432 research outputs found
A Logic Programming Approach to Knowledge-State Planning: Semantics and Complexity
We propose a new declarative planning language, called K, which is based on
principles and methods of logic programming. In this language, transitions
between states of knowledge can be described, rather than transitions between
completely described states of the world, which makes the language well-suited
for planning under incomplete knowledge. Furthermore, it enables the use of
default principles in the planning process by supporting negation as failure.
Nonetheless, K also supports the representation of transitions between states
of the world (i.e., states of complete knowledge) as a special case, which
shows that the language is very flexible. As we demonstrate on particular
examples, the use of knowledge states may allow for a natural and compact
problem representation. We then provide a thorough analysis of the
computational complexity of K, and consider different planning problems,
including standard planning and secure planning (also known as conformant
planning) problems. We show that these problems have different complexities
under various restrictions, ranging from NP to NEXPTIME in the propositional
case. Our results form the theoretical basis for the DLV^K system, which
implements the language K on top of the DLV logic programming system.Comment: 48 pages, appeared as a Technical Report at KBS of the Vienna
University of Technology, see http://www.kr.tuwien.ac.at/research/reports
Propagators and Solvers for the Algebra of Modular Systems
To appear in the proceedings of LPAR 21.
Solving complex problems can involve non-trivial combinations of distinct
knowledge bases and problem solvers. The Algebra of Modular Systems is a
knowledge representation framework that provides a method for formally
specifying such systems in purely semantic terms. Formally, an expression of
the algebra defines a class of structures. Many expressive formalism used in
practice solve the model expansion task, where a structure is given on the
input and an expansion of this structure in the defined class of structures is
searched (this practice overcomes the common undecidability problem for
expressive logics). In this paper, we construct a solver for the model
expansion task for a complex modular systems from an expression in the algebra
and black-box propagators or solvers for the primitive modules. To this end, we
define a general notion of propagators equipped with an explanation mechanism,
an extension of the alge- bra to propagators, and a lazy conflict-driven
learning algorithm. The result is a framework for seamlessly combining solving
technology from different domains to produce a solver for a combined system.Comment: To appear in the proceedings of LPAR 2
The Complexity of Reasoning with FODD and GFODD
Recent work introduced Generalized First Order Decision Diagrams (GFODD) as a
knowledge representation that is useful in mechanizing decision theoretic
planning in relational domains. GFODDs generalize function-free first order
logic and include numerical values and numerical generalizations of existential
and universal quantification. Previous work presented heuristic inference
algorithms for GFODDs and implemented these heuristics in systems for decision
theoretic planning. In this paper, we study the complexity of the computational
problems addressed by such implementations. In particular, we study the
evaluation problem, the satisfiability problem, and the equivalence problem for
GFODDs under the assumption that the size of the intended model is given with
the problem, a restriction that guarantees decidability. Our results provide a
complete characterization placing these problems within the polynomial
hierarchy. The same characterization applies to the corresponding restriction
of problems in first order logic, giving an interesting new avenue for
efficient inference when the number of objects is bounded. Our results show
that for formulas, and for corresponding GFODDs, evaluation and
satisfiability are complete, and equivalence is
complete. For formulas evaluation is complete, satisfiability
is one level higher and is complete, and equivalence is
complete.Comment: A short version of this paper appears in AAAI 2014. Version 2
includes a reorganization and some expanded proof
Applying Formal Methods to Networking: Theory, Techniques and Applications
Despite its great importance, modern network infrastructure is remarkable for
the lack of rigor in its engineering. The Internet which began as a research
experiment was never designed to handle the users and applications it hosts
today. The lack of formalization of the Internet architecture meant limited
abstractions and modularity, especially for the control and management planes,
thus requiring for every new need a new protocol built from scratch. This led
to an unwieldy ossified Internet architecture resistant to any attempts at
formal verification, and an Internet culture where expediency and pragmatism
are favored over formal correctness. Fortunately, recent work in the space of
clean slate Internet design---especially, the software defined networking (SDN)
paradigm---offers the Internet community another chance to develop the right
kind of architecture and abstractions. This has also led to a great resurgence
in interest of applying formal methods to specification, verification, and
synthesis of networking protocols and applications. In this paper, we present a
self-contained tutorial of the formidable amount of work that has been done in
formal methods, and present a survey of its applications to networking.Comment: 30 pages, submitted to IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorial
- …