Cryptoraptor : high throughput reconfigurable cryptographic processor for symmetric key encryption and cryptographic hash functions

textIn cryptographic processor design, the selection of functional primitives and connection structures between these primitives are extremely crucial to maximize throughput and flexibility. Hence, detailed analysis on the specifications and requirements of existing crypto-systems plays a crucial role in cryptographic processor design. This thesis provides the most comprehensive literature review that we are aware of on the widest range of existing cryptographic algorithms, their specifications, requirements, and hardware structures. In the light of this analysis, it also describes a high performance, low power, and highly flexible cryptographic processor, Cryptoraptor, that is designed to support both today's and tomorrow's encryption standards. To the best of our knowledge, the proposed cryptographic processor supports the widest range of cryptographic algorithms compared to other solutions in the literature and is the only crypto-specific processor targeting the future standards as well. Unlike previous work, we aim for maximum throughput for all known encryption standards, and to support future standards as well. Our 1GHz design achieves a peak throughput of 128Gbps for AES-128 which is competitive with ASIC designs and has 25X and 160X higher throughput per area than CPU and GPU solutions, respectively.Electrical and Computer Engineerin

Analysis of Implementation Hierocrypt-3 algorithm (and its comparison to Camellia algorithm) using ALTERA devices

Alghoritms: HIEROCRYPT-3, CAMELLIA and ANUBIS, GRAND CRU, NOEKEON, NUSH, Q, RC6, SAFER++128, SC2000, SHACAL were requested for the submission of block ciphers (high level block cipher) to NESSIE (New European Schemes for Signatures, Integrity, and Encryption) project. The main purpose of this project was to put forward a portfolio of strong cryptographic primitives of various types. The NESSIE project was a three year long project and has been divided into two phases. The first was finished in June 2001r. CAMELLIA, RC6, SAFER++128 and SHACAL were accepted for the second phase of the evaluation process. HIEROCRYPT-3 had key schedule problems, and there were attacks for up to 3,5 rounds out of 6, at least hardware implementations of this cipher were extremely slow [12]. HIEROCRYPT-3 was not selected to Phase II. CAMELLIA was selected as an algorithm suggested for future standard. In the paper we present the hardware implementations these two algorithms with 128-bit blocks and 128-bit keys, using ALTERA devices and their comparisons.Comment: 29 pages, presented on Enigma conferance in 2003

Optimized architecture for SNOW 3G

SNOW 3G is a synchronous, word-oriented stream cipher used by the 3GPP standards as a confidentiality and integrity algorithms. It is used as first set in long term evolution (LTE) and as a second set in universal mobile telecommunications system (UMTS) networks. The cipher uses 128-bit key and 128 bit IV to produce 32-bit ciphertext. The paper presents two techniques for performance enhancement. The first technique uses novel CLA architecture to minimize the propagation delay of the 232 modulo adders. The second technique uses novel architecture for S-box to minimize the chip area. The presented work uses VHDL language for coding. The same is implemented on the FPGA device Virtex xc5vfx100e manufactured by Xilinx. The presented architecture achieved a maximum frequency of 254.9 MHz and throughput of 7.2235 Gbps

A fully pipelined memoryless 17.8 Gbps AES-128 encryptor

A fully pipelined implementation of the Advanced Encryption Stan-dard encryption algorithm with 128-bit input and key length (AES-128) was implemented on Xilinx ’ Virtex-E and Virtex-II devices. The design is called SIG-AES-E and it implements the S-boxes combinatorially and thus requires no internal memory. It is con-cluded, that SIG-AES-E is faster than other published FPGA-based implementations of the AES-128 encryption algorithm. Categories and Subject Descriptor

Multi-shape symmetric encryption mechanism for nongeneric attacks mitigation

Static cyphers use static transformations for encryption and decryption. Therefore, the attacker will have some knowledge that can be exploited to construct assaults since the transformations are static. The class of attacks which target a specific cypher design are called Non-Generic Attacks. Whereby, dynamic cyphers can be utilised to mitigate non-generic attacks. Dynamic cyphers aim at mitigating non-generic attacks by changing how the cyphers work according to the value of the encryption key. However, existing dynamic cyphers either degrade the performance or decrease the cypher’s actual security. Hence, this thesis introduces a Multi-Shape Symmetric Encryption Mechanism (MSSEM) which is capable of mitigating non-generic attacks by eliminating the opponents’ leverage of accessing the exact operation details. The base cyphers that have been applied in the proposed MSSEM are the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) competition finalists, namely Rijndael, Serpent, MARS, Twofish, and RC6. These cyphers satisfy three essential criteria, such as security, performance, and expert input. Moreover, the modes of operation used by the MSSEM are the secure modes suggested by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, namely, Cipher Block Chaining (CBC), Cipher Feedback Mode (CFB), Output Feedback Mode (OFB), and Counter (CTR). For the proposed MSSEM implementation, the sender initially generates a random key using a pseudorandom number generator such as Blum Blum Shub (BBS) or a Linear Congruential Generator (LCG). Subsequently, the sender securely shares the key with the legitimate receiver. Besides that, the proposed MSSEM has an entity called the operation table that includes sixty different cypher suites. Each cypher suite has a specific cypher and mode of operation. During the run-time, one cypher suite is randomly selected from the operation table, and a new key is extracted from the master key with the assistance of SHA-256. The suite, as well as the new key, is allowed to encrypt one message. While each of the messages produces a new key and cypher suite. Thus, no one except communicating parties can access the encryption keys or the cypher suites. Furthermore, the security of MSSEM has been evaluated and mathematically proven to resist known and unknown attacks. As a result, the proposed MSSEM successfully mitigates unknown non-generic attacks by a factor of 2−6. In addition, the proposed MSSEM performance is better than MODEM since MODEM generates 4650 milliseconds to encrypt approximately 1000 bytes, whereas MSSEM needs only 0.14 milliseconds. Finally, a banking system simulation has been tested with the proposed MSSEM in order to secure inbound and outbound system traffic

Smile Mask Development of Cryptography Performance of MOLAZ Method (MOLAZ-SM)

Concealment of information is the most important things of interest to scientists and users alike. The work of many researchers to find new ways and methods for building specialized systems to protect the information from hackers. The method of those techniques AES and an adopted by the U.S. Department of Defense and launched in the eighties to the world. Even so, it parallels the evolution of these methods to penetrate systems. Researchers were developed this method for the protection of this algorithm. In the end of 2010 the researcher Engineer Moceheb Lazam during his studies at the Masters in the Universiti Utara Malaysia, develop this algorithm in order to keep the encryption and decoding. It was called MOLAZ. It used two algorithms AES 128 and AES 256 bits, and switching between them using special key (K,). In addition, it uses two keys to encryption and decryption. However, this method needs to be develops and supports the protection of information. Therefore, in 2011 appeared MOLAZ-SM. It presents a study is the development of this system by adding the mask technique to prevent the use of the style of repeated attempts to enter the key. The system depends on the base "If you enter a true key, you obtain to the truth information, but if you enter the false key; you obtains to the false information.