A Multi-User Interactive Coral Reef Optimization Algorithm for Considering Expert Knowledge in the Unequal Area Facility Layout Problem

The problem of Unequal Area Facility Layout Planning (UA-FLP) has been addressed by a large number of approaches considering a set of quantitative criteria. Moreover, more recently, the personal qualitative preferences of an expert designer or decision-maker (DM) have been taken into account too. This article deals with capturing more than a single DM’s personal preferences to obtain a common and collaborative design including the whole set of preferences from all the DMs to obtain more complex, complete, and realistic solutions. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that the preferences of more than one expert designer have been considered in the UA-FLP. The new strategy has been implemented on a Coral Reef Optimization (CRO) algorithm using two techniques to acquire the DMs’ evaluations. The first one demands the simultaneous presence of all the DMs, while the second one does not. Both techniques have been tested over three well-known problem instances taken from the literature and the results show that it is possible to obtain sufficient designs capturing all the DMs’ personal preferences and maintaining low values of the quantitative fitness function

The aperiodic facility layout problem with time-varying demands and an optimal master-slave solution approach

In many seasonal industries, customer demands are constantly changing over time, and accordingly the facility layout should be re-optimized in a timely manner to adapt to changing material handling patterns among manufacturing departments. This paper investigates the aperiodic facility layout problem (AFLP) that involves arranging facilities layout and re-layout aperiodically in a dynamic manufacturing environment during a given planning horizon. The AFLP is decomposed into a master problem and a combination set of static facility layout problems (FLPs, the slave problems) without loss of optimality, and all problems are formulated as mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) models that can be solved by MIP solvers for small-sized problems. An exact backward dynamic programming (BDP) algorithm with a computational complexity of O(n 2) is developed for the master problem, and an improved linear programming based problem evolution algorithm (PEA-LP) is developed for the traditional static FLP. Computational experiments are conducted on two new problems and twelve well-known benchmark problems from the literature, and the experimental results show that the proposed solution approach is promising for solving the AFLP with practical sizes of problem instances. In addition, the improved PEA-LP found new best solutions for five benchmark problems

Overview of Dynamic Facility Layout Planning as a Sustainability Strategy

[EN] The facility layout design problem is significantly relevant within the business operations strategies framework and has emerged as an alternate strategy towards supply chain sustainability. However, its wide coverage in the scientific literature has focused mainly on the static planning approach and disregarded the dynamic approach, which is very useful in real-world applications. In this context, the present article offers a literature review of the dynamic facility layout problem (DFLP). First, a taxonomy of the reviewed papers is proposed based on the problem formulation current trends (related to the problem type, planning phase, planning approach, number of facilities, number of floors, number of departments, space consideration, department shape, department dimensions, department area, and materials handling configuration); the mathematical modeling approach (regarding the type of model, type of objective function, type of constraints, nature of market demand, type of data, and distance metric), and the considered solution approach. Then, the extent to which recent research into DFLP has contributed to supply chain sustainability by addressing its three performance dimensions (economic, environmental, social) is described. Finally, some future research guidelines are provided.This research was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities Project CADS4.0, grant number RTI2018-101344-B-I00; and the Valencian Community ERDF Programme 2014-2020, grant number IDIFEDER/2018/025.Pérez-Gosende, P.; Mula, J.; Díaz-Madroñero Boluda, FM. (2020). Overview of Dynamic Facility Layout Planning as a Sustainability Strategy. Sustainability. 12(19):1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198277S1161219Ghassemi Tari, F., & Neghabi, H. (2015). A new linear adjacency approach for facility layout problem with unequal area departments. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 37, 93-103. doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2015.09.003Kheirkhah, A., Navidi, H., & Messi Bidgoli, M. (2015). Dynamic Facility Layout Problem: A New Bilevel Formulation and Some Metaheuristic Solution Methods. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 62(3), 396-410. doi:10.1109/tem.2015.2437195Altuntas, S., & Selim, H. (2012). Facility layout using weighted association rule-based data mining algorithms: Evaluation with simulation. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(1), 3-13. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.06.045Ku, M.-Y., Hu, M. H., & Wang, M.-J. (2011). Simulated annealing based parallel genetic algorithm for facility layout problem. International Journal of Production Research, 49(6), 1801-1812. doi:10.1080/00207541003645789Navidi, H., Bashiri, M., & Messi Bidgoli, M. (2012). A heuristic approach on the facility layout problem based on game theory. International Journal of Production Research, 50(6), 1512-1527. doi:10.1080/00207543.2010.550638Hosseini-Nasab, H., Fereidouni, S., Fatemi Ghomi, S. M. T., & Fakhrzad, M. B. (2017). Classification of facility layout problems: a review study. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 94(1-4), 957-977. doi:10.1007/s00170-017-0895-8Carter, C. R., & Rogers, D. S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(5), 360-387. doi:10.1108/09600030810882816Carter, C. R., & Washispack, S. (2018). Mapping the Path Forward for Sustainable Supply Chain Management: A Review of Reviews. Journal of Business Logistics, 39(4), 242-247. doi:10.1111/jbl.12196Roy, V., Schoenherr, T., & Charan, P. (2018). The thematic landscape of literature in sustainable supply chain management (SSCM). International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(4), 1091-1124. doi:10.1108/ijopm-05-2017-0260Barbosa-Póvoa, A. P., da Silva, C., & Carvalho, A. (2018). Opportunities and challenges in sustainable supply chain: An operations research perspective. European Journal of Operational Research, 268(2), 399-431. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2017.10.036Tonelli, F., Evans, S., & Taticchi, P. (2013). Industrial sustainability: challenges, perspectives, actions. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 7(2), 143. doi:10.1504/ijbir.2013.052576Sánchez-Flores, R. B., Cruz-Sotelo, S. E., Ojeda-Benitez, S., & Ramírez-Barreto, M. E. (2020). Sustainable Supply Chain Management—A Literature Review on Emerging Economies. Sustainability, 12(17), 6972. doi:10.3390/su12176972Ford, S., & Despeisse, M. (2016). Additive manufacturing and sustainability: an exploratory study of the advantages and challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, 1573-1587. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.150Kamble, S. S., Gunasekaran, A., & Gawankar, S. A. (2018). Sustainable Industry 4.0 framework: A systematic literature review identifying the current trends and future perspectives. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 117, 408-425. doi:10.1016/j.psep.2018.05.009Khuntia, J., Saldanha, T. J. V., Mithas, S., & Sambamurthy, V. (2018). Information Technology and Sustainability: Evidence from an Emerging Economy. Production and Operations Management, 27(4), 756-773. doi:10.1111/poms.12822Roy, S., Das, M., Ali, S. M., Raihan, A. S., Paul, S. K., & Kabir, G. (2020). Evaluating strategies for environmental sustainability in a supply chain of an emerging economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 262, 121389. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121389Morais, D. O. C., & Silvestre, B. S. (2018). Advancing social sustainability in supply chain management: Lessons from multiple case studies in an emerging economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 199, 222-235. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.097Stindt, D. (2017). A generic planning approach for sustainable supply chain management - How to integrate concepts and methods to address the issues of sustainability? Journal of Cleaner Production, 153, 146-163. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.126MOSLEMIPOUR, G., LEE, T. S., & LOONG, Y. T. (2017). Performance Analysis of Intelligent Robust Facility Layout Design. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 30(2), 407-418. doi:10.1007/s10033-017-0073-9Emami, S., & S. Nookabadi, A. (2013). Managing a new multi-objective model for the dynamic facility layout problem. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 68(9-12), 2215-2228. doi:10.1007/s00170-013-4820-5Al Hawarneh, A., Bendak, S., & Ghanim, F. (2019). Dynamic facilities planning model for large scale construction projects. Automation in Construction, 98, 72-89. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2018.11.021Pournaderi, N., Ghezavati, V. R., & Mozafari, M. (2019). Developing a mathematical model for the dynamic facility layout problem considering material handling system and optimizing it using cloud theory-based simulated annealing algorithm. SN Applied Sciences, 1(8). doi:10.1007/s42452-019-0865-xTuranoğlu, B., & Akkaya, G. (2018). A new hybrid heuristic algorithm based on bacterial foraging optimization for the dynamic facility layout problem. Expert Systems with Applications, 98, 93-104. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2018.01.011Moslemipour, G., Lee, T. S., & Rilling, D. (2011). A review of intelligent approaches for designing dynamic and robust layouts in flexible manufacturing systems. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 60(1-4), 11-27. doi:10.1007/s00170-011-3614-xTebaldi, L., Bigliardi, B., & Bottani, E. (2018). Sustainable Supply Chain and Innovation: A Review of the Recent Literature. Sustainability, 10(11), 3946. doi:10.3390/su10113946Tseng, M.-L., Islam, M. S., Karia, N., Fauzi, F. A., & Afrin, S. (2019). A literature review on green supply chain management: Trends and future challenges. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 141, 145-162. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.009Ghobakhloo, M. (2020). Industry 4.0, digitization, and opportunities for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 252, 119869. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119869Boar, A., Bastida, R., & Marimon, F. (2020). A Systematic Literature Review. Relationships between the Sharing Economy, Sustainability and Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability, 12(17), 6744. doi:10.3390/su12176744Novais, L., Maqueira, J. M., & Ortiz-Bas, Á. (2019). A systematic literature review of cloud computing use in supply chain integration. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 129, 296-314. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2019.01.056Masi, D., Day, S., & Godsell, J. (2017). Supply Chain Configurations in the Circular Economy: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, 9(9), 1602. doi:10.3390/su9091602Zavala-Alcívar, A., Verdecho, M.-J., & Alfaro-Saiz, J.-J. (2020). A Conceptual Framework to Manage Resilience and Increase Sustainability in the Supply Chain. Sustainability, 12(16), 6300. doi:10.3390/su12166300Li, K., Rollins, J., & Yan, E. (2017). Web of Science use in published research and review papers 1997–2017: a selective, dynamic, cross-domain, content-based analysis. Scientometrics, 115(1), 1-20. doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2622-5Kulturel-Konak, S., & Konak, A. (2014). A large-scale hybrid simulated annealing algorithm for cyclic facility layout problems. Engineering Optimization, 47(7), 963-978. doi:10.1080/0305215x.2014.933825Madhusudanan Pillai, V., Hunagund, I. B., & Krishnan, K. K. (2011). Design of robust layout for Dynamic Plant Layout Problems. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 61(3), 813-823. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2011.05.014Peng, Y., Zeng, T., Fan, L., Han, Y., & Xia, B. (2018). An Improved Genetic Algorithm Based Robust Approach for Stochastic Dynamic Facility Layout Problem. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2018, 1-8. doi:10.1155/2018/1529058McKendall, A. R., & Hakobyan, A. (2010). Heuristics for the dynamic facility layout problem with unequal-area departments. European Journal of Operational Research, 201(1), 171-182. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2009.02.028Yang, C.-L., Chuang, S.-P., & Hsu, T.-S. (2010). A genetic algorithm for dynamic facility planning in job shop manufacturing. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 52(1-4), 303-309. doi:10.1007/s00170-010-2733-0Abedzadeh, M., Mazinani, M., Moradinasab, N., & Roghanian, E. (2012). Parallel variable neighborhood search for solving fuzzy multi-objective dynamic facility layout problem. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 65(1-4), 197-211. doi:10.1007/s00170-012-4160-xGuan, X., Dai, X., Qiu, B., & Li, J. (2012). A revised electromagnetism-like mechanism for layout design of reconfigurable manufacturing system. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 63(1), 98-108. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2012.01.016Jolai, F., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., & Taghipour, M. (2012). A multi-objective particle swarm optimisation algorithm for unequal sized dynamic facility layout problem with pickup/drop-off locations. International Journal of Production Research, 50(15), 4279-4293. doi:10.1080/00207543.2011.613863Kia, R., Baboli, A., Javadian, N., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., Kazemi, M., & Khorrami, J. (2012). Solving a group layout design model of a dynamic cellular manufacturing system with alternative process routings, lot splitting and flexible reconfiguration by simulated annealing. Computers & Operations Research, 39(11), 2642-2658. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2012.01.012McKendall, A. R., & Liu, W.-H. (2012). New Tabu search heuristics for the dynamic facility layout problem. International Journal of Production Research, 50(3), 867-878. doi:10.1080/00207543.2010.545446Hosseini-Nasab, H., & Emami, L. (2013). A hybrid particle swarm optimisation for dynamic facility layout problem. International Journal of Production Research, 51(14), 4325-4335. doi:10.1080/00207543.2013.774486Kaveh, M., Dalfard, V. M., & Amiri, S. (2013). A new intelligent algorithm for dynamic facility layout problem in state of fuzzy constraints. Neural Computing and Applications, 24(5), 1179-1190. doi:10.1007/s00521-013-1339-5KIA, R., JAVADIAN, N., PAYDAR, M. M., & SAIDI-MEHRABAD, M. (2013). A SIMULATED ANNEALING FOR INTRA-CELL LAYOUT DESIGN OF DYNAMIC CELLULAR MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS WITH ROUTE SELECTION, PURCHASING MACHINES AND CELL RECONFIGURATION. Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research, 30(04), 1350004. doi:10.1142/s0217595913500048Mazinani, M., Abedzadeh, M., & Mohebali, N. (2012). Dynamic facility layout problem based on flexible bay structure and solving by genetic algorithm. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 65(5-8), 929-943. doi:10.1007/s00170-012-4229-6Samarghandi, H., Taabayan, P., & Behroozi, M. (2013). Metaheuristics for fuzzy dynamic facility layout problem with unequal area constraints and closeness ratings. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 67(9-12), 2701-2715. doi:10.1007/s00170-012-4685-zYu-Hsin Chen, G. (2013). A new data structure of solution representation in hybrid ant colony optimization for large dynamic facility layout problems. International Journal of Production Economics, 142(2), 362-371. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.12.012Bozorgi, N., Abedzadeh, M., & Zeinali, M. (2014). Tabu search heuristic for efficiency of dynamic facility layout problem. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 77(1-4), 689-703. doi:10.1007/s00170-014-6460-9CHEN, G. Y.-H., & LO, J.-C. (2014). DYNAMIC FACILITY LAYOUT WITH MULTI-OBJECTIVES. Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research, 31(04), 1450027. doi:10.1142/s0217595914500274Hosseini, S., Khaled, A. A., & Vadlamani, S. (2014). Hybrid imperialist competitive algorithm, variable neighborhood search, and simulated annealing for dynamic facility layout problem. Neural Computing and Applications, 25(7-8), 1871-1885. doi:10.1007/s00521-014-1678-xKia, R., Khaksar-Haghani, F., Javadian, N., & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. (2014). Solving a multi-floor layout design model of a dynamic cellular manufacturing system by an efficient genetic algorithm. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 33(1), 218-232. doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2013.12.005Nematian, J. (2014). A robust single row facility layout problem with fuzzy random variables. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 72(1-4), 255-267. doi:10.1007/s00170-013-5564-yPourvaziri, H., & Naderi, B. (2014). A hybrid multi-population genetic algorithm for the dynamic facility layout problem. Applied Soft Computing, 24, 457-469. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2014.06.051Derakhshan Asl, A., & Wong, K. Y. (2015). Solving unequal-area static and dynamic facility layout problems using modified particle swarm optimization. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 28(6), 1317-1336. doi:10.1007/s10845-015-1053-5Li, L., Li, C., Ma, H., & Tang, Y. (2015). An Optimization Method for the Remanufacturing Dynamic Facility Layout Problem with Uncertainties. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2015, 1-11. doi:10.1155/2015/685408Ulutas, B., & Islier, A. A. (2015). Dynamic facility layout problem in footwear industry. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 36, 55-61. doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2015.03.004Zarea Fazlelahi, F., Pournader, M., Gharakhani, M., & Sadjadi, S. J. (2016). A robust approach to design a single facility layout plan in dynamic manufacturing environments using a permutation-based genetic algorithm. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 230(12), 2264-2274. doi:10.1177/0954405415615728Hosseini, S. S., & Seifbarghy, M. (2016). A novel meta-heuristic algorithm for multi-objective dynamic facility layout problem. RAIRO - Operations Research, 50(4-5), 869-890. doi:10.1051/ro/2016057Pourvaziri, H., & Pierreval, H. (2017). Dynamic facility layout problem based on open queuing network theory. European Journal of Operational Research, 259(2), 538-553. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2016.11.011Tayal, A., & Singh, S. P. (2016). Integrating big data analytic and hybrid firefly-chaotic simulated annealing approach for facility layout problem. Annals of Operations Research, 270(1-2), 489-514. doi:10.1007/s10479-016-2237-xKumar, R., & Singh, S. P. (2017). A similarity score-based two-phase heuristic approach to solve the dynamic cellular facility layout for manufacturing systems. Engineering Optimization, 49(11), 1848-1867. doi:10.1080/0305215x.2016.1274205Liu, J., Wang, D., He, K., & Xue, Y. (2017). Combining Wang–Landau sampling algorithm and heuristics for solving the unequal-area dynamic facility layout problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 262(3), 1052-1063. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2017.04.002Vitayasak, S., Pongcharoen, P., & Hicks, C. (2017). A tool for solving stochastic dynamic facility layout problems with stochastic demand using either a Genetic Algorithm or modified Backtracking Search Algorithm. International Journal of Production Economics, 190, 146-157. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.03.019Xiao, Y., Xie, Y., Kulturel-Konak, S., & Konak, A. (2017). A problem evolution algorithm with linear programming for the dynamic facility layout problem—A general layout formulation. Computers & Operations Research, 88, 187-207. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2017.06.025Li, J., Tan, X., & Li, J. (2018). Research on Dynamic Facility Layout Problem of Manufacturing Unit Considering Human Factors. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2018, 1-13. doi:10.1155/2018/6040561Vitayasak, S., & Pongcharoen, P. (2018). Performance improvement of Teaching-Learning-Based Optimisation for robust machine layout design. Expert Systems with Applications, 98, 129-152. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2018.01.005Wei, X., Yuan, S., & Ye, Y. (2019). Optimizing facility layout planning for reconfigurable manufacturing system based on chaos genetic algorithm. Production & Manufacturing Research, 7(1), 109-124. doi:10.1080/21693277.2019.1602486Kulturel-Konak, S. (2007). Approaches to uncertainties in facility layout problems: Perspectives at the beginning of the 21st Century. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 18(2), 273-284. doi:10.1007/s10845-007-0020-1Sharma, P., & Singhal, S. (2016). Implementation of fuzzy TOPSIS methodology in selection of procedural approach for facility layout planning. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 88(5-8), 1485-1493. doi:10.1007/s00170-016-8878-8Bukchin, Y., & Tzur, M. (2014). A new MILP approach for the facility process-layout design problem with rectangular and L/T shape departments. International Journal of Production Research, 52(24), 7339-7359. doi:10.1080/00207543.2014.930534Meller, R. D., Kirkizoglu, Z., & Chen, W. (2010). A new optimization model to support a bottom-up approach to facility design. Computers & Operations Research, 37(1), 42-49. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2009.03.018Feng, J., & Che, A. (2018). Novel integer linear programming models for the facility layout problem with fixed-size rectangular departments. Computers & Operations Research, 95, 163-171. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2018.03.013Allahyari, M. Z., & Azab, A. (2018). Mathematical modeling and multi-start search simulated annealing for unequal-area facility layout problem. Expert Systems with Applications, 91, 46-62. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2017.07.049Ahmadi, A., Pishvaee, M. S., & Akbari Jokar, M. R. (2017). A survey on multi-floor facility layout problems. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 107, 158-170. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2017.03.015Drira, A., Pierreval, H., & Hajri-Gabouj, S. (2007). Facility layout problems: A survey. Annual Reviews in Control, 31(2), 255-267. doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2007.04.001Grobelny, J., & Michalski, R. (2017). A novel version of simulated annealing based on linguistic patterns for solving facility layout problems. Knowledge-Based Systems, 124, 55-69. doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2017.03.001Hathhorn, J., Sisikoglu, E., & Sir, M. Y. (2013). A multi-objective mixed-integer programming model for a multi-floor facility layout. International Journal of Production Research, 51(14), 4223-4239. doi:10.1080/00207543.2012.75348

Facility layout planning. An extended literature review

[EN] Facility layout planning (FLP) involves a set of design problems related to the arrangement of the elements that shape industrial production systems in a physical space. The fact that they are considered one of the most important design decisions as part of business operation strategies, and their proven repercussion on production systems' operation costs, efficiency and productivity, mean that this theme has been widely addressed in science. In this context, the present article offers a scientific literature review about FLP from the operations management perspective. The 232 reviewed articles were classified as a large taxonomy based on type of problem, approach and planning stage and characteristics of production facilities by configuring the material handling system and methods to generate and assess layout alternatives. We stress that the generation of layout alternatives was done mainly using mathematical optimisation models, specifically discrete quadratic programming models for similar sized departments, or continuous linear and non-linear mixed integer programming models for different sized departments. Other approaches followed to generate layout alternatives were expert's knowledge and specialised software packages. Generally speaking, the most frequent solution algorithms were metaheuristics.The research leading to these results received funding from the European Union H2020 Program under grant agreement No 958205 `Industrial Data Services for Quality Control in Smart Manufacturing (i4Q)'and from the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities under grant agreement RTI2018-101344-B-I00 `Optimisation of zerodefectsproduction technologies enabling supply chains 4.0 (CADS4.0)'Pérez-Gosende, P.; Mula, J.; Díaz-Madroñero Boluda, FM. (2021). Facility layout planning. An extended literature review. International Journal of Production Research. 59(12):3777-3816. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.189717637773816591

Proceedings of the Conference on Production Systems and Logistics: CPSL 2022

[no abstract available