Optimizing Program Efficiency with Loop Unroll Factor Prediction

Loop unrolling is a well-established code transformation technique that can improve the performance of a program at runtime. The key benefit of unrolling a loop is that it often requires fewer instruction executions than the original loop. However, determining the optimal number of loop unrolling is a critical concern. This paper presents a novel method for predicting the optimal unroll factor for a given program. Specifically, a dataset is constructed that includes the execution times of several programs with varying loop unroll factors. The programs are sourced from different benchmarks, such as Ploybench, Shooutout, and other programs. Similarity measures between the unseen program and the existing programs are computed, and the three most similar programs are identified. The unroll factor that led to the greatest reduction in execution time for the most similar programs is selected as the candidate for the unseen program. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method can enhance the performance of training programs for unroll factors of 2, 4, 6, and 8 by approximately 13%, 18%, 19%, and 21%, respectively. For the unseen programs, the speedup rate is approximately 37.7% for five programs

Lost in translation: Exposing hidden compiler optimization opportunities

Existing iterative compilation and machine-learning-based optimization techniques have been proven very successful in achieving better optimizations than the standard optimization levels of a compiler. However, they were not engineered to support the tuning of a compiler's optimizer as part of the compiler's daily development cycle. In this paper, we first establish the required properties which a technique must exhibit to enable such tuning. We then introduce an enhancement to the classic nightly routine testing of compilers which exhibits all the required properties, and thus, is capable of driving the improvement and tuning of the compiler's common optimizer. This is achieved by leveraging resource usage and compilation information collected while systematically exploiting prefixes of the transformations applied at standard optimization levels. Experimental evaluation using the LLVM v6.0.1 compiler demonstrated that the new approach was able to reveal hidden cross-architecture and architecture-dependent potential optimizations on two popular processors: the Intel i5-6300U and the Arm Cortex-A53-based Broadcom BCM2837 used in the Raspberry Pi 3B+. As a case study, we demonstrate how the insights from our approach enabled us to identify and remove a significant shortcoming of the CFG simplification pass of the LLVM v6.0.1 compiler.Comment: 31 pages, 7 figures, 2 table. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1802.0984

Portable compiler optimisation across embedded programs and microarchitectures using machine learning

Building an optimising compiler is a difficult and time consuming task which must be repeated for each generation of a microprocessor. As the underlying microarchitecture changes from one generation to the next, the compiler must be retuned to optimise specifically for that new system. It may take several releases of the compiler to effectively exploit a processor’s performance potential, by which time a new generation has appeared and the process starts again. We address this challenge by developing a portable optimising compiler. Our approach employs machine learning to automatically learn the best optimisations to apply for any new program on a new microarchitectural configuration. It achieves this by learning a model off-line which maps a microarchitecture description plus the hardware counters from a single run of the program to the best compiler optimisation passes. Our compiler gains 67 % of the maximum speedup obtainable by an iterative compiler search using 1000 evaluations. We obtain, on average, a 1.16x speedup over the highest default optimisation level across an entire microarchitecture configuration space, achieving a 4.3x speedup in the best case. We demonstrate the robustness of this technique by applying it to an extended microarchitectural space where we achieve comparable performance

Infrastructures and Compilation Strategies for the Performance of Computing Systems

This document presents our main contributions to the field of compilation, and more generally to the quest of performance ofcomputing systems.It is structured by type of execution environment, from static compilation (execution of native code), to JIT compilation, and purelydynamic optimization. We also consider interpreters. In each chapter, we give a focus on the most relevant contributions.Chapter 2 describes our work about static compilation. It covers a long time frame (from PhD work 1995--1998 to recent work on real-timesystems and worst-case execution times at Inria in 2015) and various positions, both in academia and in the industry.My research on JIT compilers started in the mid-2000s at STMicroelectronics, and is still ongoing. Chapter 3 covers the results we obtained on various aspects of JIT compilers: split-compilation, interaction with real-time systems, and obfuscation.Chapter 4 reports on dynamic binary optimization, a research effort started more recently, in 2012. This considers the optimization of a native binary (without source code), while it runs. It incurs significant challenges but also opportunities.Interpreters represent an alternative way to execute code. Instead of native code generation, an interpreter executes an infinite loop thatcontinuously reads a instruction, decodes it and executes its semantics. Interpreters are much easier to develop than compilers,they are also much more portable, often requiring a simple recompilation. The price to pay is the reduced performance. Chapter 5presents some of our work related to interpreters.All this research often required significant software infrastructures for validation, from early prototypes to robust quasi products, andfrom open-source to proprietary. We detail them in Chapter 6.The last chapter concludes and gives some perspectives

Vapor SIMD: Auto-Vectorize Once, Run Everywhere

International audienceJust-in-Time (JIT) compiler technology offers portability while facilitating target- and context-specific specialization. Single-Instruction-Multiple-Data (SIMD) hardware is ubiquitous and markedly diverse, but can be difficult for JIT compilers to efficiently target due to resource and budget constraints. We present our design for a synergistic auto-vectorizing compilation scheme. The scheme is composed of an aggressive, generic offline stage coupled with a lightweight, target-specific online stage. Our method leverages the optimized intermediate results provided by the first stage across disparate SIMD architectures from different vendors, having distinct characteristics ranging from different vector sizes, memory alignment and access constraints, to special computational idioms.We demonstrate the effectiveness of our design using a set of kernels that exercise innermost loop, outer loop, as well as straight-line code vectorization, all automatically extracted by the common offline compilation stage. This results in performance comparable to that provided by specialized monolithic offline compilers. Our framework is implemented using open-source tools and standards, thereby promoting interoperability and extendibility

Mats: MultiCore Adaptive Trace Selection

Dynamically optimizing programs is worthwhile only if the overhead created by the dynamic optimizer is less than the benefit gained from the optimization. Program trace selection is one of the most important, yet time consuming, components of many dynamic optimizers. The dynamic application of monitoring and profiling can often result in an execution slowdown rather than speedup. Achieving significant performance gain from dynamic optimization has proven to be quite challenging. However, current technological advances, namely multicore architectures, enable us to design new approaches to meet this challenge. Selecting traces in current dynamic optimizers is typically achieved through the use of instrumentation to collect control flow information from a running application. Using instrumentation for runtime analysis requires the trace selection algorithms to be light weight, and this limits how sophisticated these algorithms can be. This is problematic because the quality of the traces can determine the potential benefits that can be gained from optimizing the traces. In many cases, even when using a lightweight approach, the overhead incurred is more than the benefit of the optimizations. In this paper we exploit the multicore architecture to design an aggressive trace selection approach that produces better traces and does not perturb the running application. 1

Survey on Combinatorial Register Allocation and Instruction Scheduling

Register allocation (mapping variables to processor registers or memory) and instruction scheduling (reordering instructions to increase instruction-level parallelism) are essential tasks for generating efficient assembly code in a compiler. In the last three decades, combinatorial optimization has emerged as an alternative to traditional, heuristic algorithms for these two tasks. Combinatorial optimization approaches can deliver optimal solutions according to a model, can precisely capture trade-offs between conflicting decisions, and are more flexible at the expense of increased compilation time. This paper provides an exhaustive literature review and a classification of combinatorial optimization approaches to register allocation and instruction scheduling, with a focus on the techniques that are most applied in this context: integer programming, constraint programming, partitioned Boolean quadratic programming, and enumeration. Researchers in compilers and combinatorial optimization can benefit from identifying developments, trends, and challenges in the area; compiler practitioners may discern opportunities and grasp the potential benefit of applying combinatorial optimization

Loop transformations for clustered VLIW architectures

With increasing demands for performance by embedded systems, especially by digital signal processing (DSP) applications, embedded processors must increase available instructionlevel parallelism (ILP) within significant constraints on power consumption and chip cost. Unfortunately, supporting a large amount of ILP on a processor while maintaining a single register file increases chip cost and potentially decreases overall performance due to increased cycle time. To address this problem, some modern embedded processors partition the register file into multiple low-ported register files, each directly connected with one or more functional units. These functional unit/register file groups are called clusters. Clustered VLIW (very long instruction word) architectures need extra copy operations or delays to transfer values among clusters. To take advantage of clustered architectures, the compiler must expose parallelism for maximal functional-unit utilization, and schedule instructions to reduce intercluster communication overhead. High-level loop transformations offer an excellent opportunity to enhance the abilities of low-level optimizers to generate code for clustered architectures. This dissertation investigates the effects of three loop transformations, i.e., loop fusion, loop unrolling, and unroll-and-jam, on clustered VLIW architectures. The objective is to achieve high performance with low communication overhead. This dissertation discusses the following techniques: Loop Fusion This research examines the impact of loop fusion on clustered architectures. A metric based upon communication costs for guiding loop fusion is developed and tested on DSP benchmarks. Unroll-and-jam and Loop Unrolling A new method that integrates a communication cost model with an integer-optimization problem is developed to determine unroll amounts for loop unrolling and unroll-and-jam automatically for a specific loop on a specific architecture. These techniques have been implemented and tested using DSP benchmarks on simulated, clustered VLIW architectures and a real clustered, embedded processor, the TI TMS320C64X. The results show that the new techniques achieve an average speedup of 1.72-1.89 on five different clustered architectures. These techniques have been implemented and tested using DSP benchmarks on simulated, clustered VLIW architectures and a real clustered, embedded processor, the TI TMS320C64X. The results show that the new techniques achieve an average speedup of 1.72-1.89 on five different clustered architectures