Through and beyond classicality: analyticity, embeddings, infinity

Structural proof theory deals with formal representation of proofs and with the investigation of their properties. This thesis provides an analysis of various non-classical logical systems using proof-theoretic methods. The approach consists in the formulation of analytic calculi for these logics which are then used in order to study their metalogical properties. A specific attention is devoted to studying the connections between classical and non-classical reasoning. In particular, the use of analytic sequent calculi allows one to regain desirable structural properties which are lost in non-classical contexts. In this sense, proof-theoretic versions of embeddings between non-classical logics - both finitary and infinitary - prove to be a useful tool insofar as they build a bridge between different logical regions

Proof-theoretic Semantics for Intuitionistic Multiplicative Linear Logic

This work is the first exploration of proof-theoretic semantics for a substructural logic. It focuses on the base-extension semantics (B-eS) for intuitionistic multiplicative linear logic (IMLL). The starting point is a review of Sandqvist’s B-eS for intuitionistic propositional logic (IPL), for which we propose an alternative treatment of conjunction that takes the form of the generalized elimination rule for the connective. The resulting semantics is shown to be sound and complete. This motivates our main contribution, a B-eS for IMLL , in which the definitions of the logical constants all take the form of their elimination rule and for which soundness and completeness are established

Mathematical Logic: Proof Theory, Constructive Mathematics (hybrid meeting)

The Workshop "Mathematical Logic: Proof Theory, Constructive Mathematics" focused on proofs both as formal derivations in deductive systems as well as on the extraction of explicit computational content from given proofs in core areas of ordinary mathematics using proof-theoretic methods. The workshop contributed to the following research strands: interactions between foundations and applications; proof mining; constructivity in classical logic; modal logic and provability logic; proof theory and theoretical computer science; structural proof theory

Constructivisation through Induction and Conservation

The topic of this thesis lies in the intersection between proof theory and alge- braic logic. The main object of discussion, constructive reasoning, was intro- duced at the beginning of the 20th century by Brouwer, who followed Kant’s explanation of human intuition of spacial forms and time points: these are constructed step by step in a finite process by certain rules, mimicking con- structions with straightedge and compass and the construction of natural numbers, respectively. The aim of the present thesis is to show how classical reasoning, which admits some forms of indirect reasoning, can be made more constructive. The central tool that we are using are induction principles, methods that cap- ture infinite collections of objects by considering their process of generation instead of the whole class. We start by studying the interplay between cer- tain structures that satisfy induction and the calculi for some non-classical logics. We then use inductive methods to prove a few conservation theorems, which contribute to answering the question of which parts of classical logic and mathematics can be made constructive.Tämän opinnäytetyön aiheena on todistusteorian ja algebrallisen logiikan leikkauspiste. Keskustelun pääaiheen, rakentavan päättelyn, esitteli 1900-luvun alussa Brouwer, joka seurasi Kantin selitystä ihmisen intuitiosta tilamuodoista ja aikapisteistä: nämä rakennetaan askel askeleelta äärellisessä prosessissa tiettyjen sääntöjen mukaan, jotka jäljittelevät suoran ja kompassin konstruktioita ja luonnollisten lukujen konstruktiota. Tämän opinnäytetyön tavoitteena on osoittaa, kuinka klassista päättelyä, joka mahdollistaa tietyt epäsuoran päättelyn muodot, voidaan tehdä rakentavammaksi. Keskeinen työkalu, jota käytämme, ovat induktioperiaatteet, menetelmät, jotka keräävät äärettömiä objektikokoelmia ottamalla huomioon niiden luomisprosessin koko luokan sijaan. Aloitamme tutkimalla vuorovaikutusta tiettyjen induktiota tyydyttävien rakenteiden ja joidenkin ei-klassisten logiikan laskelmien välillä. Todistamme sitten induktiivisten menetelmien avulla muutamia säilymislauseita, jotka auttavat vastaamaan kysymykseen siitä, mitkä klassisen logiikan ja matematiikan osat voidaan tehdä rakentaviksi

Aspects of the constructive omega rule within automated deduction

In general, cut elimination holds for arithmetical systems with the w -rule, but not for systems with ordinary induction. Hence in the latter, there is the problem of generalisation, since arbitrary formulae can be cut in. This makes automatic theorem -proving very difficult. An important technique for investigating derivability in formal systems of arithmetic has been to embed such systems into semi- formal systems with the w -rule. This thesis describes the implementation of such a system. Moreover, an important application is presented in the form of a new method of generalisation by means of "guiding proofs" in the stronger system, which sometimes succeeds in producing proofs in the original system when other methods fail