก์ฒด์  ๋ถ€ํ•˜๊ฐ€ ํฐ ์ž์„ธ ๋ฐ ๋™์ž‘์œผ๋กœ ์ž‘์—…์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ์ž‘์—…์ž์˜ ๊ทผ๊ณจ๊ฒฉ๊ณ„ ์งˆํ™˜์˜ ์œ„ํ—˜์„ฑ์„ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์‹œํ‚จ๋‹ค. ์ž‘์—…์ž์˜ ๊ทผ๊ณจ๊ฒฉ๊ณ„์— ๊ฐ€ํ•ด์ง€๋Š” ์œก์ฒด์  ๋ถ€ํ•˜์˜ ์–‘์ƒ์€ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๋Š” ์ž‘์—…์˜ ์ข…๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋‹ฌ๋ผ์ง„๋‹ค. ์žฅ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ์•‰์€ ์ž์„ธ๋กœ ์ž‘์—…์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ์ž‘์—…์ž์˜ ๊ทผ์œก, ์ธ๋Œ€์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ์—ฐ์กฐ์ง์— ๊ณผ๋„ํ•œ ๋ถ€ํ•˜๊ฐ€ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ชฉ, ํ—ˆ๋ฆฌ ๋“ฑ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์‹ ์ฒด ๋ถ€์œ„์—์„œ ๊ทผ๊ณจ๊ฒฉ๊ณ„ ์งˆํ™˜์˜ ์œ„ํ—˜์„ฑ์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ, ์ฐฉ์ขŒ ์‹œ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ทผ๊ณจ๊ฒฉ๊ณ„ ์งˆํ™˜์˜ ์œ„ํ—˜์„ฑ์„ ์ €๊ฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ์ž‘์—…์ž์˜ ์ฐฉ์ขŒ ์ž์„ธ๋ฅผ ์‹ค์‹œ๊ฐ„์œผ๋กœ ๋ชจ๋‹ˆํ„ฐ๋งํ•˜๊ณ , ์ด์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ”ผ๋“œ๋ฐฑ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ๋“ค๊ธฐ ์ž‘์—…๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋™์ ์ธ ์›€์ง์ž„์ด ํฌํ•จ๋œ ์ž‘์—…์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ์ž‘์—…์ž์˜ ์ฒด์ค‘์ด ์‹ ์ฒด์  ๋ถ€ํ•˜์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ „์„ธ๊ณ„์ ์ธ ๋น„๋งŒ์˜ ์œ ํ–‰์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ๋งŽ์€ ์ž‘์—…์ž๋“ค์ด ์ฒด์ค‘ ์ฆ๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ๊ฒช๊ณ  ์žˆ๊ณ , ๋“ค๊ธฐ ์ž‘์—…๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋™์ ์ธ ์ž‘์—…์—์„œ ๋น„๋งŒ์€ ์‹ ์ฒด์  ๋ถ€ํ•˜์— ์•…์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ, ๋น„๋งŒ๊ณผ ์ž‘์—… ๊ด€๋ จ ๊ทผ๊ณจ๊ฒฉ๊ณ„ ์งˆํ™˜์˜ ์œ„ํ—˜์„ฑ์€ ์ž ์žฌ์ ์ธ ์—ฐ๊ด€์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ๊ณ , ๋น„๋งŒ์ด ๋“ค๊ธฐ ์ž‘์—…์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์ƒ์ฒด์—ญํ•™์  ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋…ผ์˜ํ•  ํ•„์š”์„ฑ์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ž‘์—…์žฅ์—์„œ์˜ ๊ทผ๊ณจ๊ฒฉ๊ณ„ ์งˆํ™˜์˜ ์œ„ํ—˜์„ฑ์„ ์ €๊ฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋“ค์ด ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜์–ด ์™”์ง€๋งŒ, ์ž‘์—… ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ์ธ๊ฐ„๊ณตํ•™์  ์„ค๊ณ„ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์ธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ์žฅ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ์˜์ž์— ์•‰์•„ ์ •์ ์ธ ์ž‘์—…์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๋Š” ์ž‘์—…์ž์˜ ๊ทผ๊ณจ๊ฒฉ๊ณ„ ์งˆํ™˜์„ ์ €๊ฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์œ ๋งํ•œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ• ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜๋กœ, ์ž‘์—…์ž์˜ ์ž์„ธ๋ฅผ ์‹ค์‹œ๊ฐ„์œผ๋กœ ๋ชจ๋‹ˆํ„ฐ๋งํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜ํ•˜๋Š” ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ œ์•ˆ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์€ ์ž‘์—…์ž๊ฐ€ ๊ทผ๊ณจ๊ฒฉ๊ณ„ ์งˆํ™˜์˜ ์œ„ํ—˜์„ฑ์ด ๋‚ฎ์€ ์ž์„ธ๋ฅผ ์ž‘์—… ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๋™์•ˆ ์œ ์ง€ํ•˜๋„๋ก ๋•๋Š” ๋ฐ ํ™œ์šฉ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ ์ž์„ธ ๋ชจ๋‹ˆํ„ฐ๋ง ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜ํ•  ์ž์„ธ๋ฅผ ์ •์˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ณผ์ •์—์„œ ์ธ๊ฐ„๊ณตํ•™์  ๋ฌธํ—Œ์ด ๊ฑฐ์˜ ๊ณ ๋ ค๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜๊ณ , ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๊ฐ€ ์‹ค์ œ๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜๊ธฐ์—๋Š” ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ํ•œ๊ณ„์ ๋“ค์ด ์กด์žฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋“ค๊ธฐ ์ž‘์—…์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ์ฒด์งˆ๋Ÿ‰ ์ง€์ˆ˜(BMI) 40 ์ด์ƒ์˜ ์ดˆ๊ณ ๋„ ๋น„๋งŒ ์ž‘์—…์ž์˜ ๋™์ž‘ ํŒจํ„ด์„ ๋…ผ์˜ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๊ฑฐ์˜ ์ฐพ์•„๋ณผ ์ˆ˜ ์—†์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋“ค๊ธฐ ์ž‘์—… ์กฐ๊ฑด ํ•˜์—์„œ ์ „์‹  ๊ด€์ ˆ๋“ค์˜ ์›€์ง์ž„์„ ์ƒ์ฒด์—ญํ•™์  ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ๋ถ„์„ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋ถ€์กฑํ•œ ์‹ค์ •์ด๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ, ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ชฉ์ ์€ 1) ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์„ผ์„œ ์กฐํ•ฉ์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ์‹ค์‹œ๊ฐ„ ์ฐฉ์ขŒ ์ž์„ธ๋ฅผ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜ํ•˜๋Š” ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜๊ณ , 2) ๋“ค๊ธฐ ์ž‘์—… ์‹œ ์ดˆ๊ณ ๋„ ๋น„๋งŒ์ด ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ๊ด€์ ˆ์˜ ์›€์ง์ž„๊ณผ ๋“ค๊ธฐ ๋™์ž‘ ํŒจํ„ด์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜์—ฌ, ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ข…๋ฅ˜์˜ ์ž‘์—…์—์„œ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ทผ๊ณจ๊ฒฉ๊ณ„ ์งˆํ™˜์˜ ์œ„ํ—˜์„ฑ์„ ์ €๊ฐํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ชฉ์ ์„ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋‹ค์Œ์˜ ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ฒซ๋ฒˆ์งธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์‹ค์‹œ๊ฐ„์œผ๋กœ ์ฐฉ์ขŒ ์ž์„ธ๋ฅผ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜ํ•˜๋Š” ์Šค๋งˆํŠธ ์˜์ž ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์Šค๋งˆํŠธ ์˜์ž ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์€ ๊ฐ๊ฐ ์—ฌ์„ฏ ๊ฐœ์˜ ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ ์„ผ์„œ์™€ ์••๋ ฅ ์„ผ์„œ๋ฅผ ์กฐํ•ฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฐฉ์ขŒ ๊ด€๋ จํ•œ ๊ทผ๊ณจ๊ฒฉ๊ณ„ ์งˆํ™˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๋ฌธํ—Œ ์กฐ์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ์ด๋ฅผ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ๊ฒฐ์ •๋œ ์ž์„ธ๋“ค์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์„œ๋ฅธ ์—ฌ์„ฏ ๋ช…์˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์Šค๋งˆํŠธ ์˜์ž ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์—์„œ ์ž์„ธ๋ฅผ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด kNN ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋‹จ์ผ ์ข…๋ฅ˜์˜ ์„ผ์„œ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋œ ๊ธฐ์ค€ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋“ค๊ณผ ๋น„๊ต๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋น„๊ตํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์„ผ์„œ๋ฅผ ์กฐํ•ฉํ•œ ์Šค๋งˆํŠธ ์˜์ž ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์ด ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ๋‘๋ฒˆ์งธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋“ค๊ธฐ ์ž‘์—…์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•  ๋•Œ ์ดˆ๊ณ ๋„ ๋น„๋งŒ์ด ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ๊ด€์ ˆ์˜ ์›€์ง์ž„๊ณผ ๋™์ž‘ ํŒจํ„ด์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ชจ์…˜ ์บก์ณ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋“ค๊ธฐ ์‹คํ—˜์—๋Š” ๊ทผ๊ณจ๊ฒฉ๊ณ„ ์งˆํ™˜ ์ด๋ ฅ์ด ์—†๋Š” ์„œ๋ฅธ ๋‹ค์„ฏ ๋ช…์ด ์ฐธ์—ฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์ง‘๋œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ์ฃผ์š” ๊ด€์ ˆ(๋ฐœ๋ชฉ, ๋ฌด๋ฆŽ, ์—‰๋ฉ์ด, ํ—ˆ๋ฆฌ, ์–ด๊นจ, ํŒ”๊ฟˆ์น˜) ๋ณ„ ์šด๋™์—ญํ•™์  ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋“ค๊ณผ, ๋“ค๊ธฐ ๋™์ž‘์˜ ํŒจํ„ด์„ ํ‘œํ˜„ํ•˜๋Š” ๋™์ž‘ ์ง€์ˆ˜๋“ค์„ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋“ค๊ธฐ ์ž‘์—… ์กฐ๊ฑด๊ณผ ๋น„๋งŒ ์ˆ˜์ค€์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ, ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์—์„œ ํ†ต๊ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ์ „์ฒด์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋น„๋งŒ์ธ์€ ์ •์ƒ์ฒด์ค‘์ธ์— ๋น„ํ•ด ๋‹ค๋ฆฌ ๋ณด๋‹ค ํ—ˆ๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋“ค๊ธฐ ์ž‘์—…์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ๋™์ž‘ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ ์‹œ ์ƒ๋Œ€์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ ์€ ๊ด€์ ˆ ๊ฐ๋„ ๋ณ€ํ™”์™€ ๋Š๋ฆฐ ์›€์ง์ž„์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ๋“ค๊ธฐ ์ž‘์—…์—์„œ ๋ฐ•์Šค์˜ ์ด๋™์— ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ๊ด€์ ˆ์ด ๊ธฐ์—ฌํ•˜๋Š” ๋น„์œจ๋„ ์ •์ƒ์ฒด์ค‘์ธ๊ณผ ๋น„๋งŒ์ธ์€ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ํŒจํ„ด์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ข…๋ฅ˜์˜ ์‹ ์ฒด์  ๋ถ€ํ•˜์— ๋…ธ์ถœ๋œ ์ž‘์—…์ž๋“ค์˜ ๊ทผ๊ณจ๊ฒฉ๊ณ„ ์งˆํ™˜์˜ ์œ„ํ—˜์„ฑ์„ ์ €๊ฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ณ , ๊ถ๊ทน์ ์œผ๋กœ ์—…๋ฌด์˜ ์ƒ์‚ฐ์„ฑ๊ณผ ๊ฐœ์ธ์˜ ๊ฑด๊ฐ•์„ ์ œ๊ณ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ์ฒซ๋ฒˆ์งธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋œ ์Šค๋งˆํŠธ ์˜์ž ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์€ ๊ธฐ์กด ์ž์„ธ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ๋‹จ์ ๋“ค์„ ์™„ํ™”ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋œ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์€ ์ €๋ ดํ•œ ์†Œ์ˆ˜์˜ ์„ผ์„œ๋งŒ์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ทผ๊ณจ๊ฒฉ๊ณ„ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์ž์„ธ๋“ค์„ ๋†’์€ ์ •ํ™•๋„๋กœ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์ž์„ธ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์€ ์ž‘์—…์ž์—๊ฒŒ ์‹ค์‹œ๊ฐ„์œผ๋กœ ์ž์„ธ ํ”ผ๋“œ๋ฐฑ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜์—ฌ, ๊ทผ๊ณจ๊ฒฉ๊ณ„ ์งˆํ™˜์˜ ์œ„ํ—˜์„ฑ์ด ๋‚ฎ์€ ์ž์„ธ๋ฅผ ์œ ์ง€ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ํ™œ์šฉ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ๋‘๋ฒˆ์งธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๋™์ ์ธ ์ž‘์—… ์‹œ ์ดˆ๊ณ ๋„ ๋น„๋งŒ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ์ž ์žฌ์ ์ธ ๊ทผ๊ณจ๊ฒฉ๊ณ„ ์งˆํ™˜์˜ ์œ„ํ—˜์„ฑ์„ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ํ™œ์šฉ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ดˆ๊ณ ๋„ ๋น„๋งŒ์ธ๊ณผ ์ •์ƒ์ฒด์ค‘์ธ ๊ฐ„ ๊ด€์ ˆ์˜ ์›€์ง์ž„๊ณผ ๋™์ž‘์˜ ์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜์—ฌ, ๋น„๋งŒ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ ์ธ๊ฐ„๊ณตํ•™์  ์ž‘์—…์žฅ ์„ค๊ณ„์™€ ๋™์ž‘ ๊ฐ€์ด๋“œ๋ผ์ธ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค.Working in stressful postures and movements increases the risk of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs). The physical stress on a workerโ€™s musculoskeletal system depends on the type of work task. In the case of sedentary work, stressful sitting postures for prolonged durations could increase the load on soft connective tissues such as muscles and ligaments, resulting in the incidence of WMSDs. Therefore, to reduce the WMSDs, it is necessary to monitor a workerโ€™s sitting posture and additionally provide ergonomic interventions. When the worker performs a task that involves dynamic movements, such as manual lifting, the workerโ€™s own body mass affects the physical stress on the musculoskeletal system. In the global prevalence of obesity in the workforce, an increase in the body weight of the workers could adversely affect the musculoskeletal system during the manual lifting task. Therefore, obesity could be associated with the development of WMSDs, and the impacts of obesity on workersโ€™ movement during manual lifting need to be examined. Despite previous research efforts to prevent WMSDs, there still exist research gaps concerning ergonomics design of work systems. For sedentary workers, a promising solution to reduce the occurrence of WMSDs is the development of a system capable of monitoring and classifying a seated worker's posture in real-time, which could be utilized to provide feedback to the worker to maintain a posture with a low-risk of WMSDs. However, the previous studies in relation to such a posture monitoring system lacked a review of the ergonomics literature to define posture categories for classification, and had some limitations in widespread use and user acceptance. In addition, only a few studies related to obesity impacts on manual lifting focused on severely obese population with a body mass index (BMI) of 40 or higher, and, analyzed lifting motions in terms of multi-joint movement organization or at the level of movement technique. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to: 1) develop a sensor-embedded posture classification system that is capable of classifying an instantaneous sitting posture as one of the posture categories discussed in the ergonomics literature while not suffering from the limitations of the previous system, and, 2) identify the impacts of severe obesity on joint kinematics and movement technique during manual lifting under various task conditions. To accomplish the research objectives, two major studies were conducted. In the study on the posture classification system, a novel smart chair system was developed to monitor and classify a workerโ€™s sitting postures in real-time. The smart chair system was a mixed sensor system utilizing six pressure sensors and six infrared reflective distance sensors in combination. For a total of thirty-six participants, data collection was conducted on posture categories determined based on an analysis of the ergonomics literature on sitting postures and sitting-related musculoskeletal problems. The mixed sensor system utilized a kNN algorithm for posture classification, and, was evaluated in posture classification performance in comparison with two benchmark systems that utilized only a single type of sensors. The mixed sensor system yielded significantly superior classification performance than the two benchmark systems. In the study on the manual lifting task, optical motion capture was conducted to examine differences in joint kinematics and movement technique between severely obese and non-obese groups. A total of thirty-five subjects without a history of WMSDs participated in the experiment. The severely obese and non-obese groups show significant differences in most joint kinematics of the ankle, knee, hip, spine, shoulder, and elbow. There were also significant differences between the groups in the movement technique index, which represents a motion in terms of the relative contribution of an individual joint degree of freedom to the box trajectory in a manual lifting task. Overall, the severely obese group adopted the back lifting technique (stoop) rather than the leg lifting technique (squat), and showed less joint range of excursions and slow movements compared to the non-obese group. The findings mentioned above could be utilized to reduce the risk of WMSDs among workers performing various types of tasks, and, thus, improve work productivity and personal health. The mixed sensor system developed in this study was free from the limitations of the previous posture monitoring systems, and, is low-cost utilizing only a small number of sensors; yet, it accomplishes accurate classification of postures relevant to the ergonomic analyses of seated work tasks. The mixed sensor system could be utilized for various applications including the development of a real-time posture feedback system for preventing sitting-related musculoskeletal disorders. The findings provided in the manual lifting study would be useful in understanding the potential risk of WMSDs for severely obese workers. Differences in joint kinematics and movement techniques between severely obese and non-obese groups provide practical implications concerning the ergonomic design of work tasks and workspace layout.Chapter 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Research Background 1 1.2 Research Objectives 5 1.3 Dissertation Outline 6 Chapter 2. Literature Review 8 2.1 Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders Among Sedentary Workers 8 2.1.1 Relationship Between Sitting Postures and Musculoskeletal Disorders 8 2.1.2 Systems for Monitoring and Classifying a Seated Worker's Postures 10 2.2 Impacts of Obesity on Manual Works 22 2.2.1 Impacts of Obesity on Work Capacity 22 2.2.2 Impacts of Obesity on Joint Kinematics and Biomechanical Demands 24 Chapter 3. Developing and Evaluating a Mixed Sensor Smart Chair System for Real-time Posture Classification: Combining Pressure and Distance Sensors 27 3.1 Introduction 27 3.2 Materials and Methods 33 3.2.1 Predefined posture categories for the mixed sensor system 33 3.2.2 Physical construction of the mixed sensor system 36 3.2.3 Posture Classifier Design for the Mixed Sensor System 38 3.2.4 Data Collection for Training and Testing the Posture Classifier of the Mixed Sensor System 41 3.2.5 Comparative Evaluation of Posture Classification Performance 43 3.3 Results 46 3.3.1 Model Parameters and Features 46 3.3.2 Posture Classification Performance 47 3.4 Discussion 50 Chapter 4. Severe Obesity Impacts on Joint Kinematics and Movement Technique During Manual Load Lifting 57 4.1 Introduction 57 4.2 Methods 61 4.2.1 Participants 61 4.2.2 Experimental Task 61 4.2.3 Experimental Procedure 64 4.2.4 Data Processing 65 4.2.5 Experimental Variables 67 4.2.6 Statistical Analysis 71 4.3 Results 72 4.3.1 Kinematic Variables 72 4.3.2 Movement Technique Indexes 83 4.4 Discussion 92 Chapter 5. Conclusion 102 5.1 Summary 102 5.2 Implications 105 5.3 Limitations and Future Directions 106 Bibliography 108 ๊ตญ๋ฌธ์ดˆ๋ก 133๋ฐ•
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore