Analysis, classification and comparison of scheduling techniques for software transactional memories

Transactional Memory (TM) is a practical programming paradigm for developing concurrent applications. Performance is a critical factor for TM implementations, and various studies demonstrated that specialised transaction/thread scheduling support is essential for implementing performance-effective TM systems. After one decade of research, this article reviews the wide variety of scheduling techniques proposed for Software Transactional Memories. Based on peculiarities and differences of the adopted scheduling strategies, we propose a classification of the existing techniques, and we discuss the specific characteristics of each technique. Also, we analyse the results of previous evaluation and comparison studies, and we present the results of a new experimental study encompassing techniques based on different scheduling strategies. Finally, we identify potential strengths and weaknesses of the different techniques, as well as the issues that require to be further investigated

Adaptive Transactional Memories: Performance and Energy Consumption Tradeoffs

Energy efficiency is becoming a pressing issue, especially in large data centers where it entails, at the same time, a non-negligible management cost, an enhancement of hardware fault probability, and a significant environmental footprint. In this paper, we study how Software Transactional Memories (STM) can provide benefits on both power saving and the overall applications’ execution performance. This is related to the fact that encapsulating shared-data accesses within transactions gives the freedom to the STM middleware to both ensure consistency and reduce the actual data contention, the latter having been shown to affect the overall power needed to complete the application’s execution. We have selected a set of self-adaptive extensions to existing STM middlewares (namely, TinySTM and R-STM) to prove how self-adapting computation can capture the actual degree of parallelism and/or logical contention on shared data in a better way, enhancing even more the intrinsic benefits provided by STM. Of course, this benefit comes at a cost, which is the actual execution time required by the proposed approaches to precisely tune the execution parameters for reducing power consumption and enhancing execution performance. Nevertheless, the results hereby provided show that adaptivity is a strictly necessary requirement to reduce energy consumption in STM systems: Without it, it is not possible to reach any acceptable level of energy efficiency at all

A Comparative Analysis of STM Approaches to Reduction Operations in Irregular Applications

As a recently consolidated paradigm for optimistic concurrency in modern multicore architectures, Transactional Memory (TM) can help to the exploitation of parallelism in irregular applications when data dependence information is not available up to run- time. This paper presents and discusses how to leverage TM to exploit parallelism in an important class of irregular applications, the class that exhibits irregular reduction patterns. In order to test and compare our techniques with other solutions, they were implemented in a software TM system called ReduxSTM, that acts as a proof of concept. Basically, ReduxSTM combines two major ideas: a sequential-equivalent ordering of transaction commits that assures the correct result, and an extension of the underlying TM privatization mechanism to reduce unnecessary overhead due to reduction memory updates as well as unnecesary aborts and rollbacks. A comparative study of STM solutions, including ReduxSTM, and other more classical approaches to the parallelization of reduction operations is presented in terms of time, memory and overhead.Universidad de Málaga. Campus de Excelencia Internacional Andalucía Tech

Model-Based Proactive Read-Validation in Transaction Processing Systems

Concurrency control protocols based on read-validation schemes allow transactions which are doomed to abort to still run until a subsequent validation check reveals them as invalid. These late aborts do not favor the reduction of wasted computation and can penalize performance. To counteract this problem, we present an analytical model that predicts the abort probability of transactions handled via read-validation schemes. Our goal is to determine what are the suited points-along a transaction lifetime-to carry out a validation check. This may lead to early aborting doomed transactions, thus saving CPU time. We show how to exploit the abort probability predictions returned by the model in combination with a threshold-based scheme to trigger read-validations. We also show how this approach can definitely improve performance-leading up to 14 % better turnaround-as demonstrated by some experiments carried out with a port of the TPC-C benchmark to Software Transactional Memory

FaulTM: Fault-tolerance using hardware transactional memory

Fault-tolerance has become an essential concern for processor designers due to increasing soft-error rates. In this study, we are motivated by the fact that Transactional Memory (TM) hardware provides an ideal base upon which to build a fault-tolerant system. We show how it is possible to provide low-cost faulttolerance for serial programs by using a minimallymodified Hardware Transactional Memory (HTM) that features lazy conflict detection, lazy data versioning. This scheme, called FaulTM, employs a hybrid hardware-software fault-tolerance technique. On the software side, FaulTM programming model is able to provide the flexibility for programmers to decide between performance and reliability. Our experimental results indicate that FaulTM produces relatively less performance overhead by reducing the number of comparisons and by leveraging already proposed TM hardware. We also conduct experiments which indicate that the baseline FaulTM design has a good error coverage. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first architectural fault-tolerance proposal using Hardware Transactional Memory.Peer ReviewedPostprint (published version

Towards lightweight and high-performance hardware transactional memory

Conventional lock-based synchronization serializes accesses to critical sections guarded by the same lock. Using multiple locks brings the possibility of a deadlock or a livelock in the program, making parallel programming a difficult task. Transactional Memory (TM) is a promising paradigm for parallel programming, offering an alternative to lock-based synchronization. TM eliminates the risk of deadlocks and livelocks, while it provides the desirable semantics of Atomicity, Consistency, and Isolation of critical sections. TM speculatively executes a series of memory accesses as a single, atomic, transaction. The speculative changes of a transaction are kept private until the transaction commits. If a transaction can break the atomicity or cause a deadlock or livelock, the TM system aborts the transaction and rolls back the speculative changes. To be effective, a TM implementation should provide high performance and scalability. While implementations of TM in pure software (STM) do not provide desirable performance, Hardware TM (HTM) implementations introduce much smaller overhead and have relatively good scalability, due to their better control of hardware resources. However, many HTM systems support only the transactions that fit limited hardware resources (for example, private caches), and fall back to software mechanisms if hardware limits are reached. These HTM systems, called best-effort HTMs, are not desirable since they force a programmer to think in terms of hardware limits, to use both HTM and STM, and to manage concurrent transactions in HTM and STM. In contrast with best-effort HTMs, unbounded HTM systems support overflowed transactions, that do not fit into private caches. Unbounded HTM systems often require complex protocols or expensive hardware mechanisms for conflict detection between overflowed transactions. In addition, an execution with overflowed transactions is often much slower than an execution that has only regular transactions. This is typically due to restrictive or approximative conflict management mechanism used for overflowed transactions. In this thesis, we study hardware implementations of transactional memory, and make three main contributions. First, we improve the general performance of HTM systems by proposing a scalable protocol for conflict management. The protocol has precise conflict detection, in contrast with often-employed inexact Bloom-filter-based conflict detection, which often falsely report conflicts between transactions. Second, we propose a best-effort HTM that utilizes the new scalable conflict detection protocol, termed EazyHTM. EazyHTM allows parallel commits for all non-conflicting transactions, and generally simplifies transaction commits. Finally, we propose an unbounded HTM that extends and improves the initial protocol for conflict management, and we name it EcoTM. EcoTM features precise conflict detection, and it efficiently supports large as well as small and short transactions. The key idea of EcoTM is to leverage an observation that very few locations are actually conflicting, even if applications have high contention. In EcoTM, each core locally detects if a cache line is non-conflicting, and conflict detection mechanism is invoked only for the few potentially conflicting cache lines.La Sincronización tradicional basada en los cerrojos de exclusión mutua (locks) serializa los accesos a las secciones críticas protegidas este cerrojo. La utilización de varios cerrojos en forma concurrente y/o paralela aumenta la posibilidad de entrar en abrazo mortal (deadlock) o en un bloqueo activo (livelock) en el programa, está es una de las razones por lo cual programar en forma paralela resulta ser mucho mas dificultoso que programar en forma secuencial. La memoria transaccional (TM) es un paradigma prometedor para la programación paralela, que ofrece una alternativa a los cerrojos. La memoria transaccional tiene muchas ventajas desde el punto de vista tanto práctico como teórico. TM elimina el riesgo de bloqueo mutuo y de bloqueo activo, mientras que proporciona una semántica de atomicidad, coherencia, aislamiento con características similares a las secciones críticas. TM ejecuta especulativamente una serie de accesos a la memoria como una transacción atómica. Los cambios especulativos de la transacción se mantienen privados hasta que se confirma la transacción. Si una transacción entra en conflicto con otra transacción o sea que alguna de ellas escribe en una dirección que la otra leyó o escribió, o se entra en un abrazo mortal o en un bloqueo activo, el sistema de TM aborta la transacción y revierte los cambios especulativos. Para ser eficaz, una implementación de TM debe proporcionar un alto rendimiento y escalabilidad. Las implementaciones de TM en el software (STM) no proporcionan este desempeño deseable, en cambio, las mplementaciones de TM en hardware (HTM) tienen mejor desempeño y una escalabilidad relativamente buena, debido a su mejor control de los recursos de hardware y que la resolución de los conflictos así el mantenimiento y gestión de los datos se hace en hardware. Sin embargo, muchos de los sistemas de HTM están limitados a los recursos de hardware disponibles, por ejemplo el tamaño de las caches privadas, y dependen de mecanismos de software para cuando esos límites son sobrepasados. Estos sistemas HTM, llamados best-effort HTM no son deseables, ya que obligan al programador a pensar en términos de los límites existentes en el hardware que se esta utilizando, así como en el sistema de STM que se llama cuando los recursos son sobrepasados. Además, tiene que resolver que transacciones hardware y software se ejecuten concurrentemente. En cambio, los sistemas de HTM ilimitados soportan un numero de operaciones ilimitadas o sea no están restringidos a límites impuestos artificialmente por el hardware, como ser el tamaño de las caches o buffers internos. Los sistemas HTM ilimitados por lo general requieren protocolos complejos o mecanismos muy costosos para la detección de conflictos y el mantenimiento de versiones de los datos entre las transacciones. Por otra parte, la ejecución de transacciones es a menudo mucho más lenta que en una ejecución sobre un sistema de HTM que este limitado. Esto es debido al que los mecanismos utilizados en el HTM limitado trabaja con conjuntos de datos relativamente pequeños que caben o están muy cerca del núcleo del procesador. En esta tesis estudiamos implementaciones de TM en hardware. Presentaremos tres contribuciones principales: Primero, mejoramos el rendimiento general de los sistemas, al proponer un protocolo escalable para la gestión de conflictos. El protocolo detecta los conflictos de forma precisa, en contraste con otras técnicas basadas en filtros Bloom, que pueden reportar conflictos falsos entre las transacciones. Segundo, proponemos un best-effort HTM que utiliza el nuevo protocolo escalable detección de conflictos, denominado EazyHTM. EazyHTM permite la ejecución completamente paralela de todas las transacciones sin conflictos, y por lo general simplifica la ejecución. Por último, proponemos una extensión y mejora del protocolo inicial para la gestión de conflictos, que llamaremos EcoTM. EcoTM cuenta con detección de conflictos precisa, eficiente y es compatible tanto con transacciones grandes como con pequeñas. La idea clave de EcoTM es aprovechar la observación que en muy pocas ubicaciones de memoria aparecen los conflictos entre las transacciones, incluso en aplicaciones tienen muchos conflictos. En EcoTM, cada núcleo detecta localmente si la línea es conflictiva, además existe un mecanismo de detección de conflictos detallado que solo se activa para las pocas líneas de memoria que son potencialmente conflictivas

Techniques to improve concurrency in hardware transactional memory

Transactional Memory (TM) aims to make shared memory parallel programming easier by abstracting away the complexity of managing shared data. The programmer defines sections of code, called transactions, which the TM system guarantees that will execute atomically and in isolation from the rest of the system. The programmer is not required to implement such behaviour, as happens in traditional mutual exclusion techniques like locks - that responsibility is delegated to the underlying TM system. In addition, transactions can exploit parallelism that would not be available in mutual exclusion techniques; this is achieved by allowing optimistic execution assuming no other transaction operates concurrently on the same data. If that assumption is true the transaction commits its updates to shared memory by the end of its execution, otherwise, a conflict occurs and the TM system may abort one of the conflicting transactions to guarantee correctness; the aborted transaction would roll-back its local updates and be re-executed. Hardware and software implementations of TM have been studied in detail. However, large-scale adoption of software-only approaches have been hindered for long due to severe performance limitations. In this thesis, we focus on identifying and solving hardware transactional memory (HTM) issues in order to improve concurrency and scalability. Two key dimensions determine the HTM design space: conflict detection and speculative version management. The first determines how conflicts are detected between concurrent transactions and how to resolve them. The latter defines where transactional updates are stored and how the system deals with two versions of the same logical data. This thesis proposes a flexible mechanism that allows efficient storage and access to two versions of the same logical data, improving overall system performance and energy efficiency. Additionally, in this thesis we explore two solutions to reduce system contention - circumstances where transactions abort due to data dependencies - in order to improve concurrency of HTM systems. The first mechanism provides a suitable design to apply prefetching to speed-up transaction executions, lowering the window of time in which such transactions can experience contention. The second is an accurate abort prediction mechanism able to identify, before a transaction's execution, potential conflicts with running transactions. This mechanism uses past behaviour of transactions and locality in memory references to infer predictions, adapting to variations in workload characteristics. We demonstrate that this mechanism is able to manage contention efficiently in single-application and multi-application scenarios. Finally, this thesis also analyses initial real-world HTM protocols that recently appeared in market products. These protocols have been designed to be simple and easy to incorporate in existing chip-multiprocessors. However, this simplicity comes at the cost of severe performance degradation due to transient and persistent livelock conditions, potentially preventing forward progress. We show that existing techniques are unable to mitigate this degradation effectively. To deal with this issue we propose a set of techniques that retain the simplicity of the protocol while providing improved performance and forward progress guarantees in a wide variety of transactional workloads

Performance models of concurrency control protocols for transaction processing systems

Transaction processing plays a key role in a lot of IT infrastructures. It is widely used in a variety of contexts, spanning from database management systems to concurrent programming tools. Transaction processing systems leverage on concurrency control protocols, which allow them to concurrently process transactions preserving essential properties, as isolation and atomicity. Performance is a critical aspect of transaction processing systems, and it is unavoidably affected by the concurrency control. For this reason, methods and techniques to assess and predict the performance of concurrency control protocols are of interest for many IT players, including application designers, developers and system administrators. The analysis and the proper understanding of the impact on the system performance of these protocols require quantitative approaches. Analytical modeling is a practical approach for building cost-effective computer system performance models, enabling us to quantitatively describe the complex dynamics characterizing these systems. In this dissertation we present analytical performance models of concurrency control protocols. We deal with both traditional transaction processing systems, such as database management systems, and emerging ones, as transactional memories. The analysis focuses on widely used protocols, providing detailed performance models and validation studies. In addition, we propose new modeling approaches, which also broaden the scope of our study towards a more realistic, application-oriented, performance analysis