The Watchdog Task: Concurrent error detection using assertions

The Watchdog Task, a software abstraction of the Watchdog-processor, is shown to be a powerful error detection tool with a great deal of flexibility and the advantages of watchdog techniques. A Watchdog Task system in Ada is presented; issues of recovery, latency, efficiency (communication) and preprocessing are discussed. Different applications, one of which is error detection on a single processor, are examined

ENHANCING CLOUD SYSTEM RUNTIME TO ADDRESS COMPLEX FAILURES

As the reliance on cloud systems intensifies in our progressively digital world, understanding and reinforcing their reliability becomes more crucial than ever. Despite impressive advancements in augmenting the resilience of cloud systems, the growing incidence of complex failures now poses a substantial challenge to the availability of these systems. With cloud systems continuing to scale and increase in complexity, failures not only become more elusive to detect but can also lead to more catastrophic consequences. Such failures question the foundational premises of conventional fault-tolerance designs, necessitating the creation of novel system designs to counteract them. This dissertation aims to enhance distributed systems’ capabilities to detect, localize, and react to complex failures at runtime. To this end, this dissertation makes contributions to address three emerging categories of failures in cloud systems. The first part delves into the investigation of partial failures, introducing OmegaGen, a tool adept at generating tailored checkers for detecting and localizing such failures. The second part grapples with silent semantic failures prevalent in cloud systems, showcasing our study findings, and introducing Oathkeeper, a tool that leverages past failures to infer rules and expose these silent issues. The third part explores solutions to slow failures via RESIN, a framework specifically designed to detect, diagnose, and mitigate memory leaks in cloud-scale infrastructures, developed in collaboration with Microsoft Azure. The dissertation concludes by offering insights into future directions for the construction of reliable cloud systems

DeSyRe: on-Demand System Reliability

The DeSyRe project builds on-demand adaptive and reliable Systems-on-Chips (SoCs). As fabrication technology scales down, chips are becoming less reliable, thereby incurring increased power and performance costs for fault tolerance. To make matters worse, power density is becoming a significant limiting factor in SoC design, in general. In the face of such changes in the technological landscape, current solutions for fault tolerance are expected to introduce excessive overheads in future systems. Moreover, attempting to design and manufacture a totally defect and fault-free system, would impact heavily, even prohibitively, the design, manufacturing, and testing costs, as well as the system performance and power consumption. In this context, DeSyRe delivers a new generation of systems that are reliable by design at well-balanced power, performance, and design costs. In our attempt to reduce the overheads of fault-tolerance, only a small fraction of the chip is built to be fault-free. This fault-free part is then employed to manage the remaining fault-prone resources of the SoC. The DeSyRe framework is applied to two medical systems with high safety requirements (measured using the IEC 61508 functional safety standard) and tight power and performance constraints

Real-time trace decoding and monitoring for safety and security in embedded systems

Integrated circuits and systems can be found almost everywhere in today’s world. As their use increases, they need to be made safer and more perfor mant to meet current demands in processing power. FPGA integrated SoCs can provide the ideal trade-off between performance, adaptability, and energy usage. One of today’s vital challenges lies in updating existing fault tolerance techniques for these new systems while utilizing all available processing capa bilities, such as multi-core and heterogeneous processing units. Control-flow monitoring is one of the primary mechanisms described for error detection at the software architectural level for the highest grade of hazard level clas sifications (e.g., ASIL D) described in industry safety standards ISO-26262. Control-flow errors are also known to compose the majority of detected errors for ICs and embedded systems in safety-critical and risk-susceptible environ ments [5]. Software-based monitoring methods remain the most popular [6–8]. However, recent studies show that the overheads they impose make actual reliability gains negligible [9, 10]. This work proposes and demonstrates a new control flow checking method implemented in FPGA for multi-core embedded systems called control-flow trace checker (CFTC). CFTC uses existing trace and debug subsystems of modern processors to rebuild their execution states. It can iden tify any errors in real-time by comparing executed states to a set of permitted state transitions determined statically. This novel implementation weighs hardware resource trade-offs to target mul tiple independent tasks in multi-core embedded applications, as well as single core systems. The proposed system is entirely implemented in hardware and isolated from all monitored software components, requiring 2.4% of the target FPGA platform resources to protect an execution unit in its entirety. There fore, it avoids undesired overheads and maintains deterministic error detection latencies, which guarantees reliability improvements without impairing the target software system. Finally, CFTC is evaluated under different software i Resumo fault-injection scenarios, achieving detection rates of 100% of all control-flow errors to wrong destinations and 98% of all injected faults to program binaries. All detection times are further analyzed and precisely described by a model based on the monitor’s resources and speed and the software application’s control-flow structure and binary characteristics.Circuitos integrados estão presentes em quase todos sistemas complexos do mundo moderno. Conforme sua frequência de uso aumenta, eles precisam se tornar mais seguros e performantes para conseguir atender as novas demandas em potência de processamento. Sistemas em Chip integrados com FPGAs conseguem prover o balanço perfeito entre desempenho, adaptabilidade, e uso de energia. Um dos maiores desafios agora é a necessidade de atualizar técnicas de tolerância à falhas para estes novos sistemas, aproveitando os novos avanços em capacidade de processamento. Monitoramento de fluxo de controle é um dos principais mecanismos para a detecção de erros em nível de software para sistemas classificados como de alto risco (e.g. ASIL D), descrito em padrões de segurança como o ISO-26262. Estes erros são conhecidos por compor a maioria dos erros detectados em sistemas integrados [5]. Embora métodos de monitoramento baseados em software continuem sendo os mais populares [6–8], estudos recentes mostram que seus custos adicionais, em termos de performance e área, diminuem consideravelmente seus ganhos reais em confiabilidade [9, 10]. Propomos aqui um novo método de monitora mento de fluxo de controle implementado em FPGA para sistemas embarcados multi-core. Este método usa subsistemas de trace e execução de código para reconstruir o estado atual do processador, identificando erros através de com parações entre diferentes estados de execução da CPU. Propomos uma implementação que considera trade-offs no uso de recuros de sistema para monitorar múltiplas tarefas independetes. Nossa abordagem suporta o monitoramento de sistemas simples e também de sistemas multi-core multitarefa. Por fim, nossa técnica é totalmente implementada em hardware, evitando o uso de unidades de processamento de software que possa adicionar custos indesejáveis à aplicação em perda de confiabilidade. Propomos, assim, um mecanismo de verificação de fluxo de controle, escalável e extensível, para proteção de sistemas embarcados críticos e multi-core

Real-Time Trace Decoding and Monitoring for Safety and Security in Embedded Systems

Integrated circuits and systems can be found almost everywhere in today’s world. As their use increases, they need to be made safer and more perfor mant to meet current demands in processing power. FPGA integrated SoCs can provide the ideal trade-off between performance, adaptability, and energy usage. One of today’s vital challenges lies in updating existing fault tolerance techniques for these new systems while utilizing all available processing capa bilities, such as multi-core and heterogeneous processing units. Control-flow monitoring is one of the primary mechanisms described for error detection at the software architectural level for the highest grade of hazard level clas sifications (e.g., ASIL D) described in industry safety standards ISO-26262. Control-flow errors are also known to compose the majority of detected errors for ICs and embedded systems in safety-critical and risk-susceptible environ ments [5]. Software-based monitoring methods remain the most popular [6–8]. However, recent studies show that the overheads they impose make actual reliability gains negligible [9, 10]. This work proposes and demonstrates a new control flow checking method implemented in FPGA for multi-core embedded systems called control-flow trace checker (CFTC). CFTC uses existing trace and debug subsystems of modern processors to rebuild their execution states. It can iden tify any errors in real-time by comparing executed states to a set of permitted state transitions determined statically. This novel implementation weighs hardware resource trade-offs to target mul tiple independent tasks in multi-core embedded applications, as well as single core systems. The proposed system is entirely implemented in hardware and isolated from all monitored software components, requiring 2.4% of the target FPGA platform resources to protect an execution unit in its entirety. There fore, it avoids undesired overheads and maintains deterministic error detection latencies, which guarantees reliability improvements without impairing the target software system. Finally, CFTC is evaluated under different software i Resumo fault-injection scenarios, achieving detection rates of 100% of all control-flow errors to wrong destinations and 98% of all injected faults to program binaries. All detection times are further analyzed and precisely described by a model based on the monitor’s resources and speed and the software application’s control-flow structure and binary characteristics.Circuitos integrados estão presentes em quase todos sistemas complexos do mundo moderno. Conforme sua frequência de uso aumenta, eles precisam se tornar mais seguros e performantes para conseguir atender as novas demandas em potência de processamento. Sistemas em Chip integrados com FPGAs conseguem prover o balanço perfeito entre desempenho, adaptabilidade, e uso de energia. Um dos maiores desafios agora é a necessidade de atualizar técnicas de tolerância à falhas para estes novos sistemas, aproveitando os novos avanços em capacidade de processamento. Monitoramento de fluxo de controle é um dos principais mecanismos para a detecção de erros em nível de software para sistemas classificados como de alto risco (e.g. ASIL D), descrito em padrões de segurança como o ISO-26262. Estes erros são conhecidos por compor a maioria dos erros detectados em sistemas integrados [5]. Embora métodos de monitoramento baseados em software continuem sendo os mais populares [6–8], estudos recentes mostram que seus custos adicionais, em termos de performance e área, diminuem consideravelmente seus ganhos reais em confiabilidade [9, 10]. Propomos aqui um novo método de monitora mento de fluxo de controle implementado em FPGA para sistemas embarcados multi-core. Este método usa subsistemas de trace e execução de código para reconstruir o estado atual do processador, identificando erros através de com parações entre diferentes estados de execução da CPU. Propomos uma implementação que considera trade-offs no uso de recuros de sistema para monitorar múltiplas tarefas independetes. Nossa abordagem suporta o monitoramento de sistemas simples e também de sistemas multi-core multitarefa. Por fim, nossa técnica é totalmente implementada em hardware, evitando o uso de unidades de processamento de software que possa adicionar custos indesejáveis à aplicação em perda de confiabilidade. Propomos, assim, um mecanismo de verificação de fluxo de controle, escalável e extensível, para proteção de sistemas embarcados críticos e multi-core

Hardware-Assisted Dependable Systems

Unpredictable hardware faults and software bugs lead to application crashes, incorrect computations, unavailability of internet services, data losses, malfunctioning components, and consequently financial losses or even death of people. In particular, faults in microprocessors (CPUs) and memory corruption bugs are among the major unresolved issues of today. CPU faults may result in benign crashes and, more problematically, in silent data corruptions that can lead to catastrophic consequences, silently propagating from component to component and finally shutting down the whole system. Similarly, memory corruption bugs (memory-safety vulnerabilities) may result in a benign application crash but may also be exploited by a malicious hacker to gain control over the system or leak confidential data. Both these classes of errors are notoriously hard to detect and tolerate. Usual mitigation strategy is to apply ad-hoc local patches: checksums to protect specific computations against hardware faults and bug fixes to protect programs against known vulnerabilities. This strategy is unsatisfactory since it is prone to errors, requires significant manual effort, and protects only against anticipated faults. On the other extreme, Byzantine Fault Tolerance solutions defend against all kinds of hardware and software errors, but are inadequately expensive in terms of resources and performance overhead. In this thesis, we examine and propose five techniques to protect against hardware CPU faults and software memory-corruption bugs. All these techniques are hardware-assisted: they use recent advancements in CPU designs and modern CPU extensions. Three of these techniques target hardware CPU faults and rely on specific CPU features: ∆-encoding efficiently utilizes instruction-level parallelism of modern CPUs, Elzar re-purposes Intel AVX extensions, and HAFT builds on Intel TSX instructions. The rest two target software bugs: SGXBounds detects vulnerabilities inside Intel SGX enclaves, and “MPX Explained” analyzes the recent Intel MPX extension to protect against buffer overflow bugs. Our techniques achieve three goals: transparency, practicality, and efficiency. All our systems are implemented as compiler passes which transparently harden unmodified applications against hardware faults and software bugs. They are practical since they rely on commodity CPUs and require no specialized hardware or operating system support. Finally, they are efficient because they use hardware assistance in the form of CPU extensions to lower performance overhead